[Odrl-cc] Vote on ODRL/CC Profile Document

[Renato Iannella]

Dear ODRL CC Profile WG members, the ODRL/CC Profile is now ready
to review to move it from Draft Specification to Specification.

We have 14 members of this WG. I think it would be reasonable to assume
that we need 2/3 votes returned (9), of that, 2/3 (6) should be 
positive to
declare the review successful. (If you have any comments on this, then
please email...)

Below is the review form. Can you please indicate your response and
send back to me by 8 June 2005.

I will send a summary of the responses and outcome by 17 June.

Cheers

Renato Iannella
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net


================================================================
ODRL REVIEW FORM BEGINS

Return form by: 8 June 2005
Send form to:   renato at odrl.net

================================================================

(1) Your Details

    Full Name:
    Email Address:
    Organisation:

(2) Review Document

    I have reviewed the following document:

     ODRL Creative Commons Profile
     Draft Specification: 7 March 2005 [1]

(3) Your Review

    I recommend that the document (mark one only with X):

   [  ]  be published as an ODRL Specification as is.

   [  ]  be published as an ODRL Specification with minor changes 
(Details in Section 5).

   [  ]  be returned for further work due to substantial issues (Details 
in Section 5).

   [  ]  not be published as a specification (Details in Section 5).

   [  ]  I abstain from this review.


(4) Intellectual Property Rights (mark one only with X):

   Intellectual property applicable to this specification should be
   disclosed according to ODRL Initiative Process guidelines [2]

   [  ] To the best of my knowledge, my organization does not have 
patents
        that may be essential technology for implementing this 
specification.

   [  ] We have disclosed patents to the Working Group (Details in 
Section 5)

(5) Detailed Comments, Reasons, or Modifications:

   In addition to any comments you may have, please provide details
   about your answer in section 3 or 4 of the form.  This may include,
   but is not restricted to, technical issues or issues associated
   with patent claims associated with the specification.


(6) References

     [1] <http://odrl.net/Profiles/CC/DS-20050307.html>
     [2] <http://odrl.net/IAB/process.html>


REVIEW FORM ENDS
================================================================