IRC log of rdf-wg on 2013-09-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:57:43 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdf-wg
- 14:57:43 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/09/11-rdf-wg-irc
- 14:57:45 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 14:57:45 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rdf-wg
- 14:57:47 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 73394
- 14:57:47 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
- 14:57:48 [trackbot]
- Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
- 14:57:48 [trackbot]
- Date: 11 September 2013
- 15:00:28 [TallTed]
- TallTed has changed the topic to: RDF WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/ -- agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.09.11
- 15:00:30 [Guus]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:00:30 [Zakim]
- SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, Guus
- 15:00:31 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, Guus, pchampin, AndyS, gavinc, TallTed, ivan, manu, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, sandro, ericP
- 15:00:42 [cgreer]
- cgreer has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:01:08 [gavinc]
- Zakim, start meeting
- 15:01:08 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'start meeting', gavinc
- 15:01:24 [gavinc]
- [08:00] <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, Guus
- 15:01:31 [TallTed]
- Zakim, this is rdfwg
- 15:01:32 [Zakim]
- ok, TallTed; that matches SW_RDFWG()11:00AM
- 15:01:33 [Zakim]
- + +1.707.874.aaaa
- 15:01:35 [TallTed]
- Zakim, who's here?
- 15:01:35 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, Sandro, GavinC, [IPcaller], OpenLink_Software, +1.707.874.aaaa
- 15:01:37 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see cgreer, Zakim, RRSAgent, Guus, pchampin, AndyS, gavinc, TallTed, ivan, manu, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, sandro, ericP
- 15:01:42 [cgreer]
- zakim, aaaa is me
- 15:01:43 [AndyS]
- zakim, IPcaller is me
- 15:01:43 [Zakim]
- +cgreer; got it
- 15:01:44 [Zakim]
- +AndyS; got it
- 15:01:47 [Zakim]
- +??P13
- 15:01:52 [Zakim]
- -AndyS
- 15:01:55 [pchampin]
- zakim, ??p13 is me
- 15:01:55 [TallTed]
- Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
- 15:01:55 [Zakim]
- +pchampin; got it
- 15:01:55 [Zakim]
- +TallTed; got it
- 15:01:57 [TallTed]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:01:57 [Zakim]
- TallTed should now be muted
- 15:02:14 [Guus]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:02:14 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:02:15 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, Sandro, GavinC, TallTed (muted), cgreer, pchampin, [IPcaller]
- 15:02:15 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see cgreer, Zakim, RRSAgent, Guus, pchampin, AndyS, gavinc, TallTed, ivan, manu, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, sandro, ericP
- 15:02:19 [AndyS]
- zakim, IPcaller is me
- 15:02:19 [Zakim]
- +AndyS; got it
- 15:02:25 [ivan]
- zakim, dial ivan-voip
- 15:02:25 [Zakim]
- ok, ivan; the call is being made
- 15:02:27 [Zakim]
- +Ivan
- 15:04:01 [Zakim]
- + +1.408.992.aabb
- 15:04:44 [pchampin]
- scribe: pchampin
- 15:05:24 [Guus]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:05:24 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, Sandro, GavinC, TallTed (muted), cgreer, pchampin, AndyS, Ivan, +1.408.992.aabb
- 15:05:26 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see cgreer, Zakim, RRSAgent, Guus, pchampin, AndyS, gavinc, TallTed, ivan, manu, davidwood, yvesr, trackbot, sandro, ericP
- 15:06:16 [pchampin]
- topic: Remaining work to be done
- 15:06:52 [pfps]
- pfps has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:06:58 [pchampin]
- sandro: discussed with the chairs this morning to set up a timeline of the things we need to do
- 15:07:02 [pfps]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:07:02 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, Sandro, GavinC, TallTed (muted), cgreer, pchampin, AndyS, Ivan, +1.408.992.aabb
- 15:07:10 [pfps]
- zakim, aabb is me
- 15:07:10 [Zakim]
- +pfps; got it
- 15:07:36 [pchampin]
- ... we have to provide some work if we don't find some documents to be left out
- 15:07:48 [pchampin]
- ... but it seems manageable
- 15:08:00 [pchampin]
- ... We need test suites for everything;
- 15:08:11 [AZ]
- AZ has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:08:28 [pchampin]
- ... most things have it, except for semantics - could probably adapt the one from 2004
- 15:08:36 [gavinc]
- N-Triples, N-Quads, and TriG publish perfectly fine with phantom JS. For Turtle I guess I need to figure out what all remaining differences between the published version and the dvcs version are.
- 15:09:14 [pchampin]
- ... We have to handle all the comments.
- 15:09:45 [Zakim]
- +AZ
- 15:09:52 [pchampin]
- ... We need implementations, with enough people on board.
- 15:10:36 [pchampin]
- Guus: we have to have all the documents on REC track in PR before the 1st of december,
- 15:11:03 [pchampin]
- ... as well as implementation reports for the tests.
- 15:11:18 [Zakim]
- +??P8
- 15:11:22 [AZ]
- Note on Dataset semantics soon ready for a first round of review
- 15:11:28 [yvesr]
- Zakim, ??P8 is me
- 15:11:28 [Zakim]
- +yvesr; got it
- 15:12:14 [pchampin]
- Sandro: in order to have all the inter-document links to work, we must all use the same version of ReSpec.
- 15:13:18 [pchampin]
- ... The documents should be reviewed during December and published in January;
- 15:13:30 [pchampin]
- ... by then, the WG will have nothing to do -- if everything goes smoothly.
- 15:14:02 [gavinc]
- https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/default/trig/tests
- 15:14:16 [pchampin]
- topic: Trig
- 15:14:52 [pchampin]
- Sandro: there are implementations, so we may be able to skip CR,
- 15:15:15 [pchampin]
- ... provided that we mention it in the LC.
- 15:16:38 [pchampin]
- Topic: admin
- 15:16:43 [pchampin]
- PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 4 Sep telecon: https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-09-04
- 15:17:56 [pchampin]
- RESOLVED to accept the minutes of the 4 Sep telecon
- 15:18:06 [pchampin]
- topic: Review of action items
- 15:18:20 [pchampin]
- Guus: Arnaud completed his action re. the RDF-JSON note
- 15:18:50 [ivan]
- q+
- 15:19:29 [pchampin]
- AndyS: the Trig document is ready today
- 15:20:00 [gavinc]
- ACTION-284 is done
- 15:20:17 [pchampin]
- Ivan: the i18n WG has taken our comments into account
- 15:20:54 [pchampin]
- topic: N-Triples / N-Quads
- 15:21:02 [pchampin]
- Guus: these documents have been published
- 15:21:12 [pchampin]
- http://www.w3.org/News/2013#entry-9932
- 15:21:59 [pchampin]
- Gavin: do we have a timeline for LC, in order to decide about the features at risk?
- 15:22:18 [pchampin]
- topic: Trig
- 15:22:23 [AndyS]
- TriG LC -- 3 week LC i.e. minimum
- 15:22:27 [pchampin]
- Guus: we need to decide early november
- 15:23:22 [pchampin]
- topic: LC Comments on Concepts, Semantics
- 15:23:30 [pchampin]
- Guus: we can not look at the comments
- 15:24:17 [pchampin]
- ... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Sep/0009.html is merely editorial (ReSpec issues)
- 15:24:35 [pchampin]
- ... ISSUE-141
- 15:25:38 [pchampin]
- Ivan: ISSUE-141 (Fragment identifiers) came up in our comments with ITS
- 15:25:56 [pchampin]
- ... I don't believe it was meant as a required change in our documents
- 15:25:59 [AndyS]
- ISSUE-141?
- 15:25:59 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-141 -- Fragment Identifiers (Sebastian Hellmann) -- open
- 15:25:59 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/141
- 15:26:27 [pchampin]
- ... Somebody should ask Sebastian what he really meant.
- 15:28:01 [Zakim]
- -AndyS
- 15:28:13 [pchampin]
- ... Sebastian made a point during a discussion that he didn't mention in his mail:
- 15:28:34 [pchampin]
- ... something in the FragID section of 2004 disappeared in the new spec
- 15:28:50 [pchampin]
- ... (scribe didn't precisely caught up what was that something...)
- 15:29:05 [pchampin]
- ... but I'm not sure he wants it to change.
- 15:29:25 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:29:27 [AndyS]
- zakim, IPCaller is me
- 15:29:27 [Zakim]
- +AndyS; got it
- 15:29:36 [AndyS]
- fg
- 15:29:43 [gavinc]
- I don't see anything missing from the new Fragment Identifiers section, except that the old one was normative and the new one isn't?
- 15:30:23 [pchampin]
- Guus: can you answer his question?
- 15:30:29 [gavinc]
- It's a non-normative section in RDF 1.1
- 15:30:30 [gavinc]
- do we care?
- 15:30:54 [pfps]
- ship it.
- 15:31:50 [pchampin]
- ACTION Ivan to respond to ISSUE-141
- 15:31:50 [trackbot]
- 'Ivan' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., ivan, imikhail).
- 15:32:38 [pfps]
- q+
- 15:32:56 [pchampin]
- Guus: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Sep/0005.html
- 15:33:15 [ivan]
- q-
- 15:33:39 [pchampin]
- ... we've discussed this at length,
- 15:33:49 [pchampin]
- ... I feel there is not much we can do here
- 15:35:30 [pchampin]
- ACTION pfps to draft a response to Jeremy
- 15:35:30 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-290 - Draft a response to jeremy [on Peter Patel-Schneider - due 2013-09-18].
- 15:36:07 [pchampin]
- Topic: test suite for semantics
- 15:36:29 [pchampin]
- pfps: what new stuff is required (compared to the previous test suite)?
- 15:37:40 [AZ]
- I can help
- 15:37:46 [pchampin]
- ... but I can start.
- 15:38:00 [cgreer]
- cgreer has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:38:06 [AZ]
- I can look at the old test suite
- 15:38:31 [pchampin]
- Guus: so Peter can look at the new document, and Antoine look at the old test suite.
- 15:39:02 [pchampin]
- ACTION pfps to start the new test suite document for semantics
- 15:39:02 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-291 - Start the new test suite document for semantics [on Peter Patel-Schneider - due 2013-09-18].
- 15:39:20 [pchampin]
- ACTION AZ to review the previous semantics test-suite
- 15:39:21 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-292 - Review the previous semantics test-suite [on Antoine Zimmermann - due 2013-09-18].
- 15:39:59 [pchampin]
- Guus: I think there were no comments on semantics.
- 15:40:04 [Zakim]
- -Sandro
- 15:40:10 [pchampin]
- pfps: Jeremy's comment is on semantics.
- 15:41:10 [gavinc]
- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments
- 15:42:02 [pchampin]
- Guus: we can do a similar page for comments on other documents
- 15:43:36 [pchampin]
- topic: Turtle
- 15:43:52 [pchampin]
- Guus: Sandro pointed out that there are still issues about comments
- 15:44:41 [gavinc]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Apr/0057.html
- 15:44:46 [pchampin]
- ... some comments being not properly tracked.
- 15:46:06 [pchampin]
- Gavin: but I don't have an answer to this comment.
- 15:48:00 [pchampin]
- ... Also, it seems that the published version is not one recorded in the VCS.
- 15:48:15 [gavinc]
- ACTION Gavin update turtle ED to match published Turtle CR document
- 15:48:16 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-293 - Update turtle ed to match published turtle cr document [on Gavin Carothers - due 2013-09-18].
- 15:48:43 [pchampin]
- Guus: how are we with the implementation report?
- 15:48:54 [pchampin]
- Gavin: doing great: we have 7 implementations.
- 15:49:48 [Zakim]
- -Ivan
- 15:49:53 [Zakim]
- -TallTed
- 15:49:54 [Zakim]
- -GavinC
- 15:49:54 [Zakim]
- -AZ
- 15:49:55 [Zakim]
- -AndyS
- 15:49:56 [pchampin]
- Guus: end of the agenda; next week we'll decide on LC for Trig.
- 15:50:02 [pchampin]
- ... Adjourned
- 15:50:03 [Zakim]
- -cgreer
- 15:50:22 [Zakim]
- -pfps
- 15:51:51 [Zakim]
- -yvesr
- 15:52:38 [Guus]
- pa, do you want help with the editing?
- 15:52:50 [Guus]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 15:52:50 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 15:52:50 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been Guus_Schreiber, Sandro, GavinC, +1.707.874.aaaa, cgreer, AndyS, pchampin, TallTed, Ivan, +1.408.992.aabb, pfps, AZ, yvesr
- 15:52:58 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 15:52:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/09/11-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot
- 15:52:59 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 15:52:59 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items