ACTION-10: Convert member submission to Editor's Draft, with support of JohnArwe and mhausenblas

adding email manually: On 2012-09-19 12:17 , "Steve K Speicher" <sspeiche@us.ibm.com> wrote

--------------------------------------------------

I have completed ACTION-10 to convert member submission to an Editor's
Draft [1].

This is an "as-is" migration from member submission [2] to follow W3C
draft format. I have also produced a HTML diff [3].

There are a few editorial items I need to address:
- What namespace URI should we use for new terms defined in this document?
- Validate the shortname for this as 'ldbp'
I assume these will either be created as official issues or actions. For
now I just made a reminder for editors in the doc.

Now that ACTION-10 is complete, I will start incorporating some of the
actions and minor editorial issues found since published as member
submission.

Fellow editors (Michael/John), once you have contributed an edit feel free
to add yourself as an editor.

Note: the diff [3] isn't perfect, for example the new draft uses ReSpec.js
which pulls in boilerplate HTML and the diff struggles with this a bit.
Note: [1] and [3] have an annoying red box at the top right since biblio
entries are missing, I have a pull request pending [4]. Robin says he'll
get to it shortly.

[1] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldbp.html
[2] - http://www.w3.org/Submission/2012/SUBM-ldbp-20120326/
[3] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldbp-diff-20120919.html
[4] - https://github.com/darobin/respec/pull/73

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web ->
http://open-services.net

Consider closing, no work left...see email