[Odrl-version2] More Requirements

Renato Iannella renato at odrl.net
Fri Oct 22 16:44:24 EST 2004


On 21 Oct 2004, at 21:35, Stephane van Hardeveld wrote:

>  Yes, I tend to like solutions without attributes :-). Besides, 
> exclusivity
>  is in itself a constraint, so why not express it that way?

Yes, we can model as an Constraint, but we need to also indicate that
the party is the *only* party with those rights.

>> 6 - Security Model
>> The current Security Model is very explicit. It needs to be
>> reviewed to determine if it is best to be more open with the
>> details being provided in community Profiles (eg OMA Mobile DRM).
>
>  And ISMACrypt?

Does ISMACrypt use W3C XML Digital Signature and Encryption standards?

Cheers

Renato Iannella
ODRL Initiative
http://odrl.net



More information about the Odrl-version2 mailing list