IRC log of pointerevents on 2013-04-02
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:59:39 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #pointerevents
- 14:59:39 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/04/02-pointerevents-irc
- 14:59:48 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make log Public
- 14:59:54 [ArtB]
- ScribeNick: ArtB
- 14:59:57 [ArtB]
- Scribe: Art
- 15:00:03 [ArtB]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013AprJun/0003.html
- 15:00:08 [ArtB]
- Chair: Art
- 15:00:14 [ArtB]
- Meeting: Pointer Events WG Voice Conference
- 15:00:23 [Zakim]
- RWC_PEWG()11:00AM has now started
- 15:00:30 [Zakim]
- +scott_gonzalez
- 15:00:31 [ArtB]
- Regrets: Rick_Byers, Olli_Pettay
- 15:01:08 [Zakim]
- +Art_Barstow
- 15:01:21 [Cathy]
- Cathy has joined #pointerevents
- 15:01:29 [Cathy]
- Present+ Cathy_Chan
- 15:01:47 [Zakim]
- +Cathy
- 15:01:52 [ArtB]
- Present+ Scott_González
- 15:01:57 [ArtB]
- Present+ Art_Barstow
- 15:02:05 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 15:02:05 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/02-pointerevents-minutes.html ArtB
- 15:02:46 [Zakim]
- +Matt_Brubeck
- 15:02:56 [ArtB]
- Present+ Matt_Brubeck
- 15:03:07 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 15:04:04 [ArtB]
- Present+ Asir_Vedamuthu
- 15:04:25 [Zakim]
- +Doug_Schepers
- 15:04:33 [ArtB]
- Present+ Doug_Schepers
- 15:04:37 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft.a]
- 15:04:45 [ArtB]
- Present+ Jacob_Rossi
- 15:05:11 [ArtB]
- Topic: Getting started
- 15:05:11 [jrossi21]
- jrossi21 has joined #pointerevents
- 15:05:16 [ArtB]
- AB: I posted a draft agenda yesterday http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013AprJun/0003.html. The main subject is to discuss the status of the LC comment processing.
- 15:05:27 [ArtB]
- AB: any change requests?
- 15:05:34 [ArtB]
- Topic: Status of Last Call comment processing
- 15:05:39 [ArtB]
- AB: Jacob created the comment tracking document https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/dc.html.
- 15:05:50 [ArtB]
- AB: it appears we have replies from everyone except Mose Bottacini (#9) and Yandex/Charles (#13-#17).
- 15:06:01 [ArtB]
- AB: Asir followed up with Mose and asked him to reply by April 8. In the absence of any additional feedback from Mose by the 8th, I propose we continue with the group's resolution and not block on him.
- 15:06:29 [ArtB]
- AB: any concerns Doug?
- 15:06:55 [ArtB]
- DS: I'm comfortable with that if we can defend it
- 15:07:29 [ArtB]
- AB: Jacob replied to him, Asir pinged him again. I think an additional week should be reasonable
- 15:07:41 [ArtB]
- AB: Rick and I followed up with Charles. Charles indicated in IRC today that he will ask Sergey to reply.
- 15:08:05 [ArtB]
- AB: Chaals understand we are waiting for him and Yandex to reply
- 15:08:26 [ArtB]
- AB: anything else on the comment processing?
- 15:08:37 [ArtB]
- JR: I would like everyone to please check the Web IDL changes
- 15:09:04 [ArtB]
- … I made one change and then committed something different
- 15:09:12 [ArtB]
- … Please take a look all
- 15:09:23 [ArtB]
- AB: please look at the new IDL changes
- 15:09:27 [jrossi21]
- https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#extensions-to-the-element-interface
- 15:09:36 [ArtB]
- … and ask you to reply to the list if you do review
- 15:09:52 [ArtB]
- … Want a record that people looked at the change
- 15:10:09 [ArtB]
- Topic: Moving Pointer Events spec to Candidate Recommendation
- 15:10:15 [ArtB]
- AB: when I created the draft agenda, I was hopeful we would have closed the comment loop with all of the `Commenters` and thus we would be in a position to determine if we have consensus to move the spec to CR.
- 15:10:28 [ArtB]
- AB: we aren't quite there yet but might be by next week's call.
- 15:10:53 [ArtB]
- Topic: Testing: status, plans
- 15:10:59 [ArtB]
- AB: any status or news re testing?
- 15:11:06 [ArtB]
- AB: it's a bit tricky to create tests when the implementations are lacking which is a segue to our next topic ...
- 15:11:08 [asir]
- asir has joined #pointerevents
- 15:11:29 [ArtB]
- Topic: Any other Business
- 15:11:35 [ArtB]
- AB: any implementation status to share? When can we expect a Public version of IE that support the standard?
- 15:11:56 [ArtB]
- JR: I can't comment on specific release timeframes
- 15:12:09 [ArtB]
- … but we are following the spec closely
- 15:12:19 [shepazu]
- q+
- 15:12:21 [ArtB]
- … and expect to update our implementation to conform to the spec
- 15:12:35 [ArtB]
- AB: anything new Matt re Mozilla?
- 15:12:50 [ArtB]
- MB: lots of discussion. Main issue is getting resources to work on it
- 15:12:54 [asir]
- q+
- 15:13:00 [ArtB]
- AB: any status on the WebKit port
- 15:13:13 [ArtB]
- AV: on a weekly basis, we are posting updates
- 15:13:22 [ArtB]
- … you can track that on the WebKit forum
- 15:14:20 [ArtB]
- AB: do you have an idea when a WebKit-based browser will have an impl?
- 15:14:24 [ArtB]
- AV: I don't have any dates
- 15:14:30 [ArtB]
- … Rick might know more
- 15:14:37 [ArtB]
- … that is certainly our goal
- 15:14:51 [ArtB]
- AB: so in the mean time, use "MS" prefix
- 15:15:11 [ArtB]
- AB: anything else on impl for today?
- 15:15:13 [ArtB]
- [ No ]
- 15:15:39 [ArtB]
- DS: I talked to some LeapMotion people at SxSW
- 15:15:44 [jrossi21]
- q+
- 15:15:47 [ArtB]
- … they want to make sure it works well with the Web
- 15:16:03 [ArtB]
- … LeapMotion is a 3D detector
- 15:16:14 [ArtB]
- … I respect JR's comment re z-axis
- 15:16:27 [ArtB]
- … There is a lot of buzz/interest re 3D
- 15:16:40 [ArtB]
- … Want to know though about the next steps to manage requests like this?
- 15:16:56 [ArtB]
- … Do we have a v2 feature list?
- 15:17:03 [ArtB]
- AB: yes, it is at the bottom of the agenda
- 15:17:18 [ArtB]
- DS: do we have a timeframe for v2?
- 15:17:37 [ArtB]
- … we have a good idea about v1 status
- 15:17:46 [ArtB]
- … have we publized the v2 list?
- 15:18:06 [ArtB]
- … can we say "it's X-X number of months before we start v2?"
- 15:18:22 [ArtB]
- … it will help with our engagement with folks like LeapMotion
- 15:18:28 [ArtB]
- … It could help bring them in
- 15:18:49 [ArtB]
- JR: I have also talked to Josh from LeapMotion and Bill
- 15:19:06 [ArtB]
- … I think our engagement has been useful
- 15:19:15 [ArtB]
- … I now have a LM device
- 15:19:36 [ArtB]
- … I think a projection of PE onto 3D can be done
- 15:19:47 [ArtB]
- … but there are some issues e.g. coordinate mapping
- 15:19:57 [ArtB]
- … I think we have done the right things for v1
- 15:20:12 [ArtB]
- … that facilitate the experimentation of other devices
- 15:20:29 [ArtB]
- … Re timeline for v2, agree a goal would be "noble"
- 15:20:39 [ArtB]
- … but I think we really need to finish v1 first
- 15:20:57 [ArtB]
- … Don't want to get distracted from finishing v1
- 15:21:18 [ArtB]
- DS: how complete is our test suite?
- 15:21:22 [ArtB]
- AB: maybe 1%
- 15:21:39 [ArtB]
- DS: so let's set a timeline for the test suite
- 15:21:54 [jrossi21]
- Work? who does that!?
- 15:21:59 [ArtB]
- … can we identify the assertions, what tests are needed
- 15:22:24 [ArtB]
- … understand that without impls, it is a bit hard to write tests
- 15:22:35 [ArtB]
- … There is a TestTheWebForward
- 15:22:46 [ArtB]
- MB: I can go to that since it is in Seattle
- 15:22:48 [jrossi21]
- http://testthewebforward.org/events/seattle-2013.html
- 15:23:00 [jrossi21]
- I should be there.
- 15:23:03 [ArtB]
- DS: would be good if some of us went to that event and asked for help
- 15:23:13 [ArtB]
- … need to know which tests we need
- 15:23:19 [ArtB]
- … could get some good tests
- 15:23:34 [ArtB]
- … Need to take steps to correct the test definciency
- 15:24:21 [ArtB]
- AB: agree it would be useful to tease out specific actions for the test suite
- 15:24:51 [ArtB]
- … FYI, Cathy made good progress on the Test Assertion document
- 15:24:52 [Cathy]
- http://www.w3.org/wiki/PointerEvents/TestAssertions
- 15:25:07 [ArtB]
- DS: that's great Cathy
- 15:25:36 [mbrubeck]
- mbrubeck has joined #pointerevents
- 15:25:42 [ArtB]
- AB: can anyone agree to take some assertions and create tests?
- 15:25:50 [ArtB]
- JR: I want to get my team involved
- 15:26:05 [ArtB]
- … we are committed to contribute
- 15:26:26 [ArtB]
- SG: I can help with some of the tests
- 15:26:31 [ArtB]
- AB: excellent
- 15:26:55 [ArtB]
- DS: can we identify different types of tests?
- 15:27:19 [ArtB]
- … f.ex. there is some commonality of pointerdown, pointerdown
- 15:27:35 [ArtB]
- … It could help with an event like TTWF
- 15:28:03 [ArtB]
- … Need a template that others can follow/use/extend
- 15:29:21 [ArtB]
- AV: would be useful to update the TA wiki with coverage and who is working on what
- 15:29:41 [ArtB]
- CC: I still need to do some more work
- 15:29:50 [asir]
- Congratulations Cathy!!
- 15:31:07 [ArtB]
- AB: could you please give us some status about which parts are complete and where we have gaps?
- 15:31:12 [ArtB]
- CC: yes, I can do that
- 15:31:31 [jrossi21]
- this is how Microsoft stress tests touch. Give your tablet to a 4 year old
- 15:31:34 [jrossi21]
- :-)
- 15:32:17 [ArtB]
- AB: if people can volunteer for assertions today, that would be great
- 15:32:33 [ArtB]
- … otherwise, send your TA items to the list
- 15:32:38 [ArtB]
- SG: ok; will do
- 15:33:02 [ArtB]
- DS: "compatibility tables" say where features are supported
- 15:33:10 [ArtB]
- … I have been doing some related automation work
- 15:33:46 [ArtB]
- … with WebPlatform.org, want the features' impl status to be current
- 15:34:07 [ArtB]
- … using a library from CanIUse.com
- 15:34:27 [ArtB]
- … working toward taking W3C test suites and report back to test assertions
- 15:35:07 [ArtB]
- … I could prototype taking our Impl results and mapping them to feature stability
- 15:36:20 [ArtB]
- AB: everyone please review the TA doc and notify the list when you identified the TAs you will create tests for
- 15:36:34 [ArtB]
- AV: what are the expectations for next call (April 9)?
- 15:36:56 [ArtB]
- AB: hopefully, we will be in a position to see if we have consensus to move to CR
- 15:37:07 [ArtB]
- … depends on the reponses from Yandex and Mose
- 15:37:28 [ArtB]
- AB: plan on a call on April 9
- 15:37:42 [ArtB]
- AB: meeting adjourned
- 15:37:48 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft.a]
- 15:37:50 [Zakim]
- -Doug_Schepers
- 15:37:51 [Zakim]
- -Cathy
- 15:37:54 [Zakim]
- -scott_gonzalez
- 15:37:56 [Zakim]
- -Art_Barstow
- 15:37:58 [Zakim]
- -asir
- 15:38:10 [Zakim]
- -Matt_Brubeck
- 15:38:12 [Zakim]
- RWC_PEWG()11:00AM has ended
- 15:38:12 [Zakim]
- Attendees were scott_gonzalez, Art_Barstow, Cathy, Matt_Brubeck, Doug_Schepers, asir
- 15:39:07 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 15:39:07 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/04/02-pointerevents-minutes.html ArtB
- 15:40:48 [scott_gonzalez]
- ArtB Cathy: Where are the existing tests stored?
- 15:42:08 [ArtB]
- scott_gonzalez https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/default/tests/pointerevents-v1/
- 15:42:46 [scott_gonzalez]
- thanks
- 15:45:59 [ArtB]
- zakim, bye
- 15:45:59 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #pointerevents
- 15:46:03 [jrossi21]
- jrossi21 has left #pointerevents
- 15:46:08 [ArtB]
- rrsagent, bye
- 15:46:08 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items