13:56:23 RRSAgent has joined #xproc 13:56:23 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/08/27-xproc-irc 13:56:26 zakim, this will be xproc 13:56:26 ok, Norm; I see XML_PMWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 13:56:57 Hello Norm 13:57:11 Morning lcahlander 13:57:25 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 13:57:25 Meeting: XML Processing Model WG 13:57:25 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/27-agenda 13:57:25 Date: 27 Aug 2014 13:57:25 Meeting: 249 13:57:26 Chair: Norm 13:57:28 Scribe: Norm 13:57:30 ScribeNick: Norm 13:59:18 ht has joined #xproc 14:01:52 zakim, who's here? 14:01:53 XML_PMWG()10:00AM has not yet started, Norm 14:01:53 On IRC I see ht, RRSAgent, Zakim, Norm, lcahlander, liam 14:02:00 me 14:05:58 -> https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues 14:06:40 zakim, mute ht 14:06:40 sorry, Norm, I don't know what conference this is 14:07:10 zakim, this is xprox 14:07:10 sorry, ht, I do not see a conference named 'xprox' in progress or scheduled at this time 14:07:13 zakim, this is xproc 14:07:13 ok, ht; that matches XML_PMWG()10:00AM 14:07:23 Present: Norm, Loren, Alex, Henry 14:07:28 zakim, ??P3 is ht 14:07:28 +ht; got it 14:07:30 zakim, mute ht 14:07:32 ht should now be muted 14:07:57 Regrets: Jim 14:07:58 Topic: Accept this agenda? 14:07:58 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/27-agenda 14:08:11 Accepted. 14:08:12 Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting? 14:08:12 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/08/20-minutes 14:08:23 Accepted. 14:08:36 Next meeting: 3 Sep 2014 14:08:52 Regrets for 3 Sept 14:09:13 No regrets heard. Norm will have to give regrets for 10, 17, and possibly 24 Sep 14:09:21 Regrets for 3 Sept 14:09:38 Topic: Specification issues 14:09:48 -> https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues 14:09:59 Norm describes the move to GitHub issues for the spec 14:11:11 Alex: Did you merge my XInclude stuff? 14:11:15 Norm: Yes, in the xproc20 branch. 14:12:01 Norm: I want everyone to use pull requests to change the spec. 14:13:28 Topic: Test suite issues 14:13:38 -> https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/issues 14:14:48 Norm describes the test-suite repo 14:15:04 -> https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/pull/13 14:15:11 Norm describes his pull request. 14:16:32 -> https://github.com/ndw/test-suite/commit/018adf51bb43edea7c00883818507bea6ddbbf6b 14:17:45 Alex: Alternatively, we could have multiple expected results and the test passes if you match any one of them. 14:18:21 Norm: I agree, but that'd be a bigger change in the test suite. 14:19:12 Alex: I'm fine with this change, but we should consider multiple outputs for the future 14:20:49 -> https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/issues/15 14:21:26 Norm: I propose that we accept the change offered in https://github.com/xproc/test-suite/pull/13 14:22:39 http://tests.xproc.org/tests/required/data-002.xml 14:24:11 zakim, mute ht 14:24:11 ht should now be muted 14:25:58 Alex: How far are we going to go, are we going to try to produce tests that test every conceivable variation. 14:26:04 Norm: We're going to go as far as we can. 14:27:18 Henry: I hear Norm saying "it would be a bug if our core processing didn't accept quoted content type parameters", but that doesn't appear to be the problem. 14:27:38 ...Alex is suggesting we should normalize these things. If we find places where there was a bug in somebody's step implementation then we should try to make sure that we test that. 14:27:45 ...But we can't go and look for all possible bugs. 14:27:54 ...What I heard Alex say was that we should actually normalize this. 14:28:11 Alex: I think you misheard me. I think there is an open issue of how we deal with this in general in our test suite for 2.0. 14:28:30 ...I think we should consider this carefully so that we have a good test suite without combinatorial issues. 14:28:55 ...My question was "should we be trying to be that complete". Norm says "best effort" and I think that's a fine answer. 14:29:30 Norm: I'm happy to have tests for all the cases we think of. 14:29:51 Alex: I've run into this with other test suites. 14:30:05 Norm: I think experience with the 1.0 test suite will improve the 2.0 test suite. 14:30:34 Norm: Coming back around to my question, does anyone object to the proposed change to those two tests? 14:30:38 None heard. Accepted. 14:30:56 -> Requirement “2.3 Align with XPath 3.0 technlogies” 14:31:11 -> -> https://github.com/xproc/specification/issues/30 14:31:31 Norm: I attempted to address part of the 2.3 requirement, removing XPath 1.0 14:31:36 -> https://ndw.github.io/specification/langspec/remove-xpath-10/head/ 14:32:18 Norm waffles on a bit about XPath versions... 14:32:36 alexmilowski has joined #xproc 14:35:11 Alex: How are we going to track the changes? For example, if I wanted to write an upgrade tool, how would I know that two p: functions had been removed. 14:35:23 Norm: I guess there should be a changelog. 14:35:44 Alex: It doesn't have to be in the document. 14:36:46 (my house is quickly devolving into morning children drama ... I may not last too much longer) 14:37:28 Topic: Any other business? 14:37:44 None heard. 14:37:51 Adjourned. 14:37:59 -Norm 14:38:00 -Alex_Milows 14:38:03 -Loren_Cahlander 14:38:11 -ht 14:38:11 rrsangent, draft minutes 14:38:12 XML_PMWG()10:00AM has ended 14:38:12 Attendees were Loren_Cahlander, Norm, Alex_Milows, ht 14:38:18 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:38:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/08/27-xproc-minutes.html Norm 14:38:39 rrsagent, set logs world visible 14:38:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:38:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/08/27-xproc-minutes.html Norm 14:51:48 alexmilowski has joined #xproc 16:31:14 Zakim has left #xproc