14:48:54 RRSAgent has joined #eval 14:48:54 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/03/13-eval-irc 14:48:56 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:48:56 Zakim has joined #eval 14:48:58 Zakim, this will be 3825 14:48:58 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)11:00AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes 14:48:59 Meeting: WCAG 2.0 Evaluation Methodology Task Force Teleconference 14:48:59 Date: 13 March 2014 14:52:27 MartijnHoutepen has joined #eval 14:56:26 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:56:26 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)11:00AM has not yet started, shadi 14:56:28 On IRC I see MartijnHoutepen, Zakim, RRSAgent, Kathy, shadi, trackbot 14:56:44 zakim, call shadi-617 14:56:44 ok, shadi; the call is being made 14:56:45 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)11:00AM has now started 14:56:46 +Shadi 14:58:59 Liz has joined #eval 14:59:06 EricVelleman has joined #eval 14:59:35 +Liz 15:00:33 Sarah_Swierenga has joined #eval 15:00:37 +MartijnHoutepen 15:01:00 +Sarah_Swierenga 15:01:00 Detlev has joined #eval 15:01:03 agenda? 15:01:43 agenda+ test-run 15:01:58 +??P7 15:02:00 agenda + open call for evaluations 15:02:21 agenda+ Disposition of comments 15:03:20 zakim, mute me 15:03:20 MartijnHoutepen should now be muted 15:04:05 +Suzann_Keohane 15:04:15 MaryJo has joined #eval 15:05:18 zakim, who's on the phone? 15:05:18 On the phone I see Shadi, Liz, MartijnHoutepen (muted), Sarah_Swierenga, ??P7, Suzann_Keohane 15:05:34 Zakim, ??p7 is EricVelleman 15:05:34 +EricVelleman; got it 15:05:37 +Detlev 15:05:42 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/minutes 15:06:18 agenda? 15:06:18 scribe: Detlev 15:06:34 MoeKraft has joined #eval 15:06:49 Eric: test run discussion 15:06:54 Zakim, Suzann_Keohane is really MaryJo 15:06:54 +MaryJo; got it 15:06:58 +MoeKraft 15:07:21 Eric: sent round info thid morning 15:07:25 q+ 15:07:30 q+ 15:07:54 Detlev: thought we agreed to have controlled test run 15:08:07 ...and additionally people to evaluate other websites 15:08:23 ...but now it looks like we are all doing one website 15:09:44 ...confused about this change 15:09:47 Detlev: explains his understanding 15:09:54 q- detlev 15:10:07 richard has joined #eval 15:10:22 Eric: explains his understandign (first the one site, later more) 15:10:29 ack sarah 15:10:47 Sarah: one survey for the one identifed site, another one for open evaluations 15:10:48 +[IPcaller] 15:11:03 Sarah: survwey just for the one werbsite? 15:11:11 Eric: yes, at the moment 15:11:51 Eric: could remove name of site from survey 15:11:51 zakim, ipcaller is richard 15:11:51 +richard; got it 15:11:56 q? 15:11:56 q+ 15:12:01 I would prefer that 15:12:02 ack me 15:12:18 +1 to generic survey for other websites 15:12:21 q+ 15:12:29 Shadi: prefers not to have the chosen werbsite named in public 15:13:14 Shadi: two versions: one only for the group, send urls off-list; another general public survey 15:14:06 Shadi: remove link from our survey, provide URL off-list 15:14:22 Eric: why 15:14:55 I agree with Shadi 15:15:03 Shadi: people should not get hung up that we evaluated this particvular website - the important thing is feedback on methodology 15:15:43 Sarah: As long as survey is distributed just to the group there is no concern on behalf of MSU 15:16:19 Sarah: A second generic version for the testerun for the wider public 15:16:31 Eric: put EVAL TF survey bwehind password? 15:16:37 Sarah: would work 15:17:05 Shadi: Link was already circulated, people can identify the site 15:17:35 Sarah: having two surveys helps 15:17:59 Eric: EVAL TF has and avantage 15:18:13 Eric: otheer comments? 15:19:02 Eric: specifc evaluation for the EVAL TF group only, remove referecne to site, make survey password protected? 15:19:04 q? 15:19:40 Sarah: It's ben okeyed that survey with reference to URL can be sent to trusted evaluators (also beyond EVAL TF) 15:20:19 +1 15:20:34 +1 to relaunching the 4-H survey with a password 15:20:36 +1 15:20:43 +1 15:20:54 Eric: will close current survey, put out new survey where evaluator 15:20:56 +1 15:21:07 +1 15:21:26 Shadi: Will you remove link from Survey? 15:21:52 Eric: Yes - link to survey can stand, URL IN survey will be removed. 15:22:18 Shadi: Needs modified message to tel people that they can pick their own website for evaluaton 15:23:09 Eric: The survey for the specific evaluation will be sent to EVSAL TF members plus selected evaluators - reference to site will be sent off-list 15:23:35 Eric: there is no harm because the output of the evaluation will not be publicly visible 15:24:04 +1 15:24:04 Shadi: even though, we will talk about resulats later - better not to have too much info in public space on specific sites 15:24:08 +1 15:24:24 Eric: will make changes after this call 15:24:42 Eric: any mire comments? 15:25:34 Detlev: give a rationale for picking a range of sites 15:25:50 Eric: not many other topics 15:25:53 Sorry, but I need to leave for my off-site grant research meeting now. I'm looking forward to meeting/seeing some of you next week at CSUN. Safe travels! 15:26:25 -Sarah_Swierenga 15:26:58 agenda? 15:27:09 Zakim, take up next 15:27:09 agendum 1. "test-run" taken up [from MartijnHoutepen] 15:27:19 Zakim, close agendum 1 15:27:19 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, MartijnHoutepen 15:27:20 Zakim, take up next 15:27:21 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Detlev 15:27:29 q? 15:27:30 q? 15:27:38 q- sae 15:27:41 q- sa 15:27:42 q- sar 15:27:43 Zakim, take up next 15:27:43 agendum 1 was just opened, Detlev 15:27:47 Zakim, close agendum 1 15:27:47 agendum 1, test-run, closed 15:27:48 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:27:48 2. open call for evaluations [from MartijnHoutepen] 15:27:54 Zakim, take up next 15:27:54 agendum 2. "open call for evaluations" taken up [from MartijnHoutepen] 15:28:02 Zakim, close agendum 2 15:28:02 agendum 2, open call for evaluations, closed 15:28:03 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:28:03 3. Disposition of comments [from MartijnHoutepen] 15:28:05 Zakim, take up next 15:28:05 agendum 3. "Disposition of comments" taken up [from MartijnHoutepen] 15:28:51 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/f2f_CSUN 15:28:51 Shadi: no comment yet, still working on disposition of comments to prepare it for face 2 face meeting 15:29:28 Zakim, mute me 15:29:28 Detlev should now be muted 15:29:51 Shadi: one open thing to discuss is the issue of scoring 15:30:05 Shadi: any other thing you find important? 15:30:08 q+ 15:30:11 ack me 15:30:54 Detlev: from going through the techniques, it seems that several are quite out of date 15:31:08 ...how does this impact WCAG-EM 15:32:02 Shadi: WCAG WG will publish techniques more regularly in the future 15:32:27 Shadi: Techniques are just advisory, focus is on SC 15:35:28 Mentioning that WCAG-EM, leaving the how-to-evaluate up to evaluators, might set a realistic expectatino level in the text itself 15:35:40 Eric: good point for the agrnda 15:36:30 Eric: Group comments in dsposition of comments, then think of answers 15:36:47 Shadi: important for prioritization 15:37:22 Shadi: will work on comments to make it easier to tacke 15:37:32 q+ 15:37:43 When is the deadline? 15:38:40 Eric: project deadline is passed 15:39:28 Test-run work after publishng the note, possibly 15:39:43 Shadi: deadline for testrun is 10 April 15:40:23 Shadi: test run may change recommendations 15:41:14 q? 15:41:35 Shadi: process the resutls of test run until end of April 15:41:37 q- de 15:41:50 Publication end of May 15:41:54 Detlev: as draft 15:42:22 Shadi: depends on comments - if there is need for substantial changes int may delay finalisation 15:42:43 Shadi: there are hints that oveerall WCAG-EM is on the right track 15:45:11 Detlev: wondering if further work wil be done on it, and how it is funded 15:45:29 Shadi: wortk was chartered to lead to a WG note, and that is it for the moment 15:46:09 No plan to publish the note of the public notes and test run results, final note wil include this feedback 15:46:21 That was Shadi 15:46:46 Shadi: hopes that by end of May work will be finished.... :-) 15:47:26 Shadi: there is more work needed on continued maintenance of the Techniques and Failures 15:47:53 Zakim, take up next 15:47:53 I do not see any more non-closed or non-skipped agenda items, Detlev 15:48:06 Zakim, close agendum 3 15:48:06 agendum 3, Disposition of comments, closed 15:48:08 I see nothing remaining on the agenda 15:48:12 Zakim, close agenda item 3 15:48:12 I don't understand 'close agenda item 3', Detlev 15:48:30 Eric: No further issues 15:48:45 bye 15:48:54 -richard 15:48:56 ack me 15:48:59 bye 15:49:03 -Detlev 15:49:04 -Shadi 15:49:04 -EricVelleman 15:49:06 -MaryJo 15:49:07 -MartijnHoutepen 15:49:08 -Liz 15:49:14 -MoeKraft 15:49:15 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)11:00AM has ended 15:49:15 Attendees were Shadi, Liz, MartijnHoutepen, Sarah_Swierenga, EricVelleman, Detlev, MaryJo, MoeKraft, richard 15:49:27 trackbot, end meeting 15:49:27 Zakim, list attendees 15:49:27 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 15:49:35 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:49:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/13-eval-minutes.html trackbot 15:49:36 RRSAgent, bye 15:49:36 I see no action items