IRC log of prov on 2013-03-28

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:50:52 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #prov

14:50:52 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-prov-irc

14:50:54 [trackbot]

RRSAgent, make logs world

14:50:54 [Zakim]

Zakim has joined #prov

14:50:56 [trackbot]

Zakim, this will be PROV

14:50:56 [Zakim]

ok, trackbot; I see SW_(PROV)11:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes

14:50:56 [Luc]

zakim, this will be PROV

14:50:57 [trackbot]

Meeting: Provenance Working Group Teleconference

14:50:57 [trackbot]

Date: 28 March 2013

14:50:58 [Zakim]

ok, Luc; I see SW_(PROV)11:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes

14:51:07 [Luc]

Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.03.28

14:51:22 [Luc]

Chair: Luc Moreau

14:52:00 [Luc]

Scribe: dgarijo

14:52:23 [Luc]

rrsagent, make logs public

14:53:14 [dgarijo]

dgarijo has joined #prov

14:55:35 [dgarijo]

Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.03.28

14:56:39 [Luc]

Hi daniel, are you OK to scribe?

14:57:04 [khalidBelhajjame]

khalidBelhajjame has joined #prov

14:57:55 [Zakim]

SW_(PROV)11:00AM has now started

14:58:03 [Zakim]

+ +44.238.059.aaaa

14:58:32 [Zakim]

+??P2

14:58:53 [Luc]

zakim, +44.238.059.aaaa is me

14:58:54 [Zakim]

+Luc; got it

14:59:01 [GK]

GK has joined #prov

14:59:08 [Luc]

Hi daniel, are you OK to scribe?

14:59:12 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller]

14:59:13 [zednik]

zednik has joined #prov

14:59:15 [GK]

zakim, ??p2 is me

14:59:15 [Zakim]

+GK; got it

14:59:27 [Paolo]

Paolo has joined #prov

14:59:34 [dgarijo]

Hi Luc, yes, I'm ok.

15:00:03 [Zakim]

+??P13

15:00:09 [dgarijo]

Zakim, ??P13 is me

15:00:10 [Zakim]

+dgarijo; got it

15:00:42 [jcheney]

jcheney has joined #prov

15:00:55 [Zakim]

+ +1.818.731.aabb

15:01:20 [hook]

hook has joined #prov

15:01:24 [Zakim]

- +1.818.731.aabb

15:01:47 [Zakim]

+ +1.818.731.aacc

15:01:59 [dgarijo]

scribe: dgarijo

15:02:23 [dgarijo]

Luc: today we are going to Luc at the documents we are going to release+ organize reviews.

15:02:25 [Luc]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2013-03-21

15:02:26 [GK]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.03.28

15:02:32 [christine]

christine has joined #prov

15:02:34 [Luc]

Proposed: approved last week's minutes

15:02:43 [Zakim]

+jcheney

15:02:46 [dgarijo]

dgarijo:+0 (I wasn't)

15:02:51 [Luc]

zakim, who is here?

15:02:51 [Zakim]

On the phone I see Luc, GK, [IPcaller], dgarijo, +1.818.731.aacc, jcheney

15:02:54 [Zakim]

On IRC I see christine, hook, jcheney, Paolo, zednik, GK, khalidBelhajjame, dgarijo, Zakim, RRSAgent, Luc, GK-alt, TallTed, ivan, stain, trackbot

15:02:58 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller.a]

15:03:06 [GK]

I'm here

15:03:08 [dgarijo]

me :)

15:03:10 [jcheney]

here

15:03:16 [hook]

here

15:03:16 [christine]

Zakim, [IPcaller.a] is christine

15:03:16 [Zakim]

+christine; got it

15:03:18 [jcheney]

+1

15:03:19 [Zakim]

+SamCoppens

15:03:19 [GK]

Wasn't present last week meeting.

15:03:21 [hook]

+1

15:03:23 [dgarijo]

+0

15:03:24 [TomDN]

TomDN has joined #prov

15:03:35 [khalidBelhajjame]

+0

15:03:35 [ivan]

zakim, code?

15:03:35 [Zakim]

the conference code is 7768 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), ivan

15:03:36 [Luc]

RESOLVED: last week's minutes

15:03:39 [Paolo]

0 (not present)

15:03:51 [dgarijo]

Luc:a few open actions left

15:03:57 [Zakim]

+ivan

15:04:00 [dgarijo]

... Paul -> prov overview document

15:04:07 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller.a]

15:04:14 [dgarijo]

... another one for Graham. Is it done (about PAQ).

15:04:25 [TomDN]

Zakim, who is on the phone?

15:04:25 [Zakim]

On the phone I see Luc, GK, [IPcaller], dgarijo, +1.818.731.aacc, jcheney, christine, SamCoppens, ivan, [IPcaller.a]

15:04:34 [Luc]

actuib0-166?

15:04:39 [GK]

Looking...

15:04:40 [Luc]

action-166?

15:04:40 [trackbot]

ACTION-166 -- Graham Klyne to add a bit of text explaining the inconsistency between html/rdf and http -- due 2013-03-21 -- OPEN

15:04:40 [trackbot]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/166

15:04:44 [TomDN]

Zakim, tomDN is with SamCoppens

15:04:44 [Zakim]

+tomDN; got it

15:04:51 [GK]

Yes, did it.

15:04:58 [TomDN]

Zakim, tomDN is me

15:04:58 [Zakim]

sorry, TomDN, I do not recognize a party named 'tomDN'

15:05:01 [dgarijo]

GK: (can't understand).

15:05:06 [smiles]

smiles has joined #prov

15:05:08 [GK]

I'm going to re-connect

15:05:10 [TomDN]

Zakim, mute me

15:05:10 [Zakim]

sorry, TomDN, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you

15:05:12 [Zakim]

-GK

15:05:22 [TomDN]

Zakim, TomDN is with SamCoppens

15:05:22 [Zakim]

tomDN was already listed in SamCoppens, TomDN

15:05:41 [Zakim]

+??P32

15:05:47 [dgarijo]

Luc: Action to Paul to talk to james about reviewing xml

15:05:51 [smiles]

zakim, ??P32 is smiles

15:05:53 [Zakim]

+smiles; got it

15:05:59 [Zakim]

+??P1

15:06:02 [Luc]

q?

15:06:06 [GK]

zakim, ??p1 is me

15:06:06 [Zakim]

+GK; got it

15:06:37 [dgarijo]

jcheney: ran across Henry Thompson, who is willing in principle o take a look, but not sure. Will try to ask other people

15:06:45 [dgarijo]

Luc: Action is now closed.

15:06:48 [Luc]

topic: prov-xml

15:06:50 [dgarijo]

... PROV-XML

15:07:07 [dgarijo]

... we had a few issues. The first one is about the media type

15:07:21 [dgarijo]

... we have received some feedback this morning

15:07:33 [dgarijo]

... stephan, have you had a chance to look at it?

15:07:54 [dgarijo]

zednik:will read it and provide a response before the end of the day

15:08:12 [Luc]

q?

15:08:25 [dgarijo]

Luc: next item is the jaxb issue

15:08:53 [dgarijo]

hook: we may have a potential candidate solution.

15:09:27 [dgarijo]

... it may be depending the jaxb implementation.

15:10:40 [CraigTrim]

CraigTrim has joined #PROV

15:10:44 [Luc]

zakim, who is noisy?

15:10:50 [dgarijo]

... One possible solution is to remove the sequence inside to ??? (I'm getting a lot of noise).

15:10:55 [Zakim]

Luc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Luc (8%), GK (18%), +1.818.731.aacc (94%), ivan (43%)

15:11:09 [GK]

That\'s odd - I'm muted.

15:11:18 [GK]

Reconnecting again.

15:11:21 [Zakim]

-GK

15:11:23 [ivan]

I muted myself

15:11:26 [ivan]

is it better?

15:11:29 [Zakim]

+Satya_Sahoo

15:11:39 [satya]

satya has joined #prov

15:12:00 [Zakim]

+??P1

15:12:08 [GK]

zakim, ??p1 is me

15:12:08 [Zakim]

+GK; got it

15:12:17 [dgarijo]

Luc: what is the timetable, was it today? How are you planning to move towards a decission.

15:12:26 [zednik]

q+

15:12:59 [Luc]

ack z

15:13:02 [dgarijo]

hook: we may need to get some confirmation. The possible solution requires one edit, but that will be the only change (adding the document bundling class).

15:13:10 [Zakim]

+CraigTrim

15:13:48 [Luc]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkplanTillFinalPublication

15:13:55 [dgarijo]

zednik: We are going to add a level of indirection to the xml serialization. I was not aware that we were going to release something today.

15:14:41 [dgarijo]

Luc: somebody said that in the current timetable. If that's not the case then we should correct it. This will be the final internal review.

15:14:49 [Luc]

q?

15:15:05 [dgarijo]

Luc: when could we hope to have a proposal to the group.

15:15:08 [dgarijo]

... ?

15:15:27 [Luc]

q?

15:16:26 [dgarijo]

hook: it will be a very small edit change. It can be done shortly after we get confimration to the solution.

15:16:37 [dgarijo]

zednik: by next thursday would be good?

15:16:52 [dgarijo]

Luc: we need to have the document staged by the 23 of April.

15:17:23 [dgarijo]

... If there is a vote on the 4th and a release on the 11th then we are tight on time.

15:17:37 [dgarijo]

zednik: ok, we will have it by tuesday.

15:17:39 [dgarijo]

Luc: ok

15:18:07 [dgarijo]

... the we don't need to set up reviewers yet.

15:18:16 [Luc]

q?

15:18:17 [dgarijo]

zednik: ok. I'll stage the document as well.

15:18:21 [dgarijo]

Luc: thanks.

15:18:27 [Luc]

topic: prov-aq

15:18:41 [dgarijo]

Luc: Is the doc ready for review?

15:18:54 [GK]

Yes, dpocument is ready

15:19:00 [dgarijo]

GK: I'll write down my responses

15:19:03 [GK]

See: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/5

15:19:18 [TomDN]

Sam volunteers

15:19:24 [dgarijo]

Luc: reviewers for PROV-AQ?

15:20:07 [Zakim]

+[IPcaller.aa]

15:20:08 [dgarijo]

Luc: it would be nice to have Tim's input as well.

15:20:16 [stain]

Zakim, IPcaller.aa is me

15:20:16 [Zakim]

+stain; got it

15:20:31 [TomDN]

(I'll take a look at it as well, but will integrate my comments in Sam's review)

15:20:35 [dgarijo]

Luc: stian?

15:20:58 [dgarijo]

stain: ok, I'll do a quick one

15:21:06 [stain]

log that Stian won't do an evil review this time

15:21:17 [dgarijo]

:D

15:21:21 [GK]

For reviewers, the comments in the tracker may help you locate the chamnges

15:21:30 [dgarijo]

Luc: anything else?

15:21:38 [GK]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/5

15:21:48 [GK]

Also change log in document.

15:22:02 [dgarijo]

... the intent is that we'd like to have the reviews complete by the 4th of April.

15:22:06 [GK]

Mercurial can provide diffs if required.

15:22:08 [Luc]

q?

15:22:22 [dgarijo]

Luc: prov-primer

15:22:24 [Luc]

topic: prov-primer

15:22:46 [dgarijo]

Luc: status?

15:23:04 [dgarijo]

smiles: I thiyght that it was going to be easy, but I'm struggling a bit.

15:23:18 [dgarijo]

r/thiyght/thought

15:23:27 [dgarijo]

... I'm aiming to finish tomorrow

15:23:29 [dgarijo]

Luc: ok

15:23:43 [dgarijo]

... will the document be staged tomorrow?

15:23:49 [dgarijo]

smiles: I don't know.

15:24:00 [dgarijo]

... working as fast as I can

15:24:23 [dgarijo]

Luc: ok, as soon as you can stage the document

15:24:30 [dgarijo]

smiles: sure.

15:24:59 [stain]

zakim, who is noisy?

15:25:09 [dgarijo]

I can have a look at the primer

15:25:10 [Zakim]

stain, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds

15:25:22 [stain]

zakim, who is noisy?

15:25:33 [Zakim]

stain, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Luc (36%), smiles (91%)

15:26:02 [dgarijo]

smiles: influence relationship. Should that be included in the primer?

15:26:13 [Luc]

+1

15:26:20 [Luc]

q?

15:26:51 [Luc]

q?

15:27:27 [Luc]

q+

15:27:30 [dgarijo]

smiles: I have the feeling that it might not be that important. Is there any objection to include bundles and collections?

15:27:31 [stain]

+1 - it could also be used for "other provenance" we don't quite cover - like I've used wasInfluencedBy as a superproperty of purl.org/pav/html#http://purl.org/pav/sourceAccessedAt

15:28:01 [dgarijo]

Luc: you can include a small section for provenance of provenance.

15:28:06 [Luc]

q?

15:28:13 [Luc]

ack Luc

15:28:20 [dgarijo]

+1 for provenance of provenance section

15:28:40 [Luc]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkplanTillFinalPublication

15:28:44 [dgarijo]

Luc: Simon, please update the timetable.

15:28:56 [pgroth]

pgroth has joined #prov

15:29:24 [dgarijo]

smiles: sure. The timetable should be left as it is.

15:29:32 [Luc]

topic: prov-dc

15:29:34 [pgroth]

i'm not on the call

15:29:39 [pgroth]

but will follow irc

15:31:39 [Luc]

q?

15:32:06 [Luc]

q?

15:32:23 [stain]

I can volunteer as I've been doing something similar mapping with dcterms recently

15:32:40 [pgroth]

i'm already going to read it

15:32:47 [stain]

what is the deadline for the review?

15:32:49 [pgroth]

assuming we're talking about prov-dc

15:32:58 [stain]

and the URI for what to review

15:33:05 [stain]

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dc-note/dc-note.html ?

15:33:34 [Luc]

q?

15:33:37 [dgarijo]

Paul and Stian will review prov-dc

15:33:45 [Luc]

topic: prov-dictionary

15:33:47 [dgarijo]

Daniel: 2 issues remain to be added to tghe document: 1- finish the dc:references debate. 2) add something about prov:hasProvenance.

15:34:00 [Luc]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkplanTillFinalPublication

15:34:03 [dgarijo]

Reviews complete by: 2013-04-04

15:34:20 [dgarijo]

Daniel: Will finish and stage the document tomorrow for internal reviw.

15:34:21 [TomDN]

https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/19

15:35:02 [dgarijo]

Tom: we are running a bit behind but it will be done by the end of today/tomorrow morning.

15:35:16 [stain]

dgarijo, is it just the default/dc-note/dc-note.html in mercurial?

15:35:31 [dgarijo]

@stian: yes.

15:35:34 [stain]

great

15:36:01 [TomDN]

changed prov:KeyValuePair to prov:KeyEntityPair; prov:keyValuePair to prov:keyEntityPair; prov:pairValue to prov:pairEntity.

15:36:04 [dgarijo]

Tom: I have done a little change to key entity pair in order to make it less ambiguous.

15:36:34 [dgarijo]

... makes things a lot more consistent

15:36:44 [stain]

+1

15:36:44 [Luc]

+1 to this change

15:36:52 [dgarijo]

... if there are objections I can change it back

15:36:53 [Luc]

q+

15:37:22 [Luc]

ack L

15:37:24 [Zakim]

- +1.818.731.aacc

15:37:56 [Luc]

q?

15:38:00 [dgarijo]

Tom: we don't want to touch the definition of influence, so the proposal is to leave things as they are.

15:38:09 [dgarijo]

Luc: what is the implication for the owl file?

15:38:15 [pgroth]

+1 for not touching influence

15:38:23 [dgarijo]

Tom: it still needs to be updated. And the xml schema.

15:38:51 [dgarijo]

Luc: once you've completed the doc it will be fine to inform Tim and Stephan about the latest changes

15:39:21 [Luc]

q?

15:39:26 [dgarijo]

Luc: we had identified some reviewer: Luc, Simon. Anybody else?

15:40:03 [Luc]

q?

15:40:06 [dgarijo]

... the reviews are due by next week.

15:40:10 [dgarijo]

... anything else?

15:40:13 [Luc]

topic: prov-overview

15:40:44 [pgroth]

suggestions due today

15:40:57 [dgarijo]

Luc: There was a call for suggestions and the deadline was today. Paul was going to produce the next version for next week

15:41:03 [Luc]

document ready for review next week?

15:41:09 [pgroth]

I had some from Tim, Graham, and also outside

15:41:16 [pgroth]

it will be ready for review next week

15:41:17 [pgroth]

yes

15:41:26 [Luc]

thanks

15:41:48 [dgarijo]

We have craig also. Anybody else?

15:41:58 [pgroth]

it's not long :-)

15:42:11 [dgarijo]

Ivan, it would be nice if you could have a look with your w3c hat.

15:42:26 [Luc]

q?

15:42:32 [dgarijo]

Ivan: I have to go to China, I don't think I'll be able.

15:42:42 [Luc]

q?

15:42:58 [dgarijo]

... if the doc is ready at the beggining of next week, I'll do it.

15:43:08 [pgroth]

ok

15:43:11 [TomDN]

(Small note on prov-dictionary: there is a small change in the prov-n grammar: the production rules keyValuePairs and keyValuePair changed to keyEntityPairs and keyEntityPair. Will update the grammar file and notify Luc, sorry)

15:43:14 [pgroth]

i'll try and make sure it's up-to-date

15:43:18 [pgroth]

before then

15:43:20 [Luc]

topic: prov-links

15:43:29 [dgarijo]

Luc: PROV-Links is ready for review.

15:43:45 [smiles]

Yes

15:43:46 [GK]

I just sent a brief review of prov-links to the mailing list

15:43:53 [dgarijo]

... I sent an email earlier today. smiles had volunteeres. Is it still the case?

15:43:59 [TomDN]

I volunteer for prov-links as well

15:44:00 [GK]

(Just now!)

15:44:06 [dgarijo]

...anybody else'

15:44:10 [dgarijo]

...?

15:44:36 [dgarijo]

Tom, Simon and Graham will review prov-links.

15:44:39 [Luc]

q?

15:44:47 [smiles]

q+

15:44:54 [dgarijo]

Do any editors want to bring any issues ?

15:45:03 [Luc]

ack sm

15:45:58 [dgarijo]

smiles: section about collections and bundles to the primer. My concern is about prov-o examples. There is no "official" way.

15:45:58 [Luc]

q?

15:45:58 [stain]

that sounds like the most obvious way to do it

15:46:04 [stain]

q+

15:46:15 [Luc]

ack st

15:46:20 [GK]

(I'm checking what PROV-AQ says here - I think it's compatible)

15:46:43 [Zakim]

-CraigTrim

15:46:54 [dgarijo]

stian: yes, prov-o examples are fine. But it's not the only way.

15:46:58 [stain]

for instance when using SPARQL it would make more sense to do them as named graphs

15:47:10 [smiles]

yes thanks

15:47:21 [dgarijo]

Luc: are you fine with this?

15:47:24 [dgarijo]

simon: yes

15:47:27 [Luc]

topic: Updates to FAQ / posts / other

15:47:28 [ivan]

q+

15:47:52 [dgarijo]

Luc: stian, were you preparing a blog post?

15:47:53 [GK]

Confirm no disagreement with note in PROV-AQ (re bundles in primer discussion)

15:48:04 [dgarijo]

stian: yes, it's a bit long.

15:48:14 [Luc]

q?

15:48:29 [dgarijo]

... I can post it in my blog and then referr from the w3c blog

15:48:33 [dgarijo]

Luc: up to you

15:48:38 [Luc]

q?

15:48:46 [Luc]

zakim, who is noisy

15:48:46 [Zakim]

I don't understand 'who is noisy', Luc

15:48:48 [Luc]

zakim, who is noisy?

15:48:59 [Zakim]

Luc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: smiles (60%)

15:49:07 [dgarijo]

ivan: we have slightly more than 2 weeks to take all the votes together.

15:49:11 [ivan]

iMinds, Apple, VU, NASA, Newcastle Univ, OpenLink, IBM, Pacific Northwest, Wright Univ, INRIA

15:49:22 [dgarijo]

... large nubmer of members that have not voted.

15:49:29 [Luc]

I am talking to my acrep!

15:49:40 [dgarijo]

@ivan: UPM has voted.

15:49:47 [GK]

Hmmm… I did ask our AC rep (Oxford)

15:50:06 [Luc]

@tallted, last week you said you would talk to your acrep?

15:50:14 [dgarijo]

... there are a number of companies that they are not anymore here.

15:50:29 [dgarijo]

ivan: yes, UPM has voted.

15:50:56 [dgarijo]

... we have to get emails to the missing persons in the group and their acrep.

15:50:59 [GK]

@Ivan, only AC rep can vote? Or can we as members do it?

15:51:28 [dgarijo]

Luc: we have already contacted all members individually, last week.

15:51:33 [stain]

9 days ago I got the reminder from Luc

15:51:55 [dgarijo]

ivan: do you have the list with the AC rep?

15:52:07 [dgarijo]

Luc: very few of them responded to me directly.

15:52:22 [dgarijo]

ivan: some of them are here.

15:52:52 [dgarijo]

ivan: Edinbourgh? Manchester?

15:52:59 [dgarijo]

... those are here.

15:53:03 [stain]

I have just reminded my Manchester contact again, but he's been on holiday this week

15:53:28 [dgarijo]

ivan: how do you want to handle that? WHat is the best to do it?

15:53:43 [dgarijo]

Luc: Ted said he would talk to his acrep. Ted?

15:53:58 [pgroth]

open link already voted ?

15:54:05 [dgarijo]

ivan: at some point in time we have to contact the acreps

15:54:58 [dgarijo]

... I don't want to contact the acreps again. If I have the list of those acreps that don't have an active member, I can contact them

15:55:04 [christine]

apologies - moving to next call - thank you Luc, all

15:55:10 [stain]

2013-04-09 23:59 boston time

15:55:16 [Zakim]

-christine

15:55:23 [dgarijo]

...^^deadline for votes

15:55:37 [dgarijo]

... next thursday is sort of ok.

15:56:04 [dgarijo]

Luc: thx for bringing that up

15:56:15 [GK]

I've just sent a chasing email to our AC Rep.

15:56:44 [Luc]

action pgroth to post daniel'post

15:56:44 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-169 - Post daniel'post [on Paul Groth - due 2013-04-04].

15:56:51 [satya]

Daniel has sent blog post to Paul

15:57:11 [dgarijo]

Luc: many people have given tutorials.

15:57:36 [dgarijo]

Paolo: I how do I do it?

15:57:38 [pgroth]

will do

15:57:48 [pgroth]

paolo: you can send the blog post to me

15:58:14 [Luc]

zakim, mute ivan

15:58:14 [Zakim]

ivan should now be muted

15:58:16 [Paolo]

@pgroth I did send it earlier today

15:58:19 [dgarijo]

Luc: send the tutorials to Paul

15:58:22 [Paolo]

will send a slightly revised version

15:58:42 [pgroth]

cool

15:58:51 [Luc]

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ

15:58:53 [dgarijo]

Luc: FAQ brainstorm

15:59:02 [dgarijo]

... what do we want to add?

15:59:03 [dgarijo]

+q

15:59:16 [dgarijo]

who is going to add it?

15:59:25 [Zakim]

-smiles

15:59:37 [Luc]

zakim, unmute ivan

15:59:37 [Zakim]

ivan should no longer be muted

15:59:50 [Luc]

zakim, mute ivan

15:59:50 [Zakim]

ivan should now be muted

15:59:58 [Luc]

ack iv

16:00:13 [Luc]

zakim, mute ivan

16:00:13 [Zakim]

ivan should now be muted

16:00:35 [Paolo]

need to go...

16:00:39 [Zakim]

-[IPcaller]

16:00:52 [Luc]

action dgarijo to draft blog post on provenance as rdfa in html documents

16:00:52 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-170 - Draft blog post on provenance as rdfa in html documents [on Daniel Garijo - due 2013-04-04].

16:00:53 [dgarijo]

Daniel: draft blog post on rdf-a and PROV.

16:01:17 [pgroth]

@daniel, I can help with this

16:01:18 [dgarijo]

Luc: If you think on something, could you circulate it to the list?

16:01:24 [dgarijo]

@paul: thanks

16:01:27 [Zakim]

-ivan

16:01:27 [dgarijo]

Luc goodbye

16:01:30 [Zakim]

-Satya_Sahoo

16:01:33 [Zakim]

-jcheney

16:01:34 [Zakim]

-dgarijo

16:01:36 [GK]

Bye

16:01:40 [Zakim]

-Luc

16:01:41 [Zakim]

-GK

16:01:47 [Zakim]

-SamCoppens

16:03:41 [GK]

GK has left #prov

16:03:55 [Zakim]

-stain

16:11:14 [Zakim]

-[IPcaller.a]

16:11:16 [Zakim]

SW_(PROV)11:00AM has ended

16:11:16 [Zakim]

Attendees were Luc, [IPcaller], GK, dgarijo, +1.818.731.aabb, +1.818.731.aacc, jcheney, christine, SamCoppens, ivan, tomDN, smiles, Satya_Sahoo, CraigTrim, stain

16:36:08 [TallTed]

Luc - sorry, failed to attend today... our rep voted last week -- within hours of meeting. unless I sent him to the wrong poll?

17:42:03 [TallTed]

TallTed has changed the topic to: Provenance WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/ -- agenda http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.03.28

18:27:58 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #prov