13:53:34 RRSAgent has joined #wcag2ict 13:53:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/12-wcag2ict-irc 13:53:36 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:53:36 Zakim has joined #wcag2ict 13:53:38 Zakim, this will be 2428 13:53:38 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 13:53:39 Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference 13:53:39 Date: 12 October 2012 13:55:05 Andi has joined #wcag2ict 13:57:51 trackbot, start meeting 13:57:53 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:57:55 Zakim, this will be 2428 13:57:55 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 13:57:56 Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference 13:57:56 Date: 12 October 2012 13:58:02 janina has joined #wcag2ict 13:58:18 WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has now started 13:58:25 +??P1 13:58:35 zakim, ??P1 is Janina 13:58:35 +Janina; got it 13:59:55 +Andi_Snow_Weaver 14:00:25 +Judy 14:00:45 MaryJo has joined #wcag2ict 14:01:13 +Mary_Jo_Mueller 14:01:27 Kiran has joined #wcag2ict 14:01:39 agenda+ Survey for October 12th Meeting https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/OCT112012/results 14:01:45 +[Microsoft] 14:02:18 agenda+ Action Items https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/OCT112012/results 14:02:29 greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict 14:02:34 zakim, [Microsoft] has Alex_Li 14:02:34 +Alex_Li; got it 14:02:46 chair: Andi_Snow-Weaver 14:02:47 +Kiran_Kaja 14:02:51 +Gregg_Vanderheiden 14:03:01 scribe: Mary_Jo_Mueller 14:03:06 scribenick: MaryJo 14:03:41 regrets: Pierce_Crowell, Peter_Korn 14:03:43 zakimk, who is on the phone? 14:04:12 zakim, next item 14:04:12 agendum 1. "Survey for October 12th Meeting https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/OCT112012/results" taken up [from Andi] 14:04:15 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:04:15 On the phone I see Janina, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Judy, Mary_Jo_Mueller, [Microsoft], Kiran_Kaja, Gregg_Vanderheiden 14:04:15 [Microsoft] has Alex_Li 14:04:27 alex_ has joined #wcag2ict 14:06:03 +Bruce_Bailey 14:06:03 BBailey has joined #wcag2ict 14:06:57 zakim, this is Bruce_Bailey 14:06:57 sorry, BBailey, I do not see a conference named 'Bruce_Bailey' in progress or scheduled at this time 14:07:07 +David_MacDonald 14:07:09 zakim, I am Bruce_Bailey 14:07:09 ok, BBailey, I now associate you with Bruce_Bailey 14:07:23 topic: Bypass blocks (2.4.1) 14:08:16 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/OCT112012/results#xq1 14:08:22 David has joined #wcag2ict 14:10:53 -Judy 14:11:23 +Judy 14:12:27 q+ 14:13:17 Discussion on example of a document that has repeated links after every section. These would need to have a way to skip over them. 14:13:46 If this applies to a singular document, that that should be captured in the notes for this SC. 14:14:49 ack kiran 14:16:57 q+ 14:17:58 Discussion on the case where a large amount of information is copied (e.g. a long table) is repeated in multiple places in a document. Since this is a table, a screen reader user can bypass it - though not by an active mechanism. 14:19:23 This is ok, because this SC only requires 'a means to bypass', not a 'navigation mechanism' which is only used in SC 3.2.3. 14:22:12 s/is repeated in multiple places/and repeated in multiple places/ 14:25:32 How could this be applied to a single document when this SC is for 'multiple Web pages' and not for a single Web page? 14:26:34 Judy has joined #wcag2ict 14:26:58 +Judy.a 14:27:00 -Judy 14:27:32 q+ 14:27:42 ack andi 14:28:36 This should be changed to something like 'in a set of documents' rather than 'in non-embedded content'. 14:28:49 ack david 14:31:02 topic: 2.4.2 page titled 14:31:11 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/OCT112012/results#xq2 14:33:18 The WCAG working group discussed whether the name of the software application is sufficient for a title, and they agreed. 14:33:38 q+ 14:33:46 A specific note will have to be proposed to them to approve which will occur next week. 14:34:34 ack kiran 14:35:42 There is a proposed note can be found at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Purpose_and_doc/app_names 14:35:55 "As described in the WCAG intent (above), the name of a software application is a sufficient title." 14:36:25 s/There is a proposed note can/The draft of the proposed note can/ 14:36:50 me, Short and sweet! 14:37:14 s/me, Short and sweet!// 14:40:15 https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/2-operable/24-provide-ways-to-help-users-navigate-find-content-and-determine-where-they-are/242-page-titled 14:41:16 RESOLUTION: Accept 2.4.2 in proposal #11 as amended in the meeting. 14:41:52 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:41:52 On the phone I see Janina, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Mary_Jo_Mueller, [Microsoft], Kiran_Kaja, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Bruce_Bailey, David_MacDonald, Judy.a 14:41:54 [Microsoft] has Alex_Li 14:43:54 topic: Definition of "navigation mechanism" 14:43:56 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/OCT112012/results#xq3 14:47:42 Discussion about the survey comments and went over additional notes proposed in Gregg's survey answer. 14:48:11 q+ 14:48:46 -Judy.a 14:49:07 +Judy 14:53:27 q+ 14:56:26 Discussed that you can't rely on headings to be used for navigation. That is because the navigation handled by the user agent, and headings aren't interactive elements. 14:56:28 ack david 14:59:36 Discussed the intent of the SC that uses this term (and whether it is really strictly to be applied to multiple Web pages, or if it applies within a single web page as well. This is important when you try to apply to documents to know if it means 'set of documents' or a single document. 15:00:24 "Small repeated sections such as individual words, phrases or single links are not considered navigation mechanisms for the purposes of this provision." 15:01:20 "Small repeated sections such as individual words, phrases or links occurring in running text are not considered navigation mechanisms for the purposes of this provision." 15:01:33 "Small repeated navigation mechanisms such as phrases or links embedded in paragraph text are not considered navigation mechanisms for the purposes of this provision." 15:04:07 I think what WCAG really intended was "When navigation mechanisms are repeated on multiple Web pages within a set of Web pages, [THE ELEMENTS OF THE NAVIGATION MECHANISM] occur in the same relative order each time they are repeated, unless a change is initiated by the user." 15:06:01 zakim, mute me 15:06:01 Bruce_Bailey should now be muted 15:07:07 zakim, unmute me 15:07:07 Bruce_Bailey should no longer be muted 15:12:59 Discussion on the wording of 'focus of reading and/or action' and change it to be more clear, 'reading focus and/or action focus'. 15:14:13 Keyboard shortcuts are not covered by this SC because this covers the order in which navigation mechanisms are presented to the user. 15:19:19 Discussed software example of the file explorer where user actions in the left-hand pane doesn't always cause a change of focus. 15:20:16 What constitutes a navigational mechanism? One way of using file explorer is a navigational mechanism and another is not, depending on whether the actions cause a change in focus. 15:21:03 When a change in focus does occur, the SC 3.2.3 would apply. 15:23:08 q+ 15:24:54 The left hand pane of file explorer, when you activate certain things you don't change focus but the content in the right pane changes - a browse mode. 15:26:33 If you're in the right pane and you activate items in that pane, focus will change. By this definition, this is a navigational mechanism. 15:28:04 ack andi 15:30:28 q+ 15:30:30 We'll have to discuss this more next time. 15:30:49 q+ to comment on schedule 15:31:00 q+ to comment on schedule with regard to next Tuesday's meeting 15:31:25 ack judy 15:31:25 Judy, you wanted to comment on schedule and to comment on schedule with regard to next Tuesday's meeting 15:32:17 topic: Next Tuesday's meeting 15:32:19 The amount of technical issues we can close on Tues is important for next Thursday's meeting. We might want to plan a longer Tuesday call. 15:32:34 We need to try to close out as much as possible. 15:33:31 -[Microsoft] 15:33:32 -Bruce_Bailey 15:33:33 -Gregg_Vanderheiden 15:33:34 -David_MacDonald 15:33:34 -Andi_Snow_Weaver 15:33:35 -Judy 15:33:36 -Mary_Jo_Mueller 15:33:39 -Kiran_Kaja 15:33:41 -Janina 15:33:42 WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has ended 15:33:42 Attendees were Janina, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Judy, Mary_Jo_Mueller, Alex_Li, Kiran_Kaja, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Bruce_Bailey, David_MacDonald 15:38:24 rrsagent, make minutes 15:38:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/12-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo 15:48:44 s/on Tues is important for next Thursday's/on Tuesday is important for next Thursday's WCAG working group/ 15:50:53 Tuesday's call will be extended to 2 hours. 15:51:04 rrsagent, make minutes 15:51:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/12-wcag2ict-minutes.html MaryJo 15:51:51 zakim, bye 15:51:51 Zakim has left #wcag2ict 15:52:39 greggvanderheiden has left #wcag2ict 17:24:09 Judy has joined #wcag2ict