12:27:49 RRSAgent has joined #er 12:27:49 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/15-er-irc 12:27:51 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:27:51 Zakim has joined #er 12:27:53 Zakim, this will be 3794 12:27:53 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 12:27:54 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 12:27:54 Date: 15 May 2013 12:29:40 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started 12:29:46 +[IPcaller] 12:29:53 zakim, ipcaller is me 12:29:53 +shadi; got it 12:30:11 regrets: Christophe, Kostas 12:32:05 Sinarmaya_ has joined #er 12:33:20 +Yehya 12:33:51 zakim, yahya is really PhilipA 12:33:51 sorry, shadi, I do not recognize a party named 'yahya' 12:33:57 zakim, yehya is really PhilipA 12:33:57 +PhilipA; got it 12:34:03 +PhilipA.a 12:34:26 carlos has joined #er 12:34:31 zakim, PhilipA.a is carlos 12:34:31 +carlos; got it 12:37:57 + +1.662.341.aaaa 12:38:14 zakim, aaaa is Sinarmaya_ 12:38:14 +Sinarmaya_; got it 12:38:50 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WD-AERT/ED-requirements 12:42:20 Sinarmaya_ has joined #er 12:42:30 Topic: Table of Contents 12:42:52 SAZ: looks ok, good to have the additional info as appendecies 12:42:59 ...may not be able to get to them 12:43:24 Topic: Objectives of the document 12:44:50 CV: no width restriction in TR format is an issue 12:44:50 ...can this be changed? 12:44:56 SAZ: not sure, need to double-check 12:45:07 CV: ok, will leave for now 12:46:46 SAZ: item #4 should be #3? 12:47:19 Support developers of accessibility evaluation tools to understand the different types of techniques in WCAG 2.0 and types of web accessibility tests: automatic, semiautomatic and manual -> Support developers of accessibility evaluation tools to understand how to use failures and techniques in WCAG 2.0 to address the different types of web accessibility tests: automatic, semiautomatic and manual 12:49:45 ER: the first one is more clear 12:49:50 CV: mixing up the concepts - who does the tests etc 12:50:04 ER: first wording has two parts 12:50:16 ...second is one thing that depends on the other 12:55:32 Support developers of accessibility evaluation tools to understand the different types of techniques in WCAG 2.0 and types of web accessibility tests: automatic, semiautomatic and manual -> Support developers of accessibility evaluation tools to understand the different types of web accessibility tests: automatic, semiautomatic and manual 12:56:46 (and how these relate to WCAG 2.0 success criteria, techniques, and failures) 12:57:45 (and how these relate to WCAG 2.0 success criteria, sufficient techniques, advisory techniques, and common failures) 12:58:50 (and to use WCAG 2.0 success criteria, sufficient techniques, advisory techniques, and common failures for web accessibility testing) 12:59:26 #3 Support developers of accessibility evaluation tools to understand the different types of web accessibility tests: automatic, semiautomatic and manual 13:00:07 #4 Support developers of accessibility evaluation tools to understand how to use WCAG 2.0 success criteria, sufficient techniques, advisory techniques, and common failures for web accessibility testing) 13:01:08 In addition, the document may provide additional information on ... 13:02:50 SAZ: put list under "Typical features of an evaluation tool" as a sub-list to objective #1 13:03:50 #1 Describe to web developers typical features of web accessibility evaluation tools. Examples of such features include: 13:04:50 CV: too much information 13:04:51 SAZ: make "typical features" a link? 13:05:21 #1 Describe to web developers typical features of web accessibility evaluation tools. Examples of such features are listed in [section ...]. 13:05:45 ER: agree 13:06:17 "and briefly describe possible implementation issues of these features. These issues may include additional information like licensing schemes, etc."? 13:06:30 s/ER/EGyR/G 13:12:27 SAZ: concerns about expectations 13:12:50 CV: will try to tone down "implementation" 13:13:01 SAZ: also concerned about "licensening discussion" 13:13:10 CV: can remove it from here 13:13:59 EgyR: licensing can be relevant to implementation but not sure the document can address all the different complex situations that can exist 13:16:45 Sinarmaya_ has joined #er 13:17:03 Topic: Next Steps 13:17:31 #1. inform the WAI Coordination Group (CG) 13:18:05 #2. ask for EOWG feedback on requirements document 13:18:15 #3. start working on main document 13:18:29 #4. identify a good title for the document 13:18:50 #5. announce the work and recruit new participants 13:21:20 Topic: Next Meeting 13:21:29 SAZ: no meeting next week 13:21:52 ...meet again in 2 weeks 13:21:58 -Sinarmaya_ 13:21:59 trackbot, end meeting 13:21:59 Zakim, list attendees 13:21:59 As of this point the attendees have been shadi, PhilipA, carlos, +1.662.341.aaaa, Sinarmaya_ 13:22:01 -PhilipA 13:22:02 -carlos 13:22:05 Sinarmaya_ has left #er 13:22:07 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:22:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/15-er-minutes.html trackbot 13:22:08 RRSAgent, bye 13:22:08 I see no action items