13:55:44 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wcag2ict
13:55:44 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/03-wcag2ict-irc
13:55:46 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
13:55:46 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #wcag2ict
13:55:48 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 2428
13:55:48 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes
13:55:49 <trackbot> Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference
13:55:49 <trackbot> Date: 03 May 2013
13:55:56 <andisnow> chair: Andi_Snow-Weaver
13:56:05 <andisnow> regrets: Alex_Li
13:56:23 <Kiran_Kaja> Kiran_Kaja has joined #wcag2ict
13:58:41 <MaryJo> MaryJo has joined #wcag2ict
13:59:28 <Zakim> WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has now started
13:59:35 <Zakim> +Andi_Snow_Weaver
14:00:24 <Mike_P> Mike_P has joined #wcag2ict
14:00:27 <Zakim> +Mary_Jo_Mueller
14:00:40 <Zakim> +Kiran_Kaja
14:00:40 <korn> korn has joined #wcag2ict
14:00:46 <Zakim> +??P17
14:00:51 <andisnow> scribe: Mary_Jo_Mueller
14:01:06 <Zakim> +[Oracle]
14:01:06 <MaryJo> scribenick:MaryJo
14:01:08 <andisnow> zakim, ??P17 is Mike_Pluke
14:01:08 <Zakim> +Mike_Pluke; got it
14:01:25 <Loic> Loic has joined #wcag2ict
14:01:40 <korn> Zakim, Oracle has Peter_Korn
14:01:40 <Zakim> +Peter_Korn; got it
14:01:53 <Zakim> +??P21
14:01:57 <janina> janina has joined #wcag2ict
14:02:00 <Zakim> +??P22
14:02:12 <Loic> Zakim, ??P21 is me
14:02:12 <Zakim> +Loic; got it
14:02:31 <janina> zakim, ??P22 is Janina_Sajka
14:02:32 <Zakim> +Janina_Sajka; got it
14:02:55 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:02:58 <Judy> Judy has joined #wcag2ict
14:03:18 <andisnow> zakim, IPCaller is Gregg_Vanderheiden
14:03:18 <Zakim> +Gregg_Vanderheiden; got it
14:03:24 <Zakim> +Judy
14:04:59 <Zakim> +Bruce_Bailey
14:05:53 <MaryJo> regrets:Alex_Li
14:06:09 <MaryJo> topic: WCAG working group results
14:06:10 <korn> https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/edits-for-michael-post-2nd-public-draft
14:06:28 <greggvanderheiden> greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict
14:06:39 <BBailey> BBailey has joined #wcag2ict
14:06:43 <korn> https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/glossary-edits-post-2nd-public-draft
14:06:57 <BBailey> zakim, who is here
14:06:58 <Zakim> BBailey, you need to end that query with '?'
14:07:01 <MaryJo> They reviewed and approved 2.2.1, and reviewed glossary terms.  We need to consider a change they made posted in link above.
14:07:07 <BBailey> zakim, who is here?
14:07:07 <Zakim> On the phone I see Andi_Snow_Weaver, Mary_Jo_Mueller, Kiran_Kaja, Mike_Pluke, [Oracle], Loic, Janina_Sajka, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Judy, Bruce_Bailey
14:07:09 <Zakim> [Oracle] has Peter_Korn
14:07:09 <Zakim> On IRC I see BBailey, greggvanderheiden, Judy, janina, Loic, korn, Mike_P, MaryJo, Kiran_Kaja, Zakim, RRSAgent, andisnow, MichaelC, shadi, trackbot
14:07:15 <BBailey> zakim, i am bruce
14:07:16 <Zakim> ok, BBailey, I now associate you with Bruce_Bailey
14:07:18 <korn> This document does not provide guidance on applying AAA Success Criteria to non-web ICT, including the following definitions.
14:07:23 <BBailey> zakim, mute me
14:07:23 <Zakim> Bruce_Bailey should now be muted
14:08:03 <Zakim> -Gregg_Vanderheiden
14:08:26 <MaryJo> We need to approve their edit.
14:08:42 <MaryJo> They didn't like our text for conformance or for command line interfact. Peter has the action item to work on those and has a first pass on conformance.
14:09:08 <korn> https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/c---conformance-all
14:10:15 <MaryJo> 2 problems with conformance - 4 bullets at top of conformance page that they want written in the 3rd person, and they want to remove references to the 'task force' as the end product will be from the WCAG working group.
14:10:26 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:10:42 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
14:11:34 <MaryJo> They want to see the text flowing more and want it placed in the appendix.
14:11:52 <MaryJo> s/interfact/interface/
14:12:11 <MaryJo> They also want the command line interface moved to an appendix.
14:12:38 <MaryJo> RESOLUTION: Accept the proposed text for the AAA glossary terms.
14:13:33 <andisnow> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/may032013pandg/results
14:13:36 <MaryJo> topic: Discuss the 'Survey on Guidance on Principles and Guidelines' survey
14:14:26 <greggvanderheiden> greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict
14:14:35 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:14:40 <MaryJo> Comments on principle 4 and guideline 4.1.2 were to change text to 'assistive technologies.'
14:14:47 <greggvanderheiden> back
14:15:01 <greggvanderheiden> what doc are we on?
14:15:13 <MaryJo> RESOLUTION: Accept guideline 3.2 as written.
14:15:52 <MaryJo> RESOLUTION: Accept Principle 4 with the change to use 'assistive technologies'.
14:15:52 <andisnow> s/guideline 3.2/proposal for guideline 3.2/
14:15:55 <andisnow> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/may032013pandg/results
14:16:29 <MaryJo> s/Principle 4/proposal for Principle 4/
14:16:44 <MaryJo> s/what doc are we on?//
14:17:18 <MaryJo> RESOLUTION: Accept proposal for guideline 4.1 as amended to use 'technologies' instead of 'technology'.
14:17:31 <andisnow_> andisnow_ has joined #wcag2ict
14:17:39 <andisnow_> s/Principle 4/proposal for Principle 4/
14:18:26 <korn> q+
14:19:10 <greggvanderheiden> it was assistive technologies   in the first place -- so this aligns better with original text
14:19:11 <BBailey> +Judy, I think Assistive Technology is already plural
14:20:21 <BBailey> i am okay w/ that explaination
14:20:24 <greggvanderheiden> user agents is plural  --so probably should be plural for AT as well
14:20:40 <MaryJo> RESOLUTION: Accept proposal for all Principles/Guidelines other than 3.2, 4, and 4.1 as written.
14:20:49 <korn> https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/edits-for-michael-post-2nd-public-draft/text-for
14:20:59 <korn> https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/edits-for-michael-post-2nd-public-draft
14:21:26 <MaryJo> topic: Discuss the 'Glossary of Terms - Part 5' survey [3] addressing items 2, 5 and 9 only
14:21:53 <MaryJo> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/glossary5/results
14:22:07 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
14:22:26 <MaryJo> viewport - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/glossary5/results#xq4
14:23:11 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:23:34 <MaryJo> Split comments on what replacement to text - 'software' vs. 'software, including user agents'.
14:23:57 <MaryJo> s/replacement to text/replacement to use/
14:24:48 <MaryJo> RESOLUTION: Accept proposal the definition of viewport replacing 'user agent' with 'software'.
14:25:22 <MaryJo> changes of context - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/glossary5/results#xq7
14:30:30 <MaryJo> WCAG is considering a 2.1, but it would not be completed for quite while.  There can be an errata in the meantime to show editorial changes, but wouldn't include any technical updates.
14:30:33 <Zakim> +Shadi
14:33:13 <greggvanderheiden> Yes  I will just type
14:33:27 <MaryJo> s/Yes  I will just type//
14:33:37 <Judy> s/considering a 2.1, but it would not be/considering an updated version, but would need to explore requirements first, so any new numbered version would not be/
14:33:59 <greggvanderheiden> click on something - that launches a separate player
14:34:22 <Judy> s/any technical updates/any normative changes/
14:34:25 <Mike_P> q+
14:34:30 <greggvanderheiden> clarify in understanding doc
14:34:36 <andisnow> ack mike
14:34:41 <andisnow> ack korn
14:35:20 <greggvanderheiden> q+  - i''ll jus type my comment.   --  you can read it.     If we need clarification we can do that in Understanding WCAG 2.0
14:36:54 <Loic> q+
14:37:46 <MaryJo> s/i''ll jus type my comment.//
14:38:01 <MaryJo> s/--  you can read it.//
14:38:14 <greggvanderheiden> q+  how about   entire document or software display simultaneously
14:38:59 <greggvanderheiden> how about      "entire document or software display simultaneously"
14:39:32 <greggvanderheiden> use that as the substitution for "entire page"
14:39:54 <andisnow> major changes in the content of the [NON-WEB DOCUMENT OR CONTENT PRESENTED BY SOFTWARE] that, if made without user awareness, can disorient users who are not able to view the entire [NON-WEB DOCUMENT OR CONTENT PRESENTED BY SOFTWARE] simultaneously." That's why Gregg and I came up with the proposal to use "content presented
14:40:11 <andisnow> S/That's why Gregg and I came up with the proposal to use "content presented//
14:40:50 <greggvanderheiden> cause you can't really see a whole document at one time ==-  nor whole software
14:40:50 <greggvanderheiden> sure
14:40:50 <greggvanderheiden> yes
14:41:03 <MaryJo> s/sure//
14:41:08 <MaryJo> s/yes//
14:41:51 <MaryJo> RESOLUTION: Accept the definition of 'changes of context' as amended.
14:42:12 <greggvanderheiden> If you can draft it I can send it up…
14:42:22 <andisnow> action: Peter to request WCAG WG clarification of changes of context in Understanding WCAG 2.0
14:42:22 <trackbot> Created ACTION-96 - Request WCAG WG clarification of changes of context in Understanding WCAG 2.0 [on Peter Korn - due 2013-05-10].
14:42:34 <MaryJo> s/If you can draft it I can send it up…//
14:42:46 <greggvanderheiden> s/: If you can draft it I can send it up…//
14:42:59 <MaryJo> structure - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/glossary5/results#xstruct
14:43:11 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
14:44:05 <greggvanderheiden> s/If you can draft it I can send it up…//
14:44:51 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:45:18 <greggvanderheiden> what note?
14:46:22 <andisnow> Suggest adding this note: Note: Unlike collections of Web pages, sets of non-Web documents or software are often simply separate files in a file system and have no meaningful structure in relation to each other.
14:47:23 <andisnow> Note: Unlike collections of Web pages, sets of non-Web documents or software are often simply separate files in a file system and are not organized in any meaningful structure in relation to each other.
14:47:24 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
14:48:48 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:49:46 <greggvanderheiden> for example
14:50:00 <Zakim> +David_MacDonald
14:50:01 <greggvanderheiden> a site map would show the relationship of pages
14:50:08 <greggvanderheiden> if not semantically marked up
14:50:31 <greggvanderheiden> you would not be able to tell what pages were children of which pages
14:51:12 <David> David has joined #wcag2ict
14:52:00 <greggvanderheiden> q+
14:52:08 <greggvanderheiden> ack g
14:52:22 <Loic> q-
14:52:24 <andisnow> ack loic
14:52:47 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
14:53:13 <Zakim> +Gregg_Vanderheiden
14:54:16 <greggvanderheiden> I can do text
14:56:06 <MaryJo> Our definition of 'sets of non-web documents or software' include providing structural linkages between them, so the proposed note is not accurate.
14:56:15 <andisnow> action: Gregg to propose modification to WCAG 2.0 INTENT for SC 1.3.1 to clarify structure wrt collections of web pages
14:56:15 <trackbot> Created ACTION-97 - Propose modification to WCAG 2.0 INTENT for SC 1.3.1 to clarify structure wrt collections of web pages [on Gregg Vanderheiden - due 2013-05-10].
14:56:18 <greggvanderheiden> For example,   a web page that shows a site map depicting the structure of the web site visually must present the information in text or markup so that the structure of the site is programmatically determinable or presented in text
14:56:20 <greggvanderheiden> DONE
14:56:31 <greggvanderheiden> DONE
14:56:31 <greggvanderheiden> see above
14:56:54 <greggvanderheiden> is that an OK example?
14:56:55 <greggvanderheiden> I will pass it on to WCAG
14:57:02 <MaryJo> s/DONE//
14:57:16 <MaryJo> s/see above//
14:57:31 <greggvanderheiden> yes it is
14:57:36 <MaryJo> s/is that an OK example?//
14:58:00 <greggvanderheiden> I will package it
14:58:00 <greggvanderheiden> go on and I will give you the package text in a sec
14:59:38 <MaryJo> s/I will package it//
14:59:53 <MaryJo> s/go on and I will give you the package text in a sec//
15:00:02 <andisnow> Note: See the guidance on user "sets of documents" and "sets of software" in the Key Terms section.
15:00:15 <MaryJo> s/user//
15:00:20 <andisnow> Note: See the guidance on user "sets of documents" and "sets of software" in the Key Terms section.
15:00:27 <andisnow> Note: See the guidance on"sets of documents" and "sets of software" in the Key Terms section.
15:00:39 <greggvanderheiden> PACKAGING TEXT:   the WCAG2ICT was examining the definition of STRUCTURE and had trouble understanding how structure of pages related, since there was no mention of structure of pages in the success criteria  themselves.  The following example was put forward by one member.  It this an example of what you meant?    If so can you add it to Understanding WCAG 2.0 ?   If not, what did it mean?  thx
15:01:17 <greggvanderheiden> is that packaging OK?
15:02:24 <korn> https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/glossary-edits-post-2nd-public-draft
15:05:06 <MaryJo> RESOLUTION: Accept the proposed definition of "structure" as amended with a note to reference "sets" discussion in Key Terms section, pending WCAG WG approval to modify SC 1.3.1 INTENT
15:05:44 <greggvanderheiden> say again?
15:06:00 <andisnow> structure of a "collection of web pages"
15:06:07 <greggvanderheiden> well isn't your point that is isn't referenced anywhere?
15:06:17 <greggvanderheiden> not just that it isn't  in one place
15:06:19 <MaryJo> s/say again?//
15:06:28 <greggvanderheiden> right
15:06:35 <andisnow> "no mention of structure of a collection of web pages in SC 1.3.1"
15:06:38 <greggvanderheiden> that is what the package says
15:06:41 <MaryJo> s/right//
15:07:04 <greggvanderheiden> you have a glossary item that isn't used ANYWHERE  to talk about set of pages
15:07:12 <greggvanderheiden> that was your point
15:07:13 <MaryJo> s/that is what the package says//
15:07:13 <greggvanderheiden> yes?
15:07:24 <greggvanderheiden> Right.
15:07:27 <MaryJo> s/yes?//
15:07:33 <MaryJo> s/Right.//
15:08:20 <greggvanderheiden> how is this
15:08:21 <andisnow> PACKAGING TEXT:  the WCAG2ICT was examining the definition of STRUCTURE and had trouble understanding how structure of A COLLECTION OF WEB pages related, since there was no mention of structure of A COLLECTION OF WEB pages in the success criteria  themselves.  IN FACT, STRUCTURE IS ONLY USED IN SC 1.3.1. The following example was put forward by one member.  It this an example of what you meant?    If so can you add it to Understanding WCAG 2.0 FOR SC [CUT]
15:08:21 <andisnow> If not, what did it mean?
15:08:21 <greggvanderheiden> The WCAG2ICT was examining the definition of STRUCTURE and had trouble understanding how structure of pages related, since structure is only in 1.3.1 and there there was no mention of structure of pages in the success criterion.  The following example was put forward by one member.
15:08:38 <greggvanderheiden> sure
15:08:50 <MaryJo> s/sure//
15:08:58 <MaryJo> s/how is this//
15:09:13 <greggvanderheiden> The WCAG2ICT was examining the definition of STRUCTURE and had trouble understanding how structure of pages related, since structure is only in 1.3.1 and there there was no mention of "the way a collection of pages is organized" in the success criterion.  The following example was put forward by one member.
15:09:22 <greggvanderheiden> does that capture it Andi?
15:09:28 <Mike_P> q+
15:09:51 <MaryJo> s/does that capture it Andi?//
15:10:15 <greggvanderheiden> The WCAG2ICT was examining the definition of STRUCTURE and had trouble understanding how structure of pages related, since structure is only in 1.3.1 and there there was no mention of structure of pages in the success criterion.  The following example was put forward by one member.
15:10:15 <greggvanderheiden>  - It this an example of what you meant?
15:10:17 <greggvanderheiden>  - If so can you add it to Understanding WCAG 2.0 ?
15:10:18 <greggvanderheiden>  - If not, what did it mean?  thx
15:10:18 <greggvanderheiden> "For example,  a web page that shows a site map depicting the structure of the web site visually must present the information in text or markup so that the structure of the site is programmatically determinable or presented in text."
15:11:04 <greggvanderheiden> where is it used?
15:11:20 <andisnow> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/glossary6/results
15:11:23 <greggvanderheiden> can you pull those parts together and post them on some one page?
15:12:28 <greggvanderheiden> I agree with Andi
15:13:07 <korn> q+
15:13:14 <greggvanderheiden> our notes ?  or WCAG?
15:13:26 <andisnow> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-wcag2ict-20121213/#visual-audio-contrast-dis-audio
15:13:39 <MaryJo> The remaining 4: conformance, conforming alternate version, technology (Web content), and accessibility supported.
15:14:39 <MaryJo> since we aren't addressing conformance in our document, we should probably remove any notes referring to conformance.  Affects 4 sc's: 1.4.2, 2.1.2, 2.2.2, and 2.3.1.
15:14:51 <greggvanderheiden> 1.2.1       1.4.2  (remove that note from 1.4.2,  2.1.2  2.2.2)
15:15:05 <greggvanderheiden> ALSO SEE  1.2.1
15:15:57 <MaryJo> 1.2.1 refers to 'conforming alternate version'.
15:16:12 <greggvanderheiden> right -- I searched for  "conform"  to find them all
15:17:13 <David> q+ to say the notes are not normative right?
15:17:19 <greggvanderheiden> This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above).
15:17:19 <greggvanderheiden> Note 1: The alternative can be provided directly in the non-web document or software – or provided in a conforming alternate version.
15:17:19 <greggvanderheiden> Note 2: See also the discussion on Closed Functionality in the Introduction.
15:17:31 <David> q-
15:18:02 <Zakim> -Gregg_Vanderheiden
15:18:04 <greggvanderheiden> This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above).
15:18:05 <greggvanderheiden> Note 1: The alternative can be provided directly in the non-web document or software – or provided in an alternate version.
15:18:06 <greggvanderheiden> Note 2: See also the discussion on Closed Functionality in the Introduction.
15:18:15 <greggvanderheiden> there is the text for 1.2.1
15:18:20 <MaryJo> Need to form a proposal to either modify the notes that refer to 'conformance' and 'conforming alternate versions' or remove those notes and take those to the WCAG working group.
15:18:33 <greggvanderheiden> it actually doesn’t appear in the SC itself
15:18:43 <greggvanderheiden> we introduced it in our note
15:18:51 <greggvanderheiden> so we could just take it OUT of our note
15:19:15 <MaryJo> s/ appear in the/appear in the/
15:19:16 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
15:19:58 <andisnow> The remaining 5: conformance, conforming alternate version, technology (Web content), and accessibility supported, satisfies a success criterion
15:20:39 <greggvanderheiden> I fell of and couldn't hear.   did the 1.2.1 fix work?
15:20:48 <andisnow> action: David to make proposal for "accessibility supported" and "technology (web content)"
15:20:48 <trackbot> Created ACTION-98 - Make proposal for "accessibility supported" and "technology (web content)" [on David MacDonald - due 2013-05-10].
15:21:15 <MaryJo> David will work on technology (Web content) and 'accessibility supported' and Andi will work on the rest as part of the existing action item on glossary terms.
15:21:47 <greggvanderheiden> OK   great
15:21:52 <MaryJo> topic: Action items
15:21:53 <greggvanderheiden> what do we have to take to WCAG WG?
15:21:58 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
15:22:28 <greggvanderheiden> other than the STRUCTUREal change to INTENT for 1.3.1
15:23:01 <greggvanderheiden> fell off again
15:23:09 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
15:23:45 <MaryJo> s/OK   great//
15:23:55 <MaryJo> s/fell off again//
15:25:36 <greggvanderheiden> ABSOLUTELY   -- please package them and send to me
15:25:43 <greggvanderheiden> that is fine
15:26:03 <andisnow> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG2ICT-TF/track/actions/open
15:26:14 <MaryJo> s/that is fine//
15:26:34 <greggvanderheiden> what was the concern?
15:26:44 <greggvanderheiden> if no one remembers  -- -close it?
15:26:53 <andisnow> close ACTION-70
15:26:53 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-70 Work with on a proposal for 3.2.3 that avoids having to define "navigational mechanisms" for software..
15:26:56 <greggvanderheiden> (sensory experience)
15:27:15 <greggvanderheiden> I think that is OBE?
15:27:53 <greggvanderheiden> then you just have to wade to get to the next one
15:28:02 <greggvanderheiden> and the intent is what we are agreeing with
15:28:06 <greggvanderheiden> so should come first
15:28:07 <greggvanderheiden> ?
15:28:44 <andisnow> close ACTION-79
15:28:44 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-79 Work with Mike on interpretation of "change of context" for software for 3.2.1 and 3.2.2.
15:29:35 <andisnow> close ACTION-85
15:29:35 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-85 Propose text for guidance on Guidelines per his comments on the survey https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/W2IDRAFT2/results.
15:29:59 <greggvanderheiden> 86 is OBE
15:30:06 <andisnow> close ACTION-86
15:30:06 <trackbot> Closed ACTION-86 Put item on next year's agenda to consider whether we want to request feedback on "set of software" and any additional topics using a "chaser note".
15:30:29 <greggvanderheiden> 97 is done
15:30:33 <greggvanderheiden> bye
15:30:35 <Zakim> -Kiran_Kaja
15:30:36 <Zakim> -Judy
15:30:37 <Zakim> -Loic
15:30:38 <Zakim> -Bruce_Bailey
15:30:39 <Zakim> -Andi_Snow_Weaver
15:30:39 <Zakim> -Mary_Jo_Mueller
15:30:40 <Zakim> -David_MacDonald
15:30:40 <Zakim> -Shadi
15:30:41 <Zakim> -[Oracle]
15:30:42 <MaryJo> s/bye//
15:30:46 <Zakim> -Mike_Pluke
15:30:54 <Zakim> -Janina_Sajka
15:30:58 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
15:30:58 <janina> janina has left #wcag2ict
15:31:00 <Zakim> WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has ended
15:31:00 <Zakim> Attendees were Andi_Snow_Weaver, Mary_Jo_Mueller, Kiran_Kaja, Mike_Pluke, Peter_Korn, Loic, Janina_Sajka, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Judy, Bruce_Bailey, [IPcaller], Shadi, David_MacDonald
15:31:15 <MaryJo> zakim, bye
15:31:15 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wcag2ict
15:31:24 <MaryJo> rrsagent, make minutes
15:31:24 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo
15:32:58 <korn> korn has left #wcag2ict
15:58:14 <Judy> Judy has joined #wcag2ict
15:59:39 <MaryJo> s/They didn't like our text for conformance/They requested edits to our text for conformance/
16:01:27 <MaryJo> s/back//
16:02:18 <MaryJo> s/explaination/explanation/
16:04:46 <MaryJo> s/That's why Gregg and I came up with the proposal to use "content presented//
16:05:11 <MaryJo> rrsagent, make minutes
16:05:11 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo
16:06:01 <MaryJo> s/That's why Gregg and I came up with the proposal to use "content presented//
16:06:10 <MaryJo> rrsagent, make minutes
16:06:10 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo
16:07:44 <MaryJo> s/what note?//
16:08:16 <MaryJo> s/I can do text//
16:09:14 <MaryJo> s/DONE//
16:09:25 <MaryJo> rrsagent, make minutes
16:09:25 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo
16:10:02 <MaryJo> s/yes it is//
16:10:22 <MaryJo> s/Note: See the guidance on user "sets of documents" and "sets of software" in the Key Terms section.//
16:10:54 <MaryJo> s/Note: See the guidance on"sets of documents" and "sets of software" in the Key Terms section.//
16:15:45 <MaryJo> s/our notes ? or WCAG?//
16:16:44 <MaryJo> s/It this an example of what you meant?/Is this an example of what you meant?/
16:16:50 <MaryJo> rrsagent, make minutes
16:16:50 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo
16:17:30 <MaryJo> s/ It this an example of what you meant?/ Is this an example of what you meant?/
16:18:29 <MaryJo> s/since we aren't addressing/Since we aren't addressing/
16:39:04 <andisnow> andisnow has joined #wcag2ict
16:39:49 <andisnow> andisnow has joined #wcag2ict
16:40:55 <andisnow_> andisnow_ has joined #wcag2ict
16:54:46 <MaryJo> s/right -- I searched for "conform" to find them all//
16:55:36 <MaryJo> s/it actually doesn’tappear in the SC itself/It actually doesn’t appear in the SC itself./
16:56:11 <MaryJo> s/I fell of and couldn't hear. did the 1.2.1 fix work?//
16:58:40 <MaryJo> rrsagent, make minutes
16:58:40 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo