13:49:34 RRSAgent has joined #papag 13:49:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/08/06-papag-irc 13:49:36 RRSAgent, make logs 121 13:49:38 Zakim, this will be 72724 13:49:38 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 13:49:39 Meeting: Push API Patent Advisory Group Teleconference 13:49:39 Date: 06 August 2013 14:05:49 zakim, this will be 72724 14:05:49 ok, wseltzer; I see SEC_(PUSHAPIPAG)11:00AM scheduled to start in 55 minutes 14:08:15 efullea has joined #PAPAG 14:08:34 wseltzer has changed the topic to: next Push API PAG call August 6, 11AM Boston 14:31:22 efullea has left #papag 14:31:35 efullea has joined #PAPAG 14:34:04 efullea has left #papag 14:34:46 efullea has joined #PAPAG 14:47:39 agenda= 14:47:43 zakim, clear agenda 14:47:43 agenda cleared 14:48:28 agenda+ Claims Analysis, progress 14:49:05 agenda+ Questions for Nokia 14:49:22 agenda+ Volunteers and additional resources 14:50:58 regrets+ DougT 14:51:06 regrets+ Yves 14:51:27 chair: wseltzer 14:59:02 SEC_(PUSHAPIPAG)11:00AM has now started 14:59:11 + +34.91.432.aaaa 14:59:19 lrosen has joined #papag 14:59:55 +Wendy 15:00:15 plh has joined #papag 15:00:17 zakim, aaaa is efullea 15:00:17 +efullea; got it 15:00:20 +Plh 15:01:07 +Larry_Rosen 15:01:13 agenda? 15:01:42 [reminder, our wiki is: https://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki ] 15:03:13 +Mike_Champion 15:03:37 +[IPcaller] 15:04:05 zakim, [IPcaller is chaals 15:04:05 +chaals; got it 15:05:03 zakim, who is here? 15:05:05 On the phone I see efullea, Wendy, Plh, Larry_Rosen, Mike_Champion, chaals 15:05:05 On IRC I see plh, lrosen, efullea, RRSAgent, chaals, trackbot, Zakim, Yves, wseltzer 15:05:52 scribe: plh 15:06:20 agenda+ Claim Analysis 15:06:26 zakim, move to next agendum 15:06:26 agendum 1. "Claims Analysis, progress" taken up [from wseltzer] 15:06:40 Wendy: see https://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/Claims_Analysis 15:06:51 ... plh and chaals pulled out the independent claims 15:07:03 ... and noted the equivalence between EU and US patents 15:07:09 ... still leaves us with 16 claims 15:07:19 ... and no one has looked at the JP patents yet 15:07:36 ... and thank you to Larry for sending information on file wrapper and additional information 15:07:53 plh: is that in the wiki? 15:07:57 Wendy: not yet 15:08:31 ACTION:plh to add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-push-pag/2013Jul/0006.html in the wiki 15:08:36 ACTION: plh to add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-push-pag/2013Jul/0006.html in the wiki 15:08:36 Created ACTION-2 - Add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-push-pag/2013Jul/0006.html in the wiki [on Philippe Le Hégaret - due 2013-08-13]. 15:08:51 Wendy: next step is to review the independent claims against the draft 15:09:29 ... in conjunction, re communication with Nokia 15:09:42 ... spoke with ? from Nokia 15:09:53 ... who expressed interest in cooperating in the PAG work 15:10:03 ... and that suggests that Nokia will be responsive to questions 15:10:13 ... even if they're engaging in litigations 15:10:30 ... they continue to assert all 9 patents against the latest version of the document 15:10:57 ... and Nokia will look into identifying the essential claims 15:11:12 ... if we have additional questions for them, feel free to bring those up 15:11:18 ... comments? 15:11:20 q+ 15:11:57 plh: I thought Moz will look into the analysis of the claims 15:12:10 Wendy: Doug sent regrets but will follow up on the status 15:12:26 ack plh 15:12:47 Wendy: we should get quick feedback from Moz on what they might be able to do 15:13:01 ... so we don't end up blocking on them for nothing 15:13:06 ... I'll ask them this week 15:13:20 ... in the meantime, it won't be a waste time for others to do the same 15:13:39 ACTION: wseltzer to follow-up with Mozilla re claims analysis 15:13:39 Created ACTION-3 - Follow-up with Mozilla re claims analysis [on Wendy Seltzer - due 2013-08-13]. 15:14:37 ?: you classified the unique patents. to what extend did you look at them? claims may be different... 15:14:46 s/?:/efullea:/ 15:14:51 Chaals: I didn't look claim by claim 15:15:09 ... the statements are basically the same however 15:15:24 ... I do think it's important to go claim by claim however 15:15:35 ... it would be useful to have links to each patent document 15:15:50 ACTION: Charles to add links to the wiki to each patent document 15:15:50 Created ACTION-4 - Add links to the wiki to each patent document [on Charles McCathie Nevile - due 2013-08-13]. 15:16:09 [Links to the patents are in the Charter: http://www.w3.org/2013/03/push-pag-charter.html ] 15:16:20 efullea: ok, so we still need to analysis the overlaps 15:17:33 ... i didn't take the time to compare them yet. but with regards to EU 15:17:54 ,,, 016, 723 and 375 are similar but claims are slightly different 15:18:14 s/,,,/.../ 15:18:26 s/similar/divisional applications/ 15:18:35 Chaals: so some might updates to other ones... 15:18:42 s/are slightly/may be/ 15:19:02 efullea: startinf from 375, there was a divisional patent which is 723, and then 016 15:19:06 -Larry_Rosen 15:19:11 s/startinf/starting/ 15:19:15 q+ 15:19:22 +Larry_Rosen 15:19:32 efullea: so, even if the text is similar, it's important to look at the patents 15:19:48 wendy: absolutely, that's a useful reminder 15:19:56 ... we need to look deeper into the claims 15:20:21 Larry: the claims have to be interpreted in light of the spec 15:20:39 ... do they all start with the same spec, and generated additional claims? 15:21:07 efullea: I didn't dive into the patents, but it seems some of them are starting from same doc and claims are slightly different 15:21:27 Larry: then it would be reasonnable to assume that they could get similar claims 15:21:38 ... but don't know if they didn't 15:22:50 Wendy: you're right, claims are only a place to start 15:23:43 Chaals: some of the claims seem broad. 15:24:14 Larry: are you suggesting that we focus on the US patents? 15:24:21 q+ 15:24:24 Chaals: not at all 15:24:50 ... the question is: is it better claims that do bear on the spec, or is it useful to begin to pick up claims that have no bearing? 15:25:06 ... from which side should we approach the eliminitation? 15:25:27 Larry: we go through the list, one by one. 15:25:50 ... if one of the claims isn't in the spec, you can ignore the entire patent 15:26:06 ack ws 15:27:14 Wendy: we can edge descriptions to say "possibly applicable" or "not applicable", we're not at the point of reaching conclusion yet. useful to have some tentive in the wiki. 15:27:20 s/tentive/tentative/ 15:28:13 Topic: Next meeting 15:28:21 Wendy: August 28th 15:28:22 ... same time. 15:28:33 -Mike_Champion 15:28:36 Chaals: regrets from me 15:28:40 Plh: regrets from me. 15:29:01 -chaals 15:29:03 -Plh 15:29:03 -Larry_Rosen 15:29:06 -Wendy 15:29:08 -efullea 15:29:08 SEC_(PUSHAPIPAG)11:00AM has ended 15:29:08 Attendees were +34.91.432.aaaa, Wendy, efullea, Plh, Larry_Rosen, Mike_Champion, [IPcaller], chaals 15:29:20 s/28th/20th/ 15:29:30 s/Plh: regrets from me.// 15:29:46 rrsagent, generate minutes 15:29:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/06-papag-minutes.html plh 15:30:01 rrsagent, make logs public-visible 15:30:37 s/they continue/I asked: do they continue/ 15:30:47 rrsagent, make minutes 15:30:47 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/08/06-papag-minutes.html wseltzer