14:57:46 RRSAgent has joined #ldp 14:57:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/01/14-ldp-irc 14:57:50 Zakim has joined #ldp 14:57:54 Zakim, who is here? 14:57:54 sorry, Ruben, I don't know what conference this is 14:57:55 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Ruben, SteveS, bhyland, MacTed, betehess, JohnArwe, stevebattle, jmvanel, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, Yves, sandro, ericP 14:58:19 Zakim, list 14:58:19 I see BusD_Digital()10:00AM, Team_(html-a11y-plan)14:05Z, SW_LDP()10:00AM active 14:58:22 also scheduled at this time are SW_HCLS(Chairs)9:00AM, XML_SchemaW()10:00AM, WAI_PFWG(ARIA)10:00AM, UW_WebTVIG()10:00AM, MM_MMI()9:00AM, Team_SysWeb()10:00AM, SW_HCLS(Disc)10:00AM 14:58:39 Zakim, this is SW_LDP 14:58:39 ok, Ruben; that matches SW_LDP()10:00AM 14:58:47 Zakim, who is here? 14:58:47 On the phone I see TomDN, SteveBattle 14:58:49 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Ruben, SteveS, bhyland, MacTed, betehess, JohnArwe, stevebattle, jmvanel, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, Yves, sandro, ericP 14:58:53 Zakim, TomDN is me 14:58:53 +Ruben; got it 14:59:04 +??P4 15:00:46 +bblfish 15:00:55 +Arnaud 15:00:57 AndyS has joined #ldp 15:00:57 hi 15:01:01 +OpenLink_Software 15:01:06 krp has joined #ldp 15:01:11 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 15:01:11 +MacTed; got it 15:01:12 +[IBM] 15:01:12 Zakim, mute me 15:01:14 MacTed should now be muted 15:01:18 zakim, [IBM] is me 15:01:18 +SteveS; got it 15:01:47 Kalpa has joined #ldp 15:01:59 +Sandro 15:02:11 +JohnArwe 15:02:14 svillata has joined #ldp 15:02:52 zakim, who's on here? 15:02:53 I don't understand your question, Arnaud. 15:03:01 + +44.208.573.aaaa 15:03:08 zakim, who's present? 15:03:08 I don't understand your question, bblfish. 15:03:10 roger has joined #ldp 15:03:12 zakim, who is here? 15:03:12 On the phone I see Ruben, SteveBattle, ??P4, bblfish, Arnaud, MacTed (muted), SteveS, Sandro, JohnArwe, +44.208.573.aaaa 15:03:13 Bonne Annee Bernadette! :) 15:03:15 On IRC I see roger, svillata, Kalpa, krp, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, Ruben, SteveS, bhyland, MacTed, betehess, JohnArwe, stevebattle, jmvanel, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, Yves, sandro, 15:03:15 ... ericP 15:03:26 hi 15:03:40 +??P19 15:04:17 zakim, I am ?aaaa 15:04:17 sorry, roger, I do not see a party named '?aaaa' 15:04:27 zakim, I am aaaa 15:04:27 +roger; got it 15:04:44 zakim, ??P19 is me 15:04:44 +krp; got it 15:04:55 +[IPcaller] 15:05:00 zakim, IPCaller is me 15:05:01 +AndyS; got it 15:05:11 regrets, in another meeting... 15:05:12 zakim, aaaa is roger 15:05:12 sorry, JohnArwe, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa' 15:05:49 zakim, pick a victim 15:05:49 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose SteveS 15:06:25 zakim, who's here? 15:06:25 On the phone I see Ruben, SteveBattle, ??P4, bblfish, Arnaud, MacTed (muted), SteveS, Sandro, JohnArwe, roger, krp, AndyS 15:06:27 cygri has joined #ldp 15:06:27 On IRC I see roger, svillata, Kalpa, krp, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, Ruben, SteveS, bhyland, MacTed, betehess, JohnArwe, stevebattle, jmvanel, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, Yves, sandro, 15:06:27 ... ericP 15:06:44 +MHausenblas 15:06:47 zakim, mhausenblas is me 15:06:47 +cygri; got it 15:07:05 zakim, who is making noise? 15:07:17 bblfish, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P4 (4%), Arnaud (43%), JohnArwe (5%), AndyS (61%) 15:07:33 Scribe: SteveS 15:07:48 Topic: Minutes from 7-Jan-2013 15:08:17 how do you know that he was on irc Arnaud? 15:08:18 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2013-01-07 15:08:33 nmihindu has joined #ldp 15:08:35 so what was his name in the irc log? 15:08:51 Arnaud: Trying to discover who is W782C 15:09:26 ah ok 15:09:31 from last meeting, we haven't identified this person/bot 15:09:55 PROPOSAL: Approve minutes 7-Jan-2013 15:09:58 +1 15:10:08 +1 15:10:18 RESOLUTION: Approve minutes 7-Jan-2013 15:10:29 +??P26 15:10:38 Topic: Logistics of meetings, including F2F 15:10:54 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/F2F2 15:11:25 Arnaud: opportunity to sponsor events 15:11:35 be sure to update whether you can attend or not on the wiki page 15:11:45 -??P4 15:11:56 Zakim, ??P26 is me 15:11:56 +nmihindu; got it 15:12:17 there are a couple of options for rooms, one with a view and other with video conference 15:12:53 would prefer a bit view, though interested who would use or need video conference 15:12:53 Arnaud: MacTed says that "found this in local IRC logs... [10:06:08 AM] *** W782C is now known as nmihindu" -- just repeating it because I am not sure /me end up being visible in the logs 15:13:11 nhihindu: you joined after a discussion that MacTed's logs suggest you might be related to. Did you join last week as W782C ? 15:13:19 Sandro: unsure of the logistical details of the video conference, could send 15:13:37 video conf room can only fit about 9 people around the room 15:13:44 s/room/table 15:13:59 Topic: Actions and Issues 15:14:12 ACTION-34? 15:14:12 ACTION-34 -- Steve Speicher to [EDITOR] Upate spec for resolution of ISSUE-12 PATCH for creation -- due 2013-01-15 -- OPEN 15:14:12 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/34 15:14:29 +[GVoice] 15:15:03 JohnArwe: has created wiki page for it already but not completely populated 15:15:28 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ISSUE-34 is the link (resolves action 35) 15:15:34 ACTION-35? 15:15:34 ACTION-35 -- John Arwe to create wiki page for issue-34 proposals -- due 2013-01-14 -- PENDINGREVIEW 15:15:34 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/35 15:15:45 CLOSE ACTION-35 15:15:45 Closed ACTION-35 Create wiki page for issue-34 proposals. 15:16:19 -bblfish 15:16:27 JohnArwe: I joined last week, I thought I joined as nhihindu. But according to the log it was first W782C. 15:16:31 I also linked issue 34 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/34 to the new wiki page 15:16:45 ACTION-6? 15:16:45 ACTION-6 -- Michael Hausenblas to review SDshare -- due 2012-09-28 -- OPEN 15:16:45 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/6 15:17:06 Arnaud: not sure Michael can tend to it 15:17:21 recommend dropping it (closing it as no work done) 15:17:35 +1 15:17:59 PROPOSAL: Close ACTION-6 as no conflict with SDshare 15:18:45 +bblfish 15:18:49 +1 15:18:55 +1 15:18:55 +1 15:18:58 +1 15:19:02 +1 15:19:10 +1 15:19:17 +1 15:19:22 RESOLUTION: Close ACTION-6 as no conflict with SDshare 15:19:29 CLOSE ACTION-6 15:19:29 Closed ACTION-6 Review SDshare. 15:19:32 oberger has joined #ldp 15:19:42 wait 15:19:49 q+ 15:20:25 +Sandro.a 15:20:32 -Sandro 15:20:42 ack bblfish 15:21:00 Action-30? 15:21:00 ACTION-30 -- Steve Speicher to [EDITOR] check the LDP spec for examples in which relative URLs might be used -- due 2012-12-31 -- OPEN 15:21:00 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/30 15:21:06 bblfish: question on ACTION-30 and whether we should include a trailing slash on container URIs 15:21:46 SteveS: editor's will take feedback and incorporate it when finishing ACTION-30 15:22:10 the issue with Action-30 I was mentioning was http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Jan/0071.html 15:22:18 Action-43 ? 15:22:20 Topic: Raised issues https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/raised 15:22:28 trackbot has joined #ldp 15:22:34 ISSUE-43? 15:22:34 ISSUE-43 -- hint at naming a resource on creation -- raised 15:22:34 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/43 15:22:59 ok 15:23:10 +1 15:23:11 PROPOSAL: Move ISSUE-43 to open 15:23:14 +1 15:23:15 +1 15:23:16 +1 15:23:17 +1 15:23:18 +1 15:23:22 +1 15:23:41 +1 15:23:52 +1 15:23:58 RESOLUTION: Open ISSUE-43 15:24:04 OPEN ISSUE-43 15:24:11 REOPEN ISSUE-43 15:24:12 Re-opened ISSUE-43 hint at naming a resource on creation. 15:24:24 ISSUE-44 15:24:24 ISSUE-44 -- 4.1.9. is obscure or too restrictive -- raised 15:24:24 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/44 15:26:38 not seeing any link from the issue to SteveS's answer 15:26:41 Zakim, unmute me 15:26:41 MacTed should no longer be muted 15:26:41 bblfish: thinks it should be in best practices doc and is confusing 15:27:14 Could someone add links to email in the issue? 15:27:20 q+ 15:27:26 You can edit the issue. 15:27:30 q- 15:27:56 ah - email discussion happened on wg list before issue was opened 15:27:56 MacTed: discussion might be lost if we don't have the thread, so should raise issue and then discussion 15:28:06 Ok, I should have done that. 15:28:11 or better to have summary of discussion, with link to detailed thread 15:28:24 Zakim, mute me 15:28:24 MacTed should now be muted 15:29:01 PROPOSAL: Move ISSUE-44 to open 15:29:04 +1 15:29:05 +1 15:29:06 +1 15:29:07 +1 15:29:08 +1 15:29:17 MacTed were you suggesting a process change for the future as well? 15:29:26 RESOLUTION: Open ISSUE-44 15:29:32 REOPEN ISSUE-44 15:29:32 Re-opened ISSUE-44 4.1.9. is obscure or too restrictive. 15:29:35 Ok, next time I'll try to summarise it. I thought that this time the issue itself summarised my thread. 15:29:52 Initially when I brought this up, I was confused about this paragraph. 15:29:54 Topic: Issues pending review, ISSUE-5 15:29:59 ISSUE-5 15:29:59 ISSUE-5 -- Add a section explaining how LDBP is related to Graph Store Protocol -- pending review 15:29:59 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/5 15:30:29 Arnaud: some discussion previously to move to this issue to postponed 15:30:32 +1 for postpone 15:30:47 ...e.g. raised issues could be discussed on the list using the tracker number so the links happen automagically, and if that discussion leads either to it not being opened or other actions, history is retained 15:31:18 q+ 15:32:10 ack bblfish 15:32:57 bblfish: better to postpone to have some time to implement and get some more feedback on what should be said in LDP 15:33:43 Arnaud: the SemWeb coordination call this came up as GSP and LDP 15:34:18 …Ian said key will be from implementers if they can implement both from same server and no conflicts 15:34:23 PROPOSAL: Move ISSUE-5 to postponed 15:34:25 +1 15:34:26 +1 15:34:31 +1 15:34:33 +1 15:34:38 +1 15:34:46 do see value in helping consumers decide which spec(s) to implement and why so +1 15:34:49 +1 15:34:56 +1 15:35:04 RESOLUTION: Postpone ISSUE-5 15:35:17 POSTPONE ISSUE-5 15:36:31 Topic: UC&R 15:36:50 Thanks to SteveS for making the final corrections to UC&R 15:37:18 SteveS: Committed changes to respect biblio references and berjon committed. 15:37:21 Zakim, mute me 15:37:21 Ruben should now be muted 15:37:47 waiting for web team to publish, everything is ready 15:38:02 Topic: Spec status 15:38:59 Issue-37? 15:38:59 ISSUE-37 -- What is the LDP data model and the LDP interaction model? -- open 15:38:59 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/37 15:39:11 JohnArwe: has done some editing and updates in the spec 15:39:32 SteveS: haven't made changes for issue 25 resolution 15:40:27 Topic: ISSUE-37 wiki summary of LDP model 15:40:38 This is the wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ISSUE-37 15:41:14 Arnaud: Erik has summarized with AtomPub model, SteveS has updated with LDP work 15:41:54 Issue-34? 15:41:54 ISSUE-34 -- Adding and removing arcs in weak aggregation -- open 15:41:54 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/34 15:43:15 Arnaud: The new proposal for aggregation should be around ISSUE-34 or others that are appropriate 15:43:16 q+ 15:43:39 q+ 15:44:04 Arnaud: Is there understanding as this is the approach? 15:44:15 q- 15:45:36 bblfish: thinks it will be helpful to map it to common concepts like filesystems, which may help people understand the model 15:46:30 +q 15:46:46 Arnaud: Erik used the AtomPub to help describe, expectation that others could contribute their views onto the wiki 15:46:52 ack steves 15:47:51 ack roger 15:48:10 q+ 15:48:14 q+ we talk a lot with issue 37 about "the model" ... is there only one, once we get into the analogies? 15:48:33 q+ to ask we talk a lot with issue 37 about "the model" ... is there only one, once we get into the analogies? 15:49:07 ack steves 15:49:38 I'll try to add a file system model as a point of comparison to see how it differs from the other two. 15:50:16 who is it? 15:50:29 Roger 15:50:32 roger is speaking, if that's your question henry 15:50:36 thnx 15:50:45 ( that's why the queue is useful ) 15:51:20 SteveS: thinks we should set a timeframe for review and get feedback, like Henry's proposal and Ashok's questions/feedback 15:51:46 roger: thinks we need a way like the wiki page to present alternative models, that have useful features 15:51:49 ack John 15:51:49 JohnArwe, you wanted to ask we talk a lot with issue 37 about "the model" ... is there only one, once we get into the analogies? 15:52:58 SteveS: we have a model in LDP, the issue 37 is about just documenting it and framing any possible gaps, we still use issue tracking to get resolution of model changes 15:53:41 +1 15:54:00 JohnArwe: we are using the issue 37 page to help compare for completeness and good examples, we already have some placeholders for other issues (new or proposal) 15:54:11 q? 15:54:59 Arnaud: we need to review the feedback, like Ashok's, and ask if it can be allowed in the spec or not 15:55:42 JohnArwe: there isn't a binary choice on some of the questions, like it could be allows, explicitly forbidden, allowed in cases, or other cases 15:56:17 -bblfish 15:56:33 JohnArwe: hard to know when we intentionally are silent 15:57:15 apologies, all; I have a hard stop at 11 today. 15:57:21 -MacTed 15:57:27 +bblfish 15:57:48 Arnaud: what did you (JohnArwe) mean by alternatives in the issue 37 wiki page? 15:58:12 sandro: the model is also important as a metaphor, which helps people understand it, and it gives people ideas/expectations about how it's going to work. the filesystem is at this point a metaphor based on a metaphor. 15:58:28 JohnArwe: mostly just alternative ways to describe it and how it could be done/used 15:59:14 +1 15:59:25 Arnaud: progrèss on ISSUE-37, SteveS proposed give people some time to review 15:59:29 1q+ 15:59:31 1+ 15:59:32 by Jan 21? 15:59:33 q+ 16:00:00 ack bblfish 16:00:17 21st is MLKjr day, some have off 16:00:25 We should also add comparison criteria 16:00:36 -nmihindu 16:00:43 bblfish: plans to have new addition filesystem by next meeting 16:00:48 (as per ericP's coments last week) 16:01:06 s/coments/comments/ 16:01:35 Arnaud have review by 28th 16:01:40 meeting is closed 16:01:41 bye 16:01:47 -cygri 16:01:48 -SteveS 16:01:54 -bblfish 16:01:58 -Sandro.a 16:01:59 -roger 16:02:01 -ericP 16:02:01 -JohnArwe 16:02:02 -SteveBattle 16:02:02 -Arnaud 16:02:03 AndyS has left #ldp 16:02:06 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 16:02:08 -AndyS 16:02:11 -krp 16:02:25 -Ruben 16:02:26 SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended 16:02:26 Attendees were SteveBattle, Ruben, bblfish, Arnaud, MacTed, SteveS, Sandro, JohnArwe, +44.208.573.aaaa, roger, krp, AndyS, cygri, nmihindu, ericP 16:02:38 SteveS__ has joined #ldp 16:03:58 MacTed has joined #ldp 16:08:00 JohnArwe has joined #ldp 16:16:09 cygri has joined #ldp 16:37:35 gavinc has joined #ldp 16:44:36 betehess has joined #ldp 16:59:54 MacTed has joined #ldp 17:00:41 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 17:01:01 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 17:24:17 bblfish has joined #ldp 18:02:04 Zakim has left #ldp 18:56:56 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 19:45:09 SteveS has joined #ldp 19:45:22 SteveS has joined #ldp 20:00:29 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 23:54:48 rrsagent, make logs public