18:17:50 RRSAgent has joined #cg 18:17:50 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/08/29-cg-irc 18:25:37 sharper has joined #cg 18:26:49 shadi_bbl has joined #cg 18:28:02 shawn has joined #cg 18:29:10 agenda+ Confirming schedule for remainder of 3Q, Sept 12 and Sept 26 18:29:49 janina has joined #cg 18:29:49 agenda+ Updates on mobile accessibility 18:29:58 jeanne has joined #cg 18:30:12 zakim, this is cg 18:30:12 ok, shadi; that matches WAI_CG()2:30PM 18:30:14 +Judy 18:30:21 zakim, who is on the phone? 18:30:21 On the phone I see Shadi, ??P14, Judy 18:30:21 zakim, who's on the phone? 18:30:22 On the phone I see Shadi, ??P14, Judy 18:30:33 zakim, ??P14 is Janina 18:30:33 +Janina; got it 18:30:37 +Jeanne 18:31:12 zakim, code? 18:31:12 the conference code is 92424 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), sharper 18:31:19 zakim, dial shawn-617 18:31:19 ok, shawn; the call is being made 18:31:20 +Shawn 18:32:20 +??P20 18:32:22 zakim, ??P20 is sharper 18:32:22 +sharper; got it 18:33:01 agenda+ html & accessibility & formal objection 18:33:29 ack me 18:33:51 agenda? 18:33:58 zakim, mute me 18:33:58 Shawn should now be muted 18:35:06 scribe: Harper_Simon 18:35:06 ScribeNick: sharper 18:35:15 zakim, take up first item 18:35:15 I don't understand 'take up first item', Judy 18:35:21 zakim, take up item 1 18:35:21 agendum 1. "Confirming schedule for remainder of 3Q, Sept 12 and Sept 26" taken up [from Judy] 18:35:56 ack me 18:36:05 zakim, agenda? 18:36:05 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 18:36:07 1. Confirming schedule for remainder of 3Q, Sept 12 and Sept 26 [from Judy] 18:36:07 2. Updates on mobile accessibility [from Judy] 18:36:07 3. html & accessibility & formal objection [from Judy] 18:36:14 zakim, take up item 2 18:36:14 agendum 2. "Updates on mobile accessibility" taken up [from Judy] 18:36:22 http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Mobile_Accessibility 18:36:48 Shawn starts to explain mobile accessibility 18:38:20 zakim, who is on the phone? 18:38:20 On the phone I see Shadi, Janina, Judy, Jeanne, Shawn, sharper 18:39:17 ack me 18:39:17 SLH: asking for comments 18:40:40 SLH: nows the time to speak up. 18:40:50 ALL: No comment 18:41:01 "This may be WCAG Techniques" -> "This may include ..."? 18:41:16 "be" sounds limiting 18:41:35 zakim, mute me 18:41:35 Shadi should now be muted 18:44:02 Action: Janina to review list of all w3c specs current and under development for additional specs relevant to mobile platforms 18:44:02 Created ACTION-110 - Review list of all w3c specs current and under development for additional specs relevant to mobile platforms [on Janina Sajka - due 2012-09-05]. 18:44:10 ACTION: Janina review Standards for Web Applications on Mobile and see which ones we might want to highlight in the last bullet under http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Mobile_Accessibility#W3C_WAI_Addresses_Mobile_Accessibility 18:44:10 Created ACTION-111 - Review Standards for Web Applications on Mobile and see which ones we might want to highlight in the last bullet under http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Mobile_Accessibility#W3C_WAI_Addresses_Mobile_Accessibility [on Janina Sajka - due 2012-09-05]. 18:46:40 JB: Within staff having a series of discussions, as mobile is critical for WAI, redefining itself in - lots of work being done overall in W3C - already some guidance relevant to mobile accessibility. WAI CG needs to do more coordination and packaging - SLH is doing the packaging. 18:47:12 JB: making sure resource consumers have a good coordinated landing page. 18:47:44 JB: More focused on mobile for coordination - at next few cg meetings 18:48:27 JB: any other input for SLH on the page to date 18:49:03 SH: coordinatation group wanted to contribute to the Note 18:49:31 ... Is there anything specific the CG wanted us to inlude wrt the roadmap. 18:49:44 JB: think possible confusion re - road map 18:49:54 s/inlude wrt the roadmap/include wrt the roadmap/ 18:50:28 JB: one issue in-terms of research road map - and one re roadmap for coordination. 18:51:23 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2012/mobile/ 18:51:43 [[This symposium brought together researchers and practitioners to discuss these challenges and possible solutions, to help develop a roadmap for future research and development in the field.]] 18:52:02 SH: concerned with the R&D aspects. roadmap comes from research from the syposium. research topics, e.g., accessibility & security... 18:52:25 ... necessary for R&D commnuity to focus on in the future 18:52:47 ... Research Roamap is fine - might even call it Future Directions 18:53:03 .. asking for contributions or any text that the CG would want to include in the Note 18:53:35 ... trying to get at that now. we're working on the Note now. want to include it from the start, rather than afterward 18:55:12 q+ 18:57:26 ack me 18:59:19 q+ to ask that there be an emphasis on existing mobile work in WAI 19:00:50 SAZ: suggest we invite chairs to comment on the RDWG Mobile note to help develop the draft 19:01:23 SAZ: bring people into the RDWG discussion. 19:02:19 JB: sees what gets lost when people don't talk together across groups. Could be effective - may end up with RDWG participants explaining and checking etc 19:02:53 [[agrees - comments are passive while discussion implies that editors have pre-prepared questions for their peers]] 19:03:10 JB: bring people in to explain technical bits - keep feeding WAI-CG - RDWG needs to figure this out - what is the most efficient work model 19:03:14 ack j 19:03:14 jeanne, you wanted to ask that there be an emphasis on existing mobile work in WAI 19:03:53 s/work model/work model, with regard to group-to-group coordination, and getting outcomes from the symposia topics 19:04:16 JS: remembering from symposium day - number of speakers operating from a context of 'no accessibility standards' - JR presented existing work - we should include this. 19:04:19 ack jeann 19:05:24 JB: in terms of workflow from RDWG - JB: in there as a pre-publication check - also with CG is critical for workflow of note publication. 19:06:17 ...in order that CG understands all the issues that RDWG is seeing, and either agrees, and takes on board the conclusions; or pushes back, and sorts things out. 19:06:30 SH: afaik, we normally put things through CG. The Metrics note is the first one. Expect CG would read it. Not sure how W3C flow works? 19:06:44 q+ 19:06:50 s/through CG./through CG, e.g., the Call for Papers./ 19:08:00 ack me 19:09:39 SAZ: likes the scout analogy; we have a very tight time schedule trying to be affective and productive - trying to breakthrough to more challenging topics - don't want to be bogged down. We have had delays due to it being anew group. GC required as long as not impacting neg. on teh group 19:09:47 s/teh/the 19:09:51 (Judy: RDWG may want to think of itself as scouts, out in the field ahead of other groups; and needing to say when you have the *results* of a session, "hey CG, this is what we found") 19:10:33 JB: thinking about what happens with the results of the outcomes 19:11:17 JB: what RDWG chooses to do with results is a critical question - want impact in the form of chances to the 'landscape' 19:11:54 JB: want to ID a follow up - or post it up so people can stumble across it 19:15:40 JB: Maybe worth a CG side pre-check - to avoid missed topics - run it through CG with polishing. 19:15:51 s/with/while 19:17:03 SAZ: able to get editors drafts out quickly - maybe best to get comments when we have something to get comments on 19:17:49 SAZ: for instance, TC maybe with the user agent groups and WCAG 19:18:08 SAZ each note is unique and will have a different tone. 19:19:11 JB: for w3c which has 300 or so member organisations - not just a question of having w3c groups as audience, or rest of the world - but also the w3c membership. 19:19:51 JB: good to think how we get to them - how are getting them interested in the next symposium. 19:20:35 JB: maybe come back to this in the next few months regarding very specific points - what relates to your group etc , can you take up the things we point out. 19:20:47 zakim, agenda? 19:20:47 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 19:20:48 ack me 19:20:49 1. Confirming schedule for remainder of 3Q, Sept 12 and Sept 26 [from Judy] 19:20:49 2. Updates on mobile accessibility [from Judy] 19:20:49 3. html & accessibility & formal objection [from Judy] 19:21:12 zakim, mute me 19:21:12 Shawn should now be muted 19:21:16 RESOLVED: Updates on mobile accessibility approved 19:21:32 zakim, close item 2 19:21:32 agendum 2, Updates on mobile accessibility, closed 19:21:33 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 19:21:33 1. Confirming schedule for remainder of 3Q, Sept 12 and Sept 26 [from Judy] 19:22:30 agenda+ guidance for accessibility in contracts https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-cg/2012JulSep/0013.html 19:23:01 ack me 19:23:11 zakim, take up item 3 19:23:11 agendum 3. "html & accessibility & formal objection" taken up [from Judy] 19:23:15 zakim, mute me 19:23:15 Shadi should now be muted 19:23:40 JB: ongoing series of challenging issues being negotiated between the accessibility and html WGs 19:24:27 JB: formal objections from PF since html trying to redefine ARIA 19:25:22 JB: important due to how expertise are acknowledge and horizontal dependancies are handled 19:25:31 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2012JulSep/0130.html 19:25:58 the link from Janina is to the formal objection that is under expedited appeal at the moment 19:26:41 JS: seems to be a catalyst to get other objections heard 19:27:32 agenda? 19:27:33 JB: questions and comments? 19:27:36 ack me 19:28:02 zakim, close item 3 19:28:02 agendum 3, html & accessibility & formal objection, closed 19:28:03 zakim, take up item 4 19:28:04 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 19:28:04 1. Confirming schedule for remainder of 3Q, Sept 12 and Sept 26 [from Judy] 19:28:04 agendum 4. "guidance for accessibility in contracts https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-cg/2012JulSep/0013.html" taken up [from shawn] 19:28:44 BSI 8878 19:29:02 q+ 19:29:11 or EOWG docs, or EOWG docs-in-dev 19:29:29 JS: ran into people and organisations, making new website - seems that it is common to get contractors - maybe useful to put out guidance on contracting an accessible site 19:29:35 ack me 19:30:49 q+ 19:31:05 SLH: we had talked about this in EO - not made a priority - consider this via WAI-Engage - people happy to share language - open up as a topic so we get a crowd-sourcing approach. 19:31:50 JB: the concept of commissioning BSI 8878 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAS_78 19:31:56 [ we also had on EOWG's wishlist guidance on selecting accessibility specialists] 19:32:01 http://shop.bsigroup.com/en/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030129227 19:32:34 q+ 19:32:36 ack j 19:32:39 q+ 19:32:47 JB: maybe better for EO instead of WAI-Engage as there are some subtleties, not sure 19:33:12 ack shadi 19:33:22 it also needs to have an international orientation 19:33:22 JB: may want this to be authoritative via EO 19:33:49 SAZ - may not have to be either / or - could be both - community group could do a lot of pre-work 19:33:57 Burger King Delivers: http://bkdelivers.com 19:34:07 q+ to say cannot be priority for EOWG. agree can use WAI-Engage as gathering ideas. and might polish as WAI Resource in the future 19:34:07 zakim, mute me 19:34:08 ack me 19:34:08 Shadi should now be muted 19:34:08 shawn, you wanted to say cannot be priority for EOWG. agree can use WAI-Engage as gathering ideas. and might polish as WAI Resource in the future 19:34:10 SAZ: info could flow into EO from community group 19:34:54 SLH: can't be a priority for EO right now - use engage first - polish and publish in the future 19:35:15 q+ 19:35:30 actually the replacement link should be http://shop.bsigroup.com/en/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030180388 19:35:38 replacement link for latest version: http://shop.bsigroup.com/en/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030180388 19:35:55 ack me 19:35:55 ] 19:36:12 SH: worried if North American centric 19:36:15 +1 19:36:21 +1 19:36:28 q+ 19:36:36 q+ to say will actively get broader 19:36:38 ack me 19:36:38 shawn, you wanted to say will actively get broader 19:37:19 SH: need an international perspective regarding legal 19:37:23 ack me 19:37:49 SLH: Will actively get broad international input 19:38:00 zakim, mute me 19:38:00 Shadi should now be muted 19:38:04 SAZ: agrees on international perspective - BSI attached to UK legal system - we want international 19:38:08 q? 19:38:44 JS: hopeful international issues dealt best with in w3c 19:39:25 ack me 19:39:44 RESOLVED: next meeting in 2 weeks 19:39:53 agenda+ publications check 19:40:06 topic : publications check 19:40:07 https://www.w3.org/WAI/CG/Group/announcements 19:40:14 zakim, close item 4 19:40:14 agendum 4, guidance for accessibility in contracts https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-cg/2012JulSep/0013.html, closed 19:40:14 zakim, take up item 5 19:40:16 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 19:40:16 1. Confirming schedule for remainder of 3Q, Sept 12 and Sept 26 [from Judy] 19:40:16 agendum 5. "publications check" taken up [from Judy] 19:40:33 ack me 19:41:46 SAZ: WAI-ACT mid September / RDWG - Metrics published tomorrow 19:42:11 zakim, mute me 19:42:11 Shadi should now be muted 19:44:20 -Janina 19:44:35 -Judy 19:44:36 -Jeanne 19:44:36 -Shawn 19:44:37 -Shadi 19:44:41 -sharper 19:44:42 WAI_CG()2:30PM has ended 19:44:42 Attendees were Shadi, Judy, Janina, Jeanne, Shawn, sharper 19:44:51 rrsagent, make logs public 19:44:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 19:44:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/08/29-cg-minutes.html sharper 19:45:16 zakim, please part 19:45:16 Zakim has left #cg 19:45:22 rrsagent, draft minutes 19:45:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/08/29-cg-minutes.html sharper 19:45:46 rrsagent, please part 19:45:46 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2012/08/29-cg-actions.rdf : 19:45:46 ACTION: Janina to review list of all w3c specs current and under development for additional specs relevant to mobile platforms [1] 19:45:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/08/29-cg-irc#T18-44-02 19:45:46 ACTION: Janina review Standards for Web Applications on Mobile and see which ones we might want to highlight in the last bullet under http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Mobile_Accessibility#W3C_WAI_Addresses_Mobile_Accessibility [2] 19:45:46 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/08/29-cg-irc#T18-44-10