14:53:45 RRSAgent has joined #wcag2ict 14:53:45 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/11/13-wcag2ict-irc 14:53:47 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:53:49 Zakim, this will be 2428 14:53:49 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 14:53:50 Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference 14:53:50 Date: 13 November 2012 14:55:12 hi andi 14:55:29 i won't be able to participate by phone today 14:55:48 ping me if i can help with anything via irc 14:56:31 MaryJo has joined #wcag2ict 14:57:58 Kiran_Kaja has joined #wcag2ict 14:58:31 BBailey has joined #wcag2ict 14:59:15 WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has now started 14:59:18 +Kiran_Kaja 14:59:22 +Bruce_Bailey 14:59:48 zakim, i am bruce 14:59:49 ok, BBailey, I now associate you with Bruce_Bailey 15:00:11 David has joined #wcag2ict 15:00:25 +Andi_Snow_Weaver 15:00:37 +David_MacDonald 15:00:53 +[Microsoft] 15:00:54 +MaryJo 15:01:15 zakim, Microsoft has Alex_Li 15:01:15 +Alex_Li; got it 15:01:22 Mike_P has joined #wcag2ict 15:02:01 +Gregg_Vanderheiden 15:02:38 greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict 15:04:07 +??P21 15:04:17 zakim, ??P21 is Mike_Pluke 15:04:17 +Mike_Pluke; got it 15:04:32 janina has joined #wcag2ict 15:04:35 chair: Mike_Pluke 15:04:59 alex_ has joined #wcag2ict 15:05:07 +??P24 15:05:12 scribe: Andi_Snow-Weaver 15:05:14 topic: Survey on the document title:https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/NOV132012/results 15:05:23 zakim, ??P24 is Janina_Sajka 15:05:23 +Janina_Sajka; got it 15:05:36 +Judy 15:05:43 regrets: Allen_Hoffman, Loic_Martinez_Normand 15:07:31 RESOLUTION: Accept new title "Guidance on Applying WCAG 2.0 to Non-web Information and Communications Technologies" 15:08:30 Back to the additional SC for Closed Functionality, starting with 2.4.2 Page Titledhttps://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/OCT112012/results 15:08:44 s/Back to/topic: Back to/ 15:09:30 MichaelC_ has joined #wcag2ict 15:10:04 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/OCT112012/results#xq12 15:11:20 q+ 15:11:42 q+ 15:12:05 q+ to say we need to careful about what being on the list means 15:12:09 ack andi 15:13:18 ack gregg 15:13:21 ack bruce 15:13:21 Bruce_Bailey, you wanted to say we need to careful about what being on the list means 15:13:46 q+ 15:14:28 M376 approach: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnx3Y2FnMmljdHxneDoxMzgxYmI2YzU4MmU5NzU5 15:14:51 ack andi 15:19:32 topic: 1.4.5 15:20:31 -Janina_Sajka 15:20:33 if there are images of text, it's important that the text either be of a sufficient size or that there be some way to enlarge it 15:21:05 +??P20 15:21:06 but we don't believe we can prescribe that actual text has to be used rather than images of text in closed functionality 15:21:24 RESOLUTION: Add 1.4.5 to the list for closed functionality 15:21:45 topic: 2.4.2 Page Titled 15:22:16 q+ 15:22:27 ack alex 15:24:10 +??P36 15:24:27 q+ 15:24:30 zakim, ??P36 is Janina_Sajka 15:24:30 +Janina_Sajka; got it 15:24:48 in multitasking environments, the purpose of the title is to remind the user what task he/she is doing - doesn't seem to be necessary in single task environments 15:24:55 q+ 15:27:06 q+ 15:27:08 ack gregg 15:27:11 q- 15:28:19 q+ 15:28:26 ack alex 15:29:14 q+ 15:29:15 ' 15:29:23 ack mike 15:29:31 ack gregg 15:30:30 this is about a document title or software title - not anything inside the document or software 15:31:15 q+ 15:31:18 q+ 15:32:33 ack alex 15:33:20 where software is an integral part of a closed product that has only one funtion (calculator, IP phone), there is no need for a title 15:34:23 if we add to the list, need a one line explanation/rationale much as we have for the others 15:35:02 q+ 15:35:07 ack andi 15:35:53 ack bruce 15:35:55 q+ 15:36:29 -??P20 15:38:26 q+ 15:38:53 ack andi 15:39:01 q+ 15:39:13 reminder of some of the words we have around this list .... 15:39:18 "Where AT cannot be used, other output and input solutions are needed to achieve the intent of these success criteria." 15:39:19 q- 15:39:30 and "Note: While these guidelines are not suitable for closed functionality as written, they will inform and aid development of built-in accessible alternatives needed with closed functionality." 15:39:34 -Janina_Sajka 15:39:46 ack david 15:40:10 +??P1 15:40:30 zakim, ??P1 is Janina_Sajka 15:40:30 +Janina_Sajka; got it 15:42:13 q+ 15:44:48 -Judy 15:45:05 q+ 15:45:05 ack andi 15:45:50 titles are not needed for any single task function environment, whether it is closed to AT or not 15:47:22 example of where there is a single task function - Linux based phone with a USB port - could put AT on a USB drive 15:47:42 RESOLUTION: Add 1.4.2 to the list for closed functionality with appropriate rationale 15:47:57 topic: 3.3.1 Error Identification 15:48:11 korn has joined #wcag2ict 15:48:32 +Judy 15:48:57 q+ 15:49:01 ack janina 15:49:24 q+ 15:49:38 +[Oracle] 15:49:44 ack andi 15:49:46 Zakim, Oracle has Peter_Korn 15:49:46 +Peter_Korn; got it 15:50:47 ack alex 15:51:18 q+ 15:53:04 we need rationale with this one that makes it clear the information needs to be presented but it doesn't have to be "text" according to the WCAG 2.0 definition of text 15:55:34 -Janina_Sajka 15:56:22 +??P1 15:56:38 -??P1 15:56:56 +??P1 15:57:05 Mike_P has joined #wcag2ict 15:57:32 zakim, ??P1 is Janina_Sajka 15:57:32 +Janina_Sajka; got it 15:57:37 +??P6 15:58:16 proposal for the rationale for this one: while it's important that errors that can be detected are described in words, for closed functionality, the error doesn't have to be in text, as defined in WCAG 16:02:24 RESOLUTION: Add 3.3.1 to the list with appropriate rationale 16:02:47 s/RESOLUTION: Add 1.4.2 to the list for closed functionality with appropriate rationale/RESOLUTION: Add 2.4.2 to the list for closed functionality with appropriate rationale/ 16:03:00 +Judy.a 16:04:04 https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/remaining-3-scs 16:05:15 topic: last three SC - guidance on software 16:05:43 rrsagent, make minutes 16:05:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/13-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 16:05:45 q+ 16:06:58 s/RESOLUTION: Add 1.4.5 to the list for closed functionality/RESOLUTION: Add 1.4.5 to the list for closed functionality with appropriate rationale/ 16:07:19 s/RESOLUTION: Add 3.3.1 to the list with appropriate rationale/RESOLUTION: Add 3.3.1 to the list for closed functionality with appropriate rationale/ 16:07:28 rrsagent, make minutes 16:07:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/13-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 16:07:31 MaryJo has joined #wcag2ict 16:11:55 -??P6 16:12:04 Judy has joined #wcag2ict 16:12:21 -Janina_Sajka 16:12:38 +[IPcaller] 16:12:55 q? 16:13:04 +??P6 16:13:32 +??P12 16:13:34 -??P6 16:14:00 zakim, ??P6 is Janina_Sajka 16:14:00 I already had ??P6 as ??P6, janina 16:14:11 q+ 16:14:26 zakim, ??P6 is Janina_Sajka 16:14:26 I already had ??P6 as ??P6, janina 16:14:48 ack mike 16:15:00 ack korn 16:15:33 zakim, who's on the phone? 16:15:33 On the phone I see Bruce_Bailey, Kiran_Kaja, Andi_Snow_Weaver, David_MacDonald, [Microsoft], MaryJo, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Mike_Pluke, Judy, [Oracle], Judy.a, [IPcaller], ??P12 16:15:36 [Microsoft] has Alex_Li 16:15:36 [Oracle] has Peter_Korn 16:15:44 q+ 16:15:53 zakim, ??P12 is Janina_Sajka 16:15:53 +Janina_Sajka; got it 16:16:49 q? 16:17:37 q+ to double check that we cannot say “webpage in a set of webpages” should be interpreted as “software”? 16:18:22 q+ 16:18:40 q- 16:19:46 ack gregg 16:19:55 korn1 has joined #wcag2ict 16:20:00 Andi has joined #wcag2ict 16:20:11 -[Oracle] 16:20:54 q+ 16:20:55 it's tricky to say there are no examples of "set of software" unless we define it 16:21:37 ack gregg 16:21:43 ack bruce 16:21:43 Bruce_Bailey, you wanted to double check that we cannot say “webpage in a set of webpages” should be interpreted as “software”? 16:22:11 https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/remaining-3-scs 16:23:15 +[IPcaller.a] 16:24:33 korn has joined #wcag2ict 16:24:57 WCAG co-chairs agree that we can't interpret "web page within a set of web pages" as "software" 16:25:09 q+ 16:25:12 korn has joined #wcag2ict 16:26:22 intent of these SC is that they apply to a set of things - we can apply within software as long as we can define what the "things" are in the set 16:27:05 we were unable to come up with a definition of things inside software that would make up the set 16:27:08 q+ 16:27:18 q- 16:27:33 ack mike 16:28:22 we attempted to define the "things" by defining "interaction context" 16:28:56 -Janina_Sajka 16:29:58 q+ 16:30:31 web applications are generally a single URL - if we apply this inside a non-web software product, the rules would be different for non-web and web software 16:32:33 ack judy 16:33:19 q+ 16:34:22 ack korn 16:35:16 ack gregg 16:35:59 q+ 16:36:08 q? 16:36:17 for next draft, may have to say we've not yet reached consensus on guidance for SW for these three SC 16:37:07 q+ 16:39:26 ack korn 16:40:55 ack mike 16:42:28 q+ 16:42:48 https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/remaining-3-scs 16:44:50 ack andi 16:47:35 The remaining three success criteria apply in situations when "a set of web pages", or "multiple web pages" share some characteristic or behavior. For these, the task force found that (with substitutions) the success criteria apply to non-web documents fairly straightforwardly. The task force has not yet been able to work out how these three success criteria dealing with "sets of web pages" or "multiplel " web page would apply to 16:47:35 software. 16:47:44 "The task force does not yet have guidance for how to apply these to software." 16:48:43 The task force does not yet have guidance for how to apply these three remainign success criteria to software. 16:48:43 "The task force does not yet have guidance for how to apply these three SC to software." 16:49:08 -[IPcaller.a] 16:49:31 The task force does not yet have guidance for how to apply these three SC in a software context 16:49:37 korn1 has joined #wcag2ict 16:49:49 The task force does not yet have guidance for how to apply these three SC in a software context 16:49:50 [10:49am] 16:51:02 The Task Force found that the majority of success criteria from WCAG 2.0 can apply to non-Web documents and software with no or only minimal changes. Specifically, of the thirty-eight Level A and AA success criteria, twenty-six did not include any web related terms and apply directly as written and as described in the "Intent" sections from the updated “Understanding WCAG 2.0”. Half of these twenty-six applied without any additional 16:51:02 notes. Half applied as written but additional notes were also provided for assist in applying them to either or both non-web documents and software. 16:51:03 Of the remaining twelve success criteria, the Task Force found that nine of them they apply as written when replacing certain web specific terms or phrases like "Web page(s)" with non-web terms or phrases like “non-web document(s) and software" or “for non-Web documents and software that use markup languages, in such a way that…etc.” Additional notes were also provided to assist in the application of these. 16:51:04 The remaining three success criteria apply in situations when "a set of web pages", or "multiple web pages" share some characteristic or behavior. For these, the task force found that (with substitutions) the success criteria apply to non-web documents fairly straightforwardly. The task force does not yet have guidance for how to apply these three success criteria in a software context 16:52:02 +1 16:52:11 +1 16:52:15 +1 16:52:22 +1 16:52:27 +1 16:54:09 RESOLUTION: Accept "PROPOSAL for final paragraphs in INTRO FROM WCAG2ICT 2012-11-13meeting" at https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/remaining-3-scs 16:55:00 rrsagent, make minutes 16:55:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/13-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 16:55:03 -Kiran_Kaja 16:55:06 -[Microsoft] 16:55:08 -Bruce_Bailey 16:55:08 -Judy.a 16:55:09 -Andi_Snow_Weaver 16:55:09 -David_MacDonald 16:55:10 -MaryJo 16:55:10 -Gregg_Vanderheiden 16:55:17 -[IPcaller] 16:55:20 by al 16:55:25 korn1 has left #wcag2ict 16:55:32 Mike_P has left #wcag2ict 16:58:59 Andi has joined #wcag2ict 17:00:05 -Judy 17:05:06 disconnecting the lone participant, Mike_Pluke, in WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM 17:05:08 WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has ended 17:05:08 Attendees were Kiran_Kaja, Bruce_Bailey, Andi_Snow_Weaver, David_MacDonald, MaryJo, Alex_Li, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Mike_Pluke, Janina_Sajka, Judy, Peter_Korn, [IPcaller]