16:46:34 RRSAgent has joined #audio 16:46:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-audio-irc 16:46:41 rrsagent, make logs public 16:46:46 zakim, this will be audio 16:46:46 ok, olivier; I see RWC_Audio()12:00PM scheduled to start in 14 minutes 16:49:20 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012OctDec/0422.html 16:49:38 Regrets: Thierry, CWilso, Philip, Marcus 16:49:42 Chair: olivier 16:49:47 Scribe: Matt 16:49:58 ScribeNick: mdjp 16:50:14 Agenda+ Testing 16:50:32 Agenda+ Face-to-face meeting 16:50:43 Agenda+ Audio WG Document Milestones 16:53:20 RWC_Audio()12:00PM has now started 16:53:26 +??P28 16:53:36 -??P28 16:53:37 RWC_Audio()12:00PM has ended 16:53:37 Attendees were 16:55:07 jussi has joined #audio 16:57:30 zakim, agenda? 16:57:30 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 16:57:30 1. Testing [from olivier] 16:57:30 2. Face-to-face meeting [from olivier] 16:57:30 3. Audio WG Document Milestones [from olivier] 16:57:57 RWC_Audio()12:00PM has now started 16:58:04 +[IPcaller] 16:58:12 zakim, code? 16:58:12 the conference code is 28346 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), olivier 16:58:20 Zakim: +[IPcaller] is me 16:58:29 rtoyg has joined #audio 16:58:41 Zakim, +[IPcaller] is me 16:58:41 sorry, chrislowis, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' 16:58:50 ChrisL has joined #audio 16:58:52 +[IPcaller.a] 16:59:03 zakim, IPcaller.a is me 16:59:03 +olivier; got it 16:59:22 Zakim, IPcaller is me 16:59:22 +chrislowis; got it 16:59:28 +??P29 16:59:45 zakim, ??P29 is Matt 16:59:45 +Matt; got it 17:00:13 +ChrisL.a 17:00:43 chris has joined #audio 17:00:51 :D 17:01:26 Zakim, ChrisL.a is ChrisLilley 17:01:26 +ChrisLilley; got it 17:01:32 zakim, ChrisL is chrislowis 17:01:32 sorry, olivier, I do not recognize a party named 'ChrisL' 17:01:40 + +1.510.334.aaaa 17:01:53 zakim, aaaa is CRogers 17:01:53 +CRogers; got it 17:02:07 +??P32 17:02:09 rrsagent, here 17:02:09 See http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-audio-irc#T17-02-09 17:02:19 zakim, ??P32 is Jussi 17:02:19 +Jussi; got it 17:02:25 olivier: I've connected telephone with irc already :) 17:02:38 good :) 17:02:55 zakim, take up agendum 1 17:02:55 agendum 1. "Testing" taken up [from olivier] 17:03:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012AprJun/thread.html#msg739 17:03:41 q+ to discuss link between testable assertions in spec and testability 17:04:37 olivier: discussion on testing - approaches to be taken - how will we manage test approach, (manual or automated) and submission 17:04:59 http://w3c-test.org/ 17:05:36 q+ to discuss link between testable assertions in spec and testability and also to discuss experience using w3c-test.w3.org 17:05:41 http://w3c-test.org/ttml/ttml11/testsuite/web-framework/START.html 17:05:41 WebKit Web Audio tests: http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk/LayoutTests/webaudio/ 17:06:02 olivier: w3c maintain a test site http://w3c-test.org/ contains interesting example (ttml) 17:06:11 ack ChrisLilley 17:06:11 ChrisLilley, you wanted to discuss link between testable assertions in spec and testability and to discuss link between testable assertions in spec and testability and also to 17:06:15 ... discuss experience using w3c-test.w3.org 17:06:40 (WOFF Test suite. link?) 17:06:45 +Doug_Schepers 17:07:43 +[Mozilla] 17:07:44 ChrisLilley - recommends use of WODD test suite been used in a previous group. Link betwen how spec is written and tests - easier to check what a test is testing if phrasing is directly testable, testing should not be left too late 17:07:53 s/WODD/WOFF/ 17:08:19 zakim, Mozilla is Ehsan 17:08:19 +Ehsan; got it 17:09:29 ehsan has joined #audio 17:09:36 chris - peter lynn working on shepard, testing tool used by css team - not fully integrated with w3c instance 17:09:38 (Peter Linss is working on Shepherd) 17:09:40 http://www.w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/woff-ua/results for user agents 17:09:47 Peter Linss 17:10:33 http://www.w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/woff-at/run test harness 17:11:21 chris let tests drive the spec. If feel there are gaps and wording is not right we can change the spec over however 75 test written in webkit so far 17:11:36 automata has joined #audio 17:11:47 chris recommend we look at tests written so far which run evey day 17:12:30 chrislowis: do webkit test depend onan implementation? 17:12:35 olivier thanks 17:12:40 link to existing webkit tests? 17:12:43 -chrislowis 17:12:59 WebKit Web Audio tests: http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk/LayoutTests/webaudio/ 17:13:03 +[IPcaller] 17:13:21 Zakim: IPcaller is me 17:13:31 Zakim, IPcaller is me 17:13:31 +chrislowis; got it 17:14:05 chris: result of tests produces a wavefile and compares with reference. Example spatialization - compare panned file against reference file 17:14:35 olivier: we should do this manually as wave file depends on the platform - can't be fully automated? 17:15:23 s/recommends use of WOFF test suite been used in a previous group/recommends use of W3C test harness, been used in Fonts WG for WOFF/ 17:16:02 chris: webkit automated but different on other browsers, quite painful to manage baselines for other platforms. 17:16:32 olivier: testing performance vs regression etc? 17:18:22 ChrisLilley: svg heading towards quick testing to check a number of conditions aiming at automation, preferable for anything that can be automated to be automated 17:19:00 olivier: We will have to have a mix of manual and automated testing 17:19:06 first…. 17:20:21 olivier: ??? has time to take care of coordinating the test submission - agrees with chris tests will drive how we change the specs, not just a translation. 17:20:55 s/???/Thierry/ 17:21:02 olivier: next step look at which of the webkit tests could be submitted as a first step 17:21:11 zakim, who is here? 17:21:11 On the phone I see olivier, Matt, ChrisLilley, CRogers, Jussi, Doug_Schepers, Ehsan, chrislowis 17:21:13 On IRC I see automata, ehsan, chris, ChrisLilley, rtoyg, jussi, RRSAgent, Zakim, chrislowis, colinbdclark, tmichel, olivier, trackbot, shepazu, heathjs, paul___irish, mdjp 17:21:19 chris: seems like a good first step 17:21:40 Ehsan: all current tests written for Mozilla can be submitted to the test kit 17:22:16 I'm happy to help with this testing effort too. 17:22:48 zakim, close this agendum 17:22:48 agendum 1 closed 17:22:49 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:22:49 2. Face-to-face meeting [from olivier] 17:22:54 zakim, take up agendum 2 17:22:54 agendum 2. "Face-to-face meeting" taken up [from olivier] 17:22:57 happy to help with web midi testing 17:23:33 olivier: havent talked about midi testing - need to think about this also 17:24:20 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46884/f2f-2013-1/ 17:24:41 agenda+ state of Mozilla implementation 17:24:43 ChrisLilley: :) let's talk more about that on the list 17:25:08 jussi - yes, sure 17:25:10 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46884/f2f-2013-1/results 17:25:17 olivier: f2f meeting couldn't meet at TPAC due to various reasons, poll in the w3c site to collect dates and locations for next f2f. Please answer if you have not done so already 17:26:21 olivier: preferred time at the moment is late or early March, location mixed preference for location (US) 17:26:24 Let's have it at SXSW :) 17:26:43 March 8-12 SXSW 17:26:46 http://sxsw.com/ 8-17 March 17:28:16 zakim, take up agendum 3 17:28:16 agendum 3. "Audio WG Document Milestones" taken up [from olivier] 17:29:24 http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/W3C_Audio_Publications_and_Milestones 17:30:03 joe has joined #audio 17:30:14 + +1.978.314.aabb 17:30:27 zakim, aabb is Joe 17:30:27 +Joe; got it 17:31:02 Joe: this page: http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/W3C_Audio_Publications_and_Milestones 17:31:13 olivier: milestones from recharter available on wiki - milestones may be ambitious, require test suite to be ready very soon. Added updated estimates for api 17:31:30 chrislowis: thx 17:33:02 olivier: need a clear an honest view about our progres at any time. Some groups don't include any milestones, we have tried to estimate, need to talk about current estimases from audio and midi api 17:33:47 olivier: could reach last call march 2013 - means we have solved all main issues internally and push for public to review 17:34:17 olivier: is this still reasonable? 17:34:32 jussi: still realistic but needs discussion 17:36:21 chris: Don't know - fast progress on adressing issues but many less significant issues. More issues will arise, 1st Q 2013 still a posibillity but may be ambitious 17:36:49 jussi: Number of issues from Mozilla will increase 17:37:16 olivier: leave at Q1 2013 and reassess 17:38:17 chris: we should publish a working draft, discussing using web IDL enums. 17:38:41 olivier: due for working draft soon, last was in August. 17:39:45 q+ to mention that linking met milestones to the actual specs would be helpful 17:39:55 ack c 17:39:55 ChrisLilley, you wanted to mention that linking met milestones to the actual specs would be helpful 17:40:33 ChrisLilley: helpful for people who want to look at milestones if they show visibly progress (style completed differently) 17:40:38 ACTION: olivier to update milestones tables with links to FPWD 17:40:38 Created ACTION-52 - Update milestones tables with links to FPWD [on Olivier Thereaux - due 2012-11-28]. 17:41:27 shepazu: public depending on this spec, may not be tracking the day to day work of the group but still invested in the work. 17:41:39 zakim, take up next agendum 17:41:39 agendum 2. "Face-to-face meeting" taken up [from olivier] 17:41:45 zakim, take up agendum 4 17:41:45 agendum 4. "state of Mozilla implementation" taken up [from shepazu] 17:42:42 shepazu: how do you feel about the spec so far, how long will it take to get to a state when people can start to test 17:43:40 -chrislowis 17:43:57 ehsan: expect to output audio within the next couple of weeks - the spec in its current form is not really well suited to be implemented by people without specific knowledge of audio processing 17:44:18 q+ to ask if there is reference material (like graphics gems) to link to for algorithmic details 17:46:01 ehsan: doesn't really cover edge cases eg no mention of invalid property values, types of exception not specified. Treating webkit as defacto, not ideal. 17:46:41 chris: good assesment, how many months will it take Moz to get to the point where people can start "playing" with it 17:46:55 s/chris/doug/ 17:48:32 ehsan: nightly channel by end 2012, working on a list of 7-10 nodes, putting off the code audio data api, expect to be finished this week and will be first part of the api available. Estimate that end of 2012 still reasonable. 17:49:09 ehsan: audio api will be hidden behind a preference - no concrete plans on when this will be enabled by default 17:49:16 ack c 17:49:16 ChrisLilley, you wanted to ask if there is reference material (like graphics gems) to link to for algorithmic details 17:50:21 https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar release date FF20 2012-Nov-20 17:50:24 q? 17:50:31 q+ ChrisLilley 17:51:07 chris: thanks - understand how parts of implementation could be difficult. Would like to continue getting feedback. Can add more details where relevant. 17:51:53 q+ to plusone what Ehsan said - ideally should be able to implement without needing to look at ref impl 17:51:57 ehsan: spec should reference literature on digital audio, 17:52:53 ack ch 17:53:53 ChrisLilley: svg had similar issues with expert knowledge during implementation. Its helpful to reference literature. 17:54:42 -ChrisLilley 17:55:23 +ChrisLilley 17:56:20 separate glossary with links sounds like a good idea 17:56:35 olivier: for definitions, reference literature - think about having seperate glossary of terms if required. Would i make more sense to have a glossary or links to reference material 17:59:06 [discussion on level of detail in algorithms. CLilley says it doesn't have to be a foolproof guide, but make it reasonably doable for an apt programmer] 18:00:48 Topic: AOB 18:01:01 chris: Is Moz interested in the web midi api and implementing it 18:01:27 ehsan: no one currently woking on it and not sure if they would be interested 18:02:26 -ChrisLilley 18:02:27 -Jussi 18:02:28 -Doug_Schepers 18:02:29 -olivier 18:02:31 -Ehsan 18:02:31 -Matt 18:02:31 -Joe 18:02:33 -CRogers 18:02:34 RWC_Audio()12:00PM has ended 18:02:34 Attendees were olivier, chrislowis, Matt, ChrisL, ChrisLilley, +1.510.334.aaaa, CRogers, Jussi, Doug_Schepers, Ehsan, +1.978.314.aabb, Joe 18:02:40 Next Meeting: 5th December, same time 18:02:49 rrsagent, make minutes 18:02:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-audio-minutes.html olivier 18:02:57 zakim, bye 18:02:57 Zakim has left #audio 18:03:04 rrsagent, bye 18:03:04 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-audio-actions.rdf : 18:03:04 ACTION: olivier to update milestones tables with links to FPWD [1] 18:03:04 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-audio-irc#T17-40-38