ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance?

Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Best practices document(s)

Raised by:

Bernadette Farias Loscio

Opened on:

2015-12-03

Description:

The current example is very simple and uses just the property prov:wasAttributedTo.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2016-03-13)
2. Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? (from deirdre@derilinx.com on 2016-03-13)
3. [Minutes] 2016-03-11 (from phila@w3.org on 2016-03-11)
4. Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2016-03-11)
5. ISSUE-239: machine-readable standardized data formats - serialization data formats - dataset formats (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2016-03-10)
6. ISSUE-242: APIs on the Web (for publishing Data on the Web) Best Practices (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2016-03-10)
7. ISSUE-232: Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2016-03-10)
8. ISSUE-228: Should we include definitions on the glossary to explain other terms used in the Context section? (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2016-03-10)
9. ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2016-03-10)
10. dwbp-ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? [Best practices document(s)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-12-03)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log