14:00:29 RRSAgent has joined #ldp 14:00:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/23-ldp-irc 14:00:40 trackbot, start meeting 14:00:42 RRSAgent, make logs 181 14:00:43 zakim, who is here 14:00:43 Ruben, you need to end that query with '?' 14:00:44 Zakim, this will be 14:00:45 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 14:00:45 Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference 14:00:45 Date: 23 July 2012 14:00:52 zakim, who is here? 14:00:52 sorry, Ruben, I don't know what conference this is 14:00:54 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, Arnaud, Ruben, domel, dret, svillata, betehess, MacTed, SteveS, trackbot, sandro, Yves, ericP 14:00:57 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:01:15 mkerrin has joined #ldp 14:01:24 rgarcia has joined #ldp 14:01:40 steve has joined #ldp 14:01:54 krp has joined #ldp 14:01:59 cygri has joined #ldp 14:02:14 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:02:14 sorry, cygri, I don't know what conference this is 14:02:21 On IRC I see cygri, krp, steve, rgarcia, mkerrin, RRSAgent, Zakim, Arnaud, Ruben, domel, dret, svillata, betehess, MacTed, SteveS, trackbot, sandro, Yves, ericP 14:02:21 trackbot, code? 14:02:21 Sorry, MacTed, I don't understand 'trackbot, code?'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 14:02:28 zakim, who is making noise? 14:02:28 sorry, sandro, I don't know what conference this is 14:02:29 Zakim, code 14:02:32 I don't understand 'code', MacTed 14:02:33 Zakim, code? 14:02:35 zakim, this is ldp 14:02:37 sorry, MacTed, I don't know what conference this is 14:02:39 ok, sandro; that matches SW_LDP()10:00AM 14:02:43 zakim, who is making noise? 14:02:43 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:02:48 On the phone I see ??P6, ??P5, TomDN, sandro, +44.117.370.aaaa, Arnaud, ??P11, [IBM], mhausenblas, +1.510.698.aabb, ??P20 14:03:02 sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P20 (50%) 14:03:04 zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me 14:03:08 zakim, mkerrin is with me 14:03:09 +cygri; got it 14:03:11 bblfish has joined #ldp 14:03:13 Zakim, [IBM] is SteveS 14:03:15 +mkerrin; got it 14:03:17 +[OpenLink] 14:03:20 hi 14:03:21 +SteveS; got it 14:03:26 Zakim, ??P5 is me 14:03:28 Zakim, [OpenLink] is temporarily me 14:03:29 +svillata; got it 14:03:30 Zakim, mute me 14:03:30 I don't see my number on the list but I'm hereā€¦ strange 14:03:32 +MacTed; got it 14:03:36 MacTed should now be muted 14:03:37 Zakim, who is here? 14:03:39 On the phone I see ??P6, svillata, TomDN, sandro, +44.117.370.aaaa, Arnaud, ??P11, SteveS, cygri, +1.510.698.aabb, ??P20, MacTed (muted) 14:03:46 cygri has cygri, mkerrin 14:03:50 On IRC I see bblfish, cygri, krp, steve, rgarcia, mkerrin, RRSAgent, Zakim, Arnaud, Ruben, domel, dret, svillata, betehess, MacTed, SteveS, trackbot, sandro, Yves, ericP 14:04:13 Zakim, aabb is me 14:04:14 +??P25 14:04:18 -TomDN 14:04:19 JohnArwe has joined #ldp 14:04:23 -??P20 14:04:24 +bblfish; got it 14:04:32 +JohnArwe 14:04:36 zakim, ??P25 is me 14:04:36 +krp; got it 14:04:38 +TomDN 14:04:40 Zakim, ??P6 is me 14:04:42 +dret; got it 14:05:08 Zakim is a robot 14:05:08 zakim, who's on the phone? 14:05:08 On the phone I see dret, svillata, sandro, +44.117.370.aaaa, Arnaud, ??P11, SteveS, cygri, bblfish, MacTed (muted), krp, JohnArwe, TomDN 14:05:12 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:05:14 cygri has cygri, mkerrin 14:05:21 On the phone I see dret, svillata, sandro, +44.117.370.aaaa, Arnaud, ??P11, SteveS, cygri, bblfish, MacTed (muted), krp, JohnArwe, TomDN 14:05:24 cygri has cygri, mkerrin 14:05:33 zakim, TomDN is me 14:05:36 +Ruben; got it 14:05:40 +??P29 14:05:47 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:05:47 On the phone I see dret, svillata, sandro, +44.117.370.aaaa, Arnaud, ??P11, SteveS, cygri, bblfish, MacTed (muted), krp, JohnArwe, Ruben, ??P29 14:05:49 cygri has cygri, mkerrin 14:06:03 zakim, ??P29 is me 14:06:03 +rgarcia; got it 14:07:41 zakim, +44.117.370.aaaa is me 14:07:41 +stevebattle; got it 14:07:54 Zakim, who's here? 14:07:54 On the phone I see dret, svillata, sandro, stevebattle, Arnaud, ??P11, SteveS, cygri, bblfish, MacTed (muted), krp, JohnArwe, Ruben, rgarcia 14:07:57 cygri has cygri, mkerrin 14:07:57 On IRC I see JohnArwe, bblfish, cygri, krp, stevebattle, rgarcia, mkerrin, RRSAgent, Zakim, Arnaud, Ruben, domel, dret, svillata, betehess, MacTed, SteveS, trackbot, sandro, Yves, 14:07:57 ... ericP 14:08:00 LeeF has joined #ldp 14:08:37 who is ??P11 14:09:04 +Lee_Feigenbaum 14:10:17 Do we know how many people might be attending a US east coast location? 14:10:40 no data, LeeF 14:10:53 Well, speaking for myself, I couldn't even consider volunteering to host without an idea of that :) 14:11:20 LeeF, I'd think you could offer to host up to 8 people or whatever. 14:11:33 whatever's convenient for you. 14:11:34 I can scribe 14:11:42 F2F TPAC is 29 Oct - 2 Nov, LDP is scheduled for 1-2 Nov http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/ 14:12:09 boris has joined #ldp 14:12:39 yes 14:12:47 but please help me along 14:12:51 scribe: bblfish 14:12:53 sometimes I fall asleep scribing 14:12:57 :-) 14:13:15 achille_zappa has joined #ldp 14:13:16 No pending actions it seems 14:13:23 +??P37 14:13:24 starting... 14:13:45 zakim, ??P37 is me 14:13:45 +boris; got it 14:14:09 we got this post from Michael are addresses by some spec called SDChair 14:14:12 URL? 14:15:22 someone just said they will send their thoughts to the group 14:15:39 that was steve speicher, aka steveS on IRC 14:16:06 http://www.sdshare.org/spec/sdshare-current.html 14:16:12 ah great thanks 14:16:37 IT looks like a very short spec 14:17:58 SDShare looks like it is also a proposal 14:18:42 Topic: Access Control 14:20:35 due to the discussion on the mailing list 14:21:42 someone is saying that one should get this base layer defined 14:22:06 +kalpa 14:22:15 access control https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/read-write-web/ 14:23:44 q? 14:23:51 -??P11 14:25:26 my argument was that I felt that the discussion came up on the use case because of a question of whether it was possible, so the read-write-web server shows that it is. 14:26:36 but the current speaker says that he started the discussion not because it was a question whether it was possible, ( there are many technologies he believes) 14:26:48 cygri has joined #ldp 14:27:08 zakim, who is speaking? 14:27:19 JohnArwe, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 14:27:39 the idea is to come up with some profile of what such an authentication system would need to look like 14:27:46 Erik Wilde aka dret 14:28:06 one should look for patterns of what this should look like with established technologies 14:28:24 interesting that zakim was unable to identify the speaker. 14:29:00 ie: requirements for access control should be captured (and this is part of the ldp's deliverable) 14:29:07 zakim, who is speaking? 14:29:18 bblfish, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (20%), SteveS (79%) 14:29:21 steve speicher 14:29:45 Chair suggested we put up a wiki page to put down ideas 14:30:38 Arnaud was suggesting to capture these requirements and put those ideas in the wiki page 14:30:55 ( I am not sure I understood SteveS's intervention before ) 14:31:03 zakim, who is speaking? 14:31:14 bblfish, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: dret (19%), Arnaud (5%) 14:31:26 dret is suggesting that this be added as a use case 14:32:12 how do you express contraints for what kind of data should be transmitted 14:32:36 bblfish, To summarize, I was suggesting to expand on the use cases wrt to authen/access needs, then looking at what we need within the scope of our first round of deliverables 14:33:34 dret was saying that even though this is not clearly in the spec, one could think of auth as such a constraint 14:35:28 does anybody else have problems logging into the wiki, or is it just me? 14:35:55 I don't have a problem with putting it in the wiki as a use case. It's certainly something I am interested in it. 14:35:59 q+ 14:36:46 Topic: Use Case and Requirements 14:38:39 I have contributed my use cases and requirements from the initial set, don't have any planned adds 14:39:26 -bblfish 14:39:29 oops 14:39:58 domel has joined #ldp 14:40:13 +bblfish 14:40:54 so my question was a use case for handling non RDF resources 14:41:38 Arnaud: a good use case to add 14:42:00 q? 14:42:04 Arnaud: we need positive feedback from people so that even if they like the use cases they should see it 14:42:05 q- 14:42:12 perhaps a vote? 14:43:29 0ne should have a call for consensus on the use cases that are already up 14:43:35 sandro: let's do a call for consensus on the proposal that we support all these use cases as valuable/appropriate 14:44:25 Topic: Comparing two things ? 14:44:50 Topic: compare with Graph Store protocol 14:45:09 where is the graph store protocol again? 14:45:30 http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/ 14:45:30 Any opinions? 14:47:18 - what is the next plan for the draft store protocol? - PR should be in september if there are enough implementations 14:48:05 zakim, who is speaking? 14:48:16 bblfish, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: sandro (82%), Arnaud (4%) 14:48:55 sandro: I had a lot of problems with that SPARQL at the time. The compromise that the idea was that the POST in that spec is SPARQL specific 14:49:14 sandro: sticky bit: if you POST RDF it has append semantics 14:50:18 sandro: so this seems to be a protocol to work only on SPARQL resources 14:50:31 zakim, who is speaking? 14:50:42 SteveS, 14:50:43 bblfish, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 14:50:58 SteveS: in the current spec POST means create a new resource 14:51:19 SteveS: posting to a resource is not define 14:51:42 ArthurK has joined #ldp 14:52:51 sandro: would POSTing RDF to a resource do something else than merging RDF? 14:53:09 dret: post in rest is app specific 14:53:24 i think the issue is whether the current spec licenses users to expect that every resource is appendable with POST 14:53:54 sandro: anyone have a story of having done that with RDF? 14:54:37 Chair: this is something that is good to document ( one could do it later and keep it in bakc of mind or document it) 14:56:08 SteveS, and someone to fill this information out 14:56:22 ( not sure what the action semantics are on irc here ) 14:56:34 Steve and sandro 14:56:51 Kalpa has joined #ldp 14:57:34 sandro, in this spec how does a client introspect the knowledge that it is interacting with a graph store? in the LDP we expose and rdf:type value to know it's a container, wondering what's the equivalent in Graph Store protocol? 14:57:58 action: SteveS to review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it 14:57:58 Sorry, couldn't find user - SteveS 14:58:06 action: Steve to review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it 14:58:06 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - Steve 14:58:06 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. sspeiche, sbattle2) 14:58:13 zakim who is on phone 14:58:16 action: sspeiche to review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it 14:58:16 Created ACTION-4 - Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it [on Steve Speicher - due 2012-07-30]. 14:58:49 Topic: ? 14:58:56 zakim who is on the call 14:59:04 -Lee_Feigenbaum 14:59:44 zakim who is on the call? 15:00:01 ACTION: bblfish to add use case for non rdf content addition 15:00:01 Created ACTION-5 - Add use case for non rdf content addition [on Henry Story - due 2012-07-30]. 15:00:53 ACTION: sspeiche Review SDshare 15:00:53 Created ACTION-6 - Review SDshare [on Steve Speicher - due 2012-07-30]. 15:01:10 action: dret add a use case for authentication.authorization to the use case wiki page 15:01:10 Created ACTION-7 - Add a use case for authentication.authorization to the use case wiki page [on Erik Wilde - due 2012-07-30]. 15:03:09 thanks 15:03:10 -JohnArwe 15:03:11 -rgarcia 15:03:14 -SteveS 15:03:15 -dret 15:03:15 -sandro 15:03:16 -Ruben 15:03:16 -stevebattle 15:03:17 -svillata 15:03:17 -cygri 15:03:20 -Arnaud 15:03:21 Ruben has left #ldp 15:03:21 -boris 15:03:23 -krp 15:03:26 -kalpa 15:03:31 -MacTed 15:03:33 -bblfish 15:03:35 SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended 15:03:37 Attendees were sandro, Arnaud, +1.510.698.aabb, cygri, mkerrin, SteveS, svillata, MacTed, bblfish, JohnArwe, krp, dret, Ruben, rgarcia, stevebattle, Lee_Feigenbaum, boris, kalpa 15:03:45 stevebattle has left #ldp 15:06:46 will we get a preliminary version of the minutes right away (i.e., does somebody know the voodoo commands to generate them)? 15:07:22 give me 30 minutes. 15:07:31 sorting out some wiki permissions bug 15:08:38 sounds great, sandro, thanks a lot! 15:09:36 mkerrin has joined #ldp 15:12:33 JohnArwe has joined #ldp 15:42:26 cygri has joined #ldp 15:50:58 We had someone on the call today identied on IRC as "TomDN" Any clue who that is? I don't see such a person on http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=55082&public=1 15:56:36 sandro, i think TomDN is someone from prov-wg 15:57:19 sandro, it's Tom De Nies from IBBT 15:58:24 Hm. Okay, that helps a little. 15:58:29 I mean, that helps. 15:58:40 Now we need to find out why he's joining without joining. :-) 16:00:36 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 16:01:05 dret, notes are done, email sent. 16:06:35 gavinc has joined #ldp 16:07:31 Ugh, get up early to try and make telecon to at least start to get an idea what's going on... spend the morning fighting DDoS fires 16:09:13 gavinc, sounds like someone doesn't want you in this group? ;-) 16:09:48 Clearly. They took out a whole DNS network just to keep me away! 16:14:20 sandro, might have been zakim, ocnfusing two names, so maybe it was ruben from ibbt 16:15:02 Well, I guess I have 2 weeks till next telecon to write an intro email at least :D 16:22:41 gavinc, maybe zakim ddos'd you? did you piss him off recently? 17:01:08 Zakim has left #ldp 17:45:19 SteveS has joined #ldp 19:01:14 bblfish has joined #ldp 19:07:52 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 19:59:09 SteveS has joined #ldp 21:18:51 LeeF has joined #ldp 21:40:41 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 21:40:54 SteveS__ has joined #ldp 23:03:55 cygri has joined #ldp