IRC log of wcag2ict on 2012-08-07
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:51:21 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wcag2ict
- 13:51:21 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/08/07-wcag2ict-irc
- 13:51:23 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 13:51:23 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #wcag2ict
- 13:51:25 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 2428
- 13:51:25 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM scheduled to start in 9 minutes
- 13:51:26 [trackbot]
- Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference
- 13:51:26 [trackbot]
- Date: 07 August 2012
- 13:51:38 [Andi]
- chair: Andi_Snow-Weaver
- 13:53:38 [greggvanderheiden]
- greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict
- 13:54:13 [Zakim]
- WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has now started
- 13:54:20 [Zakim]
- +Andi_Snow_Weaver
- 13:56:11 [Kiran]
- Kiran has joined #wcag2ict
- 13:58:14 [Zakim]
- +Kiran_Kaja
- 13:59:40 [BBailey]
- BBailey has joined #wcag2ict
- 13:59:42 [Andi]
- zakim, Kiran_Kaja is Kiran
- 13:59:42 [Zakim]
- +Kiran; got it
- 14:00:13 [Andi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 14:00:13 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Andi_Snow_Weaver, Kiran (muted)
- 14:00:20 [Zakim]
- + +1.202.272.aaaa
- 14:00:30 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 14:00:38 [Andi]
- zakim, +1.202.272.aaaa is Bruce_Bailey
- 14:00:38 [Zakim]
- +Bruce_Bailey; got it
- 14:00:48 [Andi]
- zakim, [Microsoft] has Alex_Li
- 14:00:48 [janina]
- janina has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:00:49 [Zakim]
- +Alex_Li; got it
- 14:01:04 [Zakim]
- +??P11
- 14:01:05 [Zakim]
- +??P12
- 14:01:13 [David]
- David has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:01:15 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:01:23 [Andi]
- zakim, ??P11 is Gregg_Vanderheiden
- 14:01:23 [Zakim]
- +Gregg_Vanderheiden; got it
- 14:01:34 [alex]
- alex has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:01:35 [Andi]
- zakim, ??P12 is Janina_Sajka
- 14:01:35 [Zakim]
- +Janina_Sajka; got it
- 14:01:37 [Zakim]
- +David_MacDonald
- 14:03:09 [Mike]
- Mike has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:03:18 [korn]
- korn has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:03:54 [Andi]
- regrets: Loïc_Martínez_Normand, MaryJo_Mueller
- 14:04:05 [Zakim]
- +[Oracle]
- 14:04:14 [korn]
- Zakim, Oracle has Peter_Korn
- 14:04:14 [Zakim]
- +Peter_Korn; got it
- 14:04:37 [Andi]
- topic: Survey for August 7th meeting: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/AUG072012/results
- 14:05:12 [Zakim]
- +??P4
- 14:05:14 [korn]
- q+
- 14:06:15 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:07:03 [korn]
- q+
- 14:07:29 [Andi]
- scribe: Andi_Snow-Weaver
- 14:07:51 [Andi]
- discussion about whether we need to use some flavor of "UI Context" in this provision
- 14:08:37 [Andi]
- in some cases, there is no need to use a term like "UI context" - so we are trying to use the simplest language that we can
- 14:08:45 [Mike]
- q+
- 14:09:32 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:09:51 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:10:02 [Zakim]
- +Judy
- 14:11:27 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 14:11:43 [Andi]
- we're on 3.1.1 Language of Page
- 14:11:51 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:13:02 [greggvanderheiden]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/ui-context-in-context
- 14:13:07 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:13:25 [Mike]
- q+
- 14:13:58 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:15:47 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 14:16:09 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:16:59 [Andi]
- q+
- 14:17:13 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:17:18 [greggvanderheiden]
- Not all software technologies support a method to programmatically expose the human language of the software user interface. Applications implemented in technologies where Assistive technologies cannot determine the human language and that do not support the platform "local language setting" may not be able to meet this success criterion.
- 14:17:39 [korn]
- q+
- 14:19:41 [Andi]
- ack andi
- 14:20:35 [Andi]
- eventually assistive technologies may be able to determine the human language of the document or software user interface
- 14:20:39 [Mike]
- q+
- 14:20:55 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:20:56 [Andi]
- but AT may not be able to automatically get the human language 100% of the time
- 14:20:59 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:21:36 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 14:22:13 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:23:03 [Andi]
- our guidance is not the right place for a note about ATs being able to automatically detect human language - since this would also apply to web pages, it's more appropriate in the WCAG 2.0 INTENT
- 14:23:55 [korn]
- q+
- 14:25:17 [Andi]
- "software user interface" might no be sufficient because people might not think it includes the application content
- 14:25:36 [Andi]
- s/no be/not be/
- 14:25:43 [greggvanderheiden]
- This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) replacing "each Web page" with "the document or software user interface".
- 14:25:43 [greggvanderheiden]
- Where software platforms provide a "local language" setting, applications that follow that setting would comply with this success criterion. Applications that do not follow the platform "local language setting" but instead use an assistive technology supported method for exposing the human language of the software user interface would also comply with this success criterion. Applications implemented in technologies where Assistive
- 14:25:44 [greggvanderheiden]
- technologies cannot determine the human language and that do not support the platform "local language setting" may not be able to meet this success criterion.
- 14:25:51 [korn]
- q-
- 14:25:55 [Andi]
- q+
- 14:26:32 [Andi]
- ack Andi
- 14:27:27 [Mike]
- q+
- 14:27:32 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 14:28:20 [David]
- q+
- 14:28:37 [korn]
- q+
- 14:28:42 [greggvanderheiden]
- software user interface including any content
- 14:28:58 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:29:06 [Mike]
- q+
- 14:29:27 [Andi]
- M376 team liked "software user interface" because it makes it clear that it doesn't include software that doesn't have a UI
- 14:29:32 [Andi]
- ack David
- 14:30:28 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:30:55 [Mike]
- q-
- 14:31:03 [alex]
- +1 on Peter
- 14:31:08 [korn]
- q-
- 14:31:08 [greggvanderheiden]
- how about we do [software /user interface] to make this a placeholder
- 14:31:20 [korn]
- q+
- 14:31:27 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:31:46 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:31:57 [greggvanderheiden]
- then lets use software user interface including content
- 14:32:18 [Andi]
- add a note to ourselves that we need to review this later once we settle on the term for "software"
- 14:32:26 [Andi]
- q+
- 14:32:44 [korn]
- q+
- 14:32:54 [Andi]
- ack Andi
- 14:32:59 [greggvanderheiden]
- I see what you mean
- 14:33:12 [greggvanderheiden]
- you mean other peoples content
- 14:33:21 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:33:58 [Mike]
- q+
- 14:34:09 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 14:34:41 [greggvanderheiden]
- This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) replacing "each Web page" with "the document or software user interface".
- 14:34:41 [greggvanderheiden]
- Where software platforms provide a "local language" setting, applications that follow that setting would comply with this success criterion. Applications that do not follow the platform "local language setting" but instead use an assistive technology supported method for exposing the human language of the software user interface would also comply with this success criterion. Applications implemented in technologies where Assistive
- 14:34:42 [greggvanderheiden]
- technologies cannot determine the human language and that do not support the platform "local language setting" may not be able to meet this success criterion.
- 14:35:24 [greggvanderheiden]
- This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) replacing "each Web page" with "the document or software".
- 14:35:25 [greggvanderheiden]
- Where software platforms provide a "local language" setting, applications that follow that setting would comply with this success criterion. Applications that do not follow the platform "local language setting" but instead use an assistive technology supported method for exposing the human language of the software user interface would also comply with this success criterion. Applications implemented in technologies where Assistive
- 14:35:25 [greggvanderheiden]
- technologies cannot determine the human language and that do not support the platform "local language setting" may not be able to meet this success criterion.
- 14:35:46 [greggvanderheiden]
- this is Andi's with new last sentence and using software
- 14:37:04 [Andi]
- RESOLUTION: Accept Proposal #8 for 3.1.1
- 14:37:05 [greggvanderheiden]
- This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) replacing "each Web page" with "the electronic document or software".
- 14:37:05 [greggvanderheiden]
- Where software platforms provide a "local language" setting, applications that follow that setting would comply with this success criterion. Applications that do not follow the platform "local language setting" but instead use an assistive technology supported method for exposing the human language of the software user interface would also comply with this success criterion. Applications implemented in technologies where Assistive
- 14:37:06 [greggvanderheiden]
- technologies cannot determine the human language and that do not support the platform "local language setting" may not be able to meet this success criterion.
- 14:39:20 [Andi]
- 3.1.2 Language of Parts
- 14:39:43 [Andi]
- change "This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) with “document or software” substituted for "content". " "This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) replacing "content" with "electronic document or software" substituted for "content". "
- 14:40:10 [Andi]
- change "This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) with “document or software” substituted for "content". " "This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) replacing "content" with "electronic document or software"
- 14:40:56 [greggvanderheiden]
- doing this we now get
- 14:40:57 [greggvanderheiden]
- "This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) replacing "content" with "electronic document or software"
- 14:40:57 [greggvanderheiden]
- Note that some document formats can use separate human languages for output and input purposes. In such cases both languages should be programmatically determinable.
- 14:40:58 [greggvanderheiden]
- There are some software and document technologies where there is no assistive technology supported method for marking the language for the different passages or phrases in the document or software, and it would not be possible to meet this success criterion with those technologies.
- 14:40:59 [greggvanderheiden]
- NOTE: Inheritance is one common method. For example a document or application provides the language that it is using and it can be assumed that all of the text or user interface elements within that document or application will be using the same language unless it is indicated.
- 14:41:00 [Andi]
- q?
- 14:43:03 [korn]
- q?
- 14:43:46 [Kiran]
- q+
- 14:43:57 [Kiran]
- q-
- 14:44:11 [Mike]
- +q
- 14:45:48 [Kiran]
- q+
- 14:45:49 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 14:45:52 [Andi]
- ack Kiran
- 14:46:22 [Andi]
- dicussion about marking the human language of the user's input
- 14:46:41 [korn]
- q+
- 14:47:15 [greggvanderheiden]
- I think it is an edge case and one that raises problems
- 14:47:16 [Kiran]
- q+
- 14:47:21 [Mike]
- q+
- 14:47:23 [korn]
- q-
- 14:47:33 [Andi]
- example is forms (immigration forms) that may be in one language but require the input to be in another language (language of country being entered)
- 14:47:45 [janina]
- Wouldn't a software/web version of the U.S. Visa form employ a drop-down with countries spelled the way the U.S. Dept of State wants to see them?
- 14:47:46 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:48:24 [Andi]
- suggestion that extending this to input may go beyond the SC
- 14:48:27 [Andi]
- ack Kiran
- 14:48:29 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 14:48:30 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:48:46 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:49:02 [Andi]
- remove the 2nd paragraph
- 14:50:32 [greggvanderheiden]
- Proposal #6 ( FROM meeting -- this is #5 above with first sentence changed and insert/del applied and sentence about input removed since it is beyond SC) ========================
- 14:50:32 [greggvanderheiden]
- Additional guidance when applying to Electronic Documents and Software Aspects of Products
- 14:50:33 [greggvanderheiden]
- "This applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above) replacing "content" with "electronic document or software"
- 14:50:34 [greggvanderheiden]
- There are some software and document technologies where there is no assistive technology supported method for marking the language for the different passages or phrases in the document or software, and it would not be possible to meet this success criterion with those technologies.
- 14:50:35 [greggvanderheiden]
- NOTE: Inheritance is one common method. For example a document or application provides the language that it is using and it can be assumed that all of the text or user interface elements within that document or application will be using the same language unless it is indicated.
- 14:50:41 [Andi]
- action: Mike to discuss issue of identifying the language of the input with M376 team and come back with a proposal if necessary
- 14:50:41 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-46 - Discuss issue of identifying the language of the input with M376 team and come back with a proposal if necessary [on Mike Pluke - due 2012-08-14].
- 14:51:16 [Andi]
- RESOLUTION: Accept Proposal #6 for 3.1.2
- 14:53:01 [Andi]
- RESOLUTION: Accept that no further guidance is needed on 2.2.1 and 3.3.4
- 14:53:22 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:53:27 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:53:50 [Judy]
- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/AUG072012/results#xq4
- 14:55:14 [Andi]
- 3.2.1 On Focus
- 14:55:20 [korn]
- q+
- 14:55:43 [Andi]
- discussion about Pierce's comment
- 14:56:31 [Judy]
- q+
- 14:56:35 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:57:35 [Andi]
- ack Judy
- 14:57:57 [korn]
- q+
- 14:59:23 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:59:40 [Judy]
- Judy suggesting that if we are holding this to check on that we do so for specific issues or questions, and for specific periods of time, rather than leaving things open
- 15:02:07 [Andi]
- keep 3.2.1 open - follow up with Pierce to try to close by Friday
- 15:02:11 [Andi]
- 3.2.2 On Input
- 15:02:24 [Andi]
- keep 3.2.2 open - follow up with Pierce to try to close by Friday
- 15:03:45 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 15:03:59 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 15:04:34 [korn]
- q+
- 15:04:47 [korn]
- q-
- 15:05:15 [Mike]
- q+
- 15:05:20 [korn]
- q+
- 15:05:32 [korn]
- How about "Form controls provided by many document formats..."?
- 15:06:14 [Andi]
- 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
- 15:07:29 [Andi]
- in many technologies standard controls that are used according to specification are not accessible
- 15:08:40 [korn]
- q+
- 15:09:05 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 15:10:12 [korn]
- We already say "For conforming to this success criterion, it is usually best practice for software user interfaces to use the accessibility services provided by platform software." Why not continue in that direction? "For conforming to this success criterion, it is usually best practice for document authors to use the controls provided by the document format."
- 15:10:26 [Andi]
- discussion about Mike's proposed note: Note: For many document formats, standard user interface components already meet this success criterion when used according to the general design and accessibility guidance for the document format.
- 15:11:09 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 15:12:15 [Andi]
- Note: For many document formats, standard user interface components would commonly meet this success criterion when used according to the general design and accessibility guidance for the document format.
- 15:12:35 [Andi]
- Note: For many document formats, standard user interface components commonly meet this success criterion when used according to the general design and accessibility guidance for the document format.
- 15:13:14 [Andi]
- For many document formats, standard user interface components may meet this success criterion when used according to the general design and accessibility guidance for the document format.
- 15:13:48 [David]
- q+
- 15:13:54 [Andi]
- ack David
- 15:16:03 [Andi]
- For document formats that support interoperability with AT, standard user interface components often meet this success criterion when used according to the general design and accessibility guidance for the document format.
- 15:16:21 [korn]
- +1
- 15:16:24 [greggvanderheiden]
- +1
- 15:16:54 [Andi]
- RESOLUTION: Accept additional note for 4.1.2: Note: For document formats that support interoperability with AT, standard user interface components often meet this success criterion when used according to the general design and accessibility guidance for the document format.
- 15:17:36 [korn]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/user-interface-context/ui-context-examples
- 15:18:02 [Andi]
- topic: User Interface Context discussion
- 15:20:43 [korn]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/user-interface-context/ui-context-examples
- 15:20:52 [Andi]
- proposal that in a UI where content changes over time constitutes a change of UI context and therefore invokes 2.4.1 and 3.2.2
- 15:21:44 [korn]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/user-interface-context/ui-context-examples
- 15:23:32 [BBailey]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/user-interface-context/ui-context-examples/how-many-two-document-windows
- 15:23:36 [korn]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/user-interface-context/ui-context-examples
- 15:23:42 [BBailey]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/user-interface-context/ui-context-examples/change-exampe-1-simple-tree-expansion-only-text-in-tree-nodes
- 15:24:14 [BBailey]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/user-interface-context/ui-context-examples/changed-example-2-complex-tree-expansion
- 15:26:05 [Andi]
- would we all agree on the number of UI contexts in the examples and whether or not there was a change in UI context in the examples?
- 15:26:32 [Mike]
- q+
- 15:26:56 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 15:26:59 [David]
- q+
- 15:27:25 [Andi]
- ask industry developers and Access Board to look at these examples also - if we get consistent answers, validates the concept of UI Context
- 15:27:28 [Andi]
- ack Mike
- 15:28:17 [Andi]
- suggestion that developers only need to understand UI Context when trying to interpret a particular success criterion
- 15:30:45 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 15:30:56 [Mike]
- +1
- 15:32:47 [greggvanderheiden]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/ui-context-in-context
- 15:33:56 [David]
- (2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.5) are the ones that need any distinction of context...
- 15:35:02 [korn]
- q?
- 15:35:13 [Andi]
- ack David
- 15:35:31 [janina]
- janina has left #wcag2ict
- 15:35:32 [Andi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:35:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/08/07-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi
- 15:35:33 [Zakim]
- -Bruce_Bailey
- 15:35:33 [David]
- 2.4.1 bypass blocks, 2.4.2 Page titled,, 2.4.5 multiple ways are the ones that need context al else is context
- 15:35:34 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft]
- 15:35:35 [Zakim]
- -Janina_Sajka
- 15:35:36 [MichaelC_]
- MichaelC_ has joined #wcag2ict
- 15:35:36 [Zakim]
- -Kiran
- 15:35:36 [Zakim]
- -Judy
- 15:35:38 [Zakim]
- -??P4
- 15:35:41 [Zakim]
- -Andi_Snow_Weaver
- 15:35:42 [Zakim]
- -[Oracle]
- 15:35:51 [Zakim]
- -David_MacDonald
- 15:35:59 [Andi]
- zakim, bye
- 15:35:59 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were Andi_Snow_Weaver, Kiran, Bruce_Bailey, Alex_Li, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Janina_Sajka, David_MacDonald, Peter_Korn, Judy
- 15:35:59 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wcag2ict
- 15:36:05 [Andi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:36:05 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/08/07-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi
- 15:36:29 [Mike]
- -
- 15:58:31 [korn]
- korn has left #wcag2ict
- 16:13:18 [greggvanderheiden]
- greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict
- 17:23:02 [MichaelC]
- MichaelC has joined #wcag2ict
- 17:27:52 [MichaelC_]
- MichaelC_ has joined #wcag2ict
- 17:52:12 [MichaelC_]
- MichaelC_ has joined #wcag2ict
- 17:54:08 [MichaelC]
- MichaelC has joined #wcag2ict