14:00:33 RRSAgent has joined #xproc 14:00:33 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-irc 14:00:33 +Norm 14:00:52 +??P13 14:01:11 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 14:01:11 Meeting: XML Processing Model WG 14:01:11 Date: 18 Oct 2012 14:01:11 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-agenda 14:01:11 Meeting: 222 14:01:11 Chair: Norm 14:01:11 Scribe: Norm 14:01:12 ScribeNick: norm 14:01:12 alexmilowski has joined #xproc 14:01:27 zakim, ??P13 is Henry 14:01:27 +Henry; got it 14:01:33 zakim, henry is ht 14:01:33 +ht; got it 14:01:36 zakim, ht holds alexmilowski 14:01:36 +alexmilowski; got it 14:01:38 ht has joined #xproc 14:01:39 zakim, who's here? 14:01:40 On the phone I see Norm, ht 14:01:40 ht has alexmilowski 14:01:40 On IRC I see ht, alexmilowski, RRSAgent, Zakim, Norm, liam 14:02:30 caribou has joined #xproc 14:03:57 zakim, who's here? 14:03:57 On the phone I see Norm, ht 14:03:58 ht has alex 14:03:58 On IRC I see caribou, ht, alexmilowski, RRSAgent, Zakim, Norm, liam 14:04:02 Regrets: Vojtech, Cornelia 14:04:15 Present: Norm, Henry, Alex, Jim 14:05:06 + +1.778.440.aaaa 14:05:22 zakim, aaaa is Murray 14:05:22 +Murray; got it 14:05:28 Present: Norm, Henry, Alex, Jim, Murray 14:05:50 + +420.6.026.9.aabb 14:06:12 zakim, aabb is Jim 14:06:12 +Jim; got it 14:06:15 zakim, who's here? 14:06:15 On the phone I see Norm, ht, Murray, Jim 14:06:16 ht has alex 14:06:16 On IRC I see caribou, ht, alexmilowski, RRSAgent, Zakim, Norm, liam 14:06:44 Topic: Accept this agenda? 14:06:44 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/18-agenda 14:07:04 Accepted. 14:07:08 Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting? 14:07:08 -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/10/11-minutes 14:07:27 Accepted. 14:07:33 Topic: Next meeting: telcon 25 Oct? F2F? 14:08:14 We'll skip 25 Oct and meet at the f2f. 14:08:59 Jim: Will we have good enough wifi to do VOIP at the f2f 14:09:01 Norm: Maybe. 14:09:25 Topic: Review of action items 14:09:33 No progress reported *sad panda* 14:09:39 Topic: Agenda prep for f2f 14:10:12 Norm: Finishing up the processor profiles doc, the new requirements doc, and any step notes 14:10:51 Norm: We've got a few proposals on the table: fixing parameters and binary (or non-XML) in pipelines 14:11:00 Norm: I think working through those would be good. 14:11:17 Norm: Any other suggestions? 14:11:36 Jim: If we can leave TPAC with a requirements document that we can work on by telcon, then I think that would be declaring vicory 14:11:45 Jim: It would be even better if we could publish the zip note. 14:12:28 ACTION: Norm to ask cmsmcq to see if he'll be at TPAC and might meet with us 14:13:15 Jim: Can we also look at the test suite again? 14:13:29 Norm: Oh, indeed. And we should run through the public comments. 14:14:36 Jim: There's someone who's made a bunch of comments about zip and unzip. I need about an hour to review those comments. 14:15:10 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xproc-dev/2012Jan/0018.html 14:15:30 Jim: I'll try to update the doc this week. 14:16:36 Henry: Have we given up officially on a compact syntax? I don't have a brief for it, but I think we need to be happy with that as a decision that we've made. 14:17:18 Norm: I'm happy to leave that hanging at least through the f2f. 14:19:01 Alex: In the minutes last week, there was something about how we're going to evolve the steps. A registry for example. 14:19:11 ...Separating the steps that we have from the language itself. 14:19:40 "JF: Do we need some discussion before we make this more specific? 14:19:40 AM: Yes, I think email discussion is needed" 14:19:43 That's what we said... 14:19:57 Henry: I'm really quite interested in exploring of the idea of not having a separate spec but having a step registry 14:20:35 ...Making it a little bit more like the IANA registry for media types. Make it possible to publish a document that documents a step and registers it. 14:21:02 Norm: Sure. The exproc.org site and the wiki were kind of supposed to go that way but haven't been very successful. 14:21:29 We'll keep our jobs forever ... 14:21:30 Henry: Successful or not, they don't have any normative force. We'd have to decide how much normative force we want them to have. 14:21:58 Murray: I'm wondering about if XProc wants to say anything in relation to micro XML. 14:22:10 Norm: Can you elaborate a little? 14:22:33 Murray: I think we might say that XProc can process micro XML. 14:22:43 Norm: I thought micro XML documents were XML 1.0 documents, but we could explicitly say it. 14:24:47 Alex: I'm goign to try to get my step categorization action item done, that would be something to review. 14:24:51 s/goign/going/ 14:25:04 Topic: Any other business? 14:25:09 None heard. 14:25:30 Adjourned. 14:25:32 1.0 requirements/solutions use cases 14:25:33 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:25:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/18-xproc-minutes.html Norm 14:25:34 -Jim 14:25:35 -Murray 14:25:36 …not the categorizations 14:25:41 oops, sorry alex 14:25:45 No problem 14:25:46 -Norm 14:25:48 -ht 14:25:49 XML_PMWG()10:00AM has ended 14:25:49 Attendees were Norm, alexmilowski, alex, +1.778.440.aaaa, Murray, +420.6.026.9.aabb, Jim 14:25:54 you were awfully faint :-) 14:26:03 Yeah… Henry uses a headset 14:48:30 alexmilowski has joined #xproc 15:34:20 ht has joined #xproc 16:30:34 Zakim has left #xproc 17:00:05 ht has joined #xproc