[Odrl-version2] New ODRL v2.0 Model

[Susanne Guth]

Stefan, Alapan, everybody!

Please have a short look at an early paper from myself. I defined the
various term, ticket, right, contract, etc.

Maybe we can adapt some term officially for the ODRL community, so that we
can be clear in future?

What do you think?

<http://wi.wu-wien.ac.at/~guth/toward_contract_frmwrk.pdf>
see Chapter 5

Susanne

> 
> Hi,
> Comments for Steven's email:
> > 
> > 1. Bidding would probably be a large-scale addition and if so might slow
> down dissemination of ODRL at a critical time. 
> Not really - bidding is just an extension to the type elements and thus
> has no real effect on the overall license structure.
> > 
> > 2. What is a "ticket" in your revamped model (or, for that matter, in
> the original version 2. I admit I've forgotten)? How is it different from
> "contract"?
> A ticket in both models is essentially the same as a ticket for a
> concert, the bus etc - it gives the bearer a set of rights from the
> rights holder; and the bearer is not a defined party (so I could give
> you my ticket and you will have access).
> > 3. The use of the word 'contract' will be appropriate for negotiations
> between corporations and bureacracies, but might put off the average
> consumer wishing to download music or a few pages of text, say. In this
situation,
> in my opinion, "Agreement" is much more user-friendly. Admittedly, the
> average user will not need to be looking under the hood, so "Agreement"
could
> be used in pull-down menus etc., and 'contract' in the actual code. But
> still, it would be more clean to have the same word used at both levels,
> unless there is a legal reason why the word 'contract' has to be used; I
suspect
> that there is not. ("A rose by any other name would smell as sweet").
> > 
> Agreed - but I think it is also a problem with current DRM systems - DRM
> systems are enforcement of license contracts not copyright - I think it
> is better for consumers to know and accept the fact instead of the
> current scenario where no-one knows what the exact situation is?
> > 4. Section 4.5, "Other Issues": Unfortunately in all of these I seem to
> understand too little about the situation to see a problem. I think I'll
> take the 'glass-is-half-full' approach and treat this as evidence that
ODRL 2
> is almost ready for release.  :-) 
> > 
> Well I do have a full blown XML schema ... but I am not sure using it
> would be a good idea ;)
> > steven rowat
> > 
> > 
> > >Hi,
> > >New year's greetings to everyone. 
> > >
> > >As discussed with Renato and Susanne last month, I have been working on
> > >a few new ideas on the ODRL v2.0 model, which I have just completed. In
> > >the attached PDF, you will find a paper detailing the new model, and
> the
> > >motivations for the changes (most of which are based on negotiations
> > >support). The paper also contains 7 examples (in XML), the full schema
> > >(XSD) and a sample data dictionary. 
> > >
> > >I can forward the original source documents for the model, xml examples
> > >and schema file.
> > >
> > >I would like your comments and feedback esp. with regards to the duty
> > >and action elements (see sections 4.5.4 and 4.5.5).
> > >
> > >Regards
> > >Alapan Arnab
> > >-- 
> > >Alapan Arnab
> > >Data Networks Architecture (DNA) Laboratory
> > >Department of Computer Science
> > >University of Cape Town
> > >Rondebosch, 7700
> > >South Africa
> > >
> > >Tel: +27 21 650 3127
> > >Web: http://people.cs.uct.ac.za/~aarnab/
> > >Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com
> > >----------
> > >"You must always believe that you can be the best, but you must never
> > >believe you have achieved it".
> > >Juan Manuel Fangio
> > >
> > >Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:new_odrl_20060111.pdf (PDF /CARO)
> (000A9288)
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >ODRL-Version2 mailing list
> > >ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
> > >http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ODRL-Version2 mailing list
> > ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
> > http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2
> -- 
> Alapan Arnab
> Data Networks Architecture (DNA) Laboratory
> Department of Computer Science
> University of Cape Town
> Rondebosch, 7700
> South Africa
> 
> Tel: +27 21 650 3127
> Web: http://people.cs.uct.ac.za/~aarnab/
> Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com
> ----------
> "You must always believe that you can be the best, but you must never
> believe you have achieved it".
> Juan Manuel Fangio
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ODRL-Version2 mailing list
> ODRL-Version2 at odrl.net
> http://lists.odrl.net/mailman/listinfo/odrl-version2
> 

-- 
Susanne Guth
susanne at odrl.net
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net/

Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie