See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 03 June 2014
<Joshue> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/EOTutorials_review#Overview_of_Issues
<Joshue> Scribe list: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List
<AWK> Trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 03 June 2014
<Joshue> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List
<AWK> Scribe page updated.
AWK new response is in there now
Seems like broad consensus
<AWK> I updated LC-2895 per Michael's comment
MC open alert issue regarding where in the document the paragraph
should be put.
MC can close the loop on the wording change.
if everyone accepts
or we can wait to dangling peice
AWk want to close this issue because of the way our tool works for tracking comments... the further back we go the more we lose things.
AWK group said it makes sense in this location, EO accepted the location, and they want to talk about further places the paragraph should be
AWK we should accept this comment, and let any further EO issues be separate.
RESOLUTION: Accept 2895
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/actions/open
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/actions/8
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/actions/9
Resolution: Close action 8
... Close action 8
AWK: Let's find out if people have gone through their actions.
<MichaelC> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/open
<jon_avila> yes
<MichaelC> oops, http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/actions/open
<Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to say I closed some actions by making pull requests; those will need review and processing
MC I closed my items and made pull requests
<MichaelC> I closed actions by creating pull requests 27 and 28 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/27 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/28 and
<MichaelC> they include references to the actions I closed
AWK: we asked everyone to check
action items and if completed then just close them... ask about
controversial ones
... actions on people no longer on WG, editors will go through
and close some, and move some to others etc... some OBE
David: I understand that we can close actions as soon as we take the action such as write the technique... and notify chairs
<AWK> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/open
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/3
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/9
Josh: what should we do about plain text techniques
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/9
James: Probably Peter Korn, was more interested in plain text than me
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/text.html
<jon_avila> I think they are still relevant. +1 to James
James: Easy to script text if it is set up as we suggest
David: Think we should keep it in.
AWK: If we remove them we are not
forbidding them.
... hard to say there are headings that can be supported in
text
<Zakim> jamesn, you wanted to say they are not historical
James: Not just historical... still places where text is the best way to input/output... one group wants to produce new plain text technoqies
RESOLUTION: Close Issue 9 we will keep plain text techniques
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/11 SCR2 and SCR20 seem to overlap, consider merging
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20110621/2570
s/technoques/techniques
<scribe> ACTION: Kathleen to look into Issue 11 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> 'Kathleen' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., spiderwebwoman, kwahlbin).
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/13
<Joshue> F62 may need to be modified to encompass html4/5
<AWK> ACTION spiderwebwoman to to look into Issue-11
<trackbot> Created ACTION-259 - To look into issue-11 [on Kathleen Anderson - due 2014-06-10].
<scribe> ACTION: spiderwebwoman to look into Issue 11 Kathleen [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-260 - Look into issue 11 kathleen [on Kathleen Anderson - due 2014-06-10].
<Joshue> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20130905/2861
<kathleen> http://www.w3.org/2013/10/29-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item06
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/14
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/15
<Joshue> Should h90 reference 1.3.1 like aria2 does?
<jamesn> ISSUE-15?
<trackbot> ISSUE-15 -- Should h90 reference 1.3.1 like aria2 does? -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/issues/15
<scribe> ACTION: KWalbin to look into ISSUE H-15 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Error finding 'KWalbin'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/track/users>.
JON: Should we question mapping.
<scribe> ACTION: Kathy and Non_avila to look into ISSUE-15 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-261 - And jon_avila to look into issue-15 [on Kathleen Wahlbin - due 2014-06-10].
<Joshue> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/EOTutorials_review#Overview_of_Issues
EO Tutorials review
AWK: We need to morph our individual comments into consensus
JOSH: i've gone through mine for importance
<Joshue> Note, Loretta and David did add [BEFORE PUB] already to their comments, as have AWK and Josh
Loretta: not on critical path, for the 2 tier
Removing thead information
table caption summary... josh summary is loaded
David: Would like more advance notice so we are not put in a position of having to prioritize
AWK: Have noted advice that it is not a show stopper but needed and will provide it at same time as show stopper feedback
<scribe> Finished going through our comments to EO completed https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/EOTutorials_review#Overview_of_Issues
TOPIC 2908
<Joshue> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20140306/2908
RESOLUTION: Accept 2908 as proposed
<Joshue> LC-2869: Table failure modification
<Joshue> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/F91.html
AWK: David and I spoke about this issue of scope
MC headers marked with th, scope attr on th cells when headers on more than the first row
<jon_avila> JAWS has supported scope for a long time. Window-Eyes didn't until a few years ago.
<Joshue> I still think of it as new, probably showing age
<Joshue> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20130905/2869
RESOLUTION: ACCEPT LC-2869 as amended
<Joshue> Comment LC-2854: Should we remove ACRONYM examples and discussion
<Joshue> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20130905/2854
RESOLUTION: ACCEPT LC-2854 as amended
<Joshue> ACTION: Michael Cooper to search for references to acronym in other techniques as well. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> 'Michael' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., cooper, melledge).
<scribe> ACTION: Michael to search documents for instance of ACRONYM and change to ABBR [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> 'Michael' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., cooper, melledge).
<Joshue> ACTION: MichaelC to search for references to acronym in other techniques as well. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-262 - Search for references to acronym in other techniques as well. [on Michael Cooper - due 2014-06-10].
<Joshue> LC-2921: Headings for link context
<Joshue> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20140306/2921
TOPIC LC2921
AWK Sailesh is pointing that h80 is advisory.
AWK: and he is saying remove heading mention
Loretta: the reason headings were there on hotel sites etc... with lots of ambiguous links
<Joshue> +q
<AWK> http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-refs.html
AWK: We can at end of paragraph say... In addition authors may choose to relate heading for context using aria.
<MichaelC> action-262: see https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2705_2014/results#xcomm1 for context
<trackbot> Notes added to action-262 Search for references to acronym in other techniques as well..
<AWK> https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20140306/2921
RESOLUTION: LC 2921 accepted as amended
<AWK> #5 remains on this survey
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/sked/asked/ Succeeded: s/technoques/techniques/ FAILED: s/technoques/techniques/ Succeeded: s/non_avila/jon_avila/ Succeeded: s/TOOIC:// Succeeded: s/sope/scope/ Succeeded: s/On/In/ Succeeded: s/related/relate/ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: David Inferring Scribes: David Default Present: David_MacDonald, kathleen, Sailesh_Panchang, AWK, Joshue, Kathy_Wahlbin, Michael_Cooper, Loretta, jon_avila, James_Nurthen, Marc_Johlic, Katie_Haritos-Shea Present: David_MacDonald kathleen Sailesh_Panchang AWK Joshue Kathy_Wahlbin Michael_Cooper Loretta jon_avila James_Nurthen Marc_Johlic Katie_Haritos-Shea Regrets: Wilco Bruce Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2014AprJun/0190.html Found Date: 03 Jun 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/06/03-wai-wcag-minutes.html People with action items: cooper kathleen kathy kwalbin michael michaelc non_avila spiderwebwoman WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]