15:05:14 RRSAgent has joined #webid 15:05:14 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-irc 15:05:20 Zakim has joined #webid 15:05:35 rrsagent, bookmark 15:05:35 See http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-irc#T15-05-35 15:05:41 http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html 15:06:03 I'm afraid I can't participate with voice :( 15:06:12 TallTed has joined #webid 15:06:20 trackbot, start telecon 15:06:22 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:06:24 Zakim, this will be WEBID 15:06:24 ok, trackbot, I see INC_WEBID(WEBID)10:00AM already started 15:06:25 Meeting: WebID Community Group Teleconference 15:06:25 Date: 08 February 2013 15:06:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2013Feb/0044.html 15:06:42 scribe: scorlosq 15:07:17 Topic: Meeting minutes from last time 15:07:19 http://www.w3.org/2013/02/01-webid-minutes.html 15:07:38 +1 15:07:57 +1 15:07:58 q? 15:07:58 +1 15:08:16 Topic: ACtions 15:08:27 Action-17 15:08:27 ACTION-17 -- Jeff Sayre to cross reference SocialWeb XG stories with WebID XG. There will be a handful of intersections that make sense to further develop -- due 2011-06-30 -- OPEN 15:08:27 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/17 15:09:02 bblfish: last week we said the context has changed a lot 15:09:20 Does anybody want to take this on? 15:09:26 Zakim: scribe: scorlosq 15:09:33 otherwise we close it 15:09:54 I say we close it 15:09:55 scribenick: scorlosq 15:10:00 +1 15:10:03 trueg has joined #webid 15:10:05 +1 15:10:10 +1 15:10:21 close action-17 15:10:21 Closed ACTION-17 Cross reference SocialWeb XG stories with WebID XG. There will be a handful of intersections that make sense to further develop. 15:10:24 +TallTed 15:10:39 Action-41? 15:10:39 ACTION-41 -- Henry Story to research RDFa in HTML forms -- due 2011-10-10 -- OPEN 15:10:39 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/41 15:11:01 bblfish: it was one of the first action I created 15:11:12 ... so long ago, we can close it 15:11:50 scorlosq: RDFa doesn't cover forms, so we can close 15:11:54 close action-41 15:11:54 Closed ACTION-41 Research RDFa in HTML forms. 15:11:59 bblfish: are they going to cover forms in RDFa? 15:12:05 scorlosq: no, not in this version at least 15:12:09 action-39 15:12:09 ACTION-39 -- Dominik Tomaszuk to create rdfa version for EARL test ontology -- due 2011-09-19 -- OPEN 15:12:09 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/39 15:12:41 dominik? 15:12:59 deiu has joined #webid 15:13:08 bblfish: it's nice to have, but we haven't made much progress on the EARL ontology 15:13:14 ... so I think we can close that 15:13:24 +??P6 15:13:27 also its just a very nice to have. Nothing esential 15:13:37 close action-39 15:13:37 Closed ACTION-39 create rdfa version for EARL test ontology. 15:13:38 Zakim, ??P6 is me 15:13:39 +deiu; got it 15:13:46 Zakim, mute me please 15:13:46 deiu should now be muted 15:13:50 Action-59? 15:13:50 ACTION-59 -- Andrei Sambra to adapt spec to results of vote -- due 2013-02-08 -- OPEN 15:13:50 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/59 15:14:04 bblfish: this has been raising some issues on the list 15:14:29 ... but I'd say deiu has done his work. the definition section has been adapted 15:14:48 ... there are still other issues to be discussed, but not as part of this issue 15:15:00 vote to close this action 15:15:02 +1 15:15:07 +1 15:15:16 +1 15:15:18 q+ 15:15:22 q? 15:16:43 q+ 15:16:47 TallTed: the action doesn't reflect what deiu did in the spec. we should either create a new action to reflect what he did, or update the action to reflect what deiu did in the spec 15:17:18 q? 15:17:21 q+ 15:17:29 ack deiu 15:17:37 ... causes some misunderstanding 15:18:01 deiu: this note that caused arguments was already in the spec before I made the changes 15:18:06 q+ 15:18:25 TallTed: so this action should be rescoped to reflect what was done 15:18:37 q+ 15:19:07 ack bblfish 15:19:13 TallTed: I know the note was there before, so the action "adapt the spec" needs to be updated. 15:20:08 ... let's change the wording on this action, and create a new one to make sure the spec reflects the decision that was made 15:20:45 bblfish: I'm not convinced by the arguments put on the list 15:21:11 TallTed: the new definition needs to flow through the rest of the spec 15:21:17 Zakim, mute me please 15:21:18 deiu should now be muted 15:21:49 bblfish: we should create an issue about that note 15:22:23 q+ 15:22:27 raise issue: revised WebID definition ("an HTTP(s) URI" without mention of hash) needs to be fully flowed through spec 15:22:45 bblfish: we need to cover the relation between the WebID URI and the profile document URI 15:23:45 bblfish: we have agreed to the definition, but we have more work to do now to refine that note 15:24:44 q? 15:24:46 bblfish: the question of the new issue is how much do we say about the hash, 303s, and relation between documents 15:24:46 q? 15:25:21 bergi, try to write 15:26:04 scorlosquet: argues to close the action, and open a new issue to solve this new problem 15:26:13 1. change action-59 to be accurate (change *definition*, not *spec*, to reflect decision) 15:27:18 if we look at the arguments in the last questionnaire we can expect that we can remove also the note we are currently talking about. 15:27:19 +1 15:27:24 +1 15:27:34 2. I'll raise new issue based on the current thread 15:27:38 q+ 15:28:05 ack me 15:28:15 alternative: move this note to the wiki? 15:29:00 new title "Adapt definition within spec to the results of vote" 15:29:05 Action-59? 15:29:05 ACTION-59 -- Andrei Sambra to adapt definition within spec to the results of vote -- due 2013-02-08 -- OPEN 15:29:05 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/59 15:29:12 close it? 15:29:15 +1 15:29:16 +1 15:29:17 +1 15:29:23 PROPOSAL: close Action-59 15:29:25 +1 15:29:26 +1 15:29:29 + 15:29:29 +1 15:29:32 RESOLVED: close Action-59 15:29:34 +1 15:29:37 +1 15:29:51 action has been closed 15:29:51 Error finding 'has'. You can review and register nicknames at . 15:30:16 q? 15:30:22 q- 15:30:24 action-59? 15:30:24 ACTION-59 -- Andrei Sambra to adapt definition within spec to the results of vote -- due 2013-02-08 -- CLOSED 15:30:24 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/59 15:30:40 bblfish: someone will create a new issue to follow up on the note 15:30:55 q- 15:30:55 ACTION-57? 15:30:55 ACTION-57 -- Andrei Sambra to remove redundant sections from https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index-respec.html, based on content of https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html ; former doc to then become https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/auth-respec.html -- due 2013-02-08 -- OPEN 15:30:56 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/57 15:31:52 -deiu 15:31:55 q? 15:32:34 bblfish: this action was not worded properly, too vague 15:32:50 TallTed: the original respec doc has been split into document 15:33:01 +??P3 15:33:05 Zakim, ??P3 is me 15:33:05 +deiu; got it 15:33:07 q? 15:33:24 ... the stuff from identity gets removed from auth 15:33:37 ... auth depends on identity 15:33:44 Zakim, mute me 15:33:44 deiu should now be muted 15:33:59 bblfish: it's a big task, not finished yet 15:34:11 q? 15:34:17 q- 15:34:38 q+ 15:34:47 ack me 15:34:54 TallTed: deiu will take care of the details 15:35:12 deiu: yes, it's a work in progress, depends on the current state of the identity spec 15:35:54 ... maybe we should duplicate the definitions in both specs, they are not big 15:36:42 TallTed: if you duplicate them, say one is normative and the other is non normative and depends on the other doc 15:36:53 +q 15:36:59 ... duplicate content is a nightmare to keep in sync 15:37:15 deiu: we may have to adapt some images 15:37:37 bblfish: yes, like this big box which shows protected documents 15:38:05 -q 15:38:10 Zakim, mute me please 15:38:10 deiu should now be muted 15:38:16 ACTION 53? 15:38:21 ACTION-53? 15:38:21 ACTION-53 -- Andrei Sambra to create do open issue in database, and create page on security -- due 2013-02-01 -- OPEN 15:38:21 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/53 15:38:33 that is done right? 15:38:35 Zakim, unmute me 15:38:35 deiu should no longer be muted 15:38:40 deiu: yes 15:38:55 bblfish: is it linked from the main page of the wiki so we don't lose the page? 15:39:02 deiu: I will do it now 15:39:16 close issue-53 15:39:16 Closed ISSUE-53 WebID and OpenId. 15:39:43 close Action-53 15:39:43 Closed ACTION-53 Create do open issue in database, and create page on security. 15:39:50 Issue-53? 15:39:50 ISSUE-53 -- WebID and OpenId -- closed 15:39:50 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/53 15:40:19 Topic: Issues 15:40:23 53 reopened 15:40:32 thanks 15:40:36 ISSUE-61: xsd datatypes 15:40:36 Notes added to ISSUE-61 xsd datatypes. 15:40:49 Issue-61? 15:40:49 ISSUE-61 -- xsd datatypes -- open 15:40:49 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/61 15:41:03 this was solved a long a long time ago 15:41:13 Proposal: close issue 15:41:20 Proposal: close issue-61 15:41:45 +1 15:42:00 Proposal: close issue-61 - it was resolved a long time ago 15:42:05 +1 15:42:06 +1 15:42:06 +1 15:42:07 +1 15:42:20 RESOLVED: close issue-61 - it was resolved a long time ago 15:42:20 Resolved: close issue-61 - it was resolved a long time ago 15:42:43 ISSUE-50? 15:42:43 ISSUE-50 -- WebID deployments -- raised 15:42:43 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/50 15:42:57 ISSUE-49? 15:42:57 ISSUE-49 -- Keep a list of implementations of WebId up to date -- raised 15:42:57 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/49 15:43:05 Zakim, mute me please 15:43:05 deiu should now be muted 15:44:20 TallTed: these issues are different 15:44:34 bblfish: these are part of the implementations we are meant to build 15:44:47 -deiu 15:45:02 bblfish: my idea was to build a robot that would manually generate an implementation report 15:45:53 TallTed: the state of the art is an EARL generated report. it's up to implementers to generate the EARL output and submit this to the WebID group 15:46:43 bblfish: my idea was to build a robot that would go out on the web to collect statistics on WebID implementations 15:47:01 TallTed: deployments and implementations are completely different 15:47:42 scorlosq: is this a crawler? 15:48:15 bblfish: not really, when someone sets up a WebId server, they can register it with the robot, and the robot will test it 15:48:30 TallTed: this is blurring the line between implementations and deployments 15:48:39 q? 15:49:18 TallTed: W3C doesn't test deployments... it only cares about test suite for particular implementations/softwares 15:51:02 TallTed: there should be an implementation report for conformance of WebID implementations 15:51:24 bblfish: here is an example of EARL report: http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/earl.html 15:51:54 TallTed: bblfish you should talk to people who have been in this position before 15:51:57 DAvid Booth 15:52:06 Guus also 15:52:51 bblfish: we might need to rename some of the issues or products 15:53:28 TallTed: I'll probably create new products and reassign each issue from the old products to the new products 15:53:46 +1 good names are always important 15:53:51 ISSUE-66? 15:53:51 ISSUE-66 -- Microdata Support -- raised 15:53:51 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/66 15:54:15 q? 15:54:57 TallTed: this is for TLS... it's how the consumer deals with what its gets, in my role as a webid client 15:55:11 ... I may deal with a webid client in a minimum form 15:55:34 bblfish: we can also postpone it for another WG maybe 15:55:48 ... we should first try to get a spec to get people going 15:56:16 TallTed: but we also don't want to write the simple spec saying that people have done more are not in line with the spec 15:56:20 bblfish: agreed 15:57:31 Proposal: postpone issue-66 because of lack of resources currently. 15:57:49 +1 15:57:52 +1 15:57:59 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:57:59 On the phone I see Bob_Powers, bblfish, ??P42, scor, TallTed 15:58:05 +1 15:58:32 TallTed has changed the topic to: WebID Community Group -- http://www.w3.org/community/webid/ -- 2013-02-08 agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2013Feb/0044.html 15:58:51 +1 15:59:02 Resolve: postpone issue-66 because of lack of resources currently. 15:59:07 ISSUE-10? 15:59:07 ISSUE-10 -- Hash URLs for Agents -- raised 15:59:07 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/10 15:59:46 it's 2 years old! 15:59:49 TallTed: it's redundant 15:59:59 Proposal: ISSUE-10 close it's redundant 16:00:02 +1 16:00:05 +1 16:00:05 +1 16:00:13 +1 16:00:47 ISSUE-55? 16:00:47 ISSUE-55 -- explore WebID URI-schema openness -- raised 16:00:47 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/55 16:01:40 others, like mail etc? 16:02:36 Proposal: ISSUE-55 move to identity interoperability section 16:03:17 +1 16:03:32 TallTed: by restricting WebID to HTTP/HTTPS only, we limit the possibilities of future work... browsers for example handle many schemes (or hand them to helper applications) 16:05:22 Propsal: close Issue-55 it's been resolved by the WebID definition. 16:05:26 -1 16:05:30 Proposal: close Issue-55 it's been resolved by the WebID definition. 16:05:32 +1 16:05:44 +1 16:05:47 +1 16:05:54 -1 16:06:23 thanks very much all. 16:06:24 thanks everyone! 16:06:30 thx!! 16:06:37 Topic: next call 16:06:42 next call in 2 weeks? 16:06:45 +1 16:06:48 +1 16:06:50 +1 16:07:19 see you in two weeks 16:07:28 -??P42 16:07:29 -TallTed 16:07:29 -Bob_Powers 16:07:29 -scor 16:07:30 -bblfish 16:07:30 INC_WEBID(WEBID)10:00AM has ended 16:07:30 Attendees were Bob_Powers, bblfish, scor, TallTed, deiu 16:07:39 trackbot, end conference 16:07:39 Zakim, list attendees 16:07:39 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 16:07:47 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:07:47 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-minutes.html trackbot 16:07:48 RRSAgent, bye 16:07:48 I see no action items 16:27:20 RRSAgent has joined #webid 16:27:20 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-irc 16:27:23 RRSAgent, set logs public 16:27:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:27:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-minutes.html TallTed 16:27:57 RRSAgent, set logs public 16:28:12 hm. looks like more than permissions. 16:28:26 http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-irc is there 16:30:44 bblfish - can you ping sysreq and ask what's going on? 16:33:56 WebID isn't in CommonScribe (which is the new fancy minutes generator) -- https://www.w3.org/2009/CommonScribe/panel/ 16:33:56 and RRSAgent's output (old school minutes generation) isn't going where it says it is 16:42:30 RRSAgent, pointer? 16:42:30 See http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-irc#T16-42-30 16:43:36 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:43:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/02/08-webid-minutes.html sandro 16:43:54 *shrug* that time it worked. 16:44:17 TallTed, do you think I should let groups use commonscribe without, like, me needing to add them manually? 16:44:47 funny question, just ... I don't know if there's much demand. 17:14:13 weirdness. glad it worked for you! 17:16:17 sandro - if you want to encourage use of commonscribe, then yes, I'd remove as many hurdles as possible. 17:16:18 I'd also try to publicize whatever benefits come from the new vs the old (which I'm not clear on, honestly -- right now, all I know is the new is more work than the old). 17:24:10 danbri has joined #webid 18:24:38 Zakim has left #webid