IRC log of gld on 2013-05-02

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:53:09 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #gld

13:53:09 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/05/02-gld-irc

13:53:11 [trackbot]

RRSAgent, make logs world

13:53:11 [Zakim]

Zakim has joined #gld

13:53:13 [trackbot]

Zakim, this will be GLD

13:53:13 [Zakim]

ok, trackbot; I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes

13:53:14 [trackbot]

Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference

13:53:14 [trackbot]

Date: 02 May 2013

13:53:26 [olyerickson]

LOL!

13:56:06 [bhyland]

bhyland has joined #gld

13:59:22 [Zakim]

T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started

13:59:45 [Zakim]

+Sandro

14:00:06 [Zakim]

+HadleyBeeman

14:00:29 [Zakim]

+ +000000aaaa

14:00:39 [gatemezi]

gatemezi has joined #gld

14:00:49 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, aaaa is olyerickson

14:00:50 [Zakim]

+olyerickson; got it

14:01:01 [Zakim]

+David_Wood

14:01:15 [sandro]

olyerickson, are you using IP today?

14:01:16 [bhyland]

zakim, David_Wood is me

14:01:16 [Zakim]

+bhyland; got it

14:01:20 [HadleyBeeman]

agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130502

14:01:34 [DaveReynolds]

DaveReynolds has joined #gld

14:01:46 [martinA]

martinA has joined #gld

14:02:16 [Zakim]

+??P11

14:02:24 [TallTed]

TallTed has changed the topic to: Govt Linked Data (GLD) WG - http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ - current agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130502

14:02:24 [Zakim]

+??P13

14:02:32 [Zakim]

+OpenLink_Software

14:02:34 [martinA]

zakim, ??p13 is me

14:02:34 [Zakim]

+martinA; got it

14:02:38 [TallTed]

Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me

14:02:38 [Zakim]

+TallTed; got it

14:02:39 [TallTed]

Zakim, mute me

14:02:39 [Zakim]

TallTed should now be muted

14:02:49 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:02:59 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, who is on the call

14:02:59 [Zakim]

I don't understand 'who is on the call', HadleyBeeman

14:03:04 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, who is on the call?

14:03:04 [Zakim]

On the phone I see Sandro, HadleyBeeman, olyerickson, bhyland, ??P11, martinA, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds

14:03:11 [PhilA]

PhilA has joined #gld

14:03:20 [DeirdreLee]

DeirdreLee has joined #gld

14:03:21 [JoaoPauloAlmeida]

JoaoPauloAlmeida has joined #gld

14:03:28 [Zakim]

+DeirdreLee

14:03:37 [PhilA]

zakim, code?

14:03:37 [Zakim]

the conference code is 45394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), PhilA

14:03:47 [fadmaa]

fadmaa has joined #gld

14:03:53 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:03:55 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, Fadmaa is with deirdrelee

14:03:55 [Zakim]

+Fadmaa; got it

14:03:57 [PhilA]

zakim, ipcaller is me

14:03:57 [Zakim]

+PhilA; got it

14:04:19 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, who is on the call?

14:04:19 [Zakim]

On the phone I see Sandro, HadleyBeeman, olyerickson, bhyland, ??P11, martinA, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds, DeirdreLee, PhilA

14:04:22 [Zakim]

DeirdreLee has DeirdreLee, Fadmaa

14:04:31 [JoaoPauloAlmeida]

Zakim, ??P11 is me

14:04:31 [Zakim]

+JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it

14:04:42 [HadleyBeeman]

agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130502

14:04:47 [Zakim]

+gatemezi

14:05:17 [DeirdreLee]

scribe: DeirdreLee

14:05:21 [HadleyBeeman]

last week's minutes: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-04-25

14:05:25 [olyerickson]

+1 to minutes

14:05:31 [DaveReynolds]

+1

14:05:31 [DeirdreLee]

+1

14:05:32 [JoaoPauloAlmeida]

+1

14:05:33 [gatemezi]

+1

14:05:34 [fadmaa]

+1

14:05:34 [PhilA]

+1

14:06:06 [DeirdreLee]

resolved: last week's minutes

14:06:55 [olyerickson]

DCAT UCR http://bit.ly/DCATUseCases

14:06:55 [bhyland]

zakim, who is on the call?

14:06:55 [Zakim]

On the phone I see Sandro, HadleyBeeman, olyerickson, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, martinA, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds, DeirdreLee, PhilA, gatemezi

14:06:58 [Zakim]

DeirdreLee has DeirdreLee, Fadmaa

14:07:06 [DaveReynolds]

Benedikt sent regrets to the mail list a little while ago

14:07:08 [DeirdreLee]

topic: dcat

14:07:26 [bhyland]

s/dcat/DCAT UCR

14:08:01 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: Discuss whether we should proceed with DCAT UCR?

14:08:36 [DeirdreLee]

olyerickson: prepared by cygri and fadmaa

14:09:40 [bhyland]

@olyerickson, does it really cover all of section 4, for example 4.3 Persistent URIs for catalog entries?

14:09:50 [DeirdreLee]

... what is the standing of such a document, are we obliged to complete this doc in a detailed way

14:10:34 [DeirdreLee]

... DCAT doc is already quite complete, with clear guidelines, is it necessary to go into details on how to implement each requirement?

14:10:41 [bhyland]

I agree with olyerickson that it is real work to go thru UCR & *prove* but the spec is the thing people read for implementation questions IMO.

14:10:49 [olyerickson]

Q+

14:11:02 [DeirdreLee]

sandro: UCR is a good marketing tool and would be a nice supporting doc, but not as important as the spec

14:11:21 [DeirdreLee]

... if we have time we could work on it more, but it's not essential

14:11:30 [bhyland]

+1 as a supporting documentation (I probably wouldn't call it a marketing doc ;-)

14:12:02 [DeirdreLee]

olyerickson: for a complete UCR, each one of these requirements in the DCAT spec may need an example, and this would be a lot of work

14:12:30 [DeirdreLee]

... better to leave it as an informal doc

14:13:23 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: Leave DCAT UCR as it is for the moment, and if we have more time later, or if we get an extension, we could flesh out the document

14:13:26 [bhyland]

+1

14:13:26 [sandro]

+1

14:13:39 [DeirdreLee]

... but as it is, it is fine to leave as a note

14:14:23 [DaveReynolds]

q+

14:14:45 [DaveReynolds]

q-

14:15:33 [Zakim]

+Mike_Pendleton

14:15:34 [DeirdreLee]

Proposal: Transition DCAT UCR editor's draft to be a WG Note (after removing pink todo section)

14:15:49 [Mike_Pendleton]

Mike_Pendleton has joined #gld

14:15:58 [Yigal]

Yigal has joined #gld

14:16:41 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, who is talking?

14:16:41 [DeirdreLee]

ACTION: Transition DCAT UCR editor's draft to be a WG Note

14:16:41 [trackbot]

Error finding 'Transition'. You can review and register nicknames at <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/users>.

14:16:51 [Zakim]

HadleyBeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: HadleyBeeman (20%), olyerickson (57%), bhyland (4%)

14:17:01 [bhyland]

zakim, who is on the call?

14:17:01 [Zakim]

On the phone I see Sandro, HadleyBeeman, olyerickson, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, martinA, TallTed (muted), DaveReynolds, DeirdreLee, PhilA, gatemezi (muted), Mike_Pendleton

14:17:04 [fadmaa]

ACTION: fadmaa to Transition DCAT UCR editor's draft to be a WG Note (after removing pink todo section)

14:17:04 [Zakim]

DeirdreLee has DeirdreLee, Fadmaa

14:17:04 [Zakim]

+Gregg_Vanderheiden

14:17:04 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, mute olyerickson

14:17:04 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-124 - Transition DCAT UCR editor's draft to be a WG Note (after removing pink todo section) [on Fadi Maali - due 2013-05-09].

14:17:05 [Zakim]

olyerickson should now be muted

14:17:30 [Zakim]

-martinA

14:17:36 [gatemezi]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/BP_Timetable

14:17:48 [DeirdreLee]

subtopic: Best Practices

14:17:51 [JoaoPauloAlmeida]

I can't hear anyone… is it just me?

14:18:11 [DeirdreLee]

bhyland: found great interest in best practice at ODW 2013

14:18:19 [JoaoPauloAlmeida]

PhilA, thanks, I will reconnect

14:18:44 [Zakim]

+??P32

14:18:45 [DeirdreLee]

... ODI is working on this, Dutch gov has also created a document related to best practice

14:18:49 [JoaoPauloAlmeida]

Zakim, ??P32 is me

14:18:49 [Zakim]

+JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it

14:19:52 [DeirdreLee]

... content in best practice doc needs to be restructured slightly and updated

14:19:52 [PhilA]

There's quote a lot of what Hans Overbeek presented in his ODW13 paper http://www.w3.org/2013/04/odw/odw13_submission_14.pdf

14:20:11 [DeirdreLee]

... bhyland focusing on URI section, which we expect will get most attention

14:20:43 [DeirdreLee]

... getting it to W3C note status helped to promote BP

14:20:48 [bhyland]

Sections I'm focusing on are:

14:20:48 [bhyland]

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#uri-constructionhttps://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#uri-construction

14:20:48 [bhyland]

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#uri-policy-for-persistencehttps://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#uri-policy-for-persistence

14:20:48 [bhyland]

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#internationalized-resource-identifiershttps://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#internationalized-resource-identifiers

14:22:36 [DeirdreLee]

... updating doc is a matter of transferring some content, 3-4 hours of work

14:22:51 [DeirdreLee]

... if someone was willing to help with pub rules for the glossary

14:23:56 [DeirdreLee]

... bhland would like to shadow sandro while he does it

14:24:05 [HadleyBeeman]

s/bhland/bhyland

14:24:14 [bhyland]

Note from PhilA: "Open Data Best Practices WG"

14:25:10 [HadleyBeeman]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/BP_Timetable

14:25:38 [DeirdreLee]

bhyland: would like to move timetable forward one week

14:26:28 [DeirdreLee]

... the doc hasn't changed a lot, most content has remained unchanged for a year

14:27:03 [DeirdreLee]

... get doc out by 14th, then will get feedback

14:27:45 [DaveReynolds]

q+

14:27:50 [DeirdreLee]

... might not make publication as WG note by 28th May, but will work through feedback

14:28:04 [PhilA]

ack olyerickson

14:28:06 [olyerickson]

I'm here

14:28:10 [olyerickson]

that was from before

14:28:23 [PhilA]

ack DaveReynolds

14:29:16 [DeirdreLee]

DaveReynolds: Should have a day or two before it's published, for WG members to have a complete read through the doc

14:30:00 [DeirdreLee]

... to publish on 14th (tuesday), we need to agree on previous thursday (9th)

14:30:54 [DaveReynolds]

I was only asking for a few days notice

14:31:49 [bhyland]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/BP_Timetable#Detailed_timetable_and_checklist

14:32:31 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: if we send BP doc to WG members for review on Tues 7th, we can vote on Thurs 9th, and publish for public feedback on Tues 14th

14:32:59 [bhyland]

http://dir.w3.org

14:33:17 [DeirdreLee]

bhyland: unsure about first rows in doc, will follow-up with Hadley after

14:33:46 [bhyland]

Topic: Community Directory

14:33:48 [TallTed]

Zakim, unmute me

14:33:48 [Zakim]

TallTed should no longer be muted

14:33:51 [DeirdreLee]

... every GLD organisation represented in WG should be present in Community Directory

14:34:01 [Zakim]

-JoaoPauloAlmeida.a

14:34:24 [DeirdreLee]

TallTed: added entry while ago, but it was deleted, should details be re-entered?

14:35:15 [DeirdreLee]

bhyland: yes, new version now, richer features, nice theme,

14:35:35 [DeirdreLee]

... so please resubmit if entry isn't available

14:35:53 [TallTed]

Zakim, mute me

14:35:53 [Zakim]

TallTed should now be muted

14:35:57 [DeirdreLee]

TallTed: suggests bhyland to send a reminder out to those who may have to resubmit

14:36:05 [Zakim]

+??P35

14:36:07 [DeirdreLee]

bhyland: agreed

14:36:11 [bhyland]

I'd like to announce the Directory to the various lists today.

14:36:36 [DeirdreLee]

subtopic: ADMS

14:36:51 [bhyland]

Per Ted's comment, I'll ping each organization who previously had a listing in v1.0 of the Directory. I guess we'll call this Directory 2.0

14:37:16 [DeirdreLee]

PhilA: going through the spec, addressing comments from F2F, and other comments

14:37:20 [HadleyBeeman]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ADMS_Timetable

14:37:43 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: ADMS timetable is out of date, advises PhilA to update it

14:38:02 [DeirdreLee]

Action: to PhilA update ADMS timetable

14:38:02 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-125 - PhilA update ADMS timetable [on Tope Omitola - due 2013-05-09].

14:38:22 [DeirdreLee]

subtopic: RegORG

14:38:38 [HadleyBeeman]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/REGORG_Timetable

14:38:45 [DeirdreLee]

PhilA: Marios is taking a look at that

14:38:56 [DeirdreLee]

Action: to PhilA update RegORG timetable

14:38:57 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-126 - PhilA update RegORG timetable [on Tope Omitola - due 2013-05-09].

14:39:24 [DaveReynolds]

Fadi not Dave :)

14:39:33 [DeirdreLee]

subtopic: DCAT

14:39:42 [olyerickson]

I must leave at 11a

14:40:07 [fadmaa]

q+

14:40:10 [DeirdreLee]

DaveReynolds: Could we extend this meeting to talk about DCAT?

14:40:41 [fadmaa]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised

14:40:50 [Zakim]

+Sandro.a

14:40:54 [Zakim]

-Sandro

14:40:54 [DeirdreLee]

s/DaveReynolds/Sandro

14:40:57 [olyerickson]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_LC_comments

14:41:18 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: Go through DCAT issues

14:41:43 [PhilA]

issue-6?

14:41:43 [trackbot]

ISSUE-6 -- How should publishers figure out good URIs for properties with non-literal ranges? -- raised

14:41:43 [trackbot]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/6

14:42:03 [PhilA]

issue-54?

14:42:03 [trackbot]

ISSUE-54 -- Relationship of DCAT and VoID -- raised

14:42:03 [trackbot]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/54

14:42:04 [DeirdreLee]

fadmaa: Issue 6 is done

14:42:12 [PhilA]

issue-65?

14:42:12 [trackbot]

ISSUE-65 -- Add properties for dataset versioning -- raised

14:42:12 [trackbot]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/65

14:42:19 [DeirdreLee]

... issue-9 needs richard to close

14:42:35 [DeirdreLee]

... ISSUE-54 and 65 need further discusssion

14:43:05 [PhilA]

issue-60?

14:43:05 [trackbot]

ISSUE-60 -- dct:license vs. dct:rights -- raised

14:43:05 [trackbot]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/60

14:43:07 [DeirdreLee]

.... the rest of the issues, Fadi and Richard can go through

14:43:24 [olyerickson]

60 and 65

14:43:30 [DeirdreLee]

s/54/60

14:44:05 [olyerickson]

Do we need to "normalize" on rights vs license?

14:44:10 [gatemezi]

I thought one of the resolution during F2F3 was to have a special call for DCAT..

14:44:10 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: Do we need another last call for dcat?

14:44:34 [PhilA]

q+

14:44:53 [fadmaa]

q-

14:44:59 [PhilA]

ack me

14:45:07 [DeirdreLee]

fadmaa: It depends on resolution of ISSUES 60 and 64, as decisions on these could mean a change to the core, and as such, would impact on conformance

14:45:28 [DeirdreLee]

PhilA: recommends we go for a second LC

14:46:01 [DeirdreLee]

... given the rate of progress and amount of work being done, but still to be done, we have good justification of an extension

14:46:05 [bhyland]

+1 to what PhilA is saying, critical to get this correct even if we flow over a couple months.

14:46:28 [olyerickson]

I see no strong argument against dcterms:rights

14:46:57 [DeirdreLee]

... DCAT is getting a lot of attention, so to acknowledge all comments, make informed decisions, and go for quality over urgency, we should go for 2nd LC

14:47:06 [DeirdreLee]

fadmaa: totally agrees with PhilA

14:47:33 [HadleyBeeman]

q?

14:47:41 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: We will leave this decision with editors, and should they decide on a need for 2nd LC, the chairs/groups will support this

14:48:01 [olyerickson]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/raised

14:48:07 [DeirdreLee]

PhilA: related to ADMS, will DCATinclude a contact point?

14:48:23 [DeirdreLee]

fadmaa: surprised there is no issue related to this

14:48:48 [DeirdreLee]

... fadmaa will create an issue on this, he would be for creating a contact point in DCAT

14:49:11 [DeirdreLee]

PhilA: if it is in DCAT, it can be removed from ADMS, and they will just use the DCAT property

14:49:11 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, who is talking?

14:49:14 [olyerickson]

NOT ME

14:49:21 [Zakim]

HadleyBeeman, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: HadleyBeeman (50%), DeirdreLee (44%)

14:49:22 [olyerickson]

;)

14:49:51 [olyerickson]

+1 to DCAT going to where it needs to go...

14:50:20 [fadmaa]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_LC_comments

14:50:26 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: Are all issues for DCAT being followed up on / progressed?

14:50:55 [DeirdreLee]

olyerickson: editors are working through comments/issues

14:51:27 [Zakim]

-??P35

14:51:50 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: issues are being recorded in issue-tracker and in LC comments section, they may not be the same issues, so as long as editors is keeping an eye on both places

14:51:54 [Zakim]

+??P2

14:51:59 [DeirdreLee]

subtopic: ORG

14:51:59 [DaveReynolds]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_CR_transition

14:52:00 [JoaoPauloAlmeida]

Zakim, ??P2 is me

14:52:00 [Zakim]

+JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it

14:52:48 [DeirdreLee]

DaveReynolds: Have created a section on uses of ORG that needs feedback from, from Bart and PhilA

14:52:48 [HadleyBeeman]

davereynolds: expecting bits to be completed by Bart

14:52:49 [DaveReynolds]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_CR_transition

14:52:58 [DaveReynolds]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Implementations

14:53:06 [PhilA]

action: phila to provide info about usage of ORG in Italy and Greece

14:53:06 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-127 - Provide info about usage of ORG in Italy and Greece [on Phil Archer - due 2013-05-09].

14:54:46 [DeirdreLee]

... proposes to subdivide ORG into a set of features (5), and uses could be reported at a feature level instead of property level

14:55:16 [DeirdreLee]

... that way users may not have to use every single property in a feature, but we can still see which features are actually useful

14:55:35 [HadleyBeeman]

If we label a feature "at risk" and then discover implementations, do they lose that "at risk" label?

14:55:50 [DeirdreLee]

... for the exit criteria, we could check the use/conformance specification at feature level

14:56:06 [DaveReynolds]

http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Validation_Suite

14:56:49 [HadleyBeeman]

q+

14:56:50 [DeirdreLee]

... there will be a set of SPARQL queries that will act like a minimal consumer (at link)

14:57:17 [DeirdreLee]

... the resultant list will still have to be manually checked to see if the results are valid

14:57:29 [olyerickson]

olyerickson has left #gld

14:57:29 [Zakim]

-olyerickson

14:57:42 [sandro]

q+

14:57:48 [DeirdreLee]

... will we rely on implementers to report this

14:58:13 [bhyland]

@DaveReynolds, that is a really good approach & outcome based on the WG F2F discussions, IMO. Thank you very much. I think that gives us sufficient due diligence that an implementer can use to guide their use of ORG.

14:58:28 [DeirdreLee]

... but would we need a dedicated person from WG to check the negative compliance?

14:58:40 [HadleyBeeman]

ack sandro

14:58:48 [bhyland]

Sandro: THinks this is great!

14:59:22 [DeirdreLee]

Sandro: this seems like a great approach. Normally we don't want implementations to be public, but maybe in this case we could make them public?

14:59:40 [DeirdreLee]

DaveReynolds: would we need 2 public ones, or would 1 be sufficient?

14:59:52 [DeirdreLee]

sandro: 1 is fine, 2 or more would be great

15:00:34 [DeirdreLee]

... we're not committing to cross-referencing it, but we have the option to check the public implementations ourselves then if we want

15:00:48 [Zakim]

-TallTed

15:01:09 [DeirdreLee]

DaveReynolds: we could add a checkbox for implementers, asking whether they mind if their data is made public

15:02:14 [DeirdreLee]

... we could provide a service to check this

15:02:22 [gatemezi]

@DaveReynolds: if we change the Select queries to ASK ones? could them be also sufficient for checking?

15:02:32 [DeirdreLee]

sandro: w3c will provide a vm to host the service for the CR period

15:03:11 [sandro]

(probably)

15:03:12 [DeirdreLee]

HadleyBeeman: Could this exit criteria methodology be applied to other vocabs?

15:03:17 [HadleyBeeman]

ack me

15:04:26 [DeirdreLee]

DaveReynolds: qb is a different beast., in the spec we have an idea of what is a good and bad implementation, so we can simply run the validation queries on these and see if they conform

15:04:43 [DeirdreLee]

... might not be worth breaking down into features

15:05:04 [DeirdreLee]

also doesn't make sense to have online service as datacube data would be very large

15:06:18 [DeirdreLee]

fadmaa: the exit-criteria for ORG should also apply to DCAT

15:06:42 [DeirdreLee]

... would make more sense to run online service on same VM as ORG

15:07:16 [Zakim]

-JoaoPauloAlmeida.a

15:07:28 [bhyland]

Great job Dave, thank you for blazing the path forward to seeing sunlight out the other side of CR process. Thanks.

15:07:38 [Zakim]

+??P2

15:07:45 [Zakim]

-DeirdreLee

15:07:49 [HadleyBeeman]

zakim, who is here?

15:07:49 [Zakim]

On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, bhyland, JoaoPauloAlmeida, DaveReynolds, PhilA, gatemezi (muted), Mike_Pendleton, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Sandro.a, ??P2

15:07:51 [Zakim]

On IRC I see Yigal, Mike_Pendleton, fadmaa, JoaoPauloAlmeida, DeirdreLee, PhilA, martinA, DaveReynolds, gatemezi, bhyland, Zakim, RRSAgent, HadleyBeeman, TallTed, danbri, cygri,

15:07:51 [Zakim]

... sandro, trackbot

15:07:55 [JoaoPauloAlmeida]

Zakim, ??P2 is me

15:07:56 [Zakim]

+JoaoPauloAlmeida; got it

15:08:21 [sandro]

HadleyBeeman: We just lost our scribe, but I think we're done with the agenda!

15:08:34 [bhyland]

Thank you Hadley, awesome work barreling through this mega-agenda!!

15:08:35 [Zakim]

+DeirdreLee

15:08:40 [sandro]

HadleyBeeman: Thank you all for everything today. Talk to you all next week.

15:08:41 [Zakim]

-Mike_Pendleton

15:08:41 [bhyland]

thanks all. have a good weekend.

15:08:46 [sandro]

ADJOURNED

15:08:47 [Zakim]

-JoaoPauloAlmeida.a

15:08:49 [Zakim]

-Gregg_Vanderheiden

15:08:50 [fadmaa]

bye

15:08:50 [Zakim]

-PhilA

15:08:50 [Zakim]

-HadleyBeeman

15:08:52 [Zakim]

-bhyland

15:08:52 [Zakim]

-JoaoPauloAlmeida

15:08:52 [Zakim]

-gatemezi

15:08:52 [Zakim]

-Sandro.a

15:08:54 [Zakim]

-DeirdreLee

15:08:55 [Zakim]

-DaveReynolds

15:08:57 [Zakim]

T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended

15:08:57 [Zakim]

Attendees were Sandro, HadleyBeeman, +000000aaaa, olyerickson, bhyland, martinA, TallTed, DaveReynolds, DeirdreLee, Fadmaa, PhilA, JoaoPauloAlmeida, gatemezi, Mike_Pendleton,

15:08:57 [Zakim]

... Gregg_Vanderheiden

15:09:00 [martinA]

martinA has left #gld

15:09:26 [DeirdreLee]

RRSAgent, set logs world-visible

15:09:36 [HadleyBeeman]

thank you again, DeirdreLee!

15:09:46 [DeirdreLee]

RRSAgent, generate minutes

15:09:46 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/05/02-gld-minutes.html DeirdreLee

15:09:51 [DeirdreLee]

no worries Hadley

15:10:01 [HadleyBeeman]

:)

15:28:03 [cgueret]

cgueret has joined #gld

15:39:49 [DaveReynolds]

DaveReynolds has left #gld

15:46:16 [PhilA]

PhilA has left #gld

17:16:10 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #gld

17:47:49 [bhyland]

bhyland has joined #gld

18:50:51 [cgueret]

cgueret has joined #gld