None.
<MartinD> PRESENT: MartinD, zimmer, Ivan, IanH, MarkusK_, Sandro, baojie, bcuencagrau, pfps, Rinke, Zhe, msmith, Achille, christine
<MartinD> CHAIR: IanH
<MartinD> REGRETS: Michael_Schneider
16:41:24 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-owl-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-owl-irc ←
16:41:37 <MartinD> ScribeNick: MartinD
(Scribe set to Martin Dzbor)
16:48:41 <sandro> zakim, this will be owl
(No events recorded for 7 minutes)
Sandro Hawke: zakim, this will be owl ←
16:48:41 <Zakim> ok, sandro; I see SW_OWL()1:00PM scheduled to start in 12 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, sandro; I see SW_OWL()1:00PM scheduled to start in 12 minutes ←
16:49:20 <MartinD> RRSagent, make records public
RRSagent, make records public ←
16:54:44 <Zakim> SW_OWL()1:00PM has now started
(No events recorded for 5 minutes)
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_OWL()1:00PM has now started ←
16:54:51 <Zakim> + +0190827aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +0190827aaaa ←
16:55:00 <MartinD> Zakim, aaaa is me
Zakim, aaaa is me ←
16:55:00 <Zakim> +MartinD; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MartinD; got it ←
16:56:51 <Zakim> + +03539149aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +03539149aabb ←
16:57:01 <zimmer> Zakim, +03539149aabb is me
Antoine Zimmermann: Zakim, +03539149aabb is me ←
16:57:01 <Zakim> +zimmer; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +zimmer; got it ←
16:57:23 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip
Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←
16:57:23 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←
16:57:25 <Zakim> +Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←
16:57:42 <Zakim> +IanH
Zakim IRC Bot: +IanH ←
16:58:24 <IanH> RRSAgent, make records public
Ian Horrocks: RRSAgent, make records public ←
16:58:36 <Zakim> +??P4
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P4 ←
16:58:39 <IanH> IanH has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2009.06.10/Agenda
Ian Horrocks: IanH has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2009.06.10/Agenda ←
16:59:24 <IanH> I see Martin did all the set up stuff already -- thanks!
Ian Horrocks: I see Martin did all the set up stuff already -- thanks! ←
17:00:21 <MartinD> zakim, mute me
zakim, mute me ←
17:00:21 <Zakim> MartinD should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MartinD should now be muted ←
17:00:26 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
17:00:31 <Zakim> +baojie
Zakim IRC Bot: +baojie ←
17:01:21 <Zakim> +bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm ←
17:01:29 <bcuencagrau> Zakim, bglimm is bcuencagrau
Bernardo Cuenca Grau: Zakim, bglimm is bcuencagrau ←
17:01:29 <Zakim> +bcuencagrau; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bcuencagrau; got it ←
17:01:34 <bcuencagrau> Zakim, mute me
Bernardo Cuenca Grau: Zakim, mute me ←
17:01:34 <Zakim> bcuencagrau should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bcuencagrau should now be muted ←
17:01:47 <MartinD> topic: Admin matters
17:01:53 <IanH> zakim, who is here?
Ian Horrocks: zakim, who is here? ←
17:01:53 <Zakim> On the phone I see MartinD (muted), zimmer, Ivan, IanH, MarkusK_, Sandro, baojie, bcuencagrau (muted)
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see MartinD (muted), zimmer, Ivan, IanH, MarkusK_, Sandro, baojie, bcuencagrau (muted) ←
17:01:55 <Zakim> On IRC I see baojie, bcuencagrau, Rinke, MarkusK_, zimmer, ivan, Zakim, MartinD, IanH, RRSAgent, sandro, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see baojie, bcuencagrau, Rinke, MarkusK_, zimmer, ivan, Zakim, MartinD, IanH, RRSAgent, sandro, trackbot ←
17:02:09 <MartinD> IanH: any agenda amendments?
Ian Horrocks: any agenda amendments? ←
17:02:19 <Zakim> +pfps
Zakim IRC Bot: +pfps ←
17:02:21 <Zakim> + +2
Zakim IRC Bot: + +2 ←
17:02:23 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:02:26 <MartinD> IanH: I saw the previous minutes need some cleanup
Ian Horrocks: I saw the previous minutes need some cleanup ←
17:02:27 <Rinke> zakim, +2 is me
Rinke Hoekstra: zakim, +2 is me ←
17:02:27 <Zakim> +Rinke; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Rinke; got it ←
17:02:32 <Rinke> zakim, mute me
Rinke Hoekstra: zakim, mute me ←
17:02:32 <Zakim> Rinke should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Rinke should now be muted ←
17:03:08 <MartinD> ... minutes cannot be accepted in their current shape, I will talk to Bijan
... minutes cannot be accepted in their current shape, I will talk to Bijan ←
17:03:39 <MartinD> subtopic: Action items status
17:03:48 <MartinD> IanH: both items were completed
Ian Horrocks: both items were completed ←
17:03:40 <pfps> they're done
Peter Patel-Schneider: they're done ←
17:04:00 <pfps> ... at least, they *better* be done!
Peter Patel-Schneider: ... at least, they *better* be done! ←
17:04:00 <MartinD> IanH: no overdue actions, let's move on
Ian Horrocks: no overdue actions, let's move on ←
17:04:10 <MartinD> topic: Status of the OWL WG documents
17:04:19 <MartinD> subtopic: Plain literals spec
17:04:36 <pfps> we hope everything holds together
Peter Patel-Schneider: we hope everything holds together ←
17:04:53 <MartinD> IanH: thanks goes to Sandro and Peter to make sure things were wrapped up and look good
Ian Horrocks: thanks goes to Sandro and Peter to make sure things were wrapped up and look good ←
17:05:17 <MartinD> ... there is a formal vote on the exit criteria
... there is a formal vote on the exit criteria ←
17:06:07 <MartinD> ... this needs to be updated, as the problem with rdf:text, now rdf:PlainLiteral, is no longer there
... this needs to be updated, as the problem with rdf:text, now rdf:PlainLiteral, is no longer there ←
17:06:35 <Zakim> +Zhe
Zakim IRC Bot: +Zhe ←
17:06:39 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:06:45 <MartinD> Sandro: I don't think we need to do anything like implementation of literals; it's mostly about referencing
Sandro Hawke: I don't think we need to do anything like implementation of literals; it's mostly about referencing ←
17:06:51 <MartinD> IanH: any other comments? see also http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/CR_Exit_Criteria for general information on exit criteria
Ian Horrocks: any other comments? see also http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/CR_Exit_Criteria for general information on exit criteria ←
17:07:04 <MartinD> subtopic: Status report on the publication drafts
17:07:12 <MartinD> IanH: all in good shape
Ian Horrocks: all in good shape ←
17:07:25 <MartinD> Sandro: yes, they are all in good shape
Sandro Hawke: yes, they are all in good shape ←
17:07:33 <Zakim> +msmith1
Zakim IRC Bot: +msmith1 ←
17:08:01 <MartinD> IanH: I sent an email and people responded, pointers associated with people/editors are mixed, some point to homepage, some to OWL wiki...
Ian Horrocks: I sent an email and people responded, pointers associated with people/editors are mixed, some point to homepage, some to OWL wiki... ←
17:08:03 <Zakim> +[IBM]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IBM] ←
17:08:24 <MartinD> ... please check what URL is associated with your name if you are an editor, whether it's the right one
... please check what URL is associated with your name if you are an editor, whether it's the right one ←
17:08:45 <MartinD> subtopic: Transition to CR (Candidate Recommendation)
17:09:06 <MartinD> IanH: the status is that all things are "go"... got approval from the director today
Ian Horrocks: the status is that all things are "go"... got approval from the director today ←
17:09:25 <MartinD> IanH: congratulations to everyone
Ian Horrocks: congratulations to everyone ←
17:09:44 <MartinD> Sandro: we can be optimistic that we would have it formally online in the next few days
Sandro Hawke: we can be optimistic that we would have it formally online in the next few days ←
17:10:14 <MartinD> IanH: still a few minor hurdles, most administrative... it's likely to appear tomorrow or in a few days
Ian Horrocks: still a few minor hurdles, most administrative... it's likely to appear tomorrow or in a few days ←
17:10:33 <MartinD> ... big thanks to Sandro for working on getting the docs out as early as tomorrow
... big thanks to Sandro for working on getting the docs out as early as tomorrow ←
17:10:51 <MartinD> Sandro: and also thanks to all those contributing to the work
Sandro Hawke: and also thanks to all those contributing to the work ←
17:11:17 <MartinD> subtopic: Transition to LC (Last Call)
17:11:31 <MartinD> IanH: status is also good, docs are planned to go out shortly...
Ian Horrocks: status is also good, docs are planned to go out shortly... ←
17:11:34 <Achille> zakim, ibm is me
Achille Fokoue: zakim, ibm is me ←
17:11:34 <Zakim> +Achille; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Achille; got it ←
17:11:39 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:12:13 <pfps> not a serious problem
Peter Patel-Schneider: not a serious problem ←
17:12:17 <Zakim> +??P14
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P14 ←
17:12:27 <MartinD> Sandro: my script doesn't know about notes, not sure how to publish syntax doc - as a note? but it's not a big issue at the moment
Sandro Hawke: my script doesn't know about notes, not sure how to publish syntax doc - as a note? but it's not a big issue at the moment ←
17:12:37 <christine> zakim, ??P14 is me
Christine Golbreich: zakim, ??P14 is me ←
17:12:37 <Zakim> +christine; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +christine; got it ←
17:12:41 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:12:45 <MartinD> ... more work needs to be done on this
... more work needs to be done on this ←
17:12:59 <MartinD> IanH: we can focus on other things that need to be done in the near future
Ian Horrocks: we can focus on other things that need to be done in the near future ←
17:13:04 <MartinD> TOPIC: Issues/comments
17:13:22 <MartinD> IanH: a few issues still trailing, partly queries from the review process
Ian Horrocks: a few issues still trailing, partly queries from the review process ←
17:13:54 <MartinD> IanH: first, comment from Benjamin on RL profile ( http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC2_Responses/BG1 )
Ian Horrocks: first, comment from Benjamin on RL profile ( http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC2_Responses/BG1 ) ←
17:14:02 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:14:04 <pfps> q+
17:14:10 <IanH> ack pfps
Ian Horrocks: ack pfps ←
17:14:10 <MartinD> ... do we want to raise this into an issue form or ?
... do we want to raise this into an issue form or ? ←
17:14:49 <MartinD> pfps: some changes he suggests go in less desirable direction, we made some changes for him, he was 'minimally' satisfied with those
Peter Patel-Schneider: some changes he suggests go in less desirable direction, we made some changes for him, he was 'minimally' satisfied with those ←
17:15:23 <MartinD> IanH: I think I added both those references at the end, we can certainly use the alternative references as he suggests, would hurt the content
Ian Horrocks: I think I added both those references at the end, we can certainly use the alternative references as he suggests, would hurt the content ←
17:15:25 <pfps> the more references the merrier :-)
Peter Patel-Schneider: the more references the merrier :-) ←
17:15:46 <pfps> that might be a minimal response
Peter Patel-Schneider: that might be a minimal response ←
17:15:50 <MartinD> ... not yet there, but can be done, is this sufficient?
... not yet there, but can be done, is this sufficient? ←
17:15:55 <Zhe> sounds good
17:16:27 <MartinD> ... ok, I will make that amendment and go back to Benjamin - if this satisfies his comment without deeper changes, good; if not, let's see what can be done
... ok, I will make that amendment and go back to Benjamin - if this satisfies his comment without deeper changes, good; if not, let's see what can be done ←
17:16:51 <MartinD> IanH: next, Michael's question on forest-like anonymous individuals
Ian Horrocks: next, Michael's question on forest-like anonymous individuals ←
17:16:57 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:17:10 <MartinD> ... the syntax wasn't clear on this, did editors have chance to look at this?
... the syntax wasn't clear on this, did editors have chance to look at this? ←
17:17:28 <MartinD> pfps: we may need to do an update on that explanation, it was slightly ambiguous
Peter Patel-Schneider: we may need to do an update on that explanation, it was slightly ambiguous ←
17:17:38 <MartinD> IanH: esp. unclear wrt. roles
Ian Horrocks: esp. unclear wrt. roles ←
17:17:54 <MartinD> pfps: Ian to liase with Boris to get this fixed
Peter Patel-Schneider: Ian to liase with Boris to get this fixed ←
17:18:17 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - IanH
Trackbot IRC Bot: Sorry, couldn't find user - IanH ←
17:18:32 <MartinD> ACTION: Ian to ask Boris to make a relevant editorial change in the syntax document to address Michael's points
ACTION: Ian to ask Boris to make a relevant editorial change in the syntax document to address Michael's points ←
17:18:32 <trackbot> Created ACTION-341 - Ask Boris to make a relevant editorial change in the syntax document to address Michael's points [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-341 - Ask Boris to make a relevant editorial change in the syntax document to address Michael's points [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17]. ←
17:19:01 <MartinD> Ian: I should also take formal action on Benjamin's comment
Ian Horrocks: I should also take formal action on Benjamin's comment ←
17:19:23 <IanH> ACTION: Ian to add extra reference and check with Benjamin if this satisfies his requirements
ACTION: Ian to add extra reference and check with Benjamin if this satisfies his requirements ←
17:19:23 <trackbot> Created ACTION-342 - Add extra reference and check with Benjamin if this satisfies his requirements [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-342 - Add extra reference and check with Benjamin if this satisfies his requirements [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17]. ←
17:19:57 <MartinD> Ian: the last thing was Alan's comment on abbreviation form of literals, did Peter respond to this?
Ian Horrocks: the last thing was Alan's comment on abbreviation form of literals, did Peter respond to this? ←
17:20:16 <MartinD> Peter: this has been done, part of a previous action point
Peter Patel-Schneider: this has been done, part of a previous action point ←
17:20:17 <msmith> Boris's edits to syntax were very helpful for these literals
Michael Smith: Boris's edits to syntax were very helpful for these literals ←
17:20:28 <MartinD> Ian: any other points to be discussed?
Ian Horrocks: any other points to be discussed? ←
17:20:48 <MartinD> Peter: can we make a comment about references? making them more uniform, etc?
Peter Patel-Schneider: can we make a comment about references? making them more uniform, etc? ←
17:21:04 <MartinD> ... at some point we would need to do some cleanup and make them more uniform
... at some point we would need to do some cleanup and make them more uniform ←
17:21:32 <MartinD> ... some macros are already fairly uniform, but references from text look ugly
... some macros are already fairly uniform, but references from text look ugly ←
17:21:52 <MartinD> Ian: I agree, some of them don't help with reading the text
Ian Horrocks: I agree, some of them don't help with reading the text ←
17:22:18 <MartinD> ... since it's mostly done manually, almost every of these references needs to changed by hand
... since it's mostly done manually, almost every of these references needs to changed by hand ←
17:22:47 <MartinD> Sandro: maybe we can replace them by macros, at the point of going through...
Sandro Hawke: maybe we can replace them by macros, at the point of going through... ←
17:22:56 <MartinD> Ian: do we want to record this as an issue?
Ian Horrocks: do we want to record this as an issue? ←
17:24:22 <MartinD> Ian: I take the action on me to discuss this unification with the editors of the documents to see if they are willing to do anything with it
Ian Horrocks: I take the action on me to discuss this unification with the editors of the documents to see if they are willing to do anything with it ←
17:24:30 <IanH> ACTION: Ian to discuss with editors the possibility of improving the citation style
ACTION: Ian to discuss with editors the possibility of improving the citation style ←
17:24:30 <trackbot> Created ACTION-343 - Discuss with editors the possibility of improving the citation style [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-343 - Discuss with editors the possibility of improving the citation style [on Ian Horrocks - due 2009-06-17]. ←
17:25:02 <MartinD> Ian: this is not exactly urgent, but let's have it recorded, any other issues?
Ian Horrocks: this is not exactly urgent, but let's have it recorded, any other issues? ←
17:25:08 <MartinD> TOPIC: Implementation and testing
17:25:10 <msmith> q+
Michael Smith: q+ ←
17:25:17 <MartinD> Ian: not much to say on this?
Ian Horrocks: not much to say on this? ←
17:25:17 <IanH> ack msmith
Ian Horrocks: ack msmith ←
17:25:44 <ivan> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
17:25:49 <MartinD> Mike: nothing to discuss, but I expect to have the queue of test cases down to zero next week...
Michael Smith: nothing to discuss, but I expect to have the queue of test cases down to zero next week... ←
17:26:05 <MartinD> Ian: if tests are approved, do you think we have sufficient coverage?
Ian Horrocks: if tests are approved, do you think we have sufficient coverage? ←
17:26:07 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:26:29 <MartinD> Mike: it would be nice if we had... I guess there should be enough coverage
Michael Smith: it would be nice if we had... I guess there should be enough coverage ←
17:26:36 <IanH> ack ivan
Ian Horrocks: ack ivan ←
17:26:43 <MartinD> ... enough for syntactic items, tests should be sufficient
... enough for syntactic items, tests should be sufficient ←
17:27:04 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:27:06 <MartinD> Ivan: do the upcoming tests include those that Michael prepared? I look a while ago and some are still empty
Ivan Herman: do the upcoming tests include those that Michael prepared? I look a while ago and some are still empty ←
17:27:48 <MartinD> ... we have a tight schedule, we don't have tests for some aspects... they were promised, but when do we expect them to happen?
... we have a tight schedule, we don't have tests for some aspects... they were promised, but when do we expect them to happen? ←
17:28:03 <MartinD> Ian: I will clarify this by email...
Ian Horrocks: I will clarify this by email... ←
17:28:04 <MartinD> ... Mike is getting through them pretty quickly
... Mike is getting through them pretty quickly ←
17:28:05 <msmith> yes
Michael Smith: yes ←
17:28:15 <MarkusK_> Michael already was looking at uploading his tests recently, and had some very concrete technical questions; I assume they could be ready rather soon
Markus Krötzsch: Michael already was looking at uploading his tests recently, and had some very concrete technical questions; I assume they could be ready rather soon ←
17:28:29 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:28:54 <MartinD> Ivan: next Ian and me should see potential testers for RL, so it's important
Ivan Herman: next Ian and me should see potential testers for RL, so it's important ←
17:29:08 <MartinD> Ian: I will communicate with Michael to accelerate this upload
Ian Horrocks: I will communicate with Michael to accelerate this upload ←
17:29:28 <msmith> I heard from Dmitry, and he was asking about submitting FaCT++ results
Michael Smith: I heard from Dmitry, and he was asking about submitting FaCT++ results ←
17:29:29 <MartinD> Ian: I heard from Uli that Italian people ran the tests and will be submitting their results shortly
Ian Horrocks: I heard from Uli that Italian people ran the tests and will be submitting their results shortly ←
17:30:28 <MartinD> Ian: everyone who is an implementer or if you know implementers, please, submit results, it's straightforward
Ian Horrocks: everyone who is an implementer or if you know implementers, please, submit results, it's straightforward ←
17:30:40 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:30:43 <MartinD> ... talk to us how to make the upload even easier (if necessary)
... talk to us how to make the upload even easier (if necessary) ←
17:31:12 <Zhe> zakim, mute me
17:31:12 <Zakim> Zhe should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Zhe should now be muted ←
17:31:22 <msmith> this link I think http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Test_Running_Guide
Michael Smith: this link I think http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Test_Running_Guide ←
17:31:27 <MartinD> Ivan: would it be possible to put all the necessary links for the tests on the web page? now there are only test results, but the other links should be equally prominent on the homepage
Ivan Herman: would it be possible to put all the necessary links for the tests on the web page? now there are only test results, but the other links should be equally prominent on the homepage ←
17:31:48 <MartinD> Ian: anything else on implementation and/or testing?
Ian Horrocks: anything else on implementation and/or testing? ←
17:32:11 <MartinD> ... I heard the progress was made with OWL API, there is a new version, fully OWL2 compliant - good news
... I heard the progress was made with OWL API, there is a new version, fully OWL2 compliant - good news ←
17:32:36 <pfps> q+
17:32:40 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:32:41 <MartinD> TOPIC: Features "at risk"
17:32:44 <IanH> ack pfps
Ian Horrocks: ack pfps ←
17:33:11 <MartinD> Peter: it might be good idea to have the implementation reports on the at-risk features...
Peter Patel-Schneider: it might be good idea to have the implementation reports on the at-risk features... ←
17:33:17 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:33:24 <MartinD> Ian: we already have the implementation of at least one - hermit almost done
Ian Horrocks: we already have the implementation of at least one - hermit almost done ←
17:33:32 <MartinD> ... who would be the other candidate?
... who would be the other candidate? ←
17:33:43 <MartinD> Peter: Fact++ or maybe Pellet?
Peter Patel-Schneider: Fact++ or maybe Pellet? ←
17:34:09 <MartinD> Ian: would this include both 'rational' and 'literal' support?
Ian Horrocks: would this include both 'rational' and 'literal' support? ←
17:34:26 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:34:31 <MartinD> ... is there a plan to implement this in Pellet?
... is there a plan to implement this in Pellet? ←
17:34:48 <MartinD> Mike: yes, we are actively working on this... it's a possibility...
Michael Smith: yes, we are actively working on this... it's a possibility... ←
17:35:02 <MartinD> ... unlikely to have it done in the main release of Pellet
... unlikely to have it done in the main release of Pellet ←
17:35:18 <MartinD> Ian: maybe even a preliminary report about a beta implementation might be good?
Ian Horrocks: maybe even a preliminary report about a beta implementation might be good? ←
17:35:24 <MartinD> Mike: working on it...
Michael Smith: working on it... ←
17:35:25 <msmith> yes.
Michael Smith: yes. ←
17:35:50 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:35:53 <ivan> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
17:35:55 <MartinD> Ian: this section is just a reminder to keep us thinking about the implementation points
Ian Horrocks: this section is just a reminder to keep us thinking about the implementation points ←
17:35:57 <IanH> ack ivan
Ian Horrocks: ack ivan ←
17:36:03 <MartinD> Ian: Any other business?
Ian Horrocks: Any other business? ←
17:36:21 <MartinD> Ivan: now that we are going to the CR phase, do we need weekly telecons?
Ivan Herman: now that we are going to the CR phase, do we need weekly telecons? ←
17:36:37 <MartinD> Ian: judging from this week's agenda, it looks thin.
Ian Horrocks: judging from this week's agenda, it looks thin. ←
17:36:41 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:36:48 <ivan> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
17:36:53 <IanH> ack ivan
Ian Horrocks: ack ivan ←
17:36:54 <MartinD> ... we will inquire on email what people want to do about this
... we will inquire on email what people want to do about this ←
17:37:01 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:37:02 <MartinD> ... possibility to go bi-weekly?
... possibility to go bi-weekly? ←
17:37:07 <IanH> q?
Ian Horrocks: q? ←
17:37:10 <IanH> ack ?
Ian Horrocks: ack ? ←
17:37:32 <MartinD> Ivan: bi-weekly would be alright, but we should still keep the time allocated for every week at this time, just in case something arises
Ivan Herman: bi-weekly would be alright, but we should still keep the time allocated for every week at this time, just in case something arises ←
17:37:48 <MartinD> Ian: anybody feels strongly about weekly telecons?
Ian Horrocks: anybody feels strongly about weekly telecons? ←
17:38:20 <MartinD> ... I will send an email round to suggest moving from weekly schedule to a bi-weekly one
... I will send an email round to suggest moving from weekly schedule to a bi-weekly one ←
17:38:40 <Rinke> omit: thanks, congrats and bye!
17:38:42 <Zakim> -msmith
Zakim IRC Bot: -msmith ←
17:38:42 <Zhe> omit: bye
17:38:42 <MartinD> Ian: if no other business, thanks to Martin for scribing and thanks to all for the transition to CR!
Ian Horrocks: if no other business, thanks to Martin for scribing and thanks to all for the transition to CR! ←
17:38:44 <Zakim> -Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←
17:38:45 <Zakim> -Achille
Zakim IRC Bot: -Achille ←
17:38:46 <Zakim> -zimmer
Zakim IRC Bot: -zimmer ←
17:38:47 <Zakim> -MarkusK_
Zakim IRC Bot: -MarkusK_ ←
17:38:47 <Zakim> -Zhe
Zakim IRC Bot: -Zhe ←
17:38:49 <Zakim> -baojie
Zakim IRC Bot: -baojie ←
17:38:49 <Zakim> -IanH
Zakim IRC Bot: -IanH ←
17:38:50 <Zakim> -Rinke
Zakim IRC Bot: -Rinke ←
17:38:51 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
17:38:52 <MartinD> ... telco concluded
... telco concluded ←
17:38:53 <Zakim> -pfps
Zakim IRC Bot: -pfps ←
17:38:55 <Zakim> -christine
Zakim IRC Bot: -christine ←
17:39:01 <Zakim> -bcuencagrau
Zakim IRC Bot: -bcuencagrau ←
17:39:02 <Zakim> -MartinD
Zakim IRC Bot: -MartinD ←
17:39:04 <Zakim> SW_OWL()1:00PM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_OWL()1:00PM has ended ←
17:39:08 <Zakim> Attendees were +0190827aaaa, MartinD, zimmer, Ivan, IanH, MarkusK_, Sandro, baojie, bcuencagrau, pfps, Rinke, Zhe, msmith, Achille, christine
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were +0190827aaaa, MartinD, zimmer, Ivan, IanH, MarkusK_, Sandro, baojie, bcuencagrau, pfps, Rinke, Zhe, msmith, Achille, christine ←
Formatted by CommonScribe