17:02:11 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 17:02:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/08/02-tagmem-irc 17:02:16 trackbot, start telcon 17:02:18 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:02:20 Zakim, this will be TAG 17:02:20 ok, trackbot, I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM already started 17:02:21 Meeting: Technical Architecture Group Teleconference 17:02:21 Date: 02 August 2012 17:03:13 -masinter 17:03:46 +??P2 17:04:09 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Jul/0063.html 17:04:28 Chair: Larry 17:04:31 Acribe: Yves 17:04:38 Scribe: Yves 17:04:42 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly 17:04:56 zakim, who's here? 17:04:56 On the phone I see Jonathan_Rees, Ashok_Malhotra, Yves, masinter 17:04:57 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Ashok, darobin, Zakim, masinter, jar, trackbot, plinss, Yves 17:05:25 http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag-summary#quorum 17:05:53 +plinss 17:05:53 regrets+ Robin 17:06:14 Topic: approval of minutes 17:06:28 did people review the minutes? 17:06:51 => approval of minutes postponed 17:07:12 Topic: administrative items 17:07:21 next call is aug 9 17:07:32 Topic: ]ISSUE-25 (deepLinking-25): Can publication of 17:07:48 s/]ISSUE-25// 17:08:08 s/of/of hyperlinks constitute copyright infringment? 17:08:24 Larry: got mixed feedback on the governance document 17:08:54 note: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2012Jul/0018.html 17:09:24 Ashok, let's go through the items Ashok raised 17:10:18 I would like to FPWD P&L as is 17:10:42 1. should we reference governanceFramework? 17:10:50 Larry: not yet, gotten mixed feedback 17:10:54 Ashok: should we refer to the governanc doc? (from the P&L one), response was "not yet" 17:11:29 got feedback to use Tussles in Cyberspace 17:12:09 ashok: I started to read that doc, not enough yet 17:12:29 http://groups.csail.mit.edu/ana/Publications/PubPDFs/Tussle%20in%20Cyberspace%20Defining%20Tomorrows%20Internet%202005's%20Internet.pdf 17:12:47 feedback is that the "Tussle" paper is a better foundatin to start with 17:13:11 and that governanceFramework should _start_ with Tussle, and use it as the basis for a (shorter) framework 17:14:28 the feedback is that we should start with that, and then talk specifically about the 'tussle' in the web 17:15:25 I will review the Tussle paper 17:15:37 "accommodating this tussle is crucial to the 17:15:37 evolution of the network’s technical architecture" 17:17:44 ashok: proxies that, without user interaction, are doing something with data. Some will act if there are policies allowing to process the data. Those statements are not contradictory, but are they sending different messages? 17:18:07 jar: one is judgment, the other one is ??? 17:18:26 s/???/decisions made by a machine/ 17:18:53 judgment is the word I use to mean something a human has to do. computers don't judge 17:19:10 from Ashok's email: BPs " ... should comply with instructions from origin servers that describe whether pages may be copied and transformed, but will only be able to comply with those that are machine-readable." But no machine-readable policy language defined that would spell out the rules for intermediaries...." 17:19:19 ashok: there are no machine-readable policy languages for intermediaries 17:19:36 jar: CCRel is an example 17:19:49 e.g. http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_REL 17:19:57 http://www.w3.org/Submission/ccREL/ 17:20:20 should CCRel be a citation? 17:20:59 Let me look at it 17:21:06 zakim, mute me 17:21:06 masinter should now be muted 17:21:27 also http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/#sec-proxy-use-of-no-transform 17:22:25 I don't mind details 17:23:48 jar, could you give an example of something you're uncomfortable with and how you might rewrite it? 17:24:33 jar: the idea that the information is owned is not true 17:25:05 jar: Could you ground this in a specific example 17:25:26 jar: the internet archive changed its policy to care about robots.txt It was a disservice to the public, and they were not required by law 17:25:49 not sure the report should go into arguments like that 17:25:59 jar, where does the report get into something that it shouldn't? 17:26:02 note that the internet archive is protected by library exemption 17:26:13 zakim, unmute me 17:26:13 masinter should no longer be muted 17:27:00 Proxies should comply with instructions from origin servers that describe whether pages may be copied and transformed 17:27:30 you don't think it is a best practice that proxies comply with instrucctions? 17:28:02 under what circumstance is it not a 'best practice'? 17:28:22 give an example, just one example, when it isn't a 'best practice' 17:28:48 so if it is a caching proxy? 17:29:13 proxies that are advertised as to not transform content should not transform content? 17:31:39 Jonathan, do you think the BPs are hopelessly unfixable? 17:32:29 jar: not sure about the targeted audience of this document, so I'm confused by this 17:33:42 I'm trying to distinguish between "I don't know who this is useful for?" and "I think the advice it gives is wrong and not fixable" 17:34:58 I don't think "interesting" is a consensus opinion 17:36:55 does anyone else have an opinion, 17:37:02 Peter, Yves? 17:38:28 Yves: it would be good to stay strictly in the description of how linking work 17:38:36 so getting rid of most of the BPs 17:39:10 Peter: I thought we made the decision to do so, it seems that we are back again to mixing those 17:39:26 cut away more of the policy 17:41:21 ACTION: Larry and Ashok to remove the best practises parts of the P&L document 17:41:21 Created ACTION-731 - And Ashok to remove the best practises parts of the P&L document [on Larry Masinter - due 2012-08-09]. 17:42:23 I"m still unhappy with respec use in doc, and boilerplate 17:43:27 we could add a reference to 'Tussle' in intro, too 17:43:37 zakim, mute me 17:43:37 masinter should now be muted 17:44:10 Ashok: it there a way for people to forbid linking? 17:44:13 temporary URLs, or content in scripting 17:44:19 jar: yes, don't provide a URL 17:44:36 should we talk about those things in this document? 17:44:58 ways in which people circumvent ability to deep link? 17:46:16 feedback from wendy and thomas were to reference Tussle 17:46:32 zakim, unmute me 17:46:32 masinter should no longer be muted 17:46:37 jar: the general question is "do you want a legal tool when there are legal tools to do what you want to achieve" (forbiding linking) 17:53:10 on IETF review 17:55:06 action-679? 17:55:06 ACTION-679 -- Yves Lafon to check how Appcache should fit into Ashok's storage document -- due 2012-05-01 -- OPEN 17:55:06 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/679 17:55:39 s/legal tools/technical tools/ 17:55:42 Yves and Robin convinced Ashok Appcache is not part of local storage 17:56:02 close action-679 17:56:02 ACTION-679 check how Appcache should fit into Ashok's storage document closed 17:56:25 action-404? 17:56:25 ACTION-404 -- Yves Lafon to track HTML WG ISSUE-27 rel-ownership -- due 2012-06-05 -- OPEN 17:56:25 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/404 17:56:34 should postpone 17:56:53 action-404 due in 2 months? 17:56:53 ACTION-404 Track HTML WG ISSUE-27 rel-ownership due date now in 2 months? 17:57:42 action-659? 17:57:42 ACTION-659 -- Yves Lafon to track IETF efforts on HTTP 2.0 & SPDY -- due 2012-07-31 -- OPEN 17:57:42 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/659 17:58:09 action-659 due 2012-08-05 17:58:09 ACTION-659 Track IETF efforts on HTTP 2.0 & SPDY due date now 2012-08-05 17:58:24 action-617? 17:58:24 ACTION-617 -- Yves Lafon to work with Noah to take http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-namespaceState-20060329/ off the Rec track -- due 2012-06-01 -- OPEN 17:58:24 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/617 18:00:13 peter closed some and changed dates on others 18:00:23 action-712? 18:00:23 ACTION-712 -- Peter Linss to help us decide whether to have F2F session on i18n and comparison Due 2012-05-29 -- due 2012-05-31 -- CLOSED 18:00:23 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/712 18:00:30 action-606? 18:00:30 ACTION-606 -- Peter Linss to invite I18N and other concerned groups to provide written technical input as prep to discussion with the TAG regarding unicode normalization -- due 2012-06-12 -- OPEN 18:00:30 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/606 18:01:21 i've heard from Addison recently 18:01:33 action-727? 18:01:33 ACTION-727 -- Ashok Malhotra to with help from JAR and Larry to work on a plan for taking a slightly stronger version of the Copyright and Linking draft forward -- due 2012-07-17 -- OPEN 18:01:33 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/727 18:01:48 this is overtaken, we should close it 18:01:57 close action-727 18:01:57 ACTION-727 With help from JAR and Larry to work on a plan for taking a slightly stronger version of the Copyright and Linking draft forward closed 18:02:09 action-717? 18:02:09 ACTION-717 -- Ashok Malhotra to propose outline for possible TAG document (finding or rec) on architectural issues relating to storage sync, linked data, etc. Due 2012-07-15 -- due 2012-06-20 -- OPEN 18:02:09 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/717 18:02:51 action-717 due 2012-09-01 18:02:51 ACTION-717 Propose outline for possible TAG document (finding or rec) on architectural issues relating to storage sync, linked data, etc. Due 2012-07-15 due date now 2012-09-01 18:03:20 action-719? 18:03:20 ACTION-719 -- Larry Masinter to reply to Hannes pointing to the minutes, summarizing the discussion, and asking him if he has any more specific questions. -- due 2012-06-20 -- OPEN 18:03:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/719 18:03:46 i talked to hannes Tuesday night; he said he would get back to us 18:05:07 action-722? 18:05:07 ACTION-722 -- Jonathan Rees to review 'publishing and linking' due -- due 2012-08-06 -- OPEN 18:05:07 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/722 18:05:23 action-722 due in 1 week 18:05:23 ACTION-722 Review 'publishing and linking' due due date now in 1 week 18:05:41 zakim, mute me 18:05:41 masinter should now be muted 18:06:13 review it after there's a new version of it 18:06:58 i think JAR says he'll review P&L after Ashok & Larry update it this week 18:07:20 Ashok, you and I are meeting monday to update P&L, and JAR should review after it 18:08:00 Ashok, i'll make a pass on cutting out the BPs if you like 18:08:08 zakim, unmute me 18:08:08 masinter should no longer be muted 18:08:10 Instead of this action I propose looking at the Tussle paper first 18:08:30 close action-722 18:08:30 ACTION-722 Review 'publishing and linking' due closed 18:08:41 action-726? 18:08:41 ACTION-726 -- Jonathan Rees to make a list of questions to which webarch and the findings suggest answers to, as input to possible 'study design' and/or communication to chairs etc. -- due 2012-08-14 -- OPEN 18:08:41 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/726 18:09:32 action-728? 18:09:32 ACTION-728 -- Noah Mendelsohn to find editor for copyright and linking after group reviews Ashok's proposals on stronger messages -- due 2012-07-12 -- OPEN 18:09:32 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/728 18:09:47 close action-728 18:09:47 ACTION-728 find editor for copyright and linking after group reviews Ashok's proposals on stronger messages closed 18:10:29 action-707? 18:10:29 ACTION-707 -- Henry Thompson to keep an eye on http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-00.txt and relation to RFC 3023bis -- due 2012-06-05 -- OPEN 18:10:29 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/707 18:10:51 there's news on this, this week, on the mailing list 18:11:01 action-635? 18:11:01 ACTION-635 -- Henry Thompson to update product page for Frag IDS and Mime types, to include realistic goals and dates -- due 2012-06-01 -- OPEN 18:11:01 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/635 18:11:18 the product page is ok but the link from the TAG products overview is wrong 18:11:33 any other items? 18:11:38 AOB? 18:11:39 otherwise i propose we adjourn 18:11:59 ADJOURNED 18:12:04 thank you Larry for chairing 18:12:04 -Ashok_Malhotra 18:12:10 -Yves 18:12:12 -Jonathan_Rees 18:12:33 -masinter 18:12:35 -plinss 18:12:36 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:12:36 Attendees were masinter, Jonathan_Rees, Ashok_Malhotra, Yves, plinss 18:12:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/08/02-tagmem-minutes.html Yves