14:57:34 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #html-media
14:57:34 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-irc
14:57:35 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
14:57:35 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #html-media
14:57:37 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 63342
14:57:37 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see HTML_WG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
14:57:38 <trackbot> Meeting: HTML Media Task Force Teleconference
14:57:38 <trackbot> Date: 27 August 2013
14:57:47 <glenn> zakim, this will be HTML
14:57:47 <Zakim> ok, glenn; I see HTML_WG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
14:58:28 <Zakim> HTML_WG()11:00AM has now started
14:58:35 <Zakim> +??P5
14:58:40 <glenn> zakim, ??p5 is me
14:58:40 <Zakim> +glenn; got it
14:58:42 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
14:59:06 <paulc> paulc has joined #html-media
14:59:39 <pal> pal has joined #html-media
15:00:01 <paulc> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2013Aug/0038.html
15:00:14 <joesteele> joesteele has joined #html-media
15:00:26 <paulc> trackbot, start meeting
15:00:28 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
15:00:30 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 63342
15:00:30 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see HTML_WG()11:00AM scheduled to start now
15:00:31 <trackbot> Meeting: HTML Media Task Force Teleconference
15:00:31 <trackbot> Date: 27 August 2013
15:00:37 <BobLund> BobLund has joined #html-media
15:00:43 <paulc> zakim, who is on the phone?
15:00:43 <Zakim> I notice HTML_WG()11:00AM has restarted
15:00:45 <Zakim> On the phone I see glenn, [Microsoft]
15:00:48 <Zakim> +niels_thorwirth
15:00:54 <paulc> zakim, [Microsoft] is me
15:00:55 <Zakim> +paulc; got it
15:00:58 <markw> markw has joined #html-media
15:01:10 <Zakim> +[Adobe]
15:01:10 <davide> davide has joined #html-media
15:01:20 <joesteele> Zakim, Adobe has joesteele
15:01:22 <Zakim> +joesteele; got it
15:01:30 <Zakim> +davide
15:01:50 <Zakim> +markw
15:01:54 <Niels_VMX> Niels_VMX has joined #html-media
15:02:10 <Zakim> +pladd
15:02:17 <JamilEllis> JamilEllis has joined #html-media
15:02:22 <paulc> zakim, who is on the phone?
15:02:22 <Zakim> On the phone I see glenn, paulc, niels_thorwirth, [Adobe], davide, markw, pladd
15:02:25 <Zakim> [Adobe] has joesteele
15:02:34 <pladd> pladd has joined #html-media
15:03:14 <Zakim> +pal
15:03:23 <ddorwin> ddorwin has joined #html-media
15:03:23 <pladd> Zakim, who is on the phone?
15:03:23 <Zakim> On the phone I see glenn, paulc, niels_thorwirth, [Adobe], davide, markw, pladd, pal
15:03:25 <Zakim> [Adobe] has joesteele
15:03:32 <joesteele> scribenick: joesteele
15:04:10 <Zakim> +BobLund
15:04:20 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
15:04:23 <adrianba> zakim, [Microsoft] is me
15:04:23 <Zakim> +adrianba; got it
15:04:32 <joesteele> Chair: paulc
15:04:46 <paulc> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2013Aug/0038.html
15:04:46 <joesteele> Topic: Agenda
15:05:00 <Zakim> +ddorwin
15:05:11 <joesteele> paulc: not sure where to start on the bugs
15:05:22 <joesteele> Zakim, who is here?
15:05:22 <Zakim> On the phone I see glenn, paulc, niels_thorwirth, [Adobe], davide, markw, pladd, pal, BobLund, adrianba, ddorwin
15:05:24 <Zakim> [Adobe] has joesteele
15:05:24 <Zakim> On IRC I see ddorwin, pladd, JamilEllis, Niels_VMX, davide, markw, BobLund, joesteele, pal, paulc, Zakim, RRSAgent, adrianba, glenn, trackbot, wseltzer
15:05:33 <joesteele> Topic: Heartbeat Docs
15:05:53 <paulc> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Aug/0023.html
15:06:14 <joesteele> paulc: last week looked like Adrian agreed to produce the stable doc - checked with Robin and had not seen a response from EME editors
15:06:34 <joesteele> adrianba: said last week we would do in two weeks, can't publish this week
15:06:54 <joesteele> paulc: saw reference to that - was that the consensus?
15:07:09 <joesteele> ... were there bugs we should look at and review?
15:07:52 <joesteele> adrianba: conclusion was that we did not need to wait for specific bugs, but felt that with planned work we would have more up to date spec next week
15:08:04 <joesteele> paulc: trying to have two weeks or ready this week?
15:08:05 <jdsmith> jdsmith has joined #html-media
15:08:09 <joesteele> adrianba: not sure
15:08:26 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
15:08:29 <joesteele> paulc: moratorium this week, some docs will be published next week, e.g. MSE Last Call
15:08:44 <joesteele> ... not obvious that we need to do a CFC at the working group
15:08:56 <joesteele> ... need a stable draft to do that
15:09:02 <joesteele> ... out of this meeting
15:09:35 <joesteele> ... can the participants today look at agenda today and decide which items we want to close today
15:09:35 <markw> I'm just completing ACTION-37 now
15:12:04 <joesteele> joesteele: not ready on bug#17673 yet (action-25) -- apologies
15:12:27 <joesteele> paulc: are you suggesting action-31 is moot now?
15:12:46 <joesteele> ddorwin: tried to resolve a couple of weeks ago, realized we had not made a decision yet
15:12:55 <joesteele> ... last comment refers to that
15:13:11 <joesteele> paulc: any other bugs we should focus on for candidate heartbeat?
15:13:14 <adrianba> q+
15:13:48 <joesteele> adrianba: did close ACTION-30 this morning
15:13:56 <joesteele> ... closing bug#20966
15:14:17 <joesteele> ... reason I had not done this till now was I wanted to add the privacy considerations spec
15:14:35 <joesteele> s/considerations spec/considerations language/
15:14:50 <adrianba> q-
15:14:55 <joesteele> Topic: Bug#18515
15:15:02 <adrianba> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18515#c13
15:15:19 <joesteele> paulc: believe this is the comment to look at
15:15:53 <joesteele> adrianba: ACTION-36 on Gary and I to review the comments David had made and decide what we thought
15:16:09 <joesteele> ... at the point where playback locks because of a piece of encrypted media and no key is available
15:16:17 <joesteele> ... consensus is that playback should stall
15:16:27 <joesteele> ... should media state of the element actually change to reflect the stall
15:16:34 <joesteele> ... or should stall just be implicit?
15:16:44 <joesteele> ... our position is to not change the ready state
15:16:49 <glenn> zakim, who's noisy?
15:16:59 <joesteele> ... reason is that is you are using MSE and EME together
15:17:02 <Zakim> glenn, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: paulc (92%), adrianba (75%)
15:17:16 <joesteele> ... using playback code for adaptive streaming
15:17:37 <joesteele> ... changing the ready state might change the playback code and trigger downloading more data
15:17:43 <joesteele> ... proboably not the right thing to do
15:18:56 <ddorwin> q+
15:18:57 <adrianba> q+
15:19:00 <joesteele> s/proboably/probably/
15:19:06 <markw> q+
15:19:07 <joesteele> joesteele: ok
15:19:07 <paulc> ack dd
15:19:23 <joesteele> ddorwin: still need to figure out the wording - any suggestions?
15:19:28 <adrianba> q- later
15:20:12 <joesteele> markw: proposal is that the media element could still be playing, and the fact that we are waiting for a key is represented on the key session?
15:20:21 <Zakim> +[Microsoft.a]
15:20:23 <Zakim> -paulc
15:20:34 <joesteele> ... isn't that strange that the media element cannot play although it indicates it can?
15:20:35 <paulc> zakim, [Microsoft.a] is me
15:20:35 <Zakim> +paulc; got it
15:20:51 <paulc> (swapping phones to avoid the air flow noise in my office)
15:21:00 <joesteele> adrianba: if you have a counterproposal that can handle the adaptive case, we should consider that
15:21:20 <joesteele> markw: need to check but let's go ahead
15:21:28 <ddorwin> q+ to say that I'm fine not changing readyState, but any state should be reflected in HTMLMediaElement
15:21:32 <adrianba> q?
15:21:41 <paulc> ack markw
15:21:58 <joesteele> adrianba: comment that we still have action-31 to define some text
15:22:06 <joesteele> ... does David still want to own that action?
15:22:22 <joesteele> paulc: so action-31 not covered by your proposal?
15:22:27 <paulc> ack ad
15:22:45 <joesteele> adrianba: action-31 was the proposal text, our action-36 was to review the question which we have done
15:22:58 <joesteele> ... sounds like we have consensus on how to resolve, just need the text now
15:23:13 <joesteele> paulc: david, was that your point?
15:23:33 <joesteele> ddorwin: yes, we have mostly consensus on what to change
15:23:43 <joesteele> ... just not how to reflect it
15:23:51 <joesteele> ... should not change the media session to reflect it
15:24:01 <joesteele> ... maybe in the media element or not at all
15:24:02 <adrianba> q+
15:24:07 <ddorwin> ack dd
15:24:07 <Zakim> ddorwin, you wanted to say that I'm fine not changing readyState, but any state should be reflected in HTMLMediaElement
15:24:10 <joesteele> ... just have a pseudo-state like it is currently
15:24:23 <paulc> ack ad
15:24:44 <joesteele> adrianba: I think it was clear that you would have a session in a pending state to get into this situation
15:24:58 <joesteele> ... but it is possible that you have a needKey but have not created the session yet
15:25:16 <joesteele> ... don't think I have a problem with adding something to the media element that indicates that
15:25:34 <joesteele> ddorwin: what would that be? event, attribute
15:25:58 <joesteele> adrianba: maybe an attribute, parallel to media element, like an enum
15:26:13 <joesteele> ... think we get events already that lead to this
15:26:22 <joesteele> ... may not need ot know the point at which it stalled
15:26:29 <joesteele> ... what would the app do with the event?
15:26:31 <joesteele> q+
15:26:40 <joesteele> ddorwin: not sure we need to reflect it
15:27:08 <joesteele> ... we could add text about what the UA should do
15:27:15 <joesteele> ... not about what we provide to the app
15:27:26 <joesteele> ... not sure what the app would do
15:27:47 <joesteele> adrianba: could add it but not sure if it would be useful
15:28:12 <joesteele> ... maybe start with just being clear in the spec that you are supposed to stall waiting for the key
15:28:24 <joesteele> ... if we find some gaps implementing then we can look at adding it
15:28:33 <joesteele> ddorwin: that sounds good to me
15:28:56 <joesteele> ... cpoy "future data or not future data from the spec" or I can seach around
15:29:01 <paulc> ack joe
15:29:59 <joesteele> joesteele: not worth adding until we have implementation experience or specific need
15:30:15 <ddorwin> somewhere on this page: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-0.html
15:30:15 <joesteele> paulc: can we point to that text directly?
15:30:36 <joesteele> paulc: section 4.8?
15:31:38 <joesteele> what about 4.8.10.7 "Ready states"?
15:31:48 <ddorwin> Maybe we should fire |waiting|: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-0.html#event-media-waiting
15:31:49 <joesteele> for text I mean
15:32:00 <adrianba> There is a definition of a blocked media element: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-0.html#blocked-media-element
15:33:01 <joesteele> ddorwin: we are asking for existing text that could reflect when we are waiting for a key
15:33:08 <joesteele> ... nothing exact right now
15:33:19 <joesteele> ... about what "should happen" in that state
15:33:32 <joesteele> ... probably have to make it up
15:33:44 <joesteele> paulc: should we resolve now or assign to the editors?
15:34:00 <joesteele> ... or could leave ACTION-31 open until David can propose some text?
15:34:11 <joesteele> ddorwin: don't need to block the heartbeat on this one
15:34:16 <joesteele> ... has some existing text
15:34:37 <joesteele> paulc: reopened ACTION-31 at original state
15:34:47 <joesteele> ... David you still have this action
15:34:47 <adrianba> close ACTION-36
15:34:47 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-36.
15:35:02 <paulc> ACTION-31?
15:35:02 <trackbot> ACTION-31 -- David Dorwin to Propose text to resolve bug 18515 -- due 2013-09-10 -- OPEN
15:35:02 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/31
15:35:36 <joesteele> RESOLVED: David will attend the ACTION-31 with text proposed by ACTION-36
15:35:46 <joesteele> s/attend the/attend to/
15:35:54 <joesteele> Topic: Bug#20966
15:36:04 <joesteele> paulc: you closed ACTION-30?
15:36:07 <joesteele> ACTION-30?
15:36:07 <trackbot> ACTION-30 -- Adrian Bateman to Implement closing 20966 -- due 2013-08-27 -- CLOSED
15:36:07 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/30
15:36:40 <joesteele> paulc: referred to comment #9 that it was resolved pointing to August 6th minutes
15:36:41 <paulc> See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20966#c9
15:37:02 <joesteele> adrianba: this bug has been around for awhile and reopened without specific information
15:37:18 <joesteele> ... just realized that I need to remove the note in the document about the state of this bug
15:37:44 <joesteele> ... bug#20965 is the main placeholder for privacy issues
15:38:07 <joesteele> glenn: 22909 is the generic bug I would recommend to handle this
15:38:41 <joesteele> paulc: if this bug depends on bug#22909 how do we resolve?
15:38:54 <joesteele> adrianba: looks like we have duplicate bugs
15:39:13 <joesteele> ... 20966 is a dup of 20965 unless there is more information
15:39:28 <joesteele> ... I resolved that adding the privacy condierations section later today
15:39:36 <joesteele> ... should resolve the other also
15:39:57 <paulc> Security considerations? https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22909#c1
15:39:59 <joesteele> paulc: if you add this security considerations section - that is from this comment
15:40:04 <joesteele> ... ?
15:40:21 <joesteele> adrianba: we have ended up with lots of bugs that say the same thing
15:40:39 <joesteele> ... original plan was to add this section with a placeholder
15:40:57 <joesteele> ... added the text from 22910 verbatim from Glenns proposal without review
15:41:01 <joesteele> ... needs review
15:41:14 <joesteele> ... bit more discussion on the security considerations
15:41:23 <joesteele> ... on whether the right suggestions are being made
15:41:24 <paulc> Privacy considerations are proposed in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22910#c1
15:41:42 <joesteele> ... still recommend keeping the master bug open
15:41:56 <joesteele> ... from prior to FPWD
15:42:32 <joesteele> paulc: so 20966 is resolved as NEEDSINFO
15:42:55 <joesteele> ... what do we do with the dependcey on bug#22909?
15:43:05 <joesteele> s/dependcey/dependency/
15:43:16 <joesteele> adrianba: remove it
15:43:23 <joesteele> ddorwin: think it is useful as a reference
15:44:03 <joesteele> glenn: 20966 has been closed and ir makred as dependant -- dependency can continue to exist
15:44:21 <joesteele> s/makred/marked.
15:44:23 <joesteele> s/makred/marked/
15:45:08 <joesteele> paulc: adrian you were proposing to add a security section as per bug#22909 and privacy section from bug#22910
15:45:12 <joesteele> ... does that resolve?
15:45:17 <joesteele> adrianba: I believe so
15:45:20 <paulc> Security section from https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22909#c2
15:45:36 <paulc> Privacy section from tps://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22910#c1
15:45:49 <paulc> That can resolve 22909 and 22910 leaving open 20965
15:45:52 <joesteele> paulc: this can resolve these bugs, leaving open 20965
15:46:01 <joesteele> adrianba: yes
15:46:58 <joesteele> paulc: so bug#20965 will remain open as the master bug
15:47:01 <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20965
15:47:06 <Zakim> -BobLund
15:47:57 <joesteele> RESOLVED bug#22909, bug#22910, bug#20966 will be closed and bug#20965 will remain open
15:48:22 <joesteele> paulc: other candidate bug#17673 was mentioned but joe said is not done
15:48:28 <joesteele> ... any other items we can look at?
15:49:23 <joesteele> ... ACTION-35 was on me -- still need to do it
15:49:33 <joesteele> ... putting in heartbeat means this is slightly changed
15:49:56 <joesteele> ACTION-37?
15:49:56 <trackbot> ACTION-37 -- Mark Watson to Update wiki provided for bug 20944 to cover the case where the drm is supporting by the os -- due 2013-08-20 -- CLOSED
15:49:56 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/37
15:50:04 <joesteele> markw: did that this morning
15:50:16 <joesteele> Topic: Bug#20944
15:50:47 <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20944
15:50:52 <joesteele> s/ tps:\/\//https:\/\//
15:51:00 <paulc> What is the status with this bug given ACTION-37 is closed.
15:51:03 <paulc> ACTION-37?
15:51:03 <trackbot> ACTION-37 -- Mark Watson to Update wiki provided for bug 20944 to cover the case where the drm is supporting by the os -- due 2013-08-20 -- CLOSED
15:51:03 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/37
15:51:20 <paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20944#c30
15:51:57 <joesteele> glenn: I can implement the change to the registry text as suggested
15:52:21 <joesteele> paulc: on Feb 13th we added a note to the abstract that this was an open issue
15:52:32 <markw> q+
15:52:36 <joesteele> ... if we close would need to make that cascading change
15:52:44 <paulc> Glenn's proposal in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20944#c15
15:52:55 <joesteele> ... comment #15 is where you proposed a resolution
15:53:11 <joesteele> ... simple registry and informative note, clearkey as the first entry
15:53:41 <joesteele> ... Robert Callahan said "this is not as strong as I proposed"
15:54:14 <joesteele> glenn: not clear what Robert is proposing - he has not written it down clearly
15:54:44 <joesteele> ... I referred to this in comment#22 with the draft registry text
15:54:54 <joesteele> ... comments since then by a number of people
15:55:10 <joesteele> paulc: maybe best best is to implement the changes to the wiki and the doc to refer to wiki
15:55:23 <ddorwin> q+
15:55:26 <joesteele> ... and then ask for feedback in the status section and leave the bug open
15:55:33 <paulc> ack markw
15:55:34 <joesteele> markw: open issues
15:55:59 <joesteele> ... I think what Robert proposed is fairly clear
15:56:35 <paulc> Mark's comment https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20944#c23
15:56:40 <joesteele> ... one -- we require that a key system that uses private system APIs be documented
15:56:48 <paulc> Mark's suggestion is still outstanding.
15:57:03 <joesteele> ... second -- Roberts question is to ask why can't we do his proposal
15:57:25 <joesteele> ... think we should explain why this would not work (CDM implementors)
15:57:35 <paulc> ack dd
15:57:44 <Zakim> -pladd
15:58:00 <joesteele> ddorwin: as far as adding to the spec, not sure whether folks would use it or that this would solve anything
15:58:05 <markw> s/private system APIs be documented/private system APIs be not allowed to be registered/
15:58:12 <joesteele> ... we do have an improve interop bug already
15:58:21 <joesteele> s/bug already/issue already/
15:58:37 <joesteele> paulc: would like to resolve the issues that Mark pointed to
15:58:54 <joesteele> ... any volunteers?
15:59:19 <joesteele> glenn: two implementors on this call (Microsoft and Adobe), maybe Cisco as well
15:59:28 <joesteele> joesteele: Google is also a CDM implementor
15:59:45 <pal> q+
15:59:47 <joesteele> glenn: most specs require very strict NDAs to get the keys and/or implememtations
15:59:57 <paulc> ack pal
16:00:22 <joesteele> pal: I am not sure how the W3C or any standards org can compel an implementor to publish their source code
16:00:24 <markw> @pal: the proposal is a specification, not source code
16:00:33 <joesteele> ... could be thirdparty source as well
16:00:49 <joesteele> ... don't see how this can be resolved except by making this requirement
16:00:57 <markw> @pal: and we can't compel anyone, but Robert question is to ask why we can't make it a requirement of compliance to the specification
16:01:02 <joesteele> paulc: will put this bug#20944 on the agenda for next time
16:01:23 <joesteele> pal: what information would you like to see to help the group close the bug?
16:01:38 <joesteele> paulc: Marks comment #23 should be either refuted or supported
16:01:58 <joesteele> .. and also respond to Roberts question about why we can't do what he is suggesting
16:02:02 <markw> q+
16:02:56 <paulc> ack markw
16:03:32 <joesteele> markw: my first suggestion seems to be non-controversial about public APIs, second suggestion about private APIs is more interesting, should we require that to be documented
16:03:34 <Zakim> -adrianba
16:03:57 <joesteele> paulc: suggesting that we continue the dialog along these lines
16:04:41 <joesteele> pal: Marks first suggestion is captured in comment #30
16:04:57 <joesteele> ... other part of the comment on private APIs - where is that captured?
16:05:01 <joesteele> markw: comment #23
16:05:41 <joesteele> pal: open comments on those two suggestions, but not sure that would satisfy the questioner
16:06:05 <joesteele> ... the commenter had asked for specific opinions from implementors, will bug remain open until then?
16:06:09 <joesteele> paulc: won't predict
16:06:15 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:06:15 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:06:21 <joesteele> Zakim, who is here?
16:06:21 <Zakim> On the phone I see glenn, niels_thorwirth, [Adobe], davide, markw, pal, ddorwin, [Microsoft], paulc
16:06:23 <Zakim> [Adobe] has joesteele
16:06:23 <Zakim> On IRC I see jdsmith, ddorwin, JamilEllis, Niels_VMX, davide, markw, joesteele, pal, paulc, Zakim, RRSAgent, adrianba, glenn, trackbot, wseltzer
16:06:43 <joesteele> paulc: adrian do you have clear instructions on what to do?
16:06:53 <joesteele> ... assume he does
16:07:11 <joesteele> ... past time but we will continue to propose we meet until we have closed more bugs
16:07:24 <Zakim> -pal
16:07:26 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:07:26 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:07:28 <Zakim> -davide
16:07:31 <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
16:07:32 <Zakim> -glenn
16:07:33 <Zakim> -[Adobe]
16:07:36 <Zakim> -niels_thorwirth
16:07:37 <markw> @pal: it may not be obvious to people why the drm specifications are covered by NDAs etc. when a more common approach to security is to publish algorithms (NIST etc.). If noone can explain why that approach shouldn't apply to DRM too, why not publish is ?
16:07:41 <Zakim> -markw
16:07:49 <Zakim> -ddorwin
16:07:50 <Zakim> -paulc
16:07:51 <Zakim> HTML_WG()11:00AM has ended
16:07:51 <Zakim> Attendees were glenn, niels_thorwirth, paulc, joesteele, davide, markw, pladd, pal, BobLund, adrianba, ddorwin, [Microsoft]
16:07:58 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:07:58 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:08:49 <joesteele> s/what about/joesteele\: what about/
16:08:52 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:08:52 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:09:20 <joesteele> s/RESOLVED/RESOLUTION/
16:09:23 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:09:23 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:10:06 <joesteele> s/from tps/from https/
16:10:07 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:10:07 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:10:36 <joesteele> s/s\/makred\/marked\///
16:10:37 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:10:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:11:19 <joesteele> s/implememtations/implementations/
16:11:20 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:11:20 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:13:27 <joesteele> Zakim, bye
16:13:27 <Zakim> Zakim has left #html-media
16:13:39 <joesteele> rrsagent, generate minutes
16:13:39 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-html-media-minutes.html joesteele
16:13:44 <joesteele> rrsagent, bye
16:13:44 <RRSAgent> I see no action items