15:59:12 RRSAgent has joined #html-techs-tf 15:59:12 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/15-html-techs-tf-irc 15:59:17 Zakim has joined #html-techs-tf 15:59:35 zakim, this will be WAI_HTML 15:59:35 ok, jamesn; I see WAI_HTML TT()11:30AM scheduled to start 29 minutes ago 15:59:59 Meeting: HTML/ARIA Techniques Task Force 16:00:05 chair: James_Nurthen 16:00:11 rrsagent, make minutes 16:00:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/15-html-techs-tf-minutes.html jamesn 16:00:23 WAI_HTML TT()11:30AM has now started 16:00:30 rrsagent, make log world 16:00:32 + +49.404.318.aaaa 16:00:39 rrsagent, make minutes 16:00:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/15-html-techs-tf-minutes.html jamesn 16:00:41 +[IPcaller] 16:01:06 +James_Nurthen 16:04:00 marcjohlic has joined #html-techs-tf 16:04:22 +Marc_Johlic 16:04:44 zakim, pick a victim 16:04:44 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose +49.404.318.aaaa 16:05:27 scribe: Detlev 16:05:36 zakim, +49 is Detlev 16:05:36 +Detlev; got it 16:06:00 zakim, IPcaller is Adam 16:06:00 +Adam; got it 16:06:23 adam has joined #html-techs-tf 16:06:28 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/htmltechs20121005/results 16:07:18 Starting with using aria-label for link purpose 16:07:28 +Jon_Gunderson 16:10:38 Marc: thought that aria-labelledby might be the better choice for link purpose 16:11:35 Jon: what about aria-descrobedBy - worls with JAWS and VO 16:11:52 James: that would be a diffent technique 16:12:01 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Techniques/ARIA 16:12:17 Marc: Yes there are other techniques for aria-describedby 16:13:54 jongund has joined #html-techs-tf 16:14:53 Link to SR tests: http://www.3needs.org/en/testing/code/aria-labelledby-for-link-purpose.html 16:16:18 target of aria-labelledby would need to be in the accessible tree (add tabindex -1) 16:16:28 Will update tests to reflect that 16:17:05 James: do the same tests for aria-describedBy 16:17:08 Will do 16:18:11 Marc: Is not the broader goal to identify sufficient techniques *provided* that AT will eventually support it? 16:18:33 Marc: It's then up to authors to decide what to implement 16:18:41 James: agrees 16:19:30 James: likes the example in technique, starts with same text as the link 16:19:49 jon: The typical use case would be the Read more.. links 16:20:54 Adam: could SC be met also by ajacent text? 16:21:20 Ajust example to not pass 2.44 without aria-label? 16:21:30 James: or apply to 2.4.9? 16:21:47 James: In any case, its difficult to fail 2.4.4. 16:22:17 Marc: Shall we add another example or modify? 16:22:37 Adam: adjust slightly so there is no visual adjacency 16:22:48 James: move into separate paragraphs 16:23:13 Jon: often Read more links *arte* on new lines 16:24:51 Marc: happy to go forward - include UA/AT support notes? 16:25:11 James UA notes point out where it *doesn't* work. 16:25:40 Marc: Should "Start with same text" goe into the description? 16:27:05 James: Expected behaviour of aria-label / aria-labelledby: remove the link text and replace it with content referenced by the attribute 16:28:26 James: inclusion in accessible tree of element referenced may only make a difference when more than one element is referenced - seems an IE quirk 16:29:21 James: SR results should go into UA notes of Wiki 16:29:41 and opage be linked for otgher cases 16:29:58 James: move to No. 3 of the survey (Loretta being not on the call) 16:30:17 Failure of 4.1.2 due to using Using Abstract Roles 16:31:37 James: no real code examples so that people won't copy and use it 16:31:46 Detlev: working cde useful 16:31:54 James: put note into code 16:33:01 James: referring to Detlev's comment - adding abstract roles does not meet the purpose of using ARIA 16:34:03 Detlev: if it doesn't do any harm, it should not be failure 16:34:24 James: agrees, leave it to larger audience to possibly quash it later 16:34:38 John & Marc: seem to agree it is a valid failure 16:34:50 Sorry: Jon 16:35:12 Jon: Validator will flag it 16:35:26 James: but invalidiy won't make it a failure 16:35:53 James: using abstract roles will indiacte lack of understanding of developer 16:36:08 i'll take those comments and come back with a new technique in a week or 2 16:36:27 thanks you wrequickwer than I 16:36:52 Move to nexx topic: 16:36:54 Using aria-activedescendant to allow keyboard operability 16:37:23 Adam: was discussed last week, main debate whether it falls into 2.1.1 16:37:34 Adam: results seem to indicate, it does 16:37:45 James: Jon, any opinion? 16:37:58 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Using_aria-activedescendant_to_allow_keyboard_operability 16:38:43 James: does aria-activedescendant help meeting 2.1.1? 16:39:40 Jon: aria-activedescendant supports focus handling when not everything is focusable 16:41:17 Detlev: question about behaviour aria-activedescendant 16:41:34 Loretta has joined #html-techs-tf 16:42:25 Jon: you would have to use tabindex to make elements focusable - with aria-activedescendant you can provide info to SR users without actually firing focu events 16:42:38 (Thought I'd drop in and watch while waiting for my meeting...) 16:43:07 Adam: focused elements will need visible keyboard focus (2.4.7)? 16:43:32 Jon: Yes you need companion techniques to ensure that visual focus is handled as well 16:44:15 Adam: Not clear if Sufficinet Techniques can provide a11y for parts of the disabled popolation 16:44:48 Adam: Is this not sufficient on its own? 16:45:42 James: Will be difficult to make clear what techniques have to be used in combination to create accessible content - also needs scripting 16:46:17 I think active descendant will be sufficient for 4.1.2, but not for keyboard access. 16:46:47 Jon: Suggestion would be to add a class attr to list item California may be named "focus" so it is clear that visual formatting is also required 16:47:57 Adam: agrees with Loretta that 4.1.2 is appropriate SC 16:48:19 Adam: should the technique combine 2.1.1 and 4.1.2? 16:48:45 Adam: aria-activedescendant refeers to properties of the element, not the focus 16:49:59 Adam: Title of technique needs to changed 16:50:13 James: what do you think of my suggested title? 16:50:31 james: may be "Move" ad the top does the job 16:50:50 James "Move" seems to create a redirect to the new one 16:50:58 Addam: will do if all agree with that 16:51:16 Adam: Change done! 16:51:34 Yes, use "Move" to rename. 16:51:45 Adam: The title would be in the way of combining 2.1.1 and 4.1.2 16:53:01 James: aria-label-techniques may not be easily combined 16:53:52 James: If we combine them the technique and internal diffwerentiation gets too complex - separating them out makes it easier, may be merged later 16:54:09 need to go 16:54:14 -Jon_Gunderson 16:54:47 Adam: Will write up aria-activedescendant technique for 4.1.2 16:55:17 Adam: will follow opinion of group whether we should combine 2.1.1 and 4.1.2 or not 16:55:49 Adam: If combined will a generic title like "Using aria-activedescendant" be OK? 16:56:03 James: Has only one clear use case anyway 16:56:46 Adam: could write a new one to combine later 16:57:03 Or draft both options 16:57:42 James: Reading the intent again think that Lorettta is right about the role of focus 16:58:39 Adam: Action: Will re-write and try to combine technique to map onto 2,1,1 and 4.1.2 16:58:51 rrsagent, make minutes 16:58:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/15-html-techs-tf-minutes.html jamesn 16:59:51 -Adam 16:59:52 bye 16:59:54 -James_Nurthen 16:59:55 -Marc_Johlic 16:59:56 -Detlev 16:59:57 WAI_HTML TT()11:30AM has ended 16:59:57 Attendees were +49.404.318.aaaa, James_Nurthen, Marc_Johlic, Detlev, Adam, Jon_Gunderson 16:59:58 zakim, please part 16:59:58 Zakim has left #html-techs-tf 17:00:04 rrsagent, make minutes 17:00:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/15-html-techs-tf-minutes.html jamesn 17:09:49 jongund has joined #html-techs-tf