IRC log of pf on 2013-08-19

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:01:19 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #pf
14:01:19 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/08/19-pf-irc
14:01:21 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs member
14:01:23 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be WAI_PF
14:01:23 [Zakim]
WAI_PF matches both WAI_PFWG(HTML A11Y)9:00AM and WAI_PFWG(ARIA)10:00AM
14:01:24 [trackbot]
Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
14:01:24 [trackbot]
Date: 19 August 2013
14:01:39 [richardschwerdtfeger]
RRSAgent, make log public
14:01:44 [richardschwerdtfeger]
chair: Rich
14:01:54 [richardschwerdtfeger]
meeting: W3C WAI-PF ARIA Caucus
14:03:47 [janina]
trackbot, start meeting
14:03:49 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs member
14:03:50 [clown]
zakim, who's here?
14:03:50 [Zakim]
apparently WAI_PF()12:00PM has ended, clown
14:03:51 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be WAI_PF
14:03:52 [trackbot]
Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
14:03:52 [trackbot]
Date: 19 August 2013
14:03:52 [Zakim]
On IRC I see RRSAgent, clown, richardschwerdtfeger, jongund, janina, scott_gonzalez, Zakim, trackbot
14:03:52 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot, I see WAI_PFWG(ARIA)10:00AM already started
14:04:22 [clown]
zakim, who's here?
14:04:22 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Jon_Gunderson, [GVoice], ??P5, Rich
14:04:22 [janina]
agenda?
14:04:23 [Zakim]
On IRC I see RRSAgent, clown, richardschwerdtfeger, jongund, janina, scott_gonzalez, Zakim, trackbot
14:04:33 [jcraig]
jcraig has joined #pf
14:04:38 [clown]
zakim, GVoice is Joseph_Scheuhammer
14:04:38 [Zakim]
+Joseph_Scheuhammer; got it
14:04:45 [clown]
zakim, I am Joseph_Scheuhammer
14:04:45 [Zakim]
ok, clown, I now associate you with Joseph_Scheuhammer
14:05:14 [janina]
zakim, who's here?
14:05:14 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Jon_Gunderson, Joseph_Scheuhammer, ??P5, Rich
14:05:15 [Zakim]
On IRC I see jcraig, RRSAgent, clown, richardschwerdtfeger, jongund, janina, scott_gonzalez, Zakim, trackbot
14:05:24 [janina]
zakim, ??P5 is me
14:05:24 [Zakim]
+janina; got it
14:05:26 [richardschwerdtfeger]
RRSAgent, make log public
14:05:30 [richardschwerdtfeger]
chair: Rich
14:05:42 [richardschwerdtfeger]
Meeting: W3C WAI-PF ARIA Caucus
14:05:54 [Zakim]
+James_Craig
14:07:38 [richardschwerdtfeger]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2013Aug/0027.html
14:07:45 [MichaelC]
MichaelC has joined #pf
14:08:38 [Zakim]
+Cooper
14:09:27 [jcraig]
scribe: jcraig
14:09:58 [jcraig]
TOPIC: next steps on @aria-describedat
14:10:23 [jcraig]
RS: group thought taking an ID would be a good idea
14:10:26 [jcraig]
q+
14:10:32 [MichaelC]
q+
14:11:07 [MichaelC]
ack j
14:11:36 [MichaelC]
ack me
14:11:38 [jcraig]
RS: IDREF of a@ref, link@rel, iframe, etc.
14:12:17 [jcraig]
MC: I think this goes against the idea of @decribedat
14:12:31 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q+
14:12:36 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:12:51 [jcraig]
ack r
14:13:03 [janina]
q+
14:13:24 [jcraig]
MC: author confusion with @aria-describedby, additional processing for UA, etc.
14:14:31 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:14:35 [jcraig]
RS: One example use is what description has multiple translations, like source sets or media tracks.
14:15:33 [MichaelC]
q+
14:15:42 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q+
14:15:56 [jcraig]
MC: confusion is that one is the description contents, and the other is a link to the description. Authors may not understand that.
14:16:00 [jcraig]
ack j
14:16:02 [jcraig]
ack m
14:16:37 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:17:01 [clown]
q+ where is the email that outlines the rationale for the new syntax for describeat?
14:17:22 [jcraig]
MC: "at" (as in describedat) indicates a pointer. If we want to repurpose this one, we should rename it too. possibly @aria-descreference?
14:17:24 [MichaelC]
q+ to propose we add both ¨describedat¨ with URI and ¨descriptionreference¨ with IDREF / href
14:17:35 [jcraig]
aria-descref?
14:17:56 [MichaelC]
ack me
14:17:56 [Zakim]
MichaelC, you wanted to propose we add both ¨describedat¨ with URI and ¨descriptionreference¨ with IDREF / href
14:18:25 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:18:41 [jcraig]
RS: consensus is that @longdesc is not enough.
14:18:53 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:18:59 [MichaelC]
ack r
14:19:38 [jcraig]
MC: @aria-describedat would still take a URI. If we need an IDREF to a linking element (e.g. link, iframe), that should be a different attr
14:19:44 [MichaelC]
q+
14:20:10 [janina]
Head of email thread (with 2 messages):
14:20:11 [janina]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2013Aug/0003.html
14:21:02 [jcraig]
MC: I am not arguing against the IDREF to linking element, but saying we still need the IDREF use case
14:21:19 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:21:22 [MichaelC]
ack me
14:24:03 [janina]
q+
14:24:09 [clown]
q+ for an example of how to use describedat with an iframe element
14:24:28 [jongund]
1+
14:24:32 [jongund]
q+
14:24:42 [jcraig]
RS: Multiple descriptions in different languages, and potentially different media formats, different grade level?
14:24:56 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:24:57 [jcraig]
ack j
14:25:07 [jcraig]
ack jan
14:25:47 [jcraig]
JS: @aria-describedby is auto-spoken, where this new would be be an on-demand user navigation
14:26:36 [jcraig]
ack jo
14:26:45 [jcraig]
q- jos
14:28:36 [jcraig]
RS: The IDREF of this new attr could be a element or elements representing a collection of resources representing the various forms (whether, language, format, etc) of descriptions.
14:29:49 [jcraig]
q+ to request clarification from Janina on her comment about different grade level
14:29:58 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:30:03 [jcraig]
s/different grade level?/different grade level (Janina)?/
14:30:05 [clown]
q+
14:30:26 [MichaelC]
q+ to say that the proposal for describedat was when we were looking for a solution around overloading describedby with a URI; so would like to keep the simple design pattern for that and use the indirection on another attribute
14:31:04 [MichaelC]
q+ to say if we don´t have a solution for a simple URI pointer, we force authors to add extra elements to the document that they don´t want to deal with
14:31:13 [jcraig]
JG: If you allow describedby to take a URI, would that satisfy the requirement?
14:31:28 [jcraig]
JS: not if it's auto-presented to the user
14:31:29 [MichaelC]
q+ to say which greatly increases error likelihood
14:31:42 [jcraig]
JC: That could be a UA processing difference
14:32:02 [jcraig]
JS: Concern that the processing difference would be overloading.
14:32:09 [jcraig]
ack j
14:32:12 [richardschwerdtfeger]
q?
14:32:13 [jcraig]
ack james
14:32:19 [jcraig]
ack jcra
14:32:19 [Zakim]
jcraig, you wanted to request clarification from Janina on her comment about different grade level
14:32:21 [MichaelC]
q+ to say I think the indirection attribute is going to be the ¨advanced usage¨ one
14:32:37 [clown]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/Overview.html#Descriptions_external
14:32:48 [jcraig]
q+ to request clarification from Janina on her comment about different grade level
14:34:06 [jcraig]
Clown: example in authoring practices saying you can do that now
14:34:26 [jcraig]
MC: You should remove that example from the authoring practices
14:35:57 [MichaelC]
ack me
14:35:57 [Zakim]
MichaelC, you wanted to say that the proposal for describedat was when we were looking for a solution around overloading describedby with a URI; so would like to keep the simple
14:35:58 [jcraig]
Clown: what about using a URI or Fragment-Identifier
14:36:00 [Zakim]
... design pattern for that and use the indirection on another attribute and to say if we don´t have a solution for a simple URI pointer, we force authors to add extra elements to
14:36:00 [Zakim]
... the document that they don´t want to deal with and to say which greatly increases error likelihood and to say I think the indirection attribute is going to be the ¨advanced
14:36:00 [Zakim]
... usage¨ one
14:37:14 [jcraig]
MC: thought it was crazy to overload a single attr with both IDREF and URI
14:37:38 [jcraig]
q+ to say frag-id is the not the same as URI
14:38:09 [janina]
Call it DescHref ?
14:38:28 [jcraig]
ack me
14:38:28 [Zakim]
jcraig, you wanted to request clarification from Janina on her comment about different grade level and to say frag-id is the not the same as URI
14:38:47 [jcraig]
describedby="foo"
14:39:04 [jcraig]
describedat="#foo"
14:39:45 [jcraig]
q+ to request clarification from Janina on her comment about different grade level
14:40:12 [jcraig]
ack me
14:40:12 [Zakim]
jcraig, you wanted to request clarification from Janina on her comment about different grade level
14:42:47 [jcraig]
JS: DAISY/IDPF suggested this use case for content negotiation based on different reading level
14:43:24 [jcraig]
JC: I agree with the need for that use case, but I don't think the content negotiation part of it should be ARIA
14:46:00 [clown]
q+ to point out that the describeby eg. in the APG is handled by FF
14:47:31 [jcraig]
MC: want to clarify with implementors: in-document IDREF processing can use a difference processing path that getting an element from a fragment identifier
14:48:30 [jcraig]
RS: Consensus?
14:48:52 [jcraig]
MC: Consensus for *proposal* of this approach
14:49:20 [jcraig]
MC: Mapped out by Sept?
14:49:45 [jcraig]
RS: A public editors draft would be sufficient
14:50:51 [jcraig]
q+ to mention concern that we're rushing based on some arbitrary timeline "commitment" to outside groups. Are the "commitments" publicly documented?
14:51:05 [jcraig]
ack jos
14:51:05 [Zakim]
Joseph_Scheuhammer, you wanted to point out that the describeby eg. in the APG is handled by FF
14:54:05 [jcraig]
JS: point is, that it's not abundantly clear that this use case is not already handled by browsers
14:54:36 [jcraig]
JS: +1 for the URI (with potential frag id) idea
14:54:40 [jcraig]
ack me
14:54:40 [Zakim]
jcraig, you wanted to mention concern that we're rushing based on some arbitrary timeline "commitment" to outside groups. Are the "commitments" publicly documented?
14:56:21 [MichaelC]
q+ to say we should definitely publish with lots of ¨this is early days¨ disclaimers
14:59:48 [richardschwerdtfeger]
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/aria-unofficial/raw-file/tip/describedat.html
15:00:51 [clown]
<canvas aria-describedat="#canvas-desc">
15:03:10 [jcraig]
ACTION: jcraig to add describedat using URI+FragID starting from Steve and Rich's proposed: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/aria-unofficial/raw-file/tip/describedat.html
15:03:11 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-1250 - Add describedat using uri+fragid starting from steve and rich's proposed: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/aria-unofficial/raw-file/tip/describedat.html [on James Craig - due 2013-08-26].
15:06:01 [clown]
action-691?
15:06:01 [trackbot]
action-691 -- Michael Cooper to Propose an approach for adding ARIA landmarks to the specs and work with editors -- due 2012-11-23 -- OPEN
15:06:01 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/691
15:06:25 [clown]
action-1138?
15:06:25 [trackbot]
action-1138 -- Michael Cooper to Update Role Attr ref after it gets to Recommendation status -- due 2012-01-20 -- OPEN
15:06:25 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1138
15:06:47 [clown]
action-1201?
15:06:47 [trackbot]
action-1201 -- James Nurthen to Generate example list where options can be unselectable -- due 2013-05-01 -- OPEN
15:06:47 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1201
15:06:54 [clown]
action-1218?
15:06:54 [trackbot]
action-1218 -- James Craig to Add informative note to ARIA 1.0 that authors should not rely on rowgroup mappings on all platforms and therefore should not use additional attributes on an element with role rowgroup. -- due 2013-07-31 -- OPEN
15:06:54 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1218
15:07:10 [richardschwerdtfeger]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/
15:07:45 [jcraig]
Action: Jcraig to check if action-691, action-1138, action-1151, action-1201, and action-1218 impact 1.0 source, if so, complete edits before branching for 1.1.
15:07:45 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-1251 - Check if action-691, action-1138, action-1151, action-1201, and action-1218 impact 1.0 source, if so, complete edits before branching for 1.1. [on James Craig - due 2013-08-26].
15:07:48 [clown]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/
15:12:55 [richardschwerdtfeger]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testreport?testsuite_id=1&filter_required=on&filter_cr_met=on&filter=Filter+view
15:15:38 [clown]
issue-595?
15:15:38 [trackbot]
issue-595 -- treegrid for UIA has outline roles vs. gridcell roles. IE implemented gridcell - Change it? -- closed
15:15:38 [trackbot]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/595
15:18:36 [jongund]
q+
15:24:32 [MichaelC]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/
15:26:57 [richardschwerdtfeger]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=1
15:28:34 [MichaelC]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases?testsuite_id=2
15:28:52 [MichaelC]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#keyboard-focus_tabindex
15:29:11 [MichaelC]
¨When a keydown event is cancelled, also cancel the keypress event.¨
15:32:41 [clown]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#keyboard-focus_tabindex
15:33:55 [clown]
step 7. for above link ^
15:34:20 [Zakim]
-James_Craig
15:34:25 [Zakim]
-Rich
15:34:28 [Zakim]
-Jon_Gunderson
15:34:32 [Zakim]
-Joseph_Scheuhammer
15:34:45 [Zakim]
-Cooper
15:34:47 [Zakim]
WAI_PFWG(ARIA)10:00AM has ended
15:34:47 [Zakim]
Attendees were Jon_Gunderson, Rich, Joseph_Scheuhammer, janina, James_Craig, Cooper
15:34:49 [janina]
zakim, bye
15:34:49 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #pf
15:34:57 [janina]
rrsagent, make minutes
15:34:57 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/19-pf-minutes.html janina
16:13:20 [clown]
clown has joined #pf
16:52:26 [jongund]
jongund has joined #pf
17:49:19 [richardschwerdtfeger]
richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf
18:09:57 [richardschwerdtfeger]
richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf
18:24:28 [richardschwerdtfeger]
richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf
18:52:21 [richardschwerdtfeger]
richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf
20:26:09 [richardschwerdtfeger]
richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf
21:00:42 [clown]
clown has left #pf
21:02:40 [richardschwerdtfeger]
richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf
21:27:14 [richardschwerdtfeger]
richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf
22:42:13 [richardschwerdtfeger]
richardschwerdtfeger has joined #pf