14:00:57 RRSAgent has joined #gld 14:00:58 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/23-gld-irc 14:00:59 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:01:00 Zakim has joined #gld 14:01:02 Zakim, this will be GLD 14:01:02 ok, trackbot, I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM already started 14:01:03 Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference 14:01:03 Date: 23 May 2013 14:01:06 +[Mozilla] 14:01:08 +[IPcaller] 14:01:10 zakim, mozilla is me 14:01:10 +HadleyBeeman1; got it 14:01:17 zakim, who is here? 14:01:17 On the phone I see ??P9, Sandro, HadleyBeeman1, [IPcaller] 14:01:19 On IRC I see RRSAgent, BenediktKaempgen, DaveReynolds, fadmaa, james, gatemezi, olyerickson, hadleybeeman, danbri, sandro, trackbot 14:01:26 zakim, hadleybeeman1 is me 14:01:26 +hadleybeeman; got it 14:01:34 zakim, [ipcaller] is me. 14:01:34 + +91.80.67.84.aaaa 14:01:34 +[IPcaller.a] 14:01:34 +olyerickson; got it 14:01:34 zakim, ??P9 is BenediktKaempgen 14:01:35 +BenediktKaempgen; got it 14:01:36 MakxDekkers has joined #gld 14:01:55 PhilA has joined #gld 14:02:00 +DeirdreLee 14:02:10 Biplav has joined #gld 14:02:11 Zakim, DeirdreLee is me 14:02:12 +fadmaa; got it 14:02:14 zakim, code? 14:02:14 the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), PhilA 14:02:39 +[IPcaller] 14:02:44 zakim, ipcaller is me 14:02:44 +PhilA; got it 14:02:45 zakim, deirdrelee is fadmaa 14:02:46 sorry, hadleybeeman, I do not recognize a party named 'deirdrelee' 14:02:46 +[IPcaller] 14:03:03 zakim, who's on the call? 14:03:03 On the phone I see BenediktKaempgen, Sandro, hadleybeeman, olyerickson, james, +91.80.67.84.aaaa, fadmaa, PhilA, DaveReynolds 14:03:21 +gatemezi 14:03:22 zakim, aaaa is biplav 14:03:23 +biplav; got it 14:03:34 PhilA is an octave lower than everyone else... 14:04:20 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130523 14:04:30 Zakim, mute me 14:04:31 fadmaa should now be muted 14:04:35 +1 fadmaa ! 14:04:36 scribe: fadmaa 14:04:43 fadmaa++ 14:04:43 http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/gld/2013-05-16 14:04:55 +MakxDekkers 14:05:09 martinA has joined #gld 14:05:18 PROPOSAL: accepting last telco minutes 14:05:19 +1 to last week's minutes... well formatted etc 14:05:28 +1 14:05:30 +1 14:05:31 +1 to minutes 14:05:34 +1 to last week's minutes 14:05:41 All Hail the Hail in Mother Englang! 14:05:49 +1 14:05:56 (England...) 14:05:57 RESOLUTION: accept last week minutes 14:06:09 TOPIC: Data Cube 14:06:14 JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #gld 14:06:52 tinagheen has joined #gld 14:06:57 +??P4 14:06:58 +[LC] 14:07:03 DaveReynolds: for ORG we decided it is not necessary to track all implementations and the use of every term 14:07:07 Zakim, [LC] is me 14:07:07 +tinagheen; got it 14:07:08 Zakim, ??P4 is me 14:07:09 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 14:07:51 ... exit criteria for SKOS are weaker than we proposed for ORG 14:08:11 ... marking properties that are not used twice as "at risk" didn't fly 14:08:39 ... we decide to track implementations at the feature level 14:09:00 ... I grouped properties in features 14:09:25 hadleybeeman: thanks for all the work Dave 14:09:39 s/TOPIC: Data Cube / TOPIC:ORG 14:10:38 DaveReynolds: we need to clarify the exit criteria 14:11:10 DaveReynolds: for example we can have two implementations of every feature and one implementation for every term 14:11:20 ... I will write this down in an email 14:11:21 The topic is a report on the transition call yesterday that discussed ORG and QB which we're hoping will move to CR 14:12:40 DaveReynolds: Given the integrity constraints in data cube, it is more straightforward to define exit criteria 14:12:42 BartvanLeeuwen has joined #gld 14:13:07 ... integrity constraints do not address all the terms 14:13:35 ... tracking all the implementations on the term level for Data Cube is challenging 14:13:48 ... we won't be tracking abstract classes for example 14:14:11 +??P30 14:14:19 Zakim, ??P30 is me 14:14:19 +BartvanLeeuwen; got it 14:15:13 hadleybeeman: do we need further help regarding the implementation reports and hosting a tool for that? 14:15:38 and executing the CR exit criteria assessment. 14:16:03 DaveReynolds: I am not clear on the actual execution 14:16:32 did we get the report on the transition call per mail? 14:16:38 sandro: Dave and me can discuss via emails, maybe we can find some shortcut 14:17:30 PhilA: getting into a CR is one thing but getting out of it needs to be kept in mind 14:17:35 DaveReynolds: agree 14:17:59 DaveReynolds: we need a clear idea about the future of the working group 14:18:40 DaveReynolds++ 14:18:40 +1 to DaveReynolds ! 14:18:50 Thanks! 14:18:58 TOPIC: Extension to the working group's charter 14:19:10 hadleybeeman: we have only one week left 14:19:36 sandro: nothing has changed re. our chances of getting an extension 14:19:44 ... we need to get into a CR 14:19:59 ... which looks very much doable 14:20:27 ... hard to confirm whether having a CR is sufficient to get an extension 14:20:45 ... we need to wait for a formal meeting which might not happen soon 14:21:19 ... but we still can work for a week or so even before confirming the extension 14:21:51 sandro: we need to formally capture that people are willing to continue working on the pending items 14:22:06 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 14:22:23 +??P4 14:22:27 Zakim, ??P4 is me 14:22:27 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 14:22:51 PhilA: there is an approval for the working group that will continue this WG work 14:22:58 ... starting around September 14:23:20 s/continue this WG work/continue work in this broad area/ 14:23:55 q+ 14:24:10 @Dave: I'll send you the file and a capture of the error 14:24:24 hadleybeeman: from work perspective, we need to get Cube and Org into PR and DCAT into CR 14:24:36 ... and get the notes into transition 14:24:58 -olyerickson 14:25:15 ack Biplav 14:25:18 sorry lost my skype... 14:25:24 dialing in again :( 14:25:32 +1 to carrying on 14:25:53 Biplav: one direction is to finish remaining work, the other direction is what's next 14:26:14 Biplav: I found the email from Phil on open API very interesting 14:26:23 ... so far we focused only on data 14:26:26 +[IPcaller] 14:26:32 zakim, I am [ipcaller] 14:26:32 ok, olyerickson, I now associate you with [IPcaller] 14:26:45 +??P13 14:26:50 I think DCAT will be quick.... 14:26:51 zakim, ??p13 is me 14:26:51 +martinA; got it 14:27:47 For some reason, I cannot hear anything 14:28:00 Dropping-off, and reconnecting 14:28:04 q+ 14:28:15 -biplav 14:28:55 + +91.80.67.84.aabb 14:29:20 zakim, aabb is me 14:29:20 sorry, Biplav, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb' 14:29:29 q? 14:30:34 q- DaveReynolds 14:30:34 ack me 14:30:43 TOPIC: Transition ADMS into Note 14:30:46 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html 14:31:16 PhilA: I followed up on all the comments that have been made. ADMS is a DCAT profile now 14:31:48 PhilA: still waits for DCAT to add contactPoint 14:32:07 PhilA: it is being used extensively by the European Commision 14:32:34 ... if there is no comments on it ,I'd like to publish it as a note 14:32:46 ack sandro 14:32:58 sandro asks about the identifier in ADMS 14:33:18 +1 14:33:19 re adms:Identifier see: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html#dt_identifier 14:33:25 PROPOSAL: transition ADMS to a working group note 14:33:28 +1 14:33:29 +1 14:33:30 +1 14:33:31 +1 14:33:31 +1 14:33:31 +1 for Sandro 14:33:32 sandro says +1 14:33:32 +1 14:33:33 +1 14:33:34 +1 14:33:36 +1 14:33:38 +1 14:33:38 +1 14:33:52 +1 to PhilA ! 14:33:59 +1 14:34:17 RESOLVED: transitioning ADMS into a working group note 14:34:37 sandro: what about the references? dcat is referred to as a working draft 14:35:17 topic: RegOrg https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/legal/index.html 14:35:35 PhilA: RegOrg is now in alignment with Org 14:36:11 .. it defined some new properties, it refers to ADMS identifier 14:36:28 ... its main usecase is describing corporates 14:36:45 ... if no comment on it, I'd like to publish it as a note 14:37:37 PROPOSAL: transition RegOrg to a working group note 14:37:45 +1 14:37:47 +1 14:37:49 +1 14:37:49 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 14:37:50 +1 14:37:50 +1 14:37:54 +1 14:37:55 +1 14:38:04 sandro +1 14:38:05 +1 14:38:10 +??P4 14:38:14 Zakim, ??P4 is me 14:38:14 +JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it 14:38:19 +1 14:38:37 s/sandro +1/ 14:38:38 +1 14:38:42 Makes reference to org:identifier 14:38:56 is there another browser than Chrome? 14:39:00 gatemezi: the references don't appear on my browser 14:39:11 PhilA: yes donot appear correctly on Chrome 14:39:16 +1 14:39:27 +1 14:39:30 RESOLVED: transitioning RegOrg into a working group note 14:39:30 +1 14:39:40 Thank you everyone 14:39:41 Seriously, this is browser-dependent? Whoa... 14:40:11 TOPIC: DCAT Issues 14:40:47 olyerickson: we went through all the issues 14:40:51 Zakim, unmute me 14:40:51 fadmaa should no longer be muted 14:41:28 fadmaa: we've had proposals for all the issues. We've closed a couple of them. Half issues are on the editing side, still left to be done. 14:41:33 Need URL... 14:41:38 fadmaa: Last version has contactPoint added now 14:42:05 … Two main issues to discuss (now or by email). Licences/rights and date formats. 14:42:07 fadmaa: there are 2 main issues lefted to be discusses..re using License and Date format 14:42:28 olyerickson: there is a suggestion to use dct:rights instead of dct:license 14:42:38 issue-60? 14:42:38 ISSUE-60 -- dct:license vs. dct:rights -- raised 14:42:38 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/60 14:42:38 ... most notably from Jeni Tennison 14:42:44 Biplav has joined #gld 14:42:53 ... rights is "looser" which makes it broader 14:43:25 DCMI does not agree with the "looser" interpretation 14:43:36 olyerickson: the proposal is to use dct:rights instead of dct:license 14:44:16 s/discusses/discussed 14:44:20 MakxDekkers: DCMI states that dct:rights range is a resource 14:45:24 olyerickson: I am happy with defining dct:rights with a suggestion that using dct:license is also possible 14:45:26 q+ 14:47:13 q- 14:47:13 fadmaa: support to use dct:License 14:47:21 +1 14:47:38 hadleybeeman: are you happy for the conclusion of the issue? 14:47:54 s/use dct:License/use dct:rights/ 14:47:57 +1 for dct:rights 14:47:59 issue-63? 14:47:59 ISSUE-63 -- How to treat underspecified dates in DCAT? -- raised 14:47:59 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/63 14:48:10 hadleybeeman: So, could we close issue-60? 14:49:08 olyerickson: Phil's suggestion is to drop the recommendation to use a specific format 14:49:24  Phil's suggestion is to drop this and say something like: use a date formatted as one of the formats defined in XSD such as xdd:year, xdd:date, etc. 14:49:38 +1 to Phil's suggestion on this 14:49:46 Someone else talk if you can't hear me :( 14:50:32 PhilA: in my experience asking for a specific format as for example xsd:datetime forces people to make inaccurate statements 14:50:34 +1 14:50:47 rdfs:Literal using the relevant ISO 8601 Date and Time compliant string and typed using the appropriate XML Schema datatype [[XMLSCHEMA-2]] 14:51:20 +! 14:52:12 fadmaa: versioning is not included in DCAT 14:52:42 hadleybeeman: when do you think we can go to LC? 14:53:16 fadmaa: some editions task to do...but do we need to answer to all the questions received? 14:53:33 -JoaoPauloAlmeida 14:54:27 fadmaa: Richard is quite busy, but will answer wording with olyerickson 14:54:35 so be quick... 14:54:59 ACTION: fadmaa to finish editing DCAT SPEC and reply to feedback email by next Tuesday 14:54:59 Created ACTION-140 - Finish editing DCAT SPEC and reply to feedback email by next Tuesday [on Fadi Maali - due 2013-05-30]. 14:55:20 +1 to continuing GLD WG to whenever 14:55:40 ;) 14:55:45 PROPOSED: We'd like to extend the Working Group so that we can finish our NOTES and see our three Rec-Track documents through to REC. 14:55:46 Zakim, mute me 14:55:46 fadmaa should now be muted 14:55:52 +1 14:55:55 +1 14:55:55 +1 14:55:57 +1 to continuing GLD WG for 2 months 14:55:57 +1 14:55:58 +1 14:55:58 +1 14:56:01 +1 14:56:01 +1 14:56:02 +1 to what sandro proposed 14:56:02 +1 14:56:06 +1 14:56:06 +1 14:56:19 RESOLVED: We'd like to extend the Working Group so that we can finish our NOTES and see our three Rec-Track documents through to REC. 14:56:34 Bye! 14:56:38 -[IPcaller] 14:56:38 olyerickson has left #gld 14:57:20 +1 14:57:39 i can give the status of qb ucr 14:58:35 -MakxDekkers 14:58:45 BenediktKaempgen: I received some feedback regarding the qb ucr 14:59:04 ... both editorial and content-related feedback 14:59:38 ... requirements int he documents need to be changed as some of them are relevant to tools but not to the vocabulary 14:59:53 s/int he /in the / 15:00:21 BenediktKaempgen: DaveReynolds asks if it is still worth the efforts of continuing this 15:00:51 BenediktKaempgen: I can address the comments I got but can't add new parts to it 15:01:05 q+ 15:01:53 ... I suggest that I do the required editing and then publish it as a note 15:02:07 s/note/first public working draft 15:02:08 ... if people are not happy with the document, I am fine with not publishing it 15:02:32 ack me 15:02:58 PhilA: good to hear that BenediktKaempgen is willing to continue working ont he document 15:03:34 ... I am trying to figure out the purpose of the document as Cube is done so it won't inform it 15:04:17 ... the question is whether the document is useful outside the scope of the vocabulary design 15:04:50 hadleybeeman: I think Sandro said that having a ucr is good from the implementer perspective 15:05:02 -gatemezi 15:05:07 ... is it worth having the document as input for implementers? 15:05:27 sounds like a lot more work to me! 15:06:22 -BartvanLeeuwen 15:07:03 BenediktKaempgen: currently the ucr document is an overview of the tools and application that could use and benefit from the Cube vocabulary 15:07:27 ... it help someone to make the decision whether to use the vocabulary 15:07:51 ... the spec helps someone who already decided to use the vocabulary 15:08:03 q+ 15:08:49 ack dave 15:10:09 -biplav 15:10:16 Can I emphasise again that I was not making a criticism. You wanna see me try and write German? 15:10:25 :) 15:11:10 DaveReynolds: I am not sure if there exists a working draft status for note in the W3C process 15:12:27 hadleybeeman: we did it for the best practices to get multiple rounds of feedback 15:13:59 hadleybeeman: what is your recommendation? 15:14:18 BenediktKaempgen: I can give it a try. implement the feedback I got (mostly the editorial ones) 15:14:51 ... then I can ask for feedback and then we can decide accordingly 15:15:17 Just publish it as a Note 15:15:19 ... whether to continue toward publishing the document as a note 15:15:31 It can be updated if desired or it can be left as as 15:15:40 s/as as/as is/ 15:17:01 +1 15:17:06 +1 15:17:17 yes 15:17:25 Thanks all! 15:17:31 -martinA 15:17:33 -BenediktKaempgen 15:17:34 -fadmaa 15:17:35 -tinagheen 15:17:36 -james 15:17:48 zakim, who is here? 15:17:48 On the phone I see Sandro, hadleybeeman, PhilA, DaveReynolds 15:17:49 On IRC I see martinA, PhilA, Zakim, RRSAgent, BenediktKaempgen, DaveReynolds, fadmaa, hadleybeeman, danbri, sandro, trackbot 15:18:49 martinA has left #gld 15:19:28 RRSAgent, generate minutes 15:19:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/23-gld-minutes.html fadmaa 15:22:17 RRSAgent, make notes public 15:22:17 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make notes public', fadmaa. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:22:28 thanks again, fadmaa! 15:22:30 :) have a good week 15:26:17 thanks hadleybeeman 15:31:54 s/rdfs: Literal/rdfs Literal/ 15:31:58 RRSAgent, generate minutes 15:31:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/23-gld-minutes.html fadmaa 15:32:49 s/rdfs:Literal/rdfs Literal/ 15:32:53 RRSAgent, generate minutes 15:32:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/23-gld-minutes.html fadmaa 15:37:54 zakim, who is on the call? 15:37:54 On the phone I see Sandro, hadleybeeman, PhilA, DaveReynolds 15:37:56 -Sandro 15:38:09 grrrrr, call waiting dropped me. sorry. 15:38:15 no worries 15:38:18 and zakim says the call is over so I cant get back in. 15:38:26 oh dear. 15:38:38 can we switch to a new code? 15:39:07 code 26633 (CONF3 15:39:10 ) 15:39:41 -PhilA 15:39:50 -DaveReynolds 15:39:51 -hadleybeeman 15:39:51 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended 15:39:51 Attendees were Sandro, hadleybeeman, +91.80.67.84.aaaa, olyerickson, BenediktKaempgen, james, fadmaa, PhilA, DaveReynolds, gatemezi, biplav, MakxDekkers, tinagheen, 15:39:51 ... JoaoPauloAlmeida, BartvanLeeuwen, [IPcaller], martinA, +91.80.67.84.aabb 15:40:06 I'm on CONF 3 15:40:21 sorry -- i;ll be right there 16:19:36 DaveReynolds has left #gld 16:40:33 PhilA has left #gld 17:46:42 HadleyBeeman has joined #gld 18:00:39 Zakim has left #gld 18:30:07 olyerickson has joined #gld 18:32:30 olyerickson1 has joined #gld 18:32:38 olyerickson1 has left #gld 18:58:10 danbri has joined #gld