ODRL Requirement 1.12 - Issues List
"Provide Exclusive Permissions"
Last modified: 1st December 2004
- Editor(s): The ODRL Initiative
Back to Requirements Document.
Specification Draft:
The ODRLv2 allows for expressing exclusive permissions.
Issue Summary:
This is the list of issues the ODRL Initiative has considered, when addressing the respective requirement (see above).
IssueID: |
State: |
Comment |
issue01 - How to express exclusive permissions? |
in discussion |
- |
Please send additional comments to the odrlV2 discussion list at any time.
Issue Details:
- issue01 - How to express/handle fair use?
Solution approaches:
- ODRLv1.1 already provides an attribute "exclusive" in the permission element. As the various permissions (e.g. play, print, copy) may be exclusively granted to different parties, the "exclusive" attribute should be moved one level down to the Permission elements.
Code Example:
The following play permission is exclusively granted to party01, whereas the copy permission is exclusively granted to party02.
<o-ex20:permission assigner="party99">
<o-ex20:play exclusive="true"/>
<o-ex20:object>asset01</o-ex20:object>
<o-ex20:beneficiary id="party01"/>
</o-ex20:permission>
<o-ex20:permission assigner="party99">
<o-ex20:copy exclusive="true"/>
<o-ex20:object>asset01</o-ex20:object>
<o-ex20:beneficiary id="party02"/>
</o-ex20:permission>