edit

RDF Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 14 September 2011

Seen
Alex Hall, Andy Seaborne, Antoine Zimmermann, David Wood, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Gavin Carothers, Guus Schreiber, Ivan Herman, Mischa Tuffield, Nicholas Humfrey, Peter Patel-Schneider, Pierre-Antoine Champin, Sandro Hawke, Scott Bauer, Souripriya Das, Steve Harris, Ted Thibodeau, William Waites, Zhe Wu
Scribe
Zhe Wu
IRC Log
Original
Resolutions
  1. accept the minutes of the 7 Sep telecon link
Topics
14:56:55 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/09/14-rdf-wg-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/09/14-rdf-wg-irc ←

14:56:57 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←

14:56:59 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 73394

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 73394 ←

14:56:59 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes ←

14:57:00 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
14:57:00 <trackbot> Date: 14 September 2011
14:58:18 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has now started

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has now started ←

14:58:25 <Zakim> + +1.650.917.aaaa

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.650.917.aaaa ←

14:58:36 <gavinc> zakim, aaaa is me

Gavin Carothers: zakim, aaaa is me ←

14:58:36 <Zakim> +gavinc; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +gavinc; got it ←

14:58:54 <Zakim> +Guus_Schreiber

Zakim IRC Bot: +Guus_Schreiber ←

14:59:28 <Zakim> +Tony

Zakim IRC Bot: +Tony ←

14:59:40 <Scott_Bauer> Zakim, Tony is me

Scott Bauer: Zakim, Tony is me ←

14:59:41 <Zakim> +Scott_Bauer; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Scott_Bauer; got it ←

15:00:23 <zwu2> zakim, code?

Zhe Wu: zakim, code? ←

15:00:23 <Zakim> the conference code is 73394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), zwu2

Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 73394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), zwu2 ←

15:00:58 <Zakim> +??P27

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P27 ←

15:01:01 <Zakim> +??P36

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P36 ←

15:01:07 <AndyS> zakim, ??P36 is me

Andy Seaborne: zakim, ??P36 is me ←

15:01:07 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←

15:01:10 <NickH> Zakim, ??P27 is me

Nicholas Humfrey: Zakim, ??P27 is me ←

15:01:10 <Zakim> +NickH; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +NickH; got it ←

15:01:11 <Zakim> +zwu2

Zakim IRC Bot: +zwu2 ←

15:01:18 <Zakim> +Peter_Patel-Schneider

Zakim IRC Bot: +Peter_Patel-Schneider ←

15:01:35 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip

Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←

15:01:35 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←

15:01:42 <Zakim> +Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←

15:02:06 <Zakim> + +1.443.212.aabb

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.443.212.aabb ←

15:02:10 <ww> Zakim, aabb is me

William Waites: Zakim, aabb is me ←

15:02:11 <Zakim> +??P38

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P38 ←

15:02:17 <ww> nono

William Waites: nono ←

15:02:22 <Zakim> +ww; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +ww; got it ←

15:02:24 <ww> Zakim, ??P38 is me

William Waites: Zakim, ??P38 is me ←

15:02:29 <NickH> zakim, mute me

Nicholas Humfrey: zakim, mute me ←

15:02:36 <Zakim> +ww; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +ww; got it ←

15:02:42 <Zakim> NickH should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: NickH should now be muted ←

15:02:48 <ww> Zakim, mute me

William Waites: Zakim, mute me ←

15:02:56 <Zakim> ww should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: ww should now be muted ←

15:03:19 <AlexHall> zakim, who is on the phone?

Alex Hall: zakim, who is on the phone? ←

15:03:19 <Zakim> On the phone I see gavinc, Guus_Schreiber, Scott_Bauer, NickH (muted), AndyS, zwu2, Peter_Patel-Schneider, Ivan, ww (muted), ww.a

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see gavinc, Guus_Schreiber, Scott_Bauer, NickH (muted), AndyS, zwu2, Peter_Patel-Schneider, Ivan, ww (muted), ww.a ←

15:03:41 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software

Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software ←

15:03:49 <MacTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me ←

15:03:49 <Zakim> +MacTed; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +MacTed; got it ←

15:03:51 <MacTed> Zakim, mute me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←

15:03:51 <Zakim> MacTed should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should now be muted ←

15:04:02 <Zakim> +Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←

15:04:02 <AlexHall> one of the ww's is me, how do i fix it?

Alex Hall: one of the ww's is me, how do i fix it? ←

15:04:56 <zwu2> Scribe: zwu2

(Scribe set to Zhe Wu)

15:05:23 <ww> AlexHall: sorry about that

Alex Hall: sorry about that [ Scribe Assist by William Waites ] ←

15:05:33 <ww> Zakim, aabb is AlexHall

William Waites: Zakim, aabb is AlexHall ←

15:05:41 <Zakim> sorry, ww, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, ww, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb' ←

15:05:49 <ww> zakim, ww.a is AlexHall

William Waites: zakim, ww.a is AlexHall ←

15:05:49 <Zakim> +AlexHall; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AlexHall; got it ←

15:05:57 <ww> zakim, who is on the call?

William Waites: zakim, who is on the call? ←

15:05:57 <Zakim> On the phone I see gavinc, Guus_Schreiber, Scott_Bauer, NickH (muted), AndyS, zwu2, Peter_Patel-Schneider, Ivan, ww (muted), AlexHall, MacTed (muted), Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see gavinc, Guus_Schreiber, Scott_Bauer, NickH (muted), AndyS, zwu2, Peter_Patel-Schneider, Ivan, ww (muted), AlexHall, MacTed (muted), Sandro ←

15:06:30 <zwu2> topic: introductions

1. introductions

15:06:32 <AlexHall> thanks, ww

Alex Hall: thanks, ww ←

15:06:40 <zwu2> PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 7 Sep telecon:

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 7 Sep telecon: ←

15:07:01 <ericP> Zakim, please dial ericP-office

Eric Prud'hommeaux: Zakim, please dial ericP-office ←

15:07:01 <Zakim> ok, ericP; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ericP; the call is being made ←

15:07:02 <Zakim> +EricP

Zakim IRC Bot: +EricP ←

15:07:14 <zwu2> RESOLVED: accept the minutes of the 7 Sep telecon

RESOLVED: accept the minutes of the 7 Sep telecon ←

15:07:19 <ivan> zakim, mute me

Ivan Herman: zakim, mute me ←

15:07:19 <Zakim> Ivan should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should now be muted ←

15:07:32 <zwu2> topic: action reviews

2. action reviews

15:07:59 <zwu2> Guus: David put up F2F agenda

Guus Schreiber: David put up F2F agenda ←

15:08:29 <zwu2> ... draft agenda http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/F2F2#Agenda

... draft agenda http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/F2F2#Agenda ←

15:08:49 <zwu2> ... open actions

... open actions ←

15:09:27 <zwu2> Action-67?

ACTION-67? ←

15:09:27 <trackbot> ACTION-67 -- Patrick Hayes to review Pierre-A's comments on SPARQL graph store update protocol -- due 2011-07-06 -- OPEN

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-67 -- Patrick Hayes to review Pierre-A's comments on SPARQL graph store update protocol -- due 2011-07-06 -- OPEN ←

15:09:27 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/67

Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/67 ←

15:09:45 <zwu2> action Guus: remind Pat on action-67

action Guus: remind Pat on ACTION-67 ←

15:09:46 <trackbot> Created ACTION-87 - Remind Pat on action-67 [on Guus Schreiber - due 2011-09-21].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-87 - Remind Pat on ACTION-67 [on Guus Schreiber - due 2011-09-21]. ←

15:09:52 <zwu2> action-73?

ACTION-73? ←

15:09:52 <trackbot> ACTION-73 -- Fabien Gandon to implement http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-08-03#resolution_2 -- due 2012-01-05 -- OPEN

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-73 -- Fabien Gandon to implement http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-08-03#resolution_2 -- due 2012-01-05 -- OPEN ←

15:09:52 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/73

Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/73 ←

15:09:57 <zwu2> Guus: leave it open

Guus Schreiber: leave it open ←

15:10:02 <zwu2> action-77?

ACTION-77? ←

15:10:02 <trackbot> ACTION-77 -- Richard Cyganiak to add strawman rdf dataset proposal to concepts -- due 2011-08-24 -- OPEN

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-77 -- Richard Cyganiak to add strawman rdf dataset proposal to concepts -- due 2011-08-24 -- OPEN ←

15:10:02 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/77

Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/77 ←

15:10:10 <zwu2> ... is Richard in?

... is Richard in? ←

15:10:22 <ivan> I think he is out these days

Ivan Herman: I think he is out these days ←

15:10:30 <zwu2> action-79?

ACTION-79? ←

15:10:30 <trackbot> ACTION-79 -- Guus Schreiber to discuss with FabGandon about where to put examples and what to do with primary before F2F -- due 2011-09-29 -- OPEN

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-79 -- Guus Schreiber to discuss with FabGandon about where to put examples and what to do with primary before F2F -- due 2011-09-29 -- OPEN ←

15:10:30 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/79

Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/79 ←

15:10:37 <zwu2> ... needs to be continued, for later

... needs to be continued, for later ←

15:10:42 <zwu2> Action-82?

ACTION-82? ←

15:10:42 <trackbot> ACTION-82 -- Sandro Hawke to draft well-known URI template and propose WG resolution that it is "stable" enough for IETF. -- due 2011-09-14 -- OPEN

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-82 -- Sandro Hawke to draft well-known URI template and propose WG resolution that it is "stable" enough for IETF. -- due 2011-09-14 -- OPEN ←

15:10:42 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/82

Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/82 ←

15:10:48 <zwu2> ... Sandro, did you make progress

... Sandro, did you make progress ←

15:10:52 <zwu2> sandro: no

Sandro Hawke: no ←

15:11:01 <zwu2> action-86?

ACTION-86? ←

15:11:01 <trackbot> ACTION-86 -- Sandro Hawke to provide example for how code is simpler with language-tag options 3 and 4 vs 1 and 2. -- due 2011-09-14 -- OPEN

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-86 -- Sandro Hawke to provide example for how code is simpler with language-tag options 3 and 4 vs 1 and 2. -- due 2011-09-14 -- OPEN ←

15:11:01 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/86

Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/86 ←

15:11:25 <Zakim> +??P58

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P58 ←

15:11:59 <zwu2> proposed to close action-86

proposed to close ACTION-86 ←

15:12:37 <zwu2> Topic: F2F planning

3. F2F planning

15:12:51 <zwu2> Guus: wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/F2F2

Guus Schreiber: wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/F2F2 ←

15:12:59 <zwu2> ... 11 people at BBC,

... 11 people at BBC, ←

15:13:13 <zwu2> ... peter, will you attend?

... peter, will you attend? ←

15:13:25 <zwu2> peter: may not know until Tues morning

Peter Patel-Schneider: may not know until Tues morning ←

15:13:42 <Zakim> + +33.4.77.42.aacc

Zakim IRC Bot: + +33.4.77.42.aacc ←

15:14:00 <AZ> zakim, +33.4.77.42.aacc is me

Antoine Zimmermann: zakim, +33.4.77.42.aacc is me ←

15:14:10 <Zakim> +AZ; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AZ; got it ←

15:14:38 <zwu2> Guus: draft agenda for two days http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/F2F2#Agenda

Guus Schreiber: draft agenda for two days http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/F2F2#Agenda ←

15:14:59 <zwu2> ... we have more time now due to timezone difference

... we have more time now due to timezone difference ←

15:15:14 <zwu2> ... any comments?

... any comments? ←

15:16:25 <zwu2> ... By the time of Boston f2f,

... By the time of Boston f2f, ←

15:16:38 <zwu2> ... we should have some new material

... we should have some new material ←

15:16:59 <zwu2> ... for RDF Primer,

... for RDF Primer, ←

15:17:07 <zwu2> ... unlikely to be complete.

... unlikely to be complete. ←

15:17:18 <ivan> zakim, unmute me

Ivan Herman: zakim, unmute me ←

15:17:18 <Zakim> Ivan should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should no longer be muted ←

15:17:56 <zwu2> ivan: one of the two hotels does not have any more room

Ivan Herman: one of the two hotels does not have any more room ←

15:18:01 <NickH> I will pass on the message to yvesr

Nicholas Humfrey: I will pass on the message to yvesr ←

15:18:54 <zwu2> ... can you send out that hotel info?

... can you send out that hotel info? ←

15:19:32 <mischat> the pound is weak at the moment, people should be "ok"

Mischa Tuffield: the pound is weak at the moment, people should be "ok" ←

15:19:41 <zwu2> action Guus: provide information on london hotel

action Guus: provide information on london hotel ←

15:19:41 <trackbot> Created ACTION-88 - Provide information on london hotel [on Guus Schreiber - due 2011-09-21].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-88 - Provide information on london hotel [on Guus Schreiber - due 2011-09-21]. ←

15:20:18 <zwu2> Topic: liaison with Provenance WG

4. liaison with Provenance WG

15:20:34 <zwu2> Guus: we will use RDF WG channel

Guus Schreiber: we will use RDF WG channel ←

15:20:52 <zwu2> ... zakim code is RDFG

... zakim code is RDFG ←

15:21:13 <zwu2> ... attendance is in http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.09.15

... attendance is in http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.09.15 ←

15:21:29 <zwu2> ... not sure who will attend from Provenance WG

... not sure who will attend from Provenance WG ←

15:21:40 <zwu2> ... two main objectives

... two main objectives ←

15:21:47 <zwu2> ... 1. requirement

... 1. requirement ←

15:22:25 <zwu2> ... work out use cases

... work out use cases ←

15:22:56 <zwu2> ... have joint actions to work on the examples (concrete)

... have joint actions to work on the examples (concrete) ←

15:23:40 <AndyS> +1 to concrete examples

Andy Seaborne: +1 to concrete examples ←

15:23:45 <mischat> i thought that the provenance group where going to give us concrete examples?

Mischa Tuffield: i thought that the provenance group where going to give us concrete examples? ←

15:23:52 <ivan> zakim, mute me

Ivan Herman: zakim, mute me ←

15:23:52 <Zakim> Ivan should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should now be muted ←

15:24:06 <zwu2> topic: RDF Dataset proposal

5. RDF Dataset proposal

15:24:24 <zwu2> Guus: richard is essential to this discussion, He is not here

Guus Schreiber: richard is essential to this discussion, He is not here ←

15:24:27 <Zakim> +??P59

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P59 ←

15:24:35 <pchampin> zakim, ??P59 is me

Pierre-Antoine Champin: zakim, ??P59 is me ←

15:24:35 <Zakim> +pchampin; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +pchampin; got it ←

15:25:02 <zwu2> ... not sure if we can discuss this item

... not sure if we can discuss this item ←

15:25:25 <ivan> zakim, unmute me

Ivan Herman: zakim, unmute me ←

15:25:25 <Zakim> Ivan should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should no longer be muted ←

15:25:41 <zwu2> ivan: we should not go into discussion

Ivan Herman: we should not go into discussion ←

15:26:19 <zwu2> sandro: the doc does not look much different to me

Sandro Hawke: the doc does not look much different to me ←

15:27:11 <zwu2> sandro: it is not a great proposal

Sandro Hawke: it is not a sufficient proposal ←

15:27:21 <zwu2> ... his design is minimal

... his design is minimal ←

15:27:25 <Zakim> +Souri

Zakim IRC Bot: +Souri ←

15:27:49 <sandro> s/great/sufficient/
15:28:34 <zwu2> sandro: applications need their vocab to do something useful

Sandro Hawke: applications need their vocab to do something useful ←

15:28:59 <zwu2> ... we need to proceed with more use cases

... we need to proceed with more use cases ←

15:29:14 <Guus> q?

Guus Schreiber: q? ←

15:29:18 <ivan> q-

Ivan Herman: q- ←

15:29:21 <Zakim> -Peter_Patel-Schneider

Zakim IRC Bot: -Peter_Patel-Schneider ←

15:29:43 <zwu2> Topic: language tagged literals

6. language tagged literals

15:30:13 <zwu2> Guus: only two proposals look promising

Guus Schreiber: only two proposals look promising ←

15:30:33 <zwu2> ... 1 or 2d

... 1 or 2d ←

15:31:05 <zwu2> ... either we do nothing, or we go with 2d

... either we do nothing, or we go with 2d ←

15:31:22 <zwu2> ... we don't have to make a final decision today

... we don't have to make a final decision today ←

15:31:32 <zwu2> ... for resolution, we could go for 2d

... for resolution, we could go for 2d ←

15:31:52 <zwu2> ... if we get sufficient push back, then we choose 1 and do nothing

... if we get sufficient push back, then we choose 1 and do nothing ←

15:32:00 <zwu2> sandro: I agree that approach makes sense

Sandro Hawke: I agree that approach makes sense ←

15:32:21 <zwu2> ... doing 2d at provisional at risk

... doing 2d at provisional at risk ←

15:32:26 <ivan> +1 to what to sandro says

Ivan Herman: +1 to what to sandro says ←

15:32:35 <zwu2> ... let community decide if it is desired

... let community decide if it is desired ←

15:32:58 <zwu2> Guus: not sure much is going to change before F2F

Guus Schreiber: not sure much is going to change before F2F ←

15:33:24 <zwu2> ... Pat said he prefers 4

... Pat said he prefers 4 ←

15:34:06 <ivan> -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46168/tagged_literals/results results of the poll

Ivan Herman: -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46168/tagged_literals/results results of the poll ←

15:34:08 <zwu2> ... I will write an email to the group

... I will write an email to the group ←

15:34:30 <ivan> For the records, 2d means: "The abstract syntax has a lexical form and language tag (like in RDF 2004). The value is assigned directly (like in RDF 2004), bypassing the datatype. The datatype has an empty lexical space and empty L2V mapping."

Ivan Herman: For the records, 2d means: "The abstract syntax has a lexical form and language tag (like in RDF 2004). The value is assigned directly (like in RDF 2004), bypassing the datatype. The datatype has an empty lexical space and empty L2V mapping." ←

15:35:14 <sandro> Or, more simply -- it's the same as we have now, except instead of an EMPTY datatype for tagged strings, there's a particular value for those strings.

Sandro Hawke: Or, more simply -- it's the same as we have now, except instead of an EMPTY datatype for tagged strings, there's a particular value for those strings. ←

15:35:24 <zwu2> action Guus: email to group stating a possible resolution for tagged literals

action Guus: email to group stating a possible resolution for tagged literals ←

15:35:25 <trackbot> Created ACTION-89 - Email to group stating a possible resolution for tagged literals [on Guus Schreiber - due 2011-09-21].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-89 - Email to group stating a possible resolution for tagged literals [on Guus Schreiber - due 2011-09-21]. ←

15:36:18 <zwu2> Guus: aob?

Guus Schreiber: aob? ←

15:37:32 <zwu2> Topic: telecon adjourned

7. telecon adjourned

15:37:37 <ericP> sandro: two axes:

Sandro Hawke: two axes: [ Scribe Assist by Eric Prud'hommeaux ] ←

15:37:44 <ericP> ... current (lex, (datatype | langtag)

Eric Prud'hommeaux: ... current (lex, (datatype | langtag) ←

15:37:49 <ericP> )

Eric Prud'hommeaux: ) ←

15:38:04 <sandro> Choice One:      <lexrep, dt, opt language tag>    or just <lexrep, dt>

Sandro Hawke: Choice One: <lexrep, dt, opt language tag> or just <lexrep, dt> ←

15:38:32 <ericP> isn't the current: <lexrep, dt> | <lexrep, opt language tag> ?

Eric Prud'hommeaux: isn't the current: <lexrep, dt> | <lexrep, opt language tag> ? ←

15:39:13 <sandro> Choice Two:   smoosh the lang tag into Lexrep (option 4) or into datatype URI (option 3a).

Sandro Hawke: Choice Two: smoosh the lang tag into Lexrep (option 4) or into datatype URI (option 3a). ←

15:39:31 <Zakim> -zwu2

Zakim IRC Bot: -zwu2 ←

15:39:49 <Zakim> -Souri

Zakim IRC Bot: -Souri ←

15:40:09 <gavinc> current <lexrep> | <lexrep, dt> | <lexrep, langtag>

Gavin Carothers: current <lexrep> | <lexrep, dt> | <lexrep, langtag> ←

15:40:14 <Zakim> -NickH

Zakim IRC Bot: -NickH ←

15:40:38 <gavinc> current, post xsd:string normalization: <lexrep, dt> | <lexrep, langtag>

Gavin Carothers: current, post xsd:string normalization: <lexrep, dt> | <lexrep, langtag> ←

15:42:22 <swh> agreed, option 4 is v. bad

Steve Harris: agreed, option 4 is v. bad ←

15:42:25 <ericP> +1 to -1 of smushing into the string

Eric Prud'hommeaux: +1 to -1 of smushing into the string ←

15:42:32 <gavinc> Option 4 is bad

Gavin Carothers: Option 4 is bad ←

15:42:48 <AlexHall> +1 as long as we're talking about the RDF abstract syntax

Alex Hall: +1 as long as we're talking about the RDF abstract syntax ←

15:43:15 <Zakim> -AZ

Zakim IRC Bot: -AZ ←

15:43:19 <AndyS> opt 4 is very very bad AKA it will be ignored - APIs will hide it completely so does not exist

Andy Seaborne: opt 4 is very very bad AKA it will be ignored - APIs will hide it completely so does not exist ←

15:43:22 <gavinc> language tags REQUIRE micro parsing already btw

Gavin Carothers: language tags REQUIRE micro parsing already btw ←

15:43:23 <AndyS> several of us were originally interested but DT-lang but it had problems.

Andy Seaborne: several of us were originally interested but DT-lang but it had problems. ←

15:43:37 <sandro> ivan: my problem with 3 is the vast number of language tag URIs that we'd have.   that might cause problems.

Ivan Herman: my problem with 3 is the vast number of language tag URIs that we'd have. that might cause problems. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

15:44:03 <AndyS> gavinc - not really - can treat (unchecked) as strings.

Andy Seaborne: gavinc - not really - can treat (unchecked) as strings. ←

15:44:27 <gavinc> that's true, okay... langMatches() requires micro parsing

Gavin Carothers: that's true, okay... langMatches() requires micro parsing ←

15:44:28 <AndyS> true if checking -- but can "assume" valid

Andy Seaborne: true if checking -- but can "assume" valid ←

15:44:40 <sandro> ivan: owl2 semantics, generating things like differentFrom for each datatype

Ivan Herman: owl2 semantics, generating things like differentFrom for each datatype [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

15:44:48 <AndyS> Yes, langMatches is ... interesting.

Andy Seaborne: Yes, langMatches is ... interesting. ←

15:45:59 <gavinc> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4647

Gavin Carothers: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4647 ←

15:46:36 <sandro> gavin; I don't object to 3a due to microparsing -- since you need to "microparse" language tags anyone.

Sandro Hawke: gavin; I don't object to 3a due to microparsing -- since you need to "microparse" language tags anyone. ←

15:47:08 <pchampin> +1 to Ivan: 3a makes no statements about relations between the language types

Pierre-Antoine Champin: +1 to Ivan: 3a makes no statements about relations between the language types ←

15:47:39 <sandro> AndyS: the mental framework from datatypes does not apply to the theory of lanuage tags.

Andy Seaborne: the mental framework from datatypes does not apply to the theory of lanuage tags. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

15:47:55 <pchampin> q+ to ask a question about 3a and datatypes

Pierre-Antoine Champin: q+ to ask a question about 3a and datatypes ←

15:48:07 <pchampin> ack me

Pierre-Antoine Champin: ack me ←

15:48:09 <Zakim> pchampin, you wanted to ask a question about 3a and datatypes

Zakim IRC Bot: pchampin, you wanted to ask a question about 3a and datatypes ←

15:48:09 <AndyS> Also JJC email that relationship of DT != lang relationships

Andy Seaborne: Also JJC email that relationship of DT != lang relationships ←

15:48:13 <sandro> (ah, that makes sense, Andy.)

Sandro Hawke: (ah, that makes sense, Andy.) ←

15:48:24 <ericP> we need to A/B test by teaching folks the different models and seeing which they "get" in the sense of having intelligent intuitions

Eric Prud'hommeaux: we need to A/B test by teaching folks the different models and seeing which they "get" in the sense of having intelligent intuitions ←

15:48:43 <Guus> I prefer 2d because it apprears to be the smallest change that does the trick, but maybe someone can convince me this is wrong

Guus Schreiber: I prefer 2d because it apprears to be the smallest change that does the trick, but maybe someone can convince me this is wrong ←

15:49:11 <Zakim> -Scott_Bauer

Zakim IRC Bot: -Scott_Bauer ←

15:49:24 <pchampin> zakim, mute me

Pierre-Antoine Champin: zakim, mute me ←

15:49:24 <Zakim> pchampin should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: pchampin should now be muted ←

15:49:28 <gavinc> Turtle funkyness, "Bob"@en == "Bob"^^lang:EN == "Bob"^^lang:en

Gavin Carothers: Turtle funkyness, "Bob"@en == "Bob"^^lang:EN == "Bob"^^lang:en ←

15:49:52 <pchampin> my question is: are those datatypes (in option 3a) different in any way form other datatypes?

Pierre-Antoine Champin: my question is: are those datatypes (in option 3a) different in any way form other datatypes? ←

15:50:04 <pchampin> I think not, but some ppl seem to think so

Pierre-Antoine Champin: I think not, but some ppl seem to think so ←

15:50:16 <gavinc> datatype("Bob"@en) doesn't throw an error

Gavin Carothers: datatype("Bob"@en) doesn't throw an error ←

15:50:39 <AndyS> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0425.html

Andy Seaborne: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0425.html ←

15:50:55 <ericP> gus, we lost yhou

Eric Prud'hommeaux: guus, we lost yhou ←

15:51:05 <AndyS> JJC's message from our archives

Andy Seaborne: JJC's message from our archives ←

15:51:06 <ericP> s/gus/guus/
15:51:07 <pchampin> ok thx

Pierre-Antoine Champin: ok thx ←

15:51:14 <pchampin> I'll look at that in more detail

Pierre-Antoine Champin: I'll look at that in more detail ←

15:51:20 <gavinc> -.-

Gavin Carothers: -.- ←

15:51:38 <Zakim> -AlexHall

Zakim IRC Bot: -AlexHall ←

15:51:48 <ericP> ^^lang:en-fr

Eric Prud'hommeaux: ^^lang:en-fr ←

15:52:00 <Guus> sorry, seem to have problems

Guus Schreiber: sorry, seem to have problems ←

15:52:09 <sandro>  "Bob"^^lang:en      "Bob"@en

Sandro Hawke: "Bob"^^lang:en "Bob"@en ←

15:52:16 <pchampin> @gavin: we already have "bob"@en == "bob"@EN

Pierre-Antoine Champin: @gavin: we already have "bob"@en == "bob"@EN ←

15:52:28 <pchampin> and we don't have to allow lang:EN... could normalize to lang:en

Pierre-Antoine Champin: and we don't have to allow lang:EN... could normalize to lang:en ←

15:52:44 <gavinc> Yes! but .. "1"^^xsd:int != "1"^^xsd:INT

Gavin Carothers: Yes! but .. "1"^^xsd:int != "1"^^xsd:INT ←

15:52:47 <AndyS> + a prefix declaration.

Andy Seaborne: + a prefix declaration. ←

15:52:53 <ericP> ok, you each get 3billion people...

Eric Prud'hommeaux: ok, you each get 3billion people... ←

15:53:00 <pchampin> :-=

Pierre-Antoine Champin: :-= ←

15:53:04 <pchampin> :-)

Pierre-Antoine Champin: :-) ←

15:53:51 <Zakim> -MacTed

Zakim IRC Bot: -MacTed ←

15:53:54 <AndyS> I wasn't aware any proposal was deprecating @

Andy Seaborne: I wasn't aware any proposal was deprecating @ ←

15:54:05 <AndyS> what happens in (shudder) RDF/XML?

Andy Seaborne: what happens in (shudder) RDF/XML? ←

15:54:14 <pchampin> @AndyS no, this was not the intent of 3a akaic

Pierre-Antoine Champin: @AndyS no, this was not the intent of 3a akaic ←

15:54:58 <ericP> trix?

Eric Prud'hommeaux: trix? ←

15:55:13 <Guus> [my phone apprears to be broken, sorry]

Guus Schreiber: [my phone apprears to be broken, sorry] ←

15:55:25 <AndyS> (I have never seen TriX in use)

Andy Seaborne: (I have never seen TriX in use) ←

15:55:37 <pchampin> zakim, unmute me

Pierre-Antoine Champin: zakim, unmute me ←

15:55:37 <Zakim> pchampin should no longer be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: pchampin should no longer be muted ←

15:55:47 <sandro> okay, you're close to convincing me to give up Option 3.....

Sandro Hawke: okay, you're close to convincing me to give up Option 3..... ←

15:56:11 <pchampin> we can normalize @EN to lang:en

Pierre-Antoine Champin: we can normalize @EN to lang:en ←

15:56:23 <ericP> the parser could do the smackdown on lang:eN-Fr

Eric Prud'hommeaux: the parser could do the smackdown on lang:eN-Fr ←

15:56:30 <pchampin> zakim, mute me

Pierre-Antoine Champin: zakim, mute me ←

15:56:30 <Zakim> pchampin should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: pchampin should now be muted ←

15:56:43 <gavinc>  "Bob"@en == "Bob"^^lang:en == "Bob"^^lang:en != "Bob"^^lang:EN

Gavin Carothers: "Bob"@en == "Bob"^^lang:en == "Bob"^^lang:en != "Bob"^^lang:EN ←

15:56:49 <pchampin> yes

Pierre-Antoine Champin: yes ←

15:56:54 <sandro> right.

Sandro Hawke: right. ←

15:56:55 <gavinc>  "Bob"@en == "Bob"^^lang:en == "Bob"@EN != "Bob"^^lang:EN

Gavin Carothers: "Bob"@en == "Bob"^^lang:en == "Bob"@EN != "Bob"^^lang:EN ←

15:59:40 <sandro> so maybe we have make the lang-tag -> URI mapping fold to lower case.

Sandro Hawke: so maybe we have make the lang-tag -> URI mapping fold to lower case. ←

15:59:56 <sandro> ivan: i think technically that would be okay.

Ivan Herman: i think technically that would be okay. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

15:59:59 <AlexHall> IRI equivalence: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3987#section-5.1

Alex Hall: IRI equivalence: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3987#section-5.1 ←

16:00:07 <sandro> AndyS: Didn't we ask the OWL people?

Andy Seaborne: Didn't we ask the OWL people? [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:00:15 <AlexHall> "Applications using IRIs as identity tokens with no relationship to a  protocol MUST use the Simple String Comparison"

Alex Hall: "Applications using IRIs as identity tokens with no relationship to a protocol MUST use the Simple String Comparison" ←

16:00:18 <sandro> ivan: Ian Horrocks said it was okay, but maybe that was just in theory.

Ivan Herman: Ian Horrocks said it was okay, but maybe that was just in theory. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:01:56 <sandro> gavin: xpath defines language tags as case insentivie, too.

Gavin Carothers: xpath defines language tags as case insentivie, too. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:02:22 <sandro> eric: So everyone says they are case insensitive, so normalizing would be okay.

Eric Prud'hommeaux: So everyone says they are case insensitive, so normalizing would be okay. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:03:06 <gavinc> Plain literals have a lexical form and optionally a language tag as defined by [RFC-3066], normalized to lowercase.

Gavin Carothers: Plain literals have a lexical form and optionally a language tag as defined by [RFC-3066], normalized to lowercase. ←

16:03:12 <sandro> gavin: rdf spec says "normalized to lowercase"

Gavin Carothers: rdf spec says "normalized to lowercase" [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:03:59 <AndyS> ... lang:en owl:sameAs eric:HeLLo

Andy Seaborne: ... lang:en owl:sameAs eric:HeLLo ←

16:04:43 <sandro> the proposal here for handling case is: @en == @EN == lang:en   but NOT  lang:EN

Sandro Hawke: the proposal here for handling case is: @en == @EN == lang:en but NOT lang:EN ←

16:04:58 <ivan> zh-Hant

Ivan Herman: zh-Hant ←

16:05:07 <sandro> (not that anyone is arguing in favor of this.)

Sandro Hawke: (not that anyone is arguing in favor of this.) ←

16:06:26 <swh> I think the @ syntax has to case fold, otherwise it will be too strange

Steve Harris: I think the @ syntax has to case fold, otherwise it will be too strange ←

16:07:15 <sandro> for sparql term matching, swh?

Sandro Hawke: for sparql term matching, swh? ←

16:07:27 <swh> sandro, yes

Steve Harris: sandro, yes ←

16:07:50 <swh> I would ban "foo"^^lang:bar in turtle, though that's a little strange

Steve Harris: I would ban "foo"^^lang:bar in turtle, though that's a little strange ←

16:07:54 <pchampin> makes the abstract simpler simpler

Pierre-Antoine Champin: makes the abstract simpler simpler ←

16:08:05 <pchampin> and seems to make everything else more complex :)

Pierre-Antoine Champin: and seems to make everything else more complex :) ←

16:08:22 <AndyS> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5646.txt sec  4.5

Andy Seaborne: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5646.txt sec 4.5 ←

16:08:29 <gavinc> datatype("bob"@en) does not do something errorish

Gavin Carothers: datatype("bob"@en) does not do something errorish ←

16:08:48 <pchampin> what does currently datatype("chat"@en) currently return?

Pierre-Antoine Champin: what does currently datatype("chat"@en) currently return? ←

16:09:00 <gavinc> nothing, it's an error

Gavin Carothers: nothing, it's an error ←

16:09:20 <pchampin> ok, so anyway, all options that aim to give a datatype to *every* literal will change SPARQL, right?

Pierre-Antoine Champin: ok, so anyway, all options that aim to give a datatype to *every* literal will change SPARQL, right? ←

16:09:34 <gavinc> Yep!

Gavin Carothers: Yep! ←

16:09:52 <pchampin> is there an option on the table that will change SPARQL less than the others?

Pierre-Antoine Champin: is there an option on the table that will change SPARQL less than the others? ←

16:10:02 <gavinc> Yep! Do nothing.

Gavin Carothers: Yep! Do nothing. ←

16:10:06 <pchampin> :)

Pierre-Antoine Champin: :) ←

16:10:41 <Zakim> -AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←

16:11:50 <Guus> [i'm back]

Guus Schreiber: [i'm back] ←

16:12:01 <Guus> q+

Guus Schreiber: q+ ←

16:12:02 <Zakim> +??P30

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P30 ←

16:12:10 <AndyS> zakim, ??P30 is me

Andy Seaborne: zakim, ??P30 is me ←

16:12:10 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←

16:12:11 <sandro> eric: Gavin says the reason for 2d over 1 is so you can do datatype("chat"@en).

Eric Prud'hommeaux: Gavin says the reason for 2d over 1 is so you can do datatype("chat"@en). [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:12:19 <AndyS> zakim, please do not cut me off

Andy Seaborne: zakim, please do not cut me off ←

16:12:19 <Zakim> I don't understand 'please do not cut me off', AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'please do not cut me off', AndyS ←

16:12:41 <sandro> gavin: Folks in existing queries should be using NOT LANG(...)

Gavin Carothers: Folks in existing queries should be using NOT LANG(...) [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:13:05 <AndyS> pchampin - tech answer is SPARQL does not require lang tags ;  practically, impls care about STR() most.

Andy Seaborne: pchampin - tech answer is SPARQL does not require lang tags ; practically, impls care about STR() most. ←

16:13:10 <sandro> eric: there are current queries that will break with this change.

Eric Prud'hommeaux: there are current queries that will break with this change. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:13:22 <ericP> FILTER (LANG(?a) != "en-fr")

Eric Prud'hommeaux: FILTER (LANG(?a) != "en-fr") ←

16:13:35 <sandro> gavinc: but those are funky queries, so it's okay.

Gavin Carothers: but those are funky queries, so it's okay. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:13:50 <AndyS> then LANG() then LANGMATCHES()

Andy Seaborne: then LANG() then LANGMATCHES() ←

16:13:58 <sandro> eric: yeah, hard to find an example

Eric Prud'hommeaux: yeah, hard to find an example [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:14:19 <sandro> andy: FILTER with DATATYPE then LANG_MATCHES

Andy Seaborne: FILTER with DATATYPE then LANG_MATCHES [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:14:59 <pchampin> no, that was already in SPARQL

Pierre-Antoine Champin: no, that was already in SPARQL ←

16:15:02 <sandro> gavinc: We already broke that by removing Plain Literals.

Gavin Carothers: We already broke that by removing Plain Literals. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ] ←

16:15:27 <pchampin> ok

Pierre-Antoine Champin: ok ←

16:15:36 <pchampin> good point

Pierre-Antoine Champin: good point ←

16:15:36 <AlexHall> which was exactly our intent :-)

Alex Hall: which was exactly our intent :-) ←

16:15:42 <sandro> okay.   I'm convinced to support 2d.

Sandro Hawke: okay. I'm convinced to support 2d. ←

16:15:49 <Guus> sandro, you had a question for me which i did not hear and therefore did not answer

Guus Schreiber: sandro, you had a question for me which i did not hear and therefore did not answer ←

16:15:51 <pchampin> I move too

Pierre-Antoine Champin: I move too ←

16:16:26 <sandro> (in my heart I still love 3a, but ...    it does seem like there are a lot of complications....)

Sandro Hawke: (in my heart I still love 3a, but ... it does seem like there are a lot of complications....) ←

16:16:33 <ivan> bye everybody

Ivan Herman: bye everybody ←

16:16:38 <Zakim> -Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←

16:17:04 <pchampin> for the record, I'm still convinced that 2d can be interpreted as 3b

Pierre-Antoine Champin: for the record, I'm still convinced that 2d can be interpreted as 3b ←

16:17:07 <ericP> FILTER( (LANG(?a) != 'cd' | true) (?a -> '1'@ab) (?a -> '2'@cd) (?a -> '3'^^xsd:int))

Eric Prud'hommeaux: FILTER( (LANG(?a) != 'cd' | true) (?a -> '1'@ab) (?a -> '2'@cd) (?a -> '3'^^xsd:int)) ←

16:17:10 <ericP> => (?a -> '1'@ab)

Eric Prud'hommeaux: => (?a -> '1'@ab) ←

16:17:11 <pchampin> if that's any confort to Sandro ;)

Pierre-Antoine Champin: if that's any confort to Sandro ;) ←

16:17:24 <sandro> topic: turtle in html

8. turtle in html

16:17:29 <Zakim> -ww

Zakim IRC Bot: -ww ←

16:18:10 <Zakim> -Guus_Schreiber

Zakim IRC Bot: -Guus_Schreiber ←

16:19:16 <pchampin> nasty!!!

Pierre-Antoine Champin: nasty!!! ←

16:20:04 <sandro> <script type="text/javascript">

Sandro Hawke: <script type="text/javascript"> ←

16:20:04 <sandro> <!--//--><![CDATA[//><!--

Sandro Hawke: <!--//--><![CDATA[//><!-- ←

16:20:04 <sandro> ...

Sandro Hawke: ... ←

16:20:04 <sandro> /--><!]]>

Sandro Hawke: /--><!]]> ←

16:20:04 <sandro> </script>

Sandro Hawke: </script> ←

16:21:36 <davidwood> Sandro, what convinced you to support 2d?

David Wood: Sandro, what convinced you to support 2d? ←

16:23:16 <sandro> davidwood, Gavin and AndyS pointing out tricky corner cases that I didnt know how to solve well.

Sandro Hawke: davidwood, Gavin and AndyS pointing out tricky corner cases that I didnt know how to solve well. ←

16:23:36 <ericP> <script type="text/turtle">

Eric Prud'hommeaux: <script type="text/turtle"> ←

16:23:41 <Zakim> -AndyS

Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←

16:24:04 <pchampin> got to go too, bye evrybody

Pierre-Antoine Champin: got to go too, bye evrybody ←

16:24:10 <Zakim> -pchampin

Zakim IRC Bot: -pchampin ←

16:24:43 <gavinc>     pre.example script {

Gavin Carothers: pre.example script { ←

16:24:45 <gavinc>         display:block;

Gavin Carothers: display:block; ←

16:24:46 <ericP>     pre.example script {

Eric Prud'hommeaux: pre.example script { ←

16:24:46 <ericP>         display:block;

Eric Prud'hommeaux: display:block; ←

16:24:46 <ericP>     }

Eric Prud'hommeaux: } ←

16:24:46 <gavinc>     }

Gavin Carothers: } ←

16:25:12 <sandro> Ciao

Sandro Hawke: Ciao ←

16:25:15 <davidwood> sandro, thanks.  I'll read the minutes in detail.

David Wood: sandro, thanks. I'll read the minutes in detail. ←

16:25:36 <sandro> davidwood, it was after the meeting ended, so I was just taking notes, not really scribing.

Sandro Hawke: davidwood, it was after the meeting ended, so I was just taking notes, not really scribing. ←

16:26:08 <sandro> davidwood, we finished the meeting way early, then some of us stayed after to talk about language tags.

Sandro Hawke: davidwood, we finished the meeting way early, then some of us stayed after to talk about language tags. ←

16:26:20 <davidwood> ah

David Wood: ah ←

16:26:28 <davidwood> That's OK.  I have a chat log.

David Wood: That's OK. I have a chat log. ←

16:26:33 <Zakim> -??P58

Zakim IRC Bot: -??P58 ←

16:26:46 <ericP> http://128.30.55.213/toy

Eric Prud'hommeaux: http://128.30.55.213/toy ←

16:27:17 <davidwood> ericP: Do you what time you might want to talk this afternoon?

Eric Prud'hommeaux: Do you what time you might want to talk this afternoon? [ Scribe Assist by David Wood ] ←

16:27:29 <ericP> 10 mins from now?

Eric Prud'hommeaux: 10 mins from now? ←

16:27:59 <davidwood> ok

David Wood: ok ←

16:28:05 <davidwood> Skype or phone?

David Wood: Skype or phone? ←

16:28:42 <ericP> phone's a little easier for me

Eric Prud'hommeaux: phone's a little easier for me ←

16:28:48 <davidwood> ok

David Wood: ok ←

16:29:00 <ericP> #?

Eric Prud'hommeaux: #? ←

16:29:02 <davidwood> You have my numbers in email

David Wood: You have my numbers in email ←

16:29:08 <ericP> cool

Eric Prud'hommeaux: cool ←

16:29:11 <davidwood> +1.540.898.6410

David Wood: +1.540.898.6410 ←

16:39:32 <Zakim> -gavinc

(No events recorded for 10 minutes)

Zakim IRC Bot: -gavinc ←

16:39:33 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←

16:39:35 <Zakim> -EricP

Zakim IRC Bot: -EricP ←

16:39:36 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has ended

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has ended ←

16:39:37 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.650.917.aaaa, gavinc, Guus_Schreiber, Scott_Bauer, AndyS, NickH, zwu2, Peter_Patel-Schneider, Ivan, +1.443.212.aabb, ww, MacTed, Sandro, AlexHall, EricP, AZ,

Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were +1.650.917.aaaa, gavinc, Guus_Schreiber, Scott_Bauer, AndyS, NickH, zwu2, Peter_Patel-Schneider, Ivan, +1.443.212.aabb, ww, MacTed, Sandro, AlexHall, EricP, AZ, ←

16:39:40 <Zakim> ... pchampin, Souri

Zakim IRC Bot: ... pchampin, Souri ←



Formatted by CommonScribe