[Odrl-version2] RE: ODRL-Version2 Digest, Vol 13, Issue 6

[Renato Iannella]

On 10 Feb 2006, at 03:51, Vicky Weissman wrote:

> I'm pretty sure that I've misunderstood your question.  ....  Are  
> you asking
> if there is an action that can appear as the first element of a  
> permission
> and not as the first element of a duty (or vice-versa)?  If so,  
> then I guess
> the answer is that they're your definitions, so you can do whatever  
> you want.
> But I don't see any reason why we would want to build such  
> restrictions into
> ODRL.

Nope...I'm just trying to see if there is a logical need to
enable communities (ie, those that build ODRL Profiles)
to support stating that Actions A,B,C are permissions and
Actions C,D,E are Duties.

Cheers

Renato Iannella
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net