12:32:34 RRSAgent has joined #er 12:32:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/09/10-er-irc 12:32:36 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:32:36 Zakim has joined #er 12:32:38 Zakim, this will be 3794 12:32:38 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago 12:32:39 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 12:32:39 Date: 10 September 2014 12:33:25 zakim, call shadi-617 12:33:25 ok, shadi; the call is being made 12:33:42 zakim, who is on the phone? 12:33:42 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has not yet started, shadi 12:33:44 On IRC I see RRSAgent, carlos, shadi, trackbot 12:33:57 zakim, this is ert 12:33:57 ok, shadi; that matches WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM 12:34:05 zakim, who is on the phone? 12:34:05 On the phone I see ??P15, Shadi 12:34:40 zakim, ??p15 is carlos 12:34:40 +carlos; got it 12:36:29 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/labels/needs%20discussion 12:42:41 Topic: Issue #2 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/2 12:45:26 CV: no test suite and mechanism to benchmark tools 12:46:40 SAZ: can we find some simple labels like "fully checks SC", "partially checks SC", and "doesn't address SC at all" 12:49:26 CV: not measurable unless we use massive resources 12:49:39 SAZ: so until then, prone to interpretation 12:52:06 ...honest vendors will not use because their tools would seem worse then they really are 12:52:26 ...and others may use it to misrepresent their tools 12:53:45 RESOLUTION: not add feature because there is no widely accepted comprehensive test case, but possible mention this somewhere together with the warning that tool support for automated testing varies significantly 12:59:30 Topic: Issue #63 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/63 13:07:00 CV: maybe can add a note in the formats section to "media", that they are hardly supported by tools 13:07:15 ...prefer information close to where it is relevant in the document 13:08:20 RESOLUTION: add note to 2.1.1 that few tools are known to evaluate media formats 13:12:44 SAZ: the other point raised in this comment, is that tools provide varying approaches for checking accessibility features and that they have varying levels of accuracy 13:13:01 ...we already address this point in the "testing" section 13:13:11 Topic: Issue #18 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/18 13:24:02 CV: created new section to separate between "user emulation" that is currently discussed under "dynamic content", and checking "rich internet applications" after rendering 13:24:30 ...this also resolves comments #5 and #40 13:25:23 RESOLUTION: addressed by rewrite mentioned above 13:26:02 Topic: Issue #40 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/40 13:26:15 RESOLUTION: addressed together with #18 13:26:37 Topic: Issue #5 https://github.com/w3c/w3c-waet/issues/5 13:29:34 -carlos 13:29:35 -Shadi 13:29:35 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has ended 13:29:35 Attendees were Shadi, carlos 13:30:02 SAZ: need a new section but need to avoid the word "simulation" 13:30:16 action: shadi to check with EO on alternative terms 13:30:16 Created ACTION-143 - Check with eo on alternative terms [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2014-09-17]. 13:30:33 RESOLUTION: accept feature request 13:30:39 trackbot, end meeting 13:30:39 Zakim, list attendees 13:30:39 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 13:30:47 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:30:47 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/09/10-er-minutes.html trackbot 13:30:48 RRSAgent, bye 13:30:48 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2014/09/10-er-actions.rdf : 13:30:48 ACTION: shadi to check with EO on alternative terms [1] 13:30:48 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/09/10-er-irc#T13-30-16