15:00:54 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 15:00:54 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/10/31-html-a11y-irc 15:00:56 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:00:58 Zakim, this will be 2119 15:00:59 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:00:59 Date: 31 October 2013 15:00:59 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 60 minutes ago 15:01:28 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has now started 15:01:36 +Mark_Sadecki 15:01:40 + +1.425.522.aaaa 15:01:44 zakim, agenda? 15:01:44 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda: 15:01:45 11. Bug Triage: Review of Resolved Bugs tracked by TF [from see below via janina] 15:01:45 13. HTML 5.1 Objectives http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/51wishlist [from janina] 15:01:45 14. Other Business [from janina] 15:01:45 15. Identify Scribe for the next TF teleconference http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List [from janina] 15:01:46 16. be done [from janina] 15:01:46 +Cynthia_Shelly 15:01:46 +[Microsoft] 15:01:47 +[Microsoft.a] 15:01:51 zakim, clear agenda 15:01:51 agenda cleared 15:02:06 +Judy 15:02:09 zakim, [Microsoft] is me 15:02:09 +paulc; got it 15:02:17 +??P18 15:02:22 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:02:22 On the phone I see Mark_Sadecki, +1.425.522.aaaa, paulc, Cynthia_Shelly, [Microsoft.a], Judy, ??P18 15:02:36 Judy has joined #html-a11y 15:02:40 +Suzanne_Taylor 15:03:15 +[IPcaller] 15:03:21 chaals has joined #html-a11y 15:03:40 cyns has joined #html-a11y 15:03:45 JatinderMann has joined #html-a11y 15:03:57 zakim, [Microsoft.a] is Jatinder Mann 15:03:57 I don't understand '[Microsoft.a] is Jatinder Mann', MarkS 15:03:59 trackbot, start meeting? 15:03:59 trackbot, start meeting 15:04:01 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:04:03 Zakim, this will be 2119 15:04:03 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 64 minutes ago 15:04:04 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:04:04 Date: 31 October 2013 15:04:06 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:04:08 Zakim, this will be 2119 15:04:08 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 64 minutes ago 15:04:09 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:04:09 Date: 31 October 2013 15:04:11 zakim, who is here? 15:04:11 I notice WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has restarted 15:04:12 On the phone I see Mark_Sadecki, +1.425.522.aaaa, paulc, Cynthia_Shelly, [Microsoft.a], Judy, ??P18, Suzanne_Taylor, [IPcaller], Adrian_Roselli 15:04:12 On IRC I see JatinderMann, cyns, chaals, Judy, RRSAgent, paulc, Suzanne_T, richardschwerdtfeger, davidb, IanPouncey, janina, MarkS, trackbot, Zakim, hober 15:04:20 zakim, [ip 15:04:20 I don't understand '[ip', chaals 15:04:33 zakim, Microsoft.a is Jatinder Mann 15:04:33 I don't understand 'Microsoft.a is Jatinder Mann', MarkS 15:04:52 zakim, [Micros is JatinderMann 15:04:52 +JatinderMann; got it 15:05:12 zakim, who is talking 15:05:12 I don't understand 'who is talking', chaals 15:05:17 zakim, who is making nooise? 15:05:17 I don't understand your question, chaals. 15:05:19 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger 15:05:27 aardrian has joined #html-a11y 15:05:33 zakim, aaaa is jay monroe 15:05:33 I don't understand 'aaaa is jay monroe', MarkS 15:05:50 zakim, agenda? 15:05:50 I see nothing on the agenda 15:05:53 Zakim, who is here? 15:05:53 On the phone I see Mark_Sadecki, +1.425.522.aaaa, paulc, Cynthia_Shelly, JatinderMann, Judy, ??P18, Suzanne_Taylor, [IPcaller], Adrian_Roselli, Rich_Schwerdtfeger 15:05:56 On IRC I see aardrian, JatinderMann, cyns, chaals, Judy, RRSAgent, paulc, Suzanne_T, richardschwerdtfeger, davidb, IanPouncey, janina, MarkS, trackbot, Zakim, hober 15:06:40 scribe: MarkS 15:06:40 agenda+ Format and agenda for special TF Call 15:06:40 agenda+ Canvas (announcement from MS, at-risk features, canvas subteam) 15:06:40 agenda+ Plan for Longdesc (getting consensus from TF) 15:06:40 agenda+ Calendaring for next few weeks including chairs 15:07:13 zakim, clear agenda 15:07:13 agenda cleared 15:07:32 agenda+ REMINDER: Everyone is asked to rejoin the HTML-WG http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Oct/0001.html 15:07:32 agenda+ Task Force Administration Update 15:07:32 agenda+ PFWG Approves Revised Work Statement and Decision Procedures [See Below] 15:07:32 agenda+ Longdesc LC Comments WBS http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Oct/0059.html 15:07:33 agenda+ Longdesc Testing Update 15:07:33 agenda+ New Ruby Extension Spec http://www.w3.org/TR/html-ruby-extensions/ 15:07:33 agenda+ New Media Community Group http://www.w3.org/community/inbandtracks/ 15:07:34 agenda+ Alt Edits Review [See Below] 15:07:34 agenda+ Bug Triage: Review of Resolved Bugs tracked by TF [see below] 15:07:34 agenda+ Subteam Reports: Bug Triage; AAPI Mapping; Media; 15:07:35 agenda+ HTML 5.1 Objectives http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/51wishlist 15:07:35 agenda+ Other Business 15:07:43 zakim, take up agendum 1 15:07:43 agendum 1. "REMINDER: Everyone is asked to rejoin the HTML-WG http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Oct/0001.html" taken up [from chaals] 15:07:49 JF has joined #html-a11y 15:07:51 +John_Foliot 15:08:09 Deadline is Nov 14. 15:08:17 First day of F2F in Shenzen. 15:08:26 zakim, close this item 15:08:26 agendum 1 closed 15:08:27 I see 11 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:08:27 2. Task Force Administration Update [from chaals] 15:09:07 zakim, clear agenda 15:09:07 agenda cleared 15:10:05 agenda+ upcoming meetings 15:10:14 agenda+ plan for longdesc 15:10:14 zakim, agenda? 15:10:15 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda: 15:10:15 1. upcoming meetings [from chaals] 15:10:15 2. plan for longdesc [from chaals] 15:10:16 agenda+ Identify Scribe http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List 15:10:17 agenda+ Canvas (request from Microsoft, at-risk features, canvas sub-team) [approx. 20 min] 15:10:19 agenda+ Publication plan for HTML5 Image Description Extension (reintegration or stand-alone) [approx. 20 min] 15:10:20 agenda+ Meeting schedule for coming weeks (TPAC and Holidays) 15:10:22 agenda+ Other Business 15:10:23 agenda+ Identify Scribe for the next TF teleconference http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List 15:10:23 agenda+ be done 15:10:28 zakim, close agendum 3 15:10:28 agendum 3, Identify Scribe http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List, closed 15:10:30 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:10:30 1. upcoming meetings [from chaals] 15:10:35 +1 (JF could be) 15:10:36 Paul is not available. Already in China. 15:10:36 jaymunro has joined #html-a11y 15:10:43 regrets for next week from MarkS 15:11:00 CN: plan is that there will be a meeting, I will chair 15:11:12 ...the weekend of TPAC there will not be a meeting 15:11:30 ...there will be a meeting the week of 11/21 there will be a meeting and Janina will chair 15:11:40 ...11/28 there will not be a meeting 15:11:52 agenda+ canvas... 15:11:59 ...There will be a meeting the first week of Dec. 15:12:21 ACTION: chaals to post meeting dates for next month... 15:12:22 Created ACTION-212 - Post meeting dates for next month... [on Charles McCathie Nevile - due 2013-11-07]. 15:12:27 zakim, take up item 10 15:12:27 agendum 10. "canvas..." taken up [from chaals] 15:12:28 The WG will not be meeting the two weeks after TPAC ie Nov 21 and Nov 28 there will NOT be meetings. 15:12:31 agenda? 15:12:55 Topic: canvas 15:13:47 CS: continue discussion RE canvas in 5.0 vs 5.1 and to introduce Jatinder 15:14:23 JM: I have been on IE team for many years. Helped implement canvas in IE9 and am an editor of the canvas spec 15:15:03 ...wanted to talk about at risk items in canvas. Hit regions and focus rings. IE11 does not support these features and we will not until a future version. 15:15:21 ...our proposal RE: hit regions is to move them out to the 5.1 spec 15:16:06 RS: we actually have implementations for Chrome on Mac and Win and in Firefox. They do not use Path objects 15:16:33 JM: would be interested in seeing examples of those. Interested in how that is going to work without Path objects. 15:16:59 RS: Shape object seems to be the new approach. Can get location information of object on the screen. 15:17:29 JM: If I can't describe a region on the canvas to focus on, how is that accomplished. 15:18:12 RS: you have a current path. assigning that path to the object. in chrome, you draw your objects, have a path. no focus, does not render. allows magnifier to zoom in on those objects. agree we need a path, but not necessarily a path object. 15:18:25 JM: without specific path object, its the current path. 15:19:42 q+ 15:19:49 ...very much interested in pursuing a feature here. have had 3 versions of IE that support the drawing features of canvas. i wonder if its worth moving the at risk stuff to the 5.1 spec. not stop implementations, but the goal to 5.1 15:19:57 RS: i understood that these would be a 5.1 feature. However, we need ability to drive magnification today 15:20:10 ...could be a couple years out before we see a solid plan for this. 15:20:32 ack pau 15:20:39 What does Rich means " it was agreed upon"? 15:20:41 q+ suzanne 15:20:47 PC: when you said it was agreed upon, what were you referring to? 15:21:04 RS: it was agreed that we were going to push the path object on to 5.1. 15:21:15 PC: who? the TF, the WG? 15:21:36 zakim, who is making noise? 15:21:40 RS: PLH and Rik Cabinier at F2F. Cant' get it done for 5.0, push it to 5.1 15:21:46 chaals, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Cynthia_Shelly (4%), paulc (34%), Judy (85%), Rich_Schwerdtfeger (20%) 15:21:58 RS: we have discussed this on previous calls. 15:22:24 PC: I would like to encourage the TF to decide how they would like to proceed with the current at-risk features. 15:22:46 ...we have to go back to Last Call. I would prefer that if we are going to take things out, we take them out before we go back to LC 15:22:56 q+ 15:23:08 RS: we discussed this on previous calls that path is coming out. that can come out for LC 15:23:12 q+ 15:23:48 ...working to get two implementations of drawCustomFocusRing and drawSystemFocusRing without the Path object. 15:23:56 ack suz 15:24:39 ack pau 15:24:40 ST: at Pearson, eduPub, everyone is moving away from Flash and Flex and moving towards canvas, so focus rings for driving magnification is very important to us in the ePub industry 15:25:06 PC: Would like the TF to reach consensus on what they want pushed to 5.1 15:25:37 RS: does anyone object that anything related to path get pushed to 5.1? 15:26:05 CN: we have to have a formal call for consensus. 15:26:49 CN: so you would like to get consensus that focus ring items will remain in the spec, but anything related to path be taken out of this LC 15:26:55 ST: It's also necessary to have a focus ring that matches the browser's ring for visual design 15:27:01 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #html-a11y 15:27:13 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/2dcontext/html5_canvas_CR/ 15:28:02 Revised Editor's draft: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/2dcontext/html5_canvas_CR/ 15:28:10 PC: longer list of at risk items in the current editors draft 15:28:43 ...path objects and all their methods. hit regions, all attributes of text metrics except width. 15:29:01 RS: when did focus rings get added to this list? 15:29:49 PC: there was a lot of discussion on the editors list. Chairs encouraged editors to come up with list of items with solid support 15:29:50 ...to be finalized when Rich gets back from vacation. 15:30:19 ...need to know which of these items the TF wants to remain at risk and what should move to Level2 15:31:03 ...sounds like anything related to path objects get moved to Level2. focus rings stuff will remain at risk because you believe they will be implemented. 15:31:16 RS: as far as hit regions go, you need a path for that, so move to Level2 15:31:26 ...ellipse would have to go to level 2 15:31:30 ...same for text metrics 15:31:43 ...so its just focus rings that don't require path objects 15:32:27 CN: so you want the a11y TF to say that focus rings should stay in the spec as at risk because we think it will be implemented. 15:33:02 ...for the other things, if these other items are important to a11y, we will suggest they move to level2 15:33:22 q+ 15:33:50 ...the question is, are we happy to bump any of this to Level2 15:34:01 q? 15:34:02 q+ 15:34:24 PC: yes, indicate moved to Level2, no position or remain at risk 15:34:32 ...as soon as possible 15:34:50 ACTION: chaals to frame the questions as outlined by Paul for a TF CfC 15:34:51 Created ACTION-213 - Frame the questions as outlined by paul for a tf cfc [on Charles McCathie Nevile - due 2013-11-07]. 15:35:00 ack jat 15:35:20 q+ 15:35:28 JM: I'd love to see a test page to see focus ring without path object. 15:35:36 ack cha 15:35:37 ...to see if its useful on its own 15:35:40 ack ju 15:36:22 http://www.w3.org/2013/09/accessible_canvas_clock.html 15:36:56 ack rich 15:37:29 RS: I think it would be nice to have a path object, but I see no one willing to implement it and we cannot wait for it since a hook for mag users is critical for a11y of canvas 15:37:55 ...there is not consensus in the browser community RE Path VS Shape 15:38:01 q+ 15:38:34 q+ 15:39:10 CN: my inclination is to test the consensus of the TF over the next week. 15:39:23 q+ 15:39:55 ...are the draw focus rings methods without path valuable enough to implement 15:39:55 q+ 15:40:05 ack chaa 15:40:15 ack cyns 15:40:16 ack cy 15:40:36 CS: rich can you describe how this currently works? 15:40:49 zakim, agenda? 15:40:49 I see 9 items remaining on the agenda: 15:40:50 1. upcoming meetings [from chaals] 15:40:50 2. plan for longdesc [from chaals] 15:40:50 4. Canvas (request from Microsoft, at-risk features, canvas sub-team) [from approx. 20 min via MarkS] 15:40:50 5. Publication plan for HTML5 Image Description Extension (reintegration or stand-alone) [from approx. 20 min via MarkS] 15:40:51 6. Meeting schedule for coming weeks (TPAC and Holidays) [from MarkS] 15:40:51 7. Other Business [from MarkS] 15:40:52 8. Identify Scribe for the next TF teleconference http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List [from MarkS] 15:40:52 9. be done [from MarkS] 15:40:52 10. canvas... [from chaals] 15:41:07 zakim, close agendum 10 15:41:07 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, chaals 15:41:22 zakim, close agendum 4 15:41:22 agendum 4, Canvas (request from Microsoft, at-risk features, canvas sub-team), closed 15:41:22 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:41:22 1. upcoming meetings [from chaals] 15:41:30 zakim, close agendum 1 15:41:30 agendum 1, upcoming meetings, closed 15:41:31 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:41:31 2. plan for longdesc [from chaals] 15:41:38 zakim, close agendum 6 15:41:38 agendum 6, Meeting schedule for coming weeks (TPAC and Holidays), closed 15:41:40 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:41:40 2. plan for longdesc [from chaals] 15:41:53 zakim, close agendum 9 15:41:53 agendum 9, be done, closed 15:41:54 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:41:54 2. plan for longdesc [from chaals] 15:41:58 RS: when you do drawing in canvas you have a current path. these functions, draw systemFocusRings, passes an object passes it to element, uses the system color/style to draw a focus ring. location info gives the bounding location info in the AAPI. when you use keyboard, you can focus on object and draw ring around it. 15:42:16 zakim, close agendum 5 15:42:16 agendum 5, Publication plan for HTML5 Image Description Extension (reintegration or stand-alone), closed 15:42:18 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:42:18 2. plan for longdesc [from chaals] 15:42:23 ...custom focus ring is similar, if system has high contrast focus ring, otherwise it passes it off to author to draw the focus ring 15:43:13 JM: the main thing I wanted to understand was what happens when canvas has multiple elements. 15:43:23 RS: this element is in fallback content. 15:43:32 ...which is mapped to AAPI 15:43:52 ...when those items in fallback content can receive focus, i can give it a location. 15:44:11 q? 15:44:14 ack jan 15:45:09 JS: I think we identified which features we are comfortable pushing to Level2. want the timeline for this to be sufficient that we can get these at risk items implemented. 15:45:28 PC: the current charter says that canvas is to come out of CR in this quarter. 15:45:44 q+ 15:45:54 ...this decision is up to the working group. I understand the sentiment. chairs have been working hard to figure this out. 15:46:41 ...plan is to take it back to LC, minimal LC, if there are features still at risk, come back to CR, WG to determine how long that would last. 15:46:59 ack rich 15:47:41 http://wps.pearsoned.com/wps/media/objects/13909/14243253/Patterns_System_Focus_ring.htm 15:47:52 -> http://www.w3.org/2013/09/accessible_canvas_clock.html Accessible Clock Demo that demos focus rings 15:48:19 q+ 15:49:02 CN: suzanne says custom focus rings are critical, jatinder says it may not be worth it without path 15:49:33 ack jay 15:49:49 ...ask that the canvas timeline be long enough to make implementations possible. 15:49:51 zakim, close this item 15:49:51 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, chaals 15:49:53 q? 15:49:56 ack me 15:50:03 zakim, close this item 15:50:03 agendum 10 closed 15:50:04 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:50:04 2. plan for longdesc [from chaals] 15:50:12 zakim, take up next agendum 15:50:12 agendum 2. "plan for longdesc" taken up [from chaals] 15:50:50 CN: we have finished our Last Call, we received 3 negative comments on the proposed resolutions. Others are supported. Will deal with negative responses. 15:51:16 ...there are factual errors in the arguments presented. 15:51:26 ...should come to resolution soon. 15:51:30 ...next steps: 15:51:56 ...my proposal is to drive the spec to a standalone recommendation (or as far as it can get with dependencies). 15:52:02 ...we can mark this as done. 15:52:26 q+ 15:52:44 ...ask HTML WG to make the decision regarding folding it in or not. 15:53:03 - +1.425.522.aaaa 15:53:07 -JatinderMann 15:53:25 ...what is the actual process for an extension spec? do we pass it back to the HTMLWG are we responsible for walking through the process, etc? 15:53:26 ack paul 15:53:29 "plan 2014" explains the answer to Charles question 15:53:36 q+ 15:54:13 PC: Plan 2014 says that if you want to fold back in, you need to get to CR and plan to exit CR before ??? the TF would then indicate that they wanted it back into HTML5 15:54:44 q+ 15:54:46 PC: your proposal to take to spec to rec and then roll it back in was never the intention. 15:54:54 ack ju 15:55:05 -paulc 15:55:11 JB: the question is even if we want to reintegrate it. 15:55:21 ...process is already well spelled out. 15:55:53 I got dropped and cannot rejoin. 15:55:54 ...question RE wanting to integrate it or not get more complicated as we get to later versions of the spec when use cases are still not properly understood. 15:56:46 "the conference is restricted" and i cannot rejoin. 15:57:45 +[Microsoft] 15:58:05 JS: i do want to underscore what Judy says. I have a strong concern of controlling when a longdesc attribute is obsoleted. There may be in time when we will be happy to see this happy, but controlling the timing on that is important 15:58:10 rrsagent, make minutes 15:58:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/10/31-html-a11y-minutes.html MarkS 15:58:10 Ralph got me back in. 15:58:28 yea, Ralph. 15:58:36 ack me 15:58:37 JS: I would like to see it go to recommendation. Propose to maintain it separately for that reason 15:58:52 q? 15:58:54 jaymunro has left #html-a11y 15:59:12 CN: the process of what spec is definitive is what the most recent one is. And we have the ability to rescind 16:00:25 ...do we want to, as a TF, make a stand alone spec. we appear to be well ahead of HTML at this point. 16:00:59 -Chaals 16:01:04 bye all 16:01:18 -Mark_Sadecki 16:01:26 -??P18 16:01:28 -Cynthia_Shelly 16:01:29 -Rich_Schwerdtfeger 16:01:33 -John_Foliot 16:01:34 -Adrian_Roselli 16:01:35 -Suzanne_Taylor 16:01:47 -paulc 16:01:49 -Judy 16:01:50 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has ended 16:01:50 Attendees were Mark_Sadecki, +1.425.522.aaaa, Cynthia_Shelly, Judy, paulc, Suzanne_Taylor, [IPcaller], Adrian_Roselli, JatinderMann, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, John_Foliot, [Microsoft] 16:01:54 rrsagent, make minutes 16:01:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/10/31-html-a11y-minutes.html MarkS 16:02:13 [My final comment (for the record): I am not too troubled by the risk of the HTML WG at some future point doing something bad to longdesc - the TF will continue to exist, and if it happens we will just have to go through the same process as we have of taking up the issue again and dealing with it...] 16:03:09 [Judy's comment after Charles exited call -- this seems like just the beginning of the discussion. Will need more.] 16:04:03 s/suzanne says custom focus rings are critical,/suzanne says system focus rings are critical, 16:04:17 [FWIW I agree with Judy on that - what we got sofar is just a (potentially not even representative) sample of views] 16:17:19 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #html-a11y 16:18:21 Joshue has joined #html-a11y 16:53:47 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #html-a11y 17:13:54 st2 has joined #html-a11y 17:45:32 chaals has joined #html-a11y 18:02:44 rrsagent make minutes 18:02:57 rrsagent, make minutes 18:02:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/10/31-html-a11y-minutes.html MarkS 18:11:00 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #html-a11y 19:36:50 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #html-a11y 21:29:53 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #html-a11y 22:13:11 Suzanne_T has joined #html-a11y