14:58:01 RRSAgent has joined #forms 14:58:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-irc 14:58:03 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:58:03 Zakim has joined #forms 14:58:05 Zakim, this will be IA_XForms 14:58:05 ok, trackbot; I see IA_XForms()11:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 14:58:06 Meeting: Forms Working Group Teleconference 14:58:06 Date: 08 May 2013 14:58:07 Chair: Steven 14:59:15 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013May/0008 14:59:25 Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013May/0008 15:00:54 IA_XForms()11:00AM has now started 15:01:02 +pfennell 15:01:33 alain1 has joined #forms 15:02:01 +[IPcaller] 15:02:21 Zakim, I am [IPcaller] 15:02:21 ok, alain1, I now associate you with [IPcaller] 15:03:05 +??P13 15:03:10 zakim, I am ? 15:03:10 +Steven; got it 15:03:30 +ebruchez 15:06:34 nvdbleek has joined #forms 15:06:51 zakim, code? 15:06:51 the conference code is 93676 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), nvdbleek 15:07:25 +nvdbleek 15:07:54 scribe:Nick 15:08:14 pfennell has joined #forms 15:08:17 scribenick: nvdbleek 15:08:19 Topic: Call next week 15:08:20 Topic: Call next week 15:08:20 http://www2013.org/ 15:09:03 Steven: Can't attend next call 15:09:10 nvdbleek: depends on todays call 15:09:12 Topic: Comments on XForms 2.0 Working Draft 7 August 2012 15:09:12 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2013Apr/0000.html 15:09:50 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2013May/0001.html 15:10:15 Steven: He wants better support for SOAP 15:10:37 Steven: He wants to remove requirements for GET and POST 15:10:51 Steven: Do we need to do anything more then removing it? 15:11:19 nvdbleek: Why was the limitation there in the first place 15:11:26 Steven: I can't recall 15:12:09 Steven: I'm happy not to put in any requirements on the method from the XForms side 15:12:30 Steven: My proposal is to remove the requirements 15:12:46 ebruchez: Maybe John can comment on this 15:12:58 Steven: I'll e-mail him and ask 15:13:20 Steven: The second bit I feel much comfortable about 15:13:58 ebruchez: You can't construct multipart-post yourself in XForms now 15:14:13 ebruchez: he wants more control 15:15:44 ebruchez: multipart-post contains multiple parts, if we have an upload bound to a node, we create an extra part containing the content of the URI 15:16:08 ebruchez: You can't add extra parts using submissions 15:16:23 ebruchez: Sometimes you want to do this 15:16:43 Steven: So this needs more thought 15:16:58 Steven: An extra action feels the wrong approach 15:17:39 Steven: I think it would be better to do it based on instances 15:18:11 ebruchez: You should be able to specify where to get content from, serialisation, content type, ... 15:18:51 Steven: It is related to the serialize() function 15:19:22 ebruchez: Kind of, this is a bit more complicated, because each part need to have its own 15:19:39 Steven: yes, but we were talking about how to specify the parameters 15:20:21 ebruchez: It should also support dynamic. E.g.: when attaching images, sometimes you have one, but it could be more 15:21:04 ebruchez: We should support alternative parts (e.g.: text and HTML for e-mail) 15:21:28 Steven: I will reply to the e-mail that we will think about it further 15:22:18 ACTION: Erik to propose a solution to support submitting multipart-post messages 15:22:18 Created ACTION-1944 - Propose a solution to support submitting multipart-post messages [on Erik Bruchez - due 2013-05-15]. 15:22:21 Topic: ACTION-1939: Add the xforms:HTMLFragment data type and add text to 15:22:21 the text area control similar like it is done for xs:date on xf:input 15:22:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013May/0005.html 15:22:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Apr/0007.html 15:22:43 Steven: This is just a wrap-up 15:22:49 ebruchez: Its fine 15:22:56 Steven: Any other comments 15:23:07 Topic: The function Element 15:23:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013May/0004.html 15:23:32 ebruchez: I just made a few editorial changes 15:23:38 nvdbleek: They were fine for me 15:24:02 ebruchez: The other point was the ability to support multiple result elements 15:24:21 ebruchez: In xslt when you construct a sequence you can interleave them, nest them,... 15:24:56 ebruchez: For XForms it specifies the result, not a general sequence construct 15:25:18 ebruchez: It is bit confusing if you have multiple result elements 15:25:41 ebruchez: You can use the sequence constructor of XPath to return sequences 15:26:24 (: comment :) 15:26:46 nvdbleek: no strong opinion about it 15:26:58 Steven: I'm happy with only one result element 15:27:48 ACTION: function should only allow one result element 15:27:48 Error finding 'function'. You can review and register nicknames at . 15:28:53 ACTION: Erik function should only allow one result element 15:28:53 Created ACTION-1945 - Function should only allow one result element [on Erik Bruchez - due 2013-05-15]. 15:29:21 Topic: ACTION-1943: Erik investigate why XPath 3 chose the function signature they did for serialization 15:29:21 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013May/0003.html 15:29:25 ACTION: Nick Adjust schema file to allow one result element for Function element 15:29:26 Created ACTION-1946 - Adjust schema file to allow one result element for Function element [on Nick Van Den Bleeken - due 2013-05-15]. 15:30:21 ebruchez: To summarise: we are looking for a way to specify the serialisation parameters for the serialise function 15:31:52 … they use an element to specify it, what is quite heavy, it is now in the serialisation spec, it is needed for the character map, it is a way to substitute characters when serialising (with other words do a transform) 15:32:53 … this is my interpretation, to confirm I send an e-mail to the public-qt-comments group 15:33:58 … they are at candidate recommendation 15:34:00 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2013May/ 15:34:26 ebruchez: The second part is about what we or they can do to make it more light weight 15:35:02 ebruchez: The easiest thing we can do is to use the xpath 3.0 format 15:35:36 … The second approach is to do it our own way 15:35:54 … (using tokens, JSON,...) 15:36:20 Steven: Do we have the use case of character maps 15:36:43 ebruchez: It is part from XML serialisation 15:38:07 ebruchez: We could not care about it 15:38:19 Steven: Frankly that gives my vote at this time 15:38:38 ebruchez: We still need to have a way to specify the serialisation parameters 15:39:23 nvdbleek: In the past we tried to be as close as possible to a future XPath function 15:40:09 ebruchez: The cases you want to use the character maps is probably rare, the other parameters are more common 15:41:20 ebruchez: We could support two formats, the one from XPath 3.0 and our own 15:42:27 nvdbleek: but then you loose the advantage of dropping our own function when we migrate to XPath 3.0 15:42:51 ebruchez: In principle I'm for reusing other peoples stuff, but for this ... 15:43:17 alain1: I agree with compatibility with XPath 3.0 15:43:51 nvdbleek: That is what we did for xpath 3.0 15:44:09 Steven: Anybody objects to using the xpath 3.0 15:45:20 ebruchez: OK, but if they change there format we should do it too 15:46:44 ebruchez: … it is a lot of text in the XML serialisation function 15:46:53 ebruchez: We could point to the xpath 3.0 function 15:47:44 ACTION: Erik to import the XPath 3.0 serialize() function to XForms 2.0 15:47:44 Created ACTION-1947 - Import the XPath 3.0 serialize() function to XForms 2.0 [on Erik Bruchez - due 2013-05-15]. 15:48:17 Steven: I propose not to block the SOAP issue to going to last call 15:48:23 -pfennell 15:48:52 +pfennell 15:49:41 Steven: Next call in two weeks time 15:49:43 -pfennell 15:49:45 -Steven 15:49:45 -ebruchez 15:49:46 -[IPcaller] 15:49:46 -nvdbleek 15:49:46 IA_XForms()11:00AM has ended 15:49:46 Attendees were pfennell, [IPcaller], Steven, ebruchez, nvdbleek 15:49:59 rrsagent, make minutes 15:49:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-minutes.html Steven 15:50:41 rrsagent, help 15:51:23 rrsagent, what action items? 15:51:23 I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-actions.rdf : 15:51:23 ACTION: Erik to propose a solution to support submitting multipart-post messages [1] 15:51:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-irc#T15-22-18 15:51:23 ACTION: function should only allow one result element [2] 15:51:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-irc#T15-27-48 15:51:23 ACTION: Erik function should only allow one result element [3] 15:51:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-irc#T15-28-53 15:51:23 ACTION: Nick Adjust schema file to allow one result element for Function element [4] 15:51:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-irc#T15-29-25 15:51:23 ACTION: Erik to import the XPath 3.0 serialize() function to XForms 2.0 [5] 15:51:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-irc#T15-47-44 15:51:45 rrsagent, ACTION- 2 15:51:52 rrsagent, make minutes 15:51:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/08-forms-minutes.html Steven 15:53:45 alain has joined #forms 15:54:06 alain has left #forms 17:28:12 Zakim has left #forms 18:34:10 nvdbleek has joined #forms