[Odrl-version2] Make it Simpler?

[Jaime Delgado]

Dear all,

We also support this approach.

Best regards,


         Jaime Delgado.


At 07:11 06/02/2007, Renato Iannella wrote:

>On 4 Feb 2007, at 01:30, Susanne Guth wrote:
>
>>I see what you mean. Maybe we can declare core elements and then
>>make suggestions for complemenatary elements, such as Negotiation
>>and so on. In the same chapter we should encourage the ODRL users
>>to define their own additional elements. However, I think we should
>>keep this all in one document, or would you suggest to have the
>>core only in our ODRL V2 Document?
>
>I was thinking that the "ODRL V2 Core" is a separate document
>(a cut down version of what we have now).
>
>Then we can have the extensions:
>  "ODRL V2 - Negotiation"
>  "ODRL V2 - Payments"
>  etc
>
>
>What do others think?
>
>Cheers
>
>Renato Iannella
>ODRL Initiative
>http://odrl.net
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ODRL-Version2 mailing list
>ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
>http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2