13:29:24 RRSAgent has joined #rd 13:29:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/09/03-rd-irc 13:29:26 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:29:28 Zakim, this will be 7394 13:29:28 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 13:29:29 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 13:29:29 Date: 03 September 2014 13:29:38 christos has joined #rd 13:30:02 WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has now started 13:30:08 +??P11 13:30:20 zakim, ??P11 is me 13:30:20 +christos; got it 13:31:13 +??P15 13:31:28 +Yehya 13:31:31 zakim, ??P15 is me 13:31:31 +peter_thiessen; got it 13:31:36 zakim, mute me 13:31:36 peter_thiessen should now be muted 13:31:42 Yehya has joined #rd 13:32:04 zakim, who 13:32:04 I don't understand 'who', Yehya 13:32:18 zakim, call shadi-617 13:32:18 ok, shadi; the call is being made 13:32:20 +Shadi 13:32:51 zakim, unmute me 13:32:51 peter_thiessen should no longer be muted 13:33:00 zakim, mute me 13:33:00 peter_thiessen should now be muted 13:33:40 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:33:40 On the phone I see christos, peter_thiessen (muted), Yehya, Shadi 13:34:57 regrets: Simon, Silvia, Vivienne 13:35:34 zakim, unmute me 13:35:34 peter_thiessen should no longer be muted 13:35:41 zakim, scribe is me 13:35:41 sorry, peter_thiessen, I do not recognize a party named 'scribe' 13:35:48 zakim, mute me 13:35:48 peter_thiessen should now be muted 13:36:01 scribe: peter_thiessen 13:36:13 Agenda+ Spin Through Note Edit Status: Metrics, Mobile, Text-C, E2R, UM, eLearning [sharper] 13:36:13 Agenda+ Symposium Status: Way-Finding (CfP due 7th Sept 2014 - http://goo.gl/QdSZRI) [christos, vivienne, annika] 13:36:19 agenda? 13:36:25 zakim, clear agenda 13:36:25 agenda cleared 13:36:28 Agenda+ Spin Through Note Edit Status: Metrics, Mobile, Text-C, E2R, UM, eLearning [sharper] 13:36:28 Agenda+ Symposium Status: Way-Finding (CfP due 7th Sept 2014 - http://goo.gl/QdSZRI) [christos, vivienne, annika] 13:36:52 zakim, take up next 13:36:52 agendum 2. "Symposium Status: Way-Finding (CfP due 7th Sept 2014 - http://goo.gl/QdSZRI)" taken up [from christos, vivienne, annika] 13:37:11 shadi: metrics note is still in discussion with the editors 13:37:23 .. getting some comments from Judy so no progress this week 13:37:52 .. mobile note, we received an update 13:38:07 .. I'll look at next steps and for me to get an editorial process in place 13:38:27 .. same with user modeling for a11y - congrats to the editors 13:38:40 .. I received a version last week and will be going through it editorially 13:38:57 .. will send a version back to the editors for review and then to the group 13:39:23 .. text customization not received 13:40:05 .. things look good overall though alignment may need some work, like how citations are done etc. 13:40:11 .. sound ok? 13:40:29 yehya: yes, comment on response document - will clean it up and send back 13:40:46 shadi: that was really good, so commentors will see how comments addressed 13:40:59 .. user modeling for a11y is online 13:41:06 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2013/user-modeling/note/ED-UM4A 13:41:20 .. my suggestion yehya and chrisots is to go through it editorial first 13:41:28 yehya: I think we agree to that 13:41:37 shadi: same peter for the mobile side 13:41:44 peter: ok 13:41:54 zakim, take up next 13:41:54 I do not see any more non-closed or non-skipped agenda items, peter_thiessen 13:42:04 https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Accessibility_and_way-finding,_navigation_and_exploration_systems#Accessible_Way-Finding_using_Web_Technologies_Online_Symposium_3_December_2014 13:42:19 zakim, take up 5 13:42:19 I don't understand 'take up 5', peter_thiessen 13:43:20 (looks like zakim lost our items? :( 13:43:36 shadi: let me have a look at that 13:43:44 .. we need to do the cross referencing and cleaning 13:43:54 .. let's look at the page christos put in (see link) 13:44:24 .. what are people's reactions to this - mainly scope and objectives section 13:45:02 .. have a look at background first 13:45:08 https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Accessibility_and_way-finding,_navigation_and_exploration_systems#Background 13:47:36 yehya: I miss section references in the background 13:47:53 shadi: do we want references directly in the text? 13:48:05 yehya: some numbers in the text 13:48:15 .. if I recall from other symposia the background always has references 13:48:41 christos: I think there is a difference between backgrounds in the call and main page of the symposium or final link 13:48:56 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2013/user-modeling/Overview.html#background 13:49:14 .. I believe the references are mainly used int he background instead of the call for paper 13:49:23 shadi: for example (see link) 13:49:45 .. the issue is it is sometimes more difficult to read 13:50:05 christos: I think we could put some links to places 13:50:15 yehya: I think it is ok 13:50:26 .. I thought we had previously added links 13:50:42 .. we can can stick to it as is without direct references in the call 13:50:54 shadi: one thing christos is to add a link to the wiki page 13:51:02 christos: there is a link at the end of the background 13:51:11 .. the main page needs to be cleaned up 13:51:26 yehya: I was looking for indoor-navigation and I found it 13:51:40 +q 13:51:49 shadi: quite a long sentence 13:52:02 .. fact that you missed it is an indication that that sentence was too long 13:52:22 chistos: I could change this into a list 13:52:31 .. but I don't like the way that it would look 13:52:46 shadi: I'm just wondering if the second sentence is talking about the same thing 13:53:02 .. you start talking about different types of applications 13:53:20 .. I'm not sure if everybody understand what turn by turn navigation means 13:53:30 .. lots of terms in there 13:53:42 .. I'm wondering if the third part could be a separate sentence 13:53:50 christos: yes, I could break that out 13:54:31 shadi: at least 3-4 points in there 13:54:45 christos: ok 13:55:20 shadi: why are they showing problems? "Emerging applications.." 13:55:33 christos: the wording of problems is maybe not the correct one 13:55:53 shadi: I think you're trying to do 2 things in this sentence 13:56:08 .. enumerate more domains and the statement that a lot of work needs to be done 13:56:12 .. probably best to separate them 13:56:42 .. I think that latter point - perhaps do it later on in the paragraph 13:56:53 klaus has joined #rd 13:57:02 .. first bit to highlight the scope, different areas where way finding takes place 13:57:34 .. and I'm thinking about, the way finding is the main term we plan to use - way finding includes.. 13:57:57 .. so what you'd do in the first paragraph is define/outline way finding and from there on just use the work way finding 13:58:23 christos: that's good, ok 13:58:26 +??P14 13:58:53 Minor Typo wiki: /Although there are an incresing number/Although there are an increasing number/ 13:59:06 zakim, ??p14 is klaus 13:59:06 https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Accessibility_and_way-finding,_navigation_and_exploration_systems#Background 13:59:06 +klaus; got it 13:59:38 zakim, unmute me 13:59:38 peter_thiessen should no longer be muted 13:59:52 zakim, mute me 13:59:52 peter_thiessen should now be muted 14:00:33 shadi: I think info in there is great.. and I can help you with the editing as well 14:00:47 .. let's look back at the intro section 14:00:55 https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Accessibility_and_way-finding,_navigation_and_exploration_systems#Introduction 14:01:25 .. intro is like a mini abstract and make sure the background and scope is all here, inviting.. 14:01:32 -peter_thiessen 14:01:47 test test 14:01:53 (oh ok sorry about) 14:03:15 +??P35 14:03:23 zakim, ?P35 is me 14:03:23 sorry, peter_thiessen, I do not recognize a party named '?P35' 14:03:31 zakim, ??P35 is me 14:03:31 +peter_thiessen; got it 14:03:35 zakim, mute me 14:03:35 peter_thiessen should now be muted 14:03:49 shadi: question is what is an exploration system 14:04:13 christos: systems that allow you to see the surrounding area - I'm a tourist and I want to go to a restaurant that fits my preferences and I explore the area 14:04:20 .. not a term that I see used to often 14:04:35 shadi: like location based services 14:05:00 christos: as you suggested we can use way-finding as the main term and describe it in more detail.. 14:05:33 .. I think we can keep way-finding as the main term.. 14:06:05 shadi: ok, any other comments klaus 14:06:12 klaus: more related to background 14:06:31 .. several researches and research and people working on annotations and points of interests related to this exploration 14:06:47 .. a term that could raise the interest to researches working on that domain 14:07:07 christos: .. annotations for places is also included as a term there 14:07:24 shadi: you could think about christos, so the second sentence you start describing navigation systems 14:07:37 .. you could have one sentence that talks about navigations sytems 14:07:46 .. then have a sub type about indoor explorations 14:07:56 .. then have travel types and so on.. 14:08:11 .. by breaking up that second sentence and explaining each term, could actually work 14:08:24 christos: I can do that 14:09:13 yehya: last sentence - when you read the background it's stating many problems with such systems - perhaps put in the gaols to talk about the problems that exist 14:10:18 christos: yes, I think the sentence tries to introduce the two main challenges.. 14:10:38 .. I don't know if I understand yehya's comment 14:10:57 yehya: I meant in the background you are telling that disabled persons are having a lot of problems with way-finding systems 14:11:12 .. it may be good to have in the goals to include not on the needs but also the problems 14:11:18 christos: ok I can change the wording 14:11:30 shadi: again, I think you could split the last sentence in two 14:11:36 .. first sentence is the gaol 14:11:42 .. the second is the scope 14:12:49 christos: ok 14:13:40 shadi: confirms goal 14:14:05 .. explore what are the needs of needs and challenges of existing.. 14:14:19 .. does scope reflect goal - 2min reading break 14:15:39 shadi: ok reactions 14:16:17 yehya: it covers what has been said in the intro and background - nice worded 14:16:27 peter: agree with yehya 14:16:43 klaus: +1 14:16:59 shadi: I think this spans the scope nicely. 14:17:24 .. if you look at data centre and technologies and describes them - so it gives me a bit of a taste 14:17:38 .. with the UI I'm missing that - I think this is just tweaking 14:18:12 .. maybe - haptic feedback.. audio .. and all the different kinds of UIs and information highly mapping visiual.. 14:18:28 christos: I can include more info about haptic feedback, notifcations,.. 14:18:43 shadi: just a little, not too much - in the other's you do it nicely 14:19:26 klaus: to the scope, going back to the intro - it highlights the user needs and missing understading 14:19:37 .. this might also be reflected in the scope 14:20:01 shadi: right, and maybe as part of the UI - this where the user needs to come in 14:20:06 klaus: and also the data 14:20:18 shadi: right, you need the entire stack 14:20:33 .. you could let the word user needs float in here and there in the descriptions 14:21:32 .. and also the challenges with existing systems - so UIs scope is to explore how systems could address the needs and preferences uses such as haptic feedback and other formats.. 14:21:46 .. this way you combine the exploration and user needs and preferences into one goal 14:22:05 christos: yes it's ok - I see that we missed some key words 14:22:20 shadi: we need to link all the sections together 14:22:49 .. at the end of the scope we list 4 submissions we particularly are looking for 14:23:08 .. are we looking for more or should we remove any? 14:23:37 klaus: perhaps, term approaches could also use something like prototypes or solutions.. 14:23:58 shadi: approaches and prototypes or demonstrations.. 14:24:12 klaus: i'm not a fan of the term approaches.. 14:24:40 .. I think we are interested in new and crazy ideas 14:25:00 christos: we can change that - new approaches including prototypes.. 14:25:38 shadi: I see the word approaches is also used in objectives - is approaches commonly used/understood? 14:25:55 yehya: I would at least add something to it like what klaus said 14:26:03 shadi: how about concepts and.. 14:26:22 christos: is there anything that would not fit under concepts and solutions 14:26:28 "concepts and solutions" 14:26:53 christos: concepts and solutions sounds even better 14:27:08 shadi: anything else under the scope secion? 14:27:33 klaus: one other thing of interest is about legislation and politics 14:27:42 .. perhaps there are people working on this 14:27:51 .. may go too far 14:28:04 christos: not sure if this introduces a new path in the scope.. 14:28:27 christos: maybe we could include some related terms 14:28:40 .. I don't know if we want to highligh/extend the scope 14:28:49 shadi: I wonder if we're scope creeping 14:29:10 .. the objectives would be the more specific research questions 14:29:38 christos: we could include policy and legislation in one of the questions there - maybe in the 3rd or 4th bullet - probably the 3rd one 14:30:13 shadi: I think it may be better to have as a separate question to carefully scope it 14:30:53 .. do we mean discrimination - if you're selling navigation that you should also include accessibility, or consumer protection 14:31:37 christos: the other thing, we have in the title accessible way-find.. the scope is how web tech relates to problems that way-finding systems 14:32:04 .. I don't know if adding legislation will lead to a completely new path and out of scope discussions 14:32:32 .. ok to include policy but not keep on words involving legislation.. 14:32:45 shadi: I think policy and legislation is a major driver for a11y.. 14:33:21 .. for instance a lot of countries have info about making web sites a11y but is also providing a way-finding system to be able to find a class on university 14:33:29 -peter_thiessen 14:33:33 .. how do existing policies apply to existing technologies 14:34:32 (op I'm blocked from re-joining - sorry guys) 14:35:09 (could someone take over scribing?) 14:36:33 (will use skype in the future and not sketchy voip software :) 14:36:41 KM: think alone the term "legislation" may be good to provoke ideas 14:36:56 ...can still decide to accept or not 14:38:11 christos: can try to play around with that 14:38:48 -Yehya 14:38:49 -christos 14:38:50 -klaus 14:38:51 -Shadi 14:38:51 WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has ended 14:38:53 Attendees were christos, Yehya, peter_thiessen, Shadi, klaus 14:39:22 bye all 14:44:58 trackbot, end meeting 14:44:58 Zakim, list attendees 14:44:58 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 14:45:06 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:45:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/09/03-rd-minutes.html trackbot 14:45:07 RRSAgent, bye 14:45:07 I see no action items