16:20:46 RRSAgent has joined #coga 16:20:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/03/03-coga-irc 16:20:55 zakim, list conferences 16:20:55 I see SW_HCLS(BioRDF)11:00AM, SW_LDP()10:00AM, DPUB_DPUBIG()11:00AM, Team_NewServ()9:00AM active 16:20:57 also scheduled at this time is Team_JEFF()11:00AM 16:32:19 zakim, list conferences 16:32:19 I see SW_HCLS(BioRDF)11:00AM, SW_LDP()10:00AM, DPUB_DPUBIG()11:00AM, Team_NewServ()9:00AM active 16:32:21 also scheduled at this time is Team_JEFF()11:00AM 16:41:36 zakim, list conferences 16:41:36 I see SW_HCLS(BioRDF)11:00AM, DPUB_DPUBIG()11:00AM, Team_NewServ()9:00AM active 16:41:39 also scheduled at this time is Team_JEFF()11:00AM 16:43:23 zakim, this will be WAI_CogTF 16:43:23 ok, Lisa_Seeman; I see WAI_CogTF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 17 minutes 16:43:41 regrets: Katie Haritos Shea, Mary Jo Mueller 16:43:48 agenda: this 16:44:04 agenda+ Set scribe 16:44:16 agenda+ Any new issues and introductions 16:44:21 agenda+ dyscalculia 16:44:29 agenda+ Review of other work done 16:44:37 agenda+ Actions 16:44:43 agenda+ be done 16:52:27 WAI_CogTF()12:00PM has now started 16:52:34 +??P0 16:53:44 regrets: Barry Johnson 16:54:10 ??P0 is Lisa_Seeman 16:54:23 zakim, ??P0 is Lisa_Seeman 16:54:23 +Lisa_Seeman; got it 16:59:59 Zakim, who is noisy? 16:59:59 Michel_ has joined #coga 17:00:15 Lisa_Seeman, listening for 14 seconds I could not identify any sounds 17:00:46 Liddy has joined #coga 17:00:48 +Debra_Ruh 17:00:55 +JohnRochford 17:01:01 zakim, code? 17:01:01 the conference code is 2642 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), janina 17:01:07 JohnRochford has joined #coga 17:01:17 zakim, who's here? 17:01:17 On the phone I see Lisa_Seeman, Debra_Ruh, JohnRochford 17:01:18 karlgroves has joined #coga 17:01:19 On IRC I see JohnRochford, Liddy, Michel_, RRSAgent, Zakim, Lisa_Seeman, st_afk, MichaelC, janina 17:01:32 +??P6 17:01:34 +NeilMilliken 17:01:38 akim, ??P6 is me 17:01:47 zakim, ??P6 is me 17:01:47 +janina; got it 17:01:50 zakim, who's here? 17:01:50 On the phone I see Lisa_Seeman, Debra_Ruh, JohnRochford, janina, NeilMilliken 17:01:52 On IRC I see karlgroves, JohnRochford, Liddy, Michel_, RRSAgent, Zakim, Lisa_Seeman, st_afk, MichaelC, janina 17:02:19 neilmilliken has joined #coga 17:02:27 +[IPcaller] 17:02:38 +[IPcaller.a] 17:02:43 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #coga 17:02:49 +MichelC 17:02:56 +??P9 17:02:56 zakim, who's here? 17:02:57 On the phone I see Lisa_Seeman, Debra_Ruh, JohnRochford, janina, NeilMilliken, [IPcaller], [IPcaller.a], MichelC, ??P9 17:02:57 On IRC I see richardschwerdtfeger, neilmilliken, karlgroves, JohnRochford, Liddy, Michel_, RRSAgent, Zakim, Lisa_Seeman, st_afk, MichaelC, janina 17:03:22 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:03:27 zakim, IPcaller is Karl_Groves 17:03:27 +Karl_Groves; got it 17:03:32 zakim, IPcaller.a is Liddy_Nevile 17:03:33 +Liddy_Nevile; got it 17:05:00 I can't volunteer because my line drops regularly, sorry 17:05:17 I can try 17:05:38 MichaelC has changed the topic to: Cognitive Accessibility Task Force: Zakim 2642 17:05:51 scribe: Liddy 17:05:54 scribe: liddy 17:05:55 ack me 17:06:08 scribe: Liddy 17:06:30 LS: struggling to get scribe 17:07:52 zakim, agenda? 17:07:52 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 17:07:53 1. Set scribe [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:07:53 2. Any new issues and introductions [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:07:53 3. dyscalculia [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:07:53 4. Review of other work done [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:07:53 5. Actions [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:07:53 6. be done [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:07:57 LS; main agenda item is prelim review for dyscalcula etc to see how to do it - no need to be perfect yet 17:08:20 zakim, close item 1 17:08:20 agendum 1, Set scribe, closed 17:08:21 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:08:21 2. Any new issues and introductions [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:08:37 LS: CSun breakfast reservation for Wednesday breakfast 17:09:03 zakim, next item 17:09:03 agendum 2. "Any new issues and introductions" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:09:11 + +1.502.632.aaaa 17:09:55 ??+1.502.632.aaaa is Elle 17:10:09 zakim, ??+1.502.632.aaaa is Elle 17:10:09 sorry, Lisa_Seeman, I do not recognize a party named '??+1.502.632.aaaa' 17:10:24 zakim, +1.502.632.aaaa is Elle 17:10:24 +Elle; got it 17:10:39 zakim, close item 2 17:10:39 agendum 2, Any new issues and introductions, closed 17:10:40 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:10:40 3. dyscalculia [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:10:43 zakim, next item 17:10:43 agendum 3. "dyscalculia" taken up [from Lisa_Seeman] 17:10:51 DR: quick update - looking at usability processes and remapping them esp Canadian design processes 17:11:27 Zakim, who is noisy? 17:11:37 Lisa_Seeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Debra_Ruh (36%), Liddy_Nevile (60%) 17:11:44 DR: we used to look at this from usability perspective so it's a place to start, we think. Feedback welcome 17:12:03 DF: the work's not ready yet - more to be done 17:12:31 +Suzanne_Taylor 17:12:48 DR: Katie has some ideas about this and can talk next week 17:12:57 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis/Dyscalculia 17:13:49 NM: put up some things with colleague - collated sparce info re dyscalculia - not a lot out there 17:14:15 NM: cognitive functions and descriptions and problems 17:14:53 NM: feedback often that people like the Web and say they don't have problems but when doing something they demonstrate they do - but not with text etc 17:15:50 NM: we put some use cases - booking a train ticket is important because pften such people don't drive 17:16:53 NM: time etc can cause problems, as can multiple bookings, using time or money, ... 17:17:27 NM: person explained she used 'purples' - big notes o there will be change rather than working out whan to pay... 17:18:27 NM: putting in credit card numbers etc can be tricky, passwords, etc 17:19:07 NM: putting govt services online will mean increasing difficulties 17:20:39 NM: online banking problems - login, random digits, choosing how much to transfer, extrra 0's, etc 17:21:57 NM: setting up account, browsing OK but selecting amount (quantity) is hard 17:22:43 NM: helping people by setting limits etc might be good 17:22:58 NM: maybe quidelines etc for helpers 17:23:41 q+ 17:25:05 ack lid 17:25:30 NM: assistive techs are not plentiful - 17:26:09 NM: people seem to think of the Web as an escape so they don't identify with their problem until they need to do something 17:26:25 LS: this will get worse as online increases 17:27:13 -Debra_Ruh 17:27:26 LS: I'd like a use case for a Web of things interface - eg TV with arrows up and down 17:28:22 NM: controls are often analog eg for temp have blue and red for hot and cold to avoid numbers 17:28:35 LS: good if we find things we can solve 17:29:39 NM: supermarket problems should be solvable eg with pictograms, small/medium/large 17:29:55 Q? 17:30:25 LS: brainstorming solutions is good 17:30:44 lost audio 17:31:03 q+ 17:31:22 LS: finding way to solve problems is good 17:31:36 q+ 17:31:44 -NeilMilliken 17:32:16 LS: very good work, Neil, thank you 17:32:50 ack suzanne 17:32:51 LS: are there examples of unnecessary things causing a barrier? 17:32:57 +NeilMilliken 17:33:00 Q? 17:33:00 ack st_afk 17:33:32 ack liddy 17:34:34 Suzanne: when looking for solutions, let's find ones that are useful to everyone eg comparison of price 17:34:54 I am sure that it could be beneficial for many 17:35:04 Suzanne: that might help getting ideas adopted 17:35:51 LS: (unchaired) first we need to find solutions and not worry if we can't make them for everyone 17:36:26 q+ 17:36:45 Q? 17:36:50 Suzanne: people with disabilities are more often just having something more than others - not uniquely 17:37:25 ??: in solving some problems we often do help extra people 17:38:44 NM?: one person has husband who does not like her shopping online because she buys too much unknowingly - some problems are common 17:38:53 +Tim_Boland 17:39:39 JR: I have a person with expertise and will ask for feedback 17:39:43 Thanks John 17:39:48 Q? 17:39:54 q- 17:39:55 ack neil 17:40:55 OK 17:41:05 I'll try 17:41:19 Liddy: access for all 17:41:30 topic: Access for All Review 17:41:37 scribe: lisa 17:41:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Mar/0002.html 17:42:09 Liddy: access for all metadate on prefrences 17:42:16 descriptions of preffrence 17:42:27 descriptions of resources 17:42:47 zakim, unmute rich 17:42:47 Rich_Schwerdtfeger should no longer be muted 17:43:00 I'll scribe again' 17:43:02 eg - tempritures provide slide interface 17:43:08 scribe: liddy 17:43:18 -Karl_Groves 17:43:31 LS: opening floor re what we need in a tech review 17:43:49 LS: do we want examples of how the tech helps etc? 17:44:02 +[IPcaller] 17:44:23 zakim, Ipcaller is Karl_Groves 17:44:23 +Karl_Groves; got it 17:44:56 I can add to my tech review - just couldn't get on wiki ... 17:45:07 Suzanne: yes, the more detail we have the better 17:45:15 agree 17:45:47 do we want more details - worked example of 1, were it can help, and 2. gaps- what may need to be added / augmented 17:46:04 Suzanne: what about order - what should be review first? tech, problems? 17:46:27 LS: good question, perhaps cyclic and to move adhead we have to work with what we have 17:46:56 LS: if people can contribute we should make it possible 17:47:46 Suzanne: eg for ATAG I can do it now but then will want to review what I have done 17:48:18 LS: in tech review - how it can help, how it can be augmented etc? do we want that? 17:48:22 yes 17:48:33 LS: silence is yes here 17:48:34 s/eg for ATAG/eg for APIP 17:49:49 RESOLVED: tech reviews to include details - worked example of 1, were it can help, and 2. gaps- what may need to be added / augmented - but there is space for "to be added" 17:50:11 rich what are the issues? 17:50:38 LS: I can review WCAG? or someone else? 17:51:01 Q? 17:51:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2014Feb/0041.html 17:51:33 LS: starting but maybe not enough time... 17:52:06 LS: work done before Task Force set up so preliminary 17:53:27 LS: I identified things online about how useful tech is from perspective of cog disabilities and then looked for global issues 17:53:56 LS: WCAG is gold standard and the more we can work in with existing checkpoints the better for adoption 17:54:18 LS: this is a WCAG Task Force so a good approach 17:55:21 LS: important techniques for cog are likelt to be AAA or just recs and this is because they may not be testable but this means we can't say 'this is really important for ... people' 17:56:20 LS: 'nice to have' might be advisory but essential for some 17:56:34 LS: how can the necesity be indicated? 17:58:01 LS: we might want to discuss this with WCAG - it is my 'big' issue 17:59:18 LS: comments re text alternatives - might be better if short and understandable and not jargon 17:59:39 LS: eg 'homepage' is Web jargon 18:00:14 -Rich_Schwerdtfeger 18:00:34 LS: Neilson report on aging shows many don't understand even 'homepage' 18:00:52 Q? 18:01:23 Janina: times getting funny for international calls . US going to daylight time...pls check times 18:02:22 -janina 18:02:30 LS: time's up - any comments? 18:02:56 -JohnRochford 18:03:22 LS: closing but text alt is an issue .. 18:03:35 q+ 18:03:40 I dont think it's alt text per say liddy 18:04:53 Q? 18:04:53 its the different weight of importance placed upon recommendations dependent on difficulty 18:04:59 ack lidd 18:05:04 rrsagent, make logs public 18:05:06 -Michael_Cooper 18:05:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:05:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/03/03-coga-minutes.html Lisa_Seeman 18:06:08 zakim, please part 18:06:08 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Lisa_Seeman, Debra_Ruh, JohnRochford, NeilMilliken, janina, MichelC, Michael_Cooper, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Karl_Groves, Liddy_Nevile, 18:06:08 Zakim has left #coga 18:06:08 speak next week 18:06:11 ... Elle, Suzanne_Taylor, Tim_Boland 18:06:14 rrsagent, please part 18:06:14 I see no action items