IRC log of xproc on 2014-09-03
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:02:34 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xproc
- 14:02:34 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/09/03-xproc-irc
- 14:02:38 [ndw]
- zakim, this is xproc
- 14:02:38 [Zakim]
- ok, ndw; that matches XML_PMWG()10:00AM
- 14:02:44 [Zakim]
- +Loren_Cahlander
- 14:02:57 [ndw]
- Meeting: XProc WG
- 14:03:09 [ndw]
- Date: 3 September 2014
- 14:03:25 [ndw]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/09/03-agenda
- 14:04:27 [ndw]
- Regrets: Henry
- 14:04:30 [ndw]
- Regrets: Henry, Jim
- 14:04:37 [ndw]
- Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
- 14:04:42 [ndw]
- Meeting: 250
- 14:04:44 [ndw]
- Chair: Norm
- 14:04:57 [Norm]
- Scribe: Norm
- 14:05:00 [Norm]
- ScribeNick: Norm
- 14:05:09 [Norm]
- Present: Norm, Alex, Loren
- 14:05:35 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept this agenda
- 14:05:58 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/09/03-agenda
- 14:06:01 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 14:06:10 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting
- 14:06:15 [lcahlander]
- lcahlander has joined #xproc
- 14:06:26 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/27-minutes
- 14:06:37 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 14:06:54 [Norm]
- Topic: Next meeting: 9 September 2014
- 14:07:05 [Norm]
- No regrets heard.
- 14:07:21 [Norm]
- Alex gives possible regrets.
- 14:07:33 [Norm]
- Topic: Removing XPath 1.0
- 14:08:04 [Norm]
- Norm: I propose to make that the new status quo draft for 2.0. Any objections?
- 14:08:33 [Norm]
- Alex: We replaced a lot of instances of 1.0 with 2.0 and I wonder if we should try to be more clever about insulating ourselves from future changes.
- 14:08:55 [Norm]
- Norm: I agree, but we can do that in the future.
- 14:09:53 [Norm]
- We have that as a requirement:
- 14:09:55 [Norm]
- -> https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/30
- 14:10:02 [Norm]
- Alex: We're pretty close, but it seems like we could be more clever.
- 14:10:17 [Norm]
- ...We should give implementors the option of doing an XPath 3.1 processor in the future.
- 14:10:39 [Norm]
- Norm: That's why I didn't remove xpath-version...
- 14:11:46 [Norm]
- Norm: We can just say "XPath 2.0 or some future version" if we're clever.
- 14:11:59 [Norm]
- Alex: I think we need to just be a little more careful in the XPath context sections.
- 14:12:22 [Norm]
- Norm: So, any objections to the proposal in pull request 71?
- 14:12:31 [Norm]
- None heard. Accepted.
- 14:12:41 [Norm]
- Topic: Fix spec metadata
- 14:13:26 [Norm]
- Norm: On another day, I might have just called this editorial.
- 14:14:01 [Norm]
- Alex: Are we using DeltaXML? What about higher granularity of changes?
- 14:14:17 [Norm]
- Norm: DeltaXML won't do that, the XPath spec does it by having the author do the change markup.
- 14:14:42 [MoZ]
- MoZ has joined #xproc
- 14:14:49 [MoZ]
- Zakim, code?
- 14:14:49 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 97762 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), MoZ
- 14:15:00 [Norm]
- ...I thought I could get DeltaXML to pull requests, but I couldn't.
- 14:15:01 [MoZ]
- Zakim, this is xproc
- 14:15:01 [Zakim]
- MoZ, this was already XML_PMWG()10:00AM
- 14:15:01 [Zakim]
- ok, MoZ; that matches XML_PMWG()10:00AM
- 14:15:51 [Zakim]
- + +33.9.52.47.aaaa
- 14:15:56 [MoZ]
- Zakim, aaaa is me
- 14:15:56 [Zakim]
- +MoZ; got it
- 14:15:59 [Norm]
- Present: Norm, Alex, Loren, Mohamed
- 14:16:17 [Norm]
- Norm: I'll consider doing the diff markup by hand.
- 14:16:59 [Norm]
- ...I'll do it "by hand" for the next round of changes and we'll see how that goes.
- 14:17:11 [Norm]
- ...Anyway, an objection to the proposal in pull request 73?
- 14:17:23 [Norm]
- None heard, accepted.
- 14:18:03 [Norm]
- Topic: Work plan?
- 14:18:54 [Norm]
- Alex: From a scheduling standpoint, we're all going in different directions.
- 14:19:06 [Norm]
- ...I'm just about caught up.
- 14:19:55 [Norm]
- Norm: I'm hoping discrete requirements will help.
- 14:20:28 [Norm]
- Alex: Maybe we could get some idea of peoples availability for spec work.
- 14:21:25 [MoZ]
- what about TPAC ?
- 14:21:40 [Norm]
- Norm: Realistically, I think we'll be spun back up by early October.
- 14:21:46 [Norm]
- Alex: Maybe we should make that explicit.
- 14:21:53 [Norm]
- Loren: How many folks are going to TPAC?
- 14:22:13 [Norm]
- Norm: I'll be there, Alex it's easy for you.
- 14:22:18 [Norm]
- Mohamed: I'm trying to get there.
- 14:22:20 [Norm]
- Loren: I'll be there.
- 14:22:57 [Norm]
- Loren: I think XProc is Thursday/Friday.
- 14:23:19 [Norm]
- Alex: I can't make Thursdays.
- 14:23:36 [Norm]
- Norm: Ok, I'll see about moving XProc to Monday/Tuesday.
- 14:24:56 [Norm]
- Alex: I can be there on Monday for sure.
- 14:25:53 [Norm]
- Norm: Alex, you were going to work on parameters and zip/unzip.
- 14:26:04 [Norm]
- Alex: Yes, I got some work done on zip/unzip. I just need to integrate some feedback.
- 14:26:24 [Norm]
- Alex: There's a question about process.
- 14:26:49 [Norm]
- Norm: On the process question for zip/unzip, I suggest you follow the model of the p:template step.
- 14:27:54 [Norm]
- Norm: On the authoring question, let's chat.
- 14:28:02 [Norm]
- Alex: And the instructions for this are...
- 14:28:11 [Norm]
- Norm: I have an action to update the README.
- 14:29:10 [Norm]
- Alex: I'll start with zip/unzip.
- 14:30:06 [Norm]
- Alex: We could make having zip/unzip ready for review at TPAC a goal.
- 14:31:09 [Norm]
- Topic: Any other business?
- 14:32:33 [Norm]
- None heard
- 14:32:37 [Norm]
- Adourned
- 14:32:39 [Zakim]
- -Loren_Cahlander
- 14:32:41 [Zakim]
- -Alex_Milows
- 14:32:41 [Zakim]
- -MoZ
- 14:32:42 [Norm]
- rrsagent, set logs world visible
- 14:32:47 [Norm]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 14:32:47 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/09/03-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 14:32:51 [Zakim]
- -[ArborText]
- 14:32:52 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()10:00AM has ended
- 14:32:52 [Zakim]
- Attendees were [ArborText], Alex_Milows, Loren_Cahlander, +33.9.52.47.aaaa, MoZ
- 15:27:39 [Norm]
- Norm has joined #xproc
- 15:33:24 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has joined #xproc
- 15:33:26 [lcahlander]
- lcahlander has joined #xproc
- 16:21:39 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xproc