There are some format problems with the chatlog. Please correct them and reload this page. They are labeled on this page in a red box, like this message.
It may be helpful to
<SimonKJ> Present: LeeF, swh, kasei, AndyS, pgearon, bglimm, SimonKJ, bijan, chimezie, ivanh, ericP, SimonS, SteveH
Scribe problem: the name 'SimonKJ' does not match any of the 57 active names. Either change the name used, or request the list of names be altered.Active names: Ahmed Ezzat Alexandre Passant Andrea Westerinen Andrei Lopatenko Andy Seaborne Axel Polleres Bijan Parsia Birte Glimm Bryan Thompson Chimezie Ogbuji Cui Tao Daniel Schutzer Dave Beckett David Newman Davide Palmisano Dhanapalan Kulandai Vadivel Dirk Colaert Dirk-Willem van Gulik Edward Thomas Elias Torres Enrico Franconi Eric Prud'hommeaux Frank Careccia Fred Zemke Gregory Williams Hiroyuki Sato Ivan Mikhailov Ivan Herman Jacek Kopecký Janne Saarela Jari Vänttinen Jean-François Baget Jeen Broekstra Jeff Pollock John Clark Jos De Roo Kendall Clark Kevin Wilkinson Kjetil Kjernsmo Lee Feigenbaum Luke Wilson-Mawer Michael Smith Michele Minno Nophadol Jekjantuk Orri Erling Paula Gearon Prateek Jain Rachel Yager Roland Schwaenzl Sergio Tessaris Simon Johnston Simon Schenk Souripriya Das Steve Harris Sven Groppe Timo Westkämper Yoshio Fukushige
13:52:06 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/09/08-sparql-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/09/08-sparql-irc ←
13:52:08 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
13:52:10 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←
13:52:10 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes ←
13:52:11 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
13:52:11 <trackbot> Date: 08 September 2009
13:52:12 <LeeF> zakim, this will be SPARQL
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this will be SPARQL ←
13:52:12 <Zakim> ok, LeeF; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, LeeF; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes ←
13:52:30 <LeeF> Chair: LeeF
13:52:41 <LeeF> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-09-08
13:52:48 <LeeF> LeeF has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-09-08
Lee Feigenbaum: LeeF has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-09-08 ←
13:52:57 <LeeF> Regrets: AlexP, Orri
13:53:39 <LeeF> Possible regrets from Kjetil
Lee Feigenbaum: Possible regrets from Kjetil ←
13:57:35 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started ←
14:02:12 <bijan> zakim, who is here?
Bijan Parsia: zakim, who is here? ←
14:02:13 <Zakim> On the phone I see LeeF, kasei (muted), AndyS, swh, pgearon, ??P11, +1.919.663.aacc
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see LeeF, kasei (muted), AndyS, swh, pgearon, ??P11, +1.919.663.aacc ←
14:02:24 <Zakim> On IRC I see bijan, SimonKJ, bglimm, swh, Zakim, RRSAgent, iv_an_ru, pgearon, AndyS, ivan, LeeF, karl, kasei, trackbot, ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see bijan, SimonKJ, bglimm, swh, Zakim, RRSAgent, iv_an_ru, pgearon, AndyS, ivan, LeeF, karl, kasei, trackbot, ericP ←
14:04:17 <LeeF> zakim, who's on the phone?
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
14:04:36 <Zakim> On the phone I see LeeF, kasei (muted), AndyS, swh, pgearon, bijan (muted), SimonKJ
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see LeeF, kasei (muted), AndyS, swh, pgearon, bijan (muted), SimonKJ ←
14:06:06 <LeeF> Scribe: SimonKJ
(Scribe set to Unknown SimonKJ)
14:06:19 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-08-25
PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-08-25 ←
14:06:48 <AndyS> I was there - not regrets
Andy Seaborne: I was there - not regrets ←
14:07:48 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-08-25, noting that AndyS was present
RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-08-25, noting that AndyS was present ←
14:08:04 <LeeF> Next meeting: 2009-09-15 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT, Alex Passant to scribe (Scribe List)
Lee Feigenbaum: Next meeting: 2009-09-15 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT, Alex Passant to scribe (Scribe List) ←
14:08:25 <LeeF> -> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/F2F2
Lee Feigenbaum: -> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/F2F2 ←
14:09:04 <bijan> I might call in if reasonable.
Bijan Parsia: I might call in if reasonable. ←
14:09:13 <SteveH> I'm at risk
Steve Harris: I'm at risk ←
14:09:46 <SimonKJ> SimonKJ still fighting the approval process
SimonKJ still fighting the approval process ←
14:10:08 <pgearon> The approval has to come from my manager, who has been conferencing and traveling a lot lately, so I've yet to hear
Paula Gearon: The approval has to come from my manager, who has been conferencing and traveling a lot lately, so I've yet to hear ←
14:10:14 <chimezie> I might be able to call in for portions of the agenda
Chimezie Ogbuji: I might be able to call in for portions of the agenda ←
14:11:02 <SimonKJ> if I cannot make it in person I have scheduled the time so will definitely call in
if I cannot make it in person I have scheduled the time so will definitely call in ←
14:12:00 <SteveH> SWIG
Steve Harris: SWIG ←
14:12:48 <kasei> hearing the echo here
Gregory Williams: hearing the echo here ←
14:13:47 <SimonKJ> direct all efforts to getting out the first public working draft; shooting for end of Sep but will likely slip into October
direct all efforts to getting out the first public working draft; shooting for end of Sep but will likely slip into October ←
14:14:32 <chimezie> Im not certain i can state the additional 30 mins
Chimezie Ogbuji: Im not certain i can state the additional 30 mins ←
14:14:39 <SteveH> I can't do 90 today
Steve Harris: I can't do 90 today ←
14:14:44 <chimezie> i.e., some days I'll be able to stay over - others not so much
Chimezie Ogbuji: i.e., some days I'll be able to stay over - others not so much ←
14:14:44 <kasei> I may have trouble with the last few minutes (have to dash across campus to another meeting), but most of the extra 30 min should be OK.
Gregory Williams: I may have trouble with the last few minutes (have to dash across campus to another meeting), but most of the extra 30 min should be OK. ←
14:14:45 <SimonKJ> to that end will schedule the next few teleconferences for 90mins rather than 60; who cannot make 90
to that end will schedule the next few teleconferences for 90mins rather than 60; who cannot make 90 ←
14:15:14 <SimonKJ> will at least try to do a few in a row starting next week
will at least try to do a few in a row starting next week ←
14:15:39 <ericP> i will likely have conflicts from a couple weeks onwards
Eric Prud'hommeaux: i will likely have conflicts from a couple weeks onwards ←
14:15:53 <bijan> OWL is finished CR and heading toward PR.
Bijan Parsia: OWL is finished CR and heading toward PR. ←
14:16:02 <bijan> XMLLiteral is no longer at risk, but accepted.
Bijan Parsia: XMLLiteral is no longer at risk, but accepted. ←
14:16:45 <ivanh> RDB2RDF should start any day (only admin left)
Ivan Herman: RDB2RDF should start any day (only admin left) ←
14:16:54 <LeeF> topic: FPWD Status Check
14:17:25 <LeeF> -> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/open
Lee Feigenbaum: -> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/open ←
14:17:41 <LeeF> trackbot, close ACTION-16
Lee Feigenbaum: trackbot, close ACTION-16 ←
14:17:42 <trackbot> ACTION-16 Send fleshed out example of Andy's subquery to the list { {?x :p ?v } { SELECT * { ?x :q ?w FILTER (?v>3) } } } closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-16 Send fleshed out example of Andy's subquery to the list { {?x :p ?v } { SELECT * { ?x :q ?w FILTER (?v>3) } } } closed ←
14:17:52 <AndyS> Eric helped with CVS - actions 87 and 88 are done.
Andy Seaborne: Eric helped with CVS - actions 87 and 88 are done. ←
14:19:14 <LeeF> trackbot, close ACTION-87
Lee Feigenbaum: trackbot, close ACTION-87 ←
14:19:14 <trackbot> ACTION-87 Find the editor's draft of features and rats closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-87 Find the editor's draft of features and rats closed ←
14:19:18 <LeeF> trackbot, close ACTION-88
Lee Feigenbaum: trackbot, close ACTION-88 ←
14:19:18 <trackbot> ACTION-88 Figure out where to find SPARQL2 CVS edit space closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-88 Figure out where to find SPARQL2 CVS edit space closed ←
14:19:42 <AndyS> Query doc is: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/
Andy Seaborne: Query doc is: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/ ←
14:20:09 <SteveH> I think we both answered, go andy
Steve Harris: I think we both answered, go andy ←
14:21:33 <AndyS> trackbot, close ACTION-84
Andy Seaborne: trackbot, close ACTION-84 ←
14:21:33 <trackbot> ACTION-84 And SteveH to decide whether FPWD should be inegrated or only new features closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-84 And SteveH to decide whether FPWD should be inegrated or only new features closed ←
14:23:22 <LeeF> ISSUE: Can variable used as aliases for expressions be themselves used in other expressions?
ISSUE: Can variable used as aliases for expressions be themselves used in other expressions? ←
14:23:22 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-39 - Can variable used as aliases for expressions be themselves used in other expressions? ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/39/edit .
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ISSUE-39 - Can variable used as aliases for expressions be themselves used in other expressions? ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/39/edit . ←
14:23:24 <AndyS> Example : SELECT (?x+?y) AS ?z (?z+1) AS ?w
Andy Seaborne: Example : SELECT (?x+?y) AS ?z (?z+1) AS ?w ←
14:24:33 <chimezie> why not make it an issue then, since all we have is an 'issue' tracker
Chimezie Ogbuji: why not make it an issue then, since all we have is an 'issue' tracker ←
14:24:38 <chimezie> and note that we know a workaround
Chimezie Ogbuji: and note that we know a workaround ←
14:26:49 <LeeF> ACTION: Lee to go through issues list, figure out status, which need to be discussed in TCs, which have pending actions, which can be resolved
ACTION: Lee to go through issues list, figure out status, which need to be discussed in TCs, which have pending actions, which can be resolved ←
14:26:49 <trackbot> Created ACTION-89 - Go through issues list, figure out status, which need to be discussed in TCs, which have pending actions, which can be resolved [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2009-09-15].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-89 - Go through issues list, figure out status, which need to be discussed in TCs, which have pending actions, which can be resolved [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2009-09-15]. ←
14:28:40 <ericP> q+ to ask if xmlspec variants are acceptable
Eric Prud'hommeaux: q+ to ask if xmlspec variants are acceptable ←
14:28:45 <SimonKJ> we have editors for the SPARQL 11 update document and update language.
we have editors for the SPARQL 11 update document and update language. ←
14:29:12 <ericP> 43
Eric Prud'hommeaux: 43 ←
14:29:29 <SimonKJ> where does the work on RESTful operations, and correspondence to update protocol go?
where does the work on RESTful operations, and correspondence to update protocol go? ←
14:29:59 <chimezie> how much administrative overhead do we introduce with separate docs/editors
Chimezie Ogbuji: how much administrative overhead do we introduce with separate docs/editors ←
14:30:02 <chimezie> ?
Chimezie Ogbuji: ? ←
14:30:03 <SimonKJ> should RESTful operations go into the update language or in the protocol (reduce number of docs from 3 to 2)
should RESTful operations go into the update language or in the protocol (reduce number of docs from 3 to 2) ←
14:30:13 <chimezie> if not much, seems putting them in one document makes sense to me
Chimezie Ogbuji: if not much, seems separating them makes sense to me ←
14:30:26 <SimonKJ> ericP in favor of separate documents as they seem orthogonal
ericP in favor of separate documents as they seem orthogonal ←
14:30:48 <SimonS_> +1 to having separate documents
Simon Schenk: +1 to having separate documents ←
14:31:21 <bijan> Overhead : Maintaining links between, multiple documents for people to sort through, multiple documents to be reviewed and to engage with
Bijan Parsia: Overhead : Maintaining links between, multiple documents for people to sort through, multiple documents to be reviewed and to engage with ←
14:31:26 <chimezie> s/putting them in one document/separating them
14:31:36 <bijan> Advantages : modular, can advance at different rates, etc.
Bijan Parsia: Advantages : modular, can advance at different rates, etc. ←
14:33:03 <AndyS> Suggest separate docs at the moment, esp as content accumulated - can later merge in. Reverse is harder if has been published.
Andy Seaborne: Suggest separate docs at the moment, esp as content accumulated - can later merge in. Reverse is harder if has been published. ←
14:33:54 <ivanh> return format?
Ivan Herman: result format? ←
14:34:04 <chimezie> +1 on AndyS's argument for having the second option open at a later point
Chimezie Ogbuji: +1 on AndyS's argument for having the second option open at a later point ←
14:34:18 <ivanh> so the number is 6 or 7...
Ivan Herman: so the number is 6 or 7... ←
14:34:35 <ivanh> s/return/result/
14:34:41 <bijan> But it's still "in our space"
Bijan Parsia: But it's still "in our space" ←
14:35:00 <ivanh> json format?
Ivan Herman: json format? ←
14:35:54 <SimonKJ> if the JSON format is just a note, we still have it in our space and its still active (URL?)
if the JSON format is just a note, we still have it in our space and its still active (URL?) ←
14:36:26 <AndyS> -> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/
Andy Seaborne: -> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/ ←
14:37:15 <ericP> q
14:37:16 <ivanh> -> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/ OWL Overivew document
Ivan Herman: -> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/ OWL Overivew document ←
14:37:41 <bijan> A good home page would be fine
Bijan Parsia: A good home page would be fine ←
14:37:44 <ericP> q+ to talk about XQuery/XSLT/F&O
Eric Prud'hommeaux: q+ to talk about XQuery/XSLT/F&O ←
14:37:55 <LeeF> ack ericP
Lee Feigenbaum: ack ericP ←
14:37:55 <Zakim> ericP, you wanted to ask if xmlspec variants are acceptable and to talk about XQuery/XSLT/F&O
Zakim IRC Bot: ericP, you wanted to ask if xmlspec variants are acceptable and to talk about XQuery/XSLT/F&O ←
14:38:01 <bijan> This image would be useful: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/OWL2-structure2-800.png
Bijan Parsia: This image would be useful: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/OWL2-structure2-800.png ←
14:38:53 <bijan> In OWL, the Wiki maintained cross links pretty well. but it's not just technical, it's editing, e.g., "see results format"
Bijan Parsia: In OWL, the Wiki maintained cross links pretty well. but it's not just technical, it's editing, e.g., "see results format" ←
14:39:13 <ivanh> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
14:39:16 <AndyS> Info : The Q doc has a results example + link.
Andy Seaborne: Info : The Q doc has a results example + link. ←
14:39:37 <LeeF> ack ivan
Lee Feigenbaum: ack ivan ←
14:40:55 <bijan> Really!??!?! Won't they wave it for content that's been IPR reviewed!??!
Bijan Parsia: Really!??!?! Won't they wave it for content that's been IPR reviewed!??! ←
14:42:29 <bijan> I'll note the HTML5 spec management tool: http://hg.gsnedders.com/anolis/raw-file/1.0RC1/README.html
Bijan Parsia: I'll note the HTML5 spec management tool: http://hg.gsnedders.com/anolis/raw-file/1.0RC1/README.html ←
14:43:21 <LeeF> (1) SPARQL/Query 1.1 (2) SPARQL/Update 1.0 (3) SPARQL/Protocol 1.1 (4) Service Description (5) RESTful Update operations (6) SPARQL + entailment
Lee Feigenbaum: (1) SPARQL/Query 1.1 (2) SPARQL/Update 1.0 (3) SPARQL/Protocol 1.1 (4) Service Description (5) RESTful Update operations (6) SPARQL + entailment ←
14:44:02 <AndyS> q+ to ask about 3
Andy Seaborne: q+ to ask about 3 ←
14:44:15 <AndyS> (as convenient)
Andy Seaborne: (as convenient) ←
14:44:24 <LeeF> ack AndyS
Lee Feigenbaum: ack AndyS ←
14:44:24 <Zakim> AndyS, you wanted to ask about 3
Zakim IRC Bot: AndyS, you wanted to ask about 3 ←
14:44:36 <SimonKJ> proposing 6 documents to get us to FPWD, can argue in the future around the RESTful operations
proposing 6 documents to get us to FPWD, can argue in the future around the RESTful operations ←
14:45:59 <SimonKJ> updates to (3) raise the WSDL issue (AndyS?)
updates to (3) raise the WSDL issue (AndyS?) ←
14:46:16 <AndyS> +1 to protocol 1.1
Andy Seaborne: +1 to protocol 1.1 ←
14:46:37 <SimonKJ> proposal to version (3) as 1.1 in keeping with the agreement for (1)
proposal to version (3) as 1.1 in keeping with the agreement for (1) ←
14:46:57 <SimonKJ> AndyS - want to expand on the issue?
AndyS - want to expand on the issue? ←
14:47:15 <AndyS> After call?
Andy Seaborne: After call? ←
14:47:16 <bijan> http://wiki.webont.org/page/SPARQL/OWL
Bijan Parsia: http://wiki.webont.org/page/SPARQL/OWL ←
14:49:23 <LeeF> ACTION: Lee to work with Axel to find editors for protocol, service description, and RESTful Update operations this week
ACTION: Lee to work with Axel to find editors for protocol, service description, and RESTful Update operations this week ←
14:49:24 <trackbot> Created ACTION-90 - Work with Axel to find editors for protocol, service description, and RESTful Update operations this week [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2009-09-15].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-90 - Work with Axel to find editors for protocol, service description, and RESTful Update operations this week [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2009-09-15]. ←
14:51:08 <LeeF> topic: Custom aggregates
14:51:09 <LeeF> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0248.html
Lee Feigenbaum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0248.html ←
14:51:59 <SteveH> +1 to custom aggregates
Steve Harris: +1 to custom aggregates ←
14:52:37 <pgearon> I actually liked Andy's suggestion of marking functions that are aggregate functions
Paula Gearon: I actually liked Andy's suggestion of marking functions that are aggregate functions ←
14:52:48 <pgearon> (even though other's didn't seem to enjoy the syntax)
Paula Gearon: (even though other's didn't seem to enjoy the syntax) ←
14:53:06 <SteveH> Can't you always tell from the syntactic position?
Steve Harris: Can't you always tell from the syntactic position? ←
14:53:12 <SteveH> eg. HAVING v's FILTER?
Steve Harris: eg. HAVING v's FILTER? ←
14:53:27 <pgearon> I'm just commenting on custom aggregate extensions here, not the standard ones
Paula Gearon: I'm just commenting on custom aggregate extensions here, not the standard ones ←
14:54:11 <SteveH> q+
Steve Harris: q+ ←
14:54:14 <chimezie> we may need some syntactic sugar
Chimezie Ogbuji: we may need some syntactic sugar ←
14:54:17 <pgearon> no, because standard functions could appear in HAVING (though not vice-versa)
Paula Gearon: no, because standard functions could appear in HAVING (though not vice-versa) ←
14:54:20 <LeeF> ack SteveH
Lee Feigenbaum: ack SteveH ←
14:54:59 <pgearon> +q
Paula Gearon: +q ←
14:55:05 <LeeF> ack pgearon
Lee Feigenbaum: ack pgearon ←
14:55:48 <chimezie> +1 readability
Chimezie Ogbuji: +1 readability ←
14:56:03 <SimonKJ> pgearon - issue is not about processing the HAVING clause, but readability
pgearon - issue is not about processing the HAVING clause, but readability ←
14:56:24 <AndyS> HAVING (fn:myFunction(agg:mycount(?x))) has an aggrgeate and a regular function
Andy Seaborne: HAVING (fn:myFunction(agg:mycount(?x))) has an aggrgeate and a regular function ←
14:56:35 <SimonKJ> issue is that extension functions in a WHERE clause are relatively easy to understand, but in a HAVING clause may be harder to understand
issue is that extension functions in a WHERE clause are relatively easy to understand, but in a HAVING clause may be harder to understand ←
14:59:05 <SteveH> I'm a 0 FWIW
Steve Harris: I'm a 0 FWIW ←
14:59:28 <SteveH> if someone has a syntax that's not horrible I'd be more in favour
Steve Harris: if someone has a syntax that's not horrible I'd be more in favour ←
14:59:41 <SteveH> CUSTOM(uri, ...) would be less horrible
Steve Harris: CUSTOM(uri, ...) would be less horrible ←
15:01:41 <SimonKJ> AndyS - where is the update spec? LeeF, an update of the doc is due a week from today
AndyS - where is the update spec? LeeF, an update of the doc is due a week from today ←
15:01:52 <ivanh> bye everybody
Ivan Herman: bye everybody ←
15:01:53 <SteveH> bye all
Steve Harris: bye all ←
15:01:56 <SimonKJ> bye
bye ←
15:01:57 <bglimm> bye
Birte Glimm: bye ←
15:04:39 <bijan> Pointer to xml spec langauge?
Bijan Parsia: Pointer to xml spec langauge? ←
15:05:08 <bijan> Anolis, I beleive, just uses IDs on elements.
Bijan Parsia: Anolis, I beleive, just uses IDs on elements. ←
15:05:40 <Zakim> -bijan
Zakim IRC Bot: -bijan ←
15:07:14 <AndyS> SimonKJ - WSDL?
Andy Seaborne: SimonKJ - WSDL? ←
15:08:05 <SimonKJ> AndyS - I assume this is a previous topic rearing up again, is there a link to the conversation?
AndyS - I assume this is a previous topic rearing up again, is there a link to the conversation? ←
15:08:38 <Zakim> -ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: -ericP ←
15:09:03 <AndyS> Not a specifc thread - was recurring issue for protocol because we seemed to be first to use WSDL for HTTP for a spec.
Andy Seaborne: Not a specifc thread - was recurring issue for protocol because we seemed to be first to use WSDL for HTTP for a spec. ←
15:09:39 <AndyS> And to impl we less than many SOAP impls - it was (and is?) not popular for SPARQL.
Andy Seaborne: And to impl we less than many SOAP impls - it was (and is?) not popular for SPARQL. ←
15:11:52 <pgearon> quoll71
Paula Gearon: quoll71 ←
15:13:16 <AndyS> CEST
Andy Seaborne: CEST ←
15:13:56 <AndyS> www.timeanddate.com
Andy Seaborne: www.timeanddate.com ←
15:14:58 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended ←
15:14:59 <Zakim> Attendees were LeeF, +1.518.276.aaaa, kasei, AndyS, +1.312.863.aabb, swh, pgearon, Bijan, bglimm, SimonKJ, Chimezie_Ogbuji, Ivan, +49.261.287.aadd, ericP, SimonS_, +1.937.775.aaee
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were LeeF, +1.518.276.aaaa, kasei, AndyS, +1.312.863.aabb, swh, pgearon, Bijan, bglimm, SimonKJ, Chimezie_Ogbuji, Ivan, +49.261.287.aadd, ericP, SimonS_, +1.937.775.aaee ←
Formatted by CommonScribe