ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it
Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Steve Speicher
- Due on:
- September 12, 2012
- Created on:
- July 23, 2012
- Associated Product:
- Linked Data Platform Spec
- Related emails:
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from sspeiche@us.ibm.com on 2012-09-24)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from sspeiche@us.ibm.com on 2012-09-24)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-09-21)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-09-21)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from sspeiche@us.ibm.com on 2012-09-20)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-09-20)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from eric@w3.org on 2012-09-20)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-09-20)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2012-09-20)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-09-19)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2012-09-19)
- ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from sspeiche@us.ibm.com on 2012-09-17)
- Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2012-09-17)
Related notes:
Earlier thread that discussed some differences and possible overlap http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Jul/0001.html
Steve Speicher, 17 Sep 2012, 12:01:48Display change log.