14:26:11 RRSAgent has joined #rd 14:26:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/01/09-rd-irc 14:26:13 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:26:13 Zakim has joined #rd 14:26:15 Zakim, this will be 7394 14:26:15 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 14:26:16 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 14:26:16 Date: 09 January 2013 14:26:19 zakim, agenda? 14:26:19 I see nothing on the agenda 14:26:27 zakim, please clear the agenda 14:26:29 agenda cleared 14:26:41 Chair: Harper_Simon 14:26:41 Agenda+ Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [sharper] 14:26:41 Agenda+ Text Customisation Note EARLY DRAFT - 14:26:42 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/TC4R_Draft_Report [shawn/david] 14:26:42 Agenda+ Mobile Note DRAFT - 14:26:42 https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2094833/RDWG%20Mobile%20Note.html [yeliz/peter/simon] 14:26:43 14:26:43 Agenda+ Issues and Actions (Standing Item): 14:26:43 https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/tracker/ [sharper] 14:26:43 Agenda+ Any Other Business (Standing Item) [sharper] 14:26:52 zakim, save agenda 14:26:58 zakim, take up item 1 14:26:59 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2013/01/09-rd-agenda.rdf 14:27:01 agendum 1. "Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments)" taken up [from sharper] 14:27:15 regrets+ Abou-Zahra_Shadi 14:27:24 regrets+ Mohamad_Yehya 14:27:58 sloandr has joined #rd 14:28:11 regrets+ Brown_Justin 14:28:47 Scribes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/scribes 14:29:19 regrets+ O'Connor_Joshue 14:29:53 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:29:53 WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has not yet started, shawn 14:29:55 On IRC I see sloandr, Zakim, RRSAgent, Vivienne, sharper, klaus, annika, shawn, Joshue, nonge_, shadi, Mate, trackbot 14:30:06 rrsagent, make logs public 14:30:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:30:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/09-rd-minutes.html sharper 14:30:14 zakim this is WAI_RDWG 14:30:18 zakim, this is WAI_RDWG 14:30:18 ok, shawn; that matches WAI_RDWG()9:30AM 14:30:22 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:30:23 On the phone I see ??P27, [IPcaller], Shawn, [IPcaller.a] 14:30:23 zakim, mute me 14:30:23 sorry, Vivienne, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 14:30:24 hi all, i have dialled in via skype but can't hear anything 14:30:48 sloandr has joined #rd 14:30:53 zakim, [ipcaller] is me 14:30:53 +Vivienne; got it 14:31:05 zakim, mute me 14:31:05 Vivienne should now be muted 14:31:06 giorgio has joined #rd 14:31:14 zakim, mute me 14:31:14 sorry, sloandr, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 14:31:27 zakim, ??P27 is me 14:31:27 +klaus; got it 14:31:27 zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me 14:31:28 +sloandr; got it 14:31:28 +??P32 14:31:36 zakim, mute me 14:31:36 sloandr should now be muted 14:31:42 yay 14:31:44 zakim, mute me 14:31:44 klaus should now be muted 14:31:44 zakim, ??P32 is me 14:31:45 +annika; got it 14:31:50 +??P33 14:32:02 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:32:02 On the phone I see klaus (muted), Vivienne (muted), Shawn, sloandr (muted), annika, ??P33 14:32:06 zakim, ??P33 is sharper 14:32:06 +sharper; got it 14:32:10 zakim, mute me 14:32:10 annika should now be muted 14:33:30 zakim, unmute me 14:33:30 sloandr should no longer be muted 14:33:48 + +1.609.734.aaaa 14:33:56 christos has joined #rd 14:33:58 sorry, thought i was unmuted 14:34:01 ? 14:34:10 +??P34 14:34:14 +??P35 14:34:30 zakim, ??P34 is me 14:34:30 +christos; got it 14:34:50 zakim, aaaa is Markku 14:34:50 +Markku; got it 14:34:51 zakim, mute me 14:34:51 christos should now be muted 14:34:56 zakim, ??P35 is giorgio 14:34:56 +giorgio; got it 14:35:22 i can do that 14:35:22 zakim, mute me 14:35:22 sloandr should now be muted 14:35:24 ack me 14:35:48 zakim, mute me 14:35:48 christos should now be muted 14:35:51 zakim, scribe is giorgio 14:35:51 sorry, giorgio, I do not recognize a party named 'scribe' 14:36:11 zakim, scribe: giorgio 14:36:11 I don't understand 'scribe: giorgio', giorgio 14:36:19 scribe: giorgio 14:37:02 agenda? 14:37:08 -giorgio 14:37:22 no 14:37:22 zakim, close agenda 1 14:37:22 agendum 1, Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments), closed 14:37:24 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:37:24 2. Text Customisation Note EARLY DRAFT - [from sharper] 14:37:37 zakim, take up agenda 3 14:37:37 agendum 3. "Mobile Note DRAFT -" taken up [from sharper] 14:38:06 https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2094833/RDWG%20Mobile%20Note.html 14:38:14 markel has joined #rd 14:38:37 sh: firrst draft of mobile webinar is out; anybody has read it? 14:38:41 I had a brief look 14:39:22 sh: if everybody could read by next meeting so that we go though it line by line and make sure that we agree 14:39:27 s/mobile webinar /mobile report / 14:39:30 +??P35 14:39:35 sounds fine 14:39:36 sh: is everybody ok with this? 14:39:38 +1 14:39:46 zakim, ??P35 is markel 14:39:46 +markel; got it 14:40:02 +1 14:40:27 +1 14:40:30 shawn: can you go through it and give us an outline? 14:41:34 sh: check if related work is missing 14:42:24 sh: in current research should be a summary of what was dealt with 14:42:40 yeliz has joined #rd 14:42:52 Hi all, sorry I am late 14:43:00 sh: emerging themes is our interpretation of what came out from the webinar. This is very subjective so people can disagree here 14:43:37 +[IPcaller] 14:43:41 sh: research roadmap is a discussion of what came out from the meeting and from the invited experts 14:43:51 zakim, +[IPcaller] is yeliz 14:43:51 sorry, yeliz, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' 14:44:05 sh: we'll be happy to take any additional txt that poeple think is useful. 14:44:09 zakim, IPcaller is yeliz 14:44:09 +yeliz; got it 14:44:16 zakim, mute me 14:44:16 yeliz should now be muted 14:44:40 sh: in appendix we've thequestions and ansers, quite a lot of them 14:45:40 sh: this is our questions, and there is a lot of info here because there was no room in the note itself and neither in individual papers. 14:45:42 q+ to say minor point: label the Appendix so it's clear from the TOC what it is 14:46:24 ack shaw 14:46:24 shawn, you wanted to say minor point: label the Appendix so it's clear from the TOC what it is 14:46:26 ack me 14:46:53 q+ to say important point - make sure the themes of WAI work are included. see http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/ 14:46:54 shawn: minor point but label the appendix with a moe infomative title, "additional other questions" 14:46:54 OK, thanks Shawn 14:46:56 ack me 14:46:56 shawn, you wanted to say important point - make sure the themes of WAI work are included. see http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/ 14:48:01 shawn: more importantly, make sure that a theme comes out from the report that says that guidelins are important and that it is tied to the pages we have in theWAI for mobile 14:48:24 Issue tracking would be good 14:48:31 sh: how shall we handle these comments? with a ticket tracking tool? 14:48:42 so we have a list of comments to be addressed 14:48:58 shawn: we can do that with zakim as an action 14:49:03 important point -- while additional guidance is needed; mobile accessibility is already covered in WAI guidelines (UAAG & WCAG) 14:49:58 Action: sharper to make explicit that Mobile accessibility already exists (with pointers) even though there can be more to do (inc links from roadmap) near the top. 14:49:58 Created ACTION-34 - Make explicit that Mobile accessibility already exists (with pointers) even though there can be more to do (inc links from roadmap) near the top. [on Simon Harper - due 2013-01-16]. 14:50:27 action: sharper to append appendix title with more descriptive text 14:50:27 Created ACTION-35 - Append appendix title with more descriptive text [on Simon Harper - due 2013-01-16]. 14:50:39 zakim, q? 14:50:39 I see no one on the speaker queue 14:51:07 sh: any comments? 14:51:18 zakim, unmute me 14:51:18 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:51:21 sh: yeliz? are you there? 14:52:47 yy: no additional comments today 14:52:48 q+ to say minor point - W3C reference style http://www.w3.org/TR/accessibility-metrics-report/#references 14:52:48 zakim, mute me 14:52:49 yeliz should now be muted 14:52:54 ack me 14:52:54 shawn, you wanted to say minor point - W3C reference style http://www.w3.org/TR/accessibility-metrics-report/#references 14:52:55 ack shawn 14:53:07 +??P2 14:53:18 zakim, ??P2 is me 14:53:18 +christos; got it 14:53:32 shawn: minor points, check the w3c reference style (eg brakets). 14:53:39 zakim, mute me 14:53:39 christos was already muted, christos 14:53:45 zakim, unmute me 14:53:45 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:53:47 shawn: double check with Shadi if we need to do that. 14:54:09 yy: references are in academic style. 14:54:28 action: sharper to check with Shadi regarding academic style for references. 14:54:28 Created ACTION-36 - Check with Shadi regarding academic style for references. [on Simon Harper - due 2013-01-16]. 14:54:46 zakim, mute me 14:54:46 yeliz should now be muted 14:54:55 yy: in previous note there also mixed urls. Here everything is the academic style. 14:56:00 sh: now the document is in my dropbox. we use bit-bucket as a version-control system. is it still ok to keep using that? 14:56:27 shawn: it would be better to have it in the w3c space, but I leave to Shadi to decide. 14:56:44 shawn: before we announce it publicly we'll need to move it to the w3c space 14:56:55 It's much easier to edit it I think if we have the control 14:57:04 zakim, unmute me 14:57:04 sloandr should no longer be muted 14:57:06 zakim, take up agenda 2 14:57:06 agendum 2. "Text Customisation Note EARLY DRAFT -" taken up [from sharper] 14:57:18 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/TC4R_Draft_Report 14:57:43 sh: david and shawn, would you lie to talk? 14:57:49 s/lie/like/ 14:57:58 s/before we announce it publicly we'll need to move it to the w3c space/before we announce it publicly we'll need to move it to the w3c space -although while editing, certainly easier to have where all can edit/ 14:58:04 ok, sorry. I'm unmuted and i can hear you 14:58:06 shawn: david we can't hear you. 14:58:18 not locally muted 14:58:32 will drop and call in again, sorry 14:58:36 s/shawn: david we can't hear you./ / 14:58:41 -Vivienne 14:59:09 ah - looks like i was associated with vivienne 14:59:33 shawn: it is still a draft. People have had a chance to read it? 14:59:38 zakim, sloandr is really Vivienne 14:59:38 +Vivienne; got it 14:59:57 +[IPcaller] 15:00:03 shawn: any comments? 15:00:05 zakim, [ipcaller] is me 15:00:05 +sloandr; got it 15:00:06 q+ 15:00:14 ack shar 15:00:16 I started looking through it - it's looking good so far 15:00:51 zakim, q+ 15:00:51 I see yeliz on the speaker queue 15:00:54 q+ 15:01:04 sh: I skimmed over it. can you tell me the way it is structured? are these lists to be moved into a discussion or shall they remain as they are now? 15:01:10 ack slo 15:01:18 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:01:18 On the phone I see klaus (muted), Shawn, Vivienne, annika (muted), sharper, Markku, christos (muted), markel, yeliz (muted), christos.a, sloandr 15:01:31 zakim, mute Vivienne 15:01:31 Vivienne should now be muted 15:01:39 david: simon you're right. it's "listy" because we wanted still to think at thecontent. 15:02:44 david: the intention is to compress the numbr of headings 15:03:22 shawn: simon, where you talking about the numebr of sections or their contents? 15:03:33 s/where/were/ 15:03:41 From reading it, the content is looking 'listy', but I assumed this was because it was a draft and you are organizing your ideas. 15:03:45 [ I think example of listy section is: ] 15:03:55 sh: both. 15:04:20 sh: it's nice to have a flowing narrative description rather than lists. 15:04:40 sh: I just wanted to verify with you what was your intention. 15:04:51 david: it's a temporary struture. 15:05:02 s/sh: both./sh: within sections./ 15:05:46 [ the numeric references are historical - copy & paste -- will be changed] 15:05:48 +1 for name and the year, it is much better for reading the text 15:06:17 shawn: references will be converted in the format NAME-YEAR 15:06:24 q? 15:06:26 zakim, q? 15:06:26 I see yeliz on the speaker queue 15:06:30 zakim, unmute yeliz 15:06:30 yeliz should no longer be muted 15:06:30 ack yeliz 15:06:40 yy: on simon's comment 15:06:58 zakim, mute me 15:06:58 sloandr should now be muted 15:07:33 yy: the number of sections is too large, for lower levels ones (ie the more detaild ones). 15:07:46 zakim, mute me 15:07:46 yeliz should now be muted 15:08:00 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:08:00 On the phone I see klaus (muted), Shawn, Vivienne (muted), annika (muted), sharper, Markku, christos (muted), markel, yeliz (muted), christos.a, sloandr (muted) 15:08:11 I can hear a real echo as well 15:08:14 -yeliz 15:08:17 I'm muted 15:08:17 zakim, who is making noise? 15:08:20 zakim, mute me 15:08:20 sorry, giorgio, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 15:08:28 sharper, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: christos.a (26%), Markku (43%), Shawn (54%) 15:08:31 zakim, mute me 15:08:31 christos was already muted, christos 15:08:38 zakim, who is making noise? 15:08:48 sharper, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: christos.a (50%), Shawn (14%), sharper (25%) 15:09:16 zakim, christos.a is me 15:09:16 +christos; got it 15:09:52 sh: we cut the time for review and added extra heading just to have an idea of the kind of contentwere were adding 15:10:40 shawn: we wanted to make sure that certain content was clear and had the appropriate emphasis, eg impact 15:11:02 zakim, q? 15:11:02 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:11:11 sh: any other comments? 15:11:29 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/TC4R_Draft_Report#Summary 15:11:40 shawn: look at he summary, new and still drafty. let's read it now 15:13:15 sh: anybody has read it? 15:13:41 trackbot has joined #rd 15:14:00 s/sh: anybody has read it?/ / 15:14:16 yeliz has joined #rd 15:14:30 sorry, I lost the connection :( 15:14:33 zakim, unmute me 15:14:33 sloandr should no longer be muted 15:14:36 sh: you talk aabout text size, font, color, but you provide a single example. Are there there examples? 15:15:10 Having problems with connection so will be only on IRC 15:16:02 david: there are 2 perspectives, and I agree with Simon that other examples could be added 15:16:20 shawn: please add some note as a reminder for us 15:16:52 have to leave, sorry 15:16:57 sh: can you make suggesstions on how other groups (eg css people) could contribute to tackling these issues. 15:16:58 -klaus 15:17:23 s/ please add some note as a reminder for us/ refresh - I added a note for reminder to us/ 15:18:33 david I can barely hear you; lot of echo and background noise! 15:18:49 zakim, mute me 15:18:49 sloandr should now be muted 15:19:08 q+ 15:19:15 sh: do you plan to invite experts in the field to discuss the roadmap? as we did for the mobile event. 15:19:16 sorry, giorgio - do you need me to summarise what i said in text? 15:19:16 zakim, q? 15:19:16 I see annika on the speaker queue 15:19:44 shawn: I'm not sure if we want to establish a precedent with a follow up discussion 15:20:17 +1 for a follow up discussion 15:20:18 shawn: we were thinking for that input to be submitted as email, so that it is more referenceable 15:20:19 ack ann 15:20:19 ack me 15:20:32 was interesting to hear some expert views on the topic 15:20:56 annika: consider also settings of the OS, not just those of the user agent 15:21:16 zakim, mute me 15:21:16 annika should now be muted 15:21:18 +1 to annika 15:21:24 shawn: great point, thank you. 15:21:32 zakim, q? 15:21:32 I see no one on the speaker queue 15:22:18 s/we were thinking for that input to be submitted as email, so that it is more referenceable/we plan to ask for specific input to the public draft. we were thinking for that input to be submitted as email, so that it is more referenceable/ 15:22:20 sh: if have comments supply them via the rdwg mailing list 15:22:46 sh: next week read the mobile note as we will go line by line for changes. 15:23:06 sh: and then we will move to the text customization note. 15:23:20 sh: where are we with the easy to read note, klaus? 15:23:30 sh: any other business? 15:23:44 -Markku 15:23:47 good night all. 15:23:47 sh: see you all next week. 15:23:57 thanks! bye 15:24:00 ok. it's been a pleasure. bye 15:24:01 markel has left #rd 15:24:01 gooodbye... 15:24:02 bye 15:24:03 thanks - bye! 15:24:06 -Shawn 15:24:07 -annika 15:24:09 -sloandr 15:24:09 -markel 15:24:10 -christos.aa 15:24:15 -Vivienne 15:24:17 -sharper 15:24:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:24:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/09-rd-minutes.html shawn 15:24:21 -christos 15:24:23 WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has ended 15:24:23 Attendees were Shawn, Vivienne, klaus, annika, sharper, +1.609.734.aaaa, christos, Markku, giorgio, markel, yeliz, sloandr 15:24:27 annika has left #rd 15:24:52 Present: Shawn, Vivienne, klaus, annika, sharper, christos, Markku, giorgio, markel, yeliz, sloandr 15:24:54 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:24:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/01/09-rd-minutes.html shawn 15:29:18 sloandr has left #rd 15:47:51 shawn has joined #rd 15:49:02 shadi has joined #rd 17:50:01 yeliz has joined #rd 17:52:25 shawn has left #rd 19:22:33 shadi has joined #rd 19:30:16 shadi has joined #rd 19:35:34 shadi has joined #rd 19:41:35 shadi has joined #rd 19:52:21 shadi has joined #rd 20:23:47 shadi has joined #rd 20:32:01 yeliz has joined #rd