12:57:24 RRSAgent has joined #dwbp 12:57:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/07/25-dwbp-irc 12:57:26 RRSAgent, make logs 351 12:57:28 Zakim, this will be DWBP 12:57:28 ok, trackbot; I see DATA_DWBP()9:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 12:57:29 Meeting: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 12:57:29 Date: 25 July 2014 12:57:59 antoine has joined #dwbp 12:59:31 JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #dwbp 12:59:43 DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has now started 12:59:50 +[IPcaller] 12:59:55 zakim, IPcaller is me 12:59:55 +antoine; got it 13:00:05 MTCarrasco has joined #dwbp 13:00:27 +Yaso 13:00:28 phila has changed the topic to: DWBP Weekly agenda: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20140725 13:00:40 +??P8 13:00:48 +[IPcaller] 13:00:54 zakim, ipcaller is me 13:00:54 +phila; got it 13:01:06 zakim, ??P8 is me 13:01:06 +MTCarrasco; got it 13:01:08 -Yaso 13:01:42 +Yaso 13:01:47 newton has joined #dwbp 13:02:10 nathalia has joined #dwbp 13:02:13 yaso has joined #dwbp 13:02:29 zakim, who is here? 13:02:29 On the phone I see antoine, MTCarrasco, phila, Yaso 13:02:31 On IRC I see yaso, nathalia, newton, MTCarrasco, JoaoPauloAlmeida, antoine, RRSAgent, Zakim, HadleyBeeman, phila, trackbot 13:02:33 flavio has joined #dwbp 13:02:44 zakim, yaso has flavio, newton 13:02:44 +flavio, newton; got it 13:02:44 yaso has newton, flavio 13:03:19 markharrison has joined #dwbp 13:03:53 +HadleyBeeman 13:04:54 +[IPcaller] 13:04:58 zakim, pick a victim 13:04:58 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose flavio 13:05:10 IPcaller is me 13:05:18 Zakim, IPcaller is me 13:05:18 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 13:05:36 +ericstephan 13:05:39 ericstephan has joined #dwbp 13:05:45 zakim, pick a victim 13:05:45 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose MTCarrasco 13:05:50 Chair: HadleyBeeman 13:06:04 scribe: MTCarrasco 13:06:09 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/dwbp/2014-07-11 13:06:37 PROPOSED: Accept last minutes 13:06:46 +1 13:06:46 +1 13:06:48 +1 13:06:50 +1 13:06:53 + +3539149aaaa 13:06:58 deirdrelee has joined #dwbp 13:07:22 I am willing to try to scribe, but I need administrative help 13:07:30 +1 13:07:33 CarlosIglesias has joined #dwbp 13:07:36 +??P14 13:07:45 +1 13:07:49 jerdeb has joined #DWBP 13:07:57 jerdeb has joined #DWBP 13:08:01 +1 13:08:27 Caroline_ has joined #DWBP 13:08:29 RESOLVED: Accept last minutes 13:08:36 +1 13:08:41 zakim, yaso has Caroline_ 13:08:41 +Caroline_; got it 13:09:19 HadleyBeeman: Encourages everyone to register for TPAC 13:09:39 -> http://www.w3.org/2014/11/TPAC/ TPAC Details 13:10:05 + +44.122.333.aabb 13:10:15 topic: Actions 13:10:21 Zakim, aabb is markharrison 13:10:22 +markharrison; got it 13:10:28 + +1.516.353.aacc 13:10:44 HadleyBeeman: There was a discussion 2 weeks ago about how to make these meetings more discusion based with more discussion on e-mail 13:10:45 adler1 has joined #DWBP 13:10:53 hello everyone 13:11:03 ... but this meeting is meant to be issues & actions, next week will be more discussion-y 13:11:13 ... which for non-native speakers is not a word ;-) 13:11:16 Phil I have a problem hearing 13:11:22 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/open 13:11:36 action-32? 13:11:36 action-32 -- Hadley Beeman to Write email on discoverable data vs data catalogues -- due 2014-05-16 -- OPEN 13:11:36 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/32 13:11:51 HadleyBeeman: I've just finished a project and so have more time to do that before next week 13:11:55 action-46/ 13:11:55 action-46 -- Yaso Córdova to Generate/collate further use cases concerning iot, transport, privacy -- due 2014-06-13 -- OPEN 13:11:55 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/46 13:12:19 yaso: I'm still working on that, sorry. I'll close this action in the next week 13:12:26 HadleyBeeman: Do you uave what you need? 13:12:42 yaso: No. I think in the last meeting I was offered some help 13:12:51 ... but my colleage Renaldo went to the WoT workshop 13:13:25 phila: you might find this useful, yaso http://www.w3.org/2014/02/wot/report 13:13:39 ... it's not yet published but if you know where to look... ;-) 13:14:10 yaso: I want to write a use case but the problem is that the companies don't want to open their data 13:14:18 ... but we are working on an alternative 13:15:26 ericstephan: I'm in the process of writing a use case related to the data management facility. That's for scientific means - we bring in various aspects of DWBP so that can be looked at to see if it's applicable 13:15:46 nathalia_ has joined #dwbp 13:15:52 yaso: I talked to some IoT people. They work with tracking big trucks in Brazil using sensors. They mentiuoned that they use their own protocols, not the Web 13:15:58 Zakim, yaso has nathalia_ 13:15:58 +nathalia_; got it 13:16:09 ... but I'm still curious about it as at some points they'll use the Web. It's all very proprietary 13:16:18 ericstephan: Our use case is more WoT than IoT 13:16:41 yaso: I think we can continue this by e-mail, but I'm almost at the conclusion that the hardware that people use is important 13:16:55 ... it defines the kind of protocols that they use 13:16:55 For track and trace, GS1 has developed open standards for exchange of event data within organisations and across supply chains - see the GS1 EPCIS standard http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/kc/epcglobal/epcis 13:17:05 yaso: where the data is stored etc 13:17:14 +q 13:17:16 yaso: I'll write about that 13:17:25 ericstephan: I'll get some text to you this w/e 13:17:28 ack markharrison 13:17:59 markharrison: GS1 has developed a relevant standard for track & trace. That might be of interest. We have some comapanies doing pilots 13:18:07 do you have a link for this Mark? 13:18:11 ... healthcare, produce. Might be some use casesa from that work 13:18:15 q+ 13:18:21 ack phila 13:18:54 phila: How closely does that GS1 standard overlap with this group's work? If not at all, should we interact with it? 13:18:59 s/Mark/markharrison/ 13:19:32 markharrison: I raised it in reponse to Yaso's comments about tracking trucks etc. But I think there are potential areas of overlap. 13:19:40 thank you, great 13:19:42 ... one is on the WoT and the other is on geolocation 13:19:52 ... which is event data, which has a location component 13:20:05 ... and it also has relation to the Social Web WG work as that is also event data 13:20:21 ... it's an open data model for event data - what where when why etc. 13:20:32 ... it's all agnostic to how the data is stored underneath 13:20:44 ... there's no LD binding, it'as all XML and WS* 13:20:46 I need to leave... 13:20:48 bye 13:20:53 ... but is potentially relevant to a nuymber of W3C Activities 13:20:59 Bye, Tks Flavio 13:21:11 ... we can certainly contribute some uase cases about what is being collected and shared 13:21:18 ... prob is it may be competitive info etc 13:22:03 new Social Web activities at W3C: http://www.w3.org/2014/06/social.html.en 13:22:48 +q 13:22:59 -??P14 13:23:14 +??P14 13:23:33 markharrison: not it's not irrelevant because it's not LD :-) 13:23:39 q+ 13:23:53 ericstephan: Some things on the WoT get introcued by a human operator doing an experiement etc. 13:24:17 ... so you perhaps need to think about that background. And Social Web is interesting in that context 13:24:21 q- ericstephan 13:24:27 ack MTCarrasco 13:24:52 MTCarrasco: I agree with this discussion - there's a huge overlap here. We're all looking at the same elephant from a differnet direction 13:25:09 ... the data is a common thread - there's ahuge overlap 13:25:14 s/ahuge/a huge/ 13:25:34 +q 13:25:40 MTCarrasco: I'm not sure how to include it all etc. 13:25:45 ack mark 13:25:55 markharrison: EPCIS is primarily about abservations of things at places and times. 13:26:13 ... it doesn't currently handle sensor data in its current form, but it could contrinute to a future W3C WG 13:26:31 ... that might work in the geo WG 13:26:41 -> http://www.w3.org/2014/05/geo-charter Spatial data WG (proposed) 13:27:04 markharrison: It's important, I think, that W3C has a coherent events data model, whether it's about organisations, or things, otr people 13:27:16 phila takes note, thanks Mark 13:27:24 s/otr/or/ 13:27:47 HadleyBeeman: I agree that events is something that will hit a number of areas 13:27:53 http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/kc/epcglobal/cbv 13:28:04 markharrison: And there's the Core Business Vocabulary for things like transaction identifiers etc 13:28:33 action-51? 13:28:33 action-51 -- Eric Stephan to Work with sumitpurohit to put a wiki page together showing other examples of closed data that may not be in the ucr -- due 2014-06-27 -- OPEN 13:28:33 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/51 13:28:42 events or ocurrences is one area of "foundation ontology" that will anyway affect "domain ontologies" 13:29:06 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Closed_Data_Examples 13:29:20 ericstephan: OK, yes... not sure I I sent this out but Sumit and I put some egs together ^ 13:29:49 ... they're points for conversation. Just some thoughts we had for different types of example that relate to open data but don't specifically fit into the OD categoty 13:29:56 ... feedback would be welcome 13:30:13 ... it would be good to be able to list more use cases that relate to some of these aspectrs 13:30:26 phila: Cue Deirdre 13:30:39 deirdrelee: That's the kind of feedback I'm looking for from my last e-mail 13:30:51 ... I wanted to give people a chance to talk about this sort of thing on these calls 13:31:05 ... should these be included or not, what actual use cases do we need/have 13:31:24 ... if I look at the other networks I'm in (Share-PSI etc.) then this is a helpful reference point 13:31:31 ... so see my e-mail on this 13:31:41 +q to say that I might be able to contribute examples of closed / access-restricted data from supply chain traceability e.g. for pharmaceuticals 13:31:43 -HadleyBeeman 13:32:04 ericstephan: to me this represents an opportunity to connect with communities who don't necessarily see themselves as being part of the data on the Web 13:32:11 q+ 13:32:15 adler1: so this is data behind the firewall 13:32:34 adler1: What about data shared within an organisation but not publicly - that's open data from that company's POV 13:32:47 ericstephan: Yeah, we have data like that, open to the community but not the world 13:32:51 +HadleyBeeman 13:33:04 adler1: I'm seeing increased interest in 'open behind the firewall data' 13:33:32 ... corproations the size of mine with vast amounts of data. We can open it internally and ask developers in diff departments to use that 13:33:43 ericstephan: I like the idea of calling that open data within a corporate body 13:34:05 ... but I've been reluctatnt to call it open data 13:34:27 adler1: There are interesting privacy issues. A lot of the data we're talking about is personal, customer info, etc. 13:34:39 ... so the privacy rules are very challenging, even behind the firewall 13:34:49 q+ 13:34:51 ... it requires new types of authorisation engines 13:35:17 ... e.g. sharing bank data among otehr banks, within and outwith the EU etc. 13:35:25 ... makes in interesting matrix of controls 13:35:36 ... different from open or not discussion 13:35:46 ... it's 'publish and control' 13:36:07 adler1: I think a lot of what we're doing around DCAT+ is relevant but the rules are very complicatewd 13:36:12 ack markharrison 13:36:12 markharrison, you wanted to say that I might be able to contribute examples of closed / access-restricted data from supply chain traceability e.g. for pharmaceuticals 13:36:34 markharrison: on closed vs open, we have situations where data is being expressed and exchanged in open format but very restricted distribution 13:36:44 ... it's open data formats and ideas from point to point 13:37:16 ... on the auth engine complexity - is there an unbroken chain of trust between the info requester and the provier when there is no direct connectsion. ege a retailer many links along the chain from a manufacturer 13:37:18 q+ 13:37:21 ack MTCarrasco 13:37:48 perhaps open data only is one direction in some cases as opposed to bidirectional 13:37:57 MTCarrasco: Talking about open data - more like OD style of publishing. We don't have HTTP for intranet and a diff one for the public, just the firewall in the middle 13:38:06 ... one has to think in terms of access control lists 13:38:15 ... open to individuals, groups and the worl 13:38:20 HadleyBeeman: +1 13:38:41 -??P14 13:38:46 ... when we were working on LD in the GLD, some of it was behind the firewall, some was internal. It doesn't mean using diff architecture, it's the same 13:38:55 ack HadleyBeeman 13:39:02 +??P14 13:39:03 ... and that's in scope for DWBP 13:39:08 q- 13:39:43 close action-51 13:39:43 Closed action-51. 13:39:52 https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Guidance_on_the_Provision_of_Metadata#Intrinsic_vs_Extrinsic_Metadata 13:39:56 action-54? 13:39:56 action-54 -- Mark Harrison to Write to write up definitions on intrinsic metadata -- due 2014-07-04 -- OPEN 13:39:56 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/54 13:40:22 markharrison: So far I've written lists of what I think are different in|extrinsic metadata 13:40:31 ... there have been diagrams and discussion about whether they are helpful 13:40:46 ... Bernadette suggested having examples of different types 13:40:55 HadleyBeeman: Does anyone have any comments 13:41:01 q+ 13:41:04 q+ 13:41:16 ack antoine 13:41:45 antoine: I was involved in this discussion. I wasn't convinced by the diagrams. Maybe the examples can be useful but I ... 13:41:59 ... see need to change the text 13:42:04 ack MTCarrasco 13:42:30 MTCarrasco: Cutting the metadata into fine pieces... what do you call all the data associated with a resource? 13:42:43 ... in the same time, in the resource you may have differnet variants of the resource 13:43:02 does it make sense to talk about "all data"? 13:43:02 ... all the info associated with the resource. Is it variants? 13:43:02 q+ 13:43:07 in an open world? 13:43:16 markharrison: Thats' why I tried to break it down into intrinsic and extrinsic metadata 13:43:30 ... that's how I tried to split it (whether I succeeded or not) 13:43:53 MTCarrasco: Did you call the variants in the data part of the metadata or the data? 13:43:59 ... eg the Teaty of Rome 13:44:13 ... you have a URI, but there are differnet formats, langauges etc 13:44:22 q+ to talk about versioned assets 13:44:35 markharrison: Diff representation of the same thing 13:45:10 markharrison: I would say that's metadata that is extrinsic. The Treaty of Rome has the same info irrespective of language and format 13:45:27 ... they're outside the graph of the data. So I'd say they're metadata 13:45:38 ... formats, variants and language translations are all important 13:46:03 MTCarrasco: I don't mind how this things are categorised. The variant list is still part of the metadata 13:46:16 HadleyBeeman: cuts discussion short for time 13:46:23 sad that the discussion has ended 13:46:31 q- 13:46:49 q- 13:46:50 q- antoine 13:46:55 I was just beginning to understand what they were talking about :-) 13:47:06 HadleyBeeman: Please carry that on via e-mail 13:47:17 action: markharrison to continue this discussion by e-mail 13:47:17 Created ACTION-60 - Continue this discussion by e-mail [on Mark Harrison - due 2014-08-01]. 13:47:27 action-55? 13:47:27 action-55 -- Eric Stephan to Seek feedback on json-ld version of dcat schema, using, for example http://rdf-translator.appspot.com/ with http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat.ttl -- due 2014-07-17 -- OPEN 13:47:27 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/55 13:47:45 q+ 13:47:57 ack adler1 13:47:58 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open 13:48:11 adler1: I think I sent out a note last week about the Open data Africa event 13:48:12 q+ 13:48:20 q- adler 13:48:47 adler1: Next week the White House is hosting a big meeting for African leaders around open data issues. I'm working with a bunch of agencies ot host an open data jam 13:49:02 ... to help African countries to improve their open data work 13:49:03 That sounds so exciting, wish I could be there.... 13:49:22 ... looking to find developers who can help this happen 13:49:37 ... event will be simulcast in audio 13:49:45 *All* the information associated with a resource is metadata: Dublin Core, variants (language, formats), etc. 13:49:49 ... should be first of many data jams for Africa 13:50:04 ... we'll be at IBM's beuolding a block from the Whitehouse 13:50:09 ... ambassadors etc. 13:50:16 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/open 13:50:20 Topic: Issues 13:50:24 issue-14? 13:50:24 issue-14 -- Improve Use case "Feedback Loop for Corrections" -- open 13:50:24 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/14 13:52:16 +1 For having recommendation verification based on use cases 13:52:34 deirdrelee: I agree with that - UCs need eveidence so that the BPs that follow have ground truth 13:52:53 ... so yes, we need to go through the issues and make sure that we've addressed them in the UCR 13:53:04 action: deirdrelee to work through UCR issues 13:53:04 Error finding 'deirdrelee'. You can review and register nicknames at . 13:53:12 action: deirdre to work through UCR issues 13:53:12 Created ACTION-61 - Work through ucr issues [on Deirdre Lee - due 2014-08-01]. 13:53:21 issue-41? 13:53:21 issue-41 -- Update Use Case #4 - OKFN Tranport WG -- open 13:53:21 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/41 13:54:07 deirdrelee: This came out of a presentation I saw at EDF that I haven't been able to find. 13:54:13 HadleyBeeman: Leave it open for another week? 13:54:17 deirdrelee: Yep 13:54:27 -??P14 13:54:36 http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/raised 13:54:44 +??P14 13:55:13 HadleyBeeman: Looks at diff between raised and open issues... 13:55:17 is raise "suggested" versus open is agreed up by the wg 13:55:47 yes, eric, raised issues may be not opened if they are not in scope. 13:56:07 q? 13:56:50 +q 13:56:56 ack deirdrelee 13:57:11 ack ericstephan 13:57:14 "raised" appears to be unassigned to specific people, whereas actions are assigned to specific people 13:57:25 ericstephan: Just to thank Antoine and Phil for responding - I'll get back to you 13:57:40 deirdrelee: So this week in Ireland there's been a lot happening around open data. 13:57:49 -antoine 13:58:08 ... at the beginning of the year as had a contract with the Irish gov. Lots of local stuff but no national action. 13:58:17 ... they then joined OGP, opened the national data portal 13:58:41 ... put out a tender for an alpha version of the portal, best practices etc 13:58:46 ... all launched this week 13:58:51 HadleyBeeman: Congratulations 13:59:13 deirdrelee: There are lots of diff hand books and guidelines for people who may not be familiar with open data 13:59:28 ... and because I was one of the co-authors so I think that may be useful to this WG 13:59:37 ... I'll send the link to the actual report 13:59:46 ... the portal is very alpha, a basic CKAN instance 13:59:56 ... lots to do, few licnececs etc 14:00:11 ... hoping to build quality portal 14:00:20 - +1.516.353.aacc 14:00:21 -MTCarrasco 14:00:24 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 14:00:26 -ericstephan 14:00:27 phila: +q to Hadley's congrats 14:00:28 bye 14:00:29 -??P14 14:00:31 -Yaso 14:00:32 -markharrison 14:00:33 -phila 14:00:50 zakim, who is here? 14:00:50 On the phone I see +3539149aaaa, HadleyBeeman 14:00:52 On IRC I see CarlosIglesias, deirdrelee, markharrison, yaso, antoine, RRSAgent, Zakim, HadleyBeeman, phila, trackbot 14:00:53 rrsagent, make logs public 14:05:08 - +3539149aaaa 14:05:10 -HadleyBeeman 14:05:10 DATA_DWBP()9:00AM has ended 14:05:10 Attendees were antoine, phila, MTCarrasco, flavio, newton, HadleyBeeman, JoaoPauloAlmeida, ericstephan, +3539149aaaa, Caroline_, +44.122.333.aabb, markharrison, +1.516.353.aacc, 14:05:10 ... nathalia_ 16:20:16 Zakim has left #dwbp