IRC log of wcag2ict on 2012-07-13
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:48:54 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wcag2ict
- 13:48:54 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/13-wcag2ict-irc
- 13:48:56 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 13:48:56 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #wcag2ict
- 13:48:58 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 2428
- 13:48:58 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes
- 13:48:59 [trackbot]
- Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference
- 13:48:59 [trackbot]
- Date: 13 July 2012
- 13:49:28 [Andi]
- agenda+ Action items https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG2ICT-TF/track/actions/open
- 13:49:58 [Andi]
- agenda+ Summary of WCAG 2.0 decision on SC we sent for their review, starting with 1.2.2 and 1.2.4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag2ict-tf/2012Jul/0031.html
- 13:50:15 [Andi]
- agenda+ Work items to be completed for publication of first public working draft
- 13:50:58 [Andi]
- agenda+ Discuss strategies for blocking issues - "user interaction context", 2.4.1 and 3.2.3 survey comments, remaining SC https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUL062012/results
- 13:56:00 [David]
- David has joined #wcag2ict
- 13:56:39 [Zakim]
- WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has now started
- 13:56:46 [Zakim]
- +David_MacDonald
- 13:57:40 [Zakim]
- +Judy
- 13:59:01 [Zakim]
- +Andi_Snow_Weaver
- 13:59:53 [Andi]
- chair: Andi_Snow-Weaver
- 14:00:28 [Loic]
- Loic has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:00:56 [Mike]
- Mike has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:01:08 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 14:01:10 [korn]
- korn has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:01:15 [Zakim]
- +??P6
- 14:01:31 [Andi]
- zakim, Microsoft has Alex_Li
- 14:01:31 [Zakim]
- +Alex_Li; got it
- 14:01:34 [Zakim]
- +Kiran_Keja
- 14:01:51 [Zakim]
- +Bruce_Bailey
- 14:02:09 [Andi]
- zakim, ??P6 is Loic_Martinez_Normand
- 14:02:09 [Zakim]
- +Loic_Martinez_Normand; got it
- 14:02:13 [BBailey]
- BBailey has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:02:36 [Zakim]
- +??P9
- 14:02:40 [alex]
- alex has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:02:50 [Andi]
- zakim, ??P9 is Mike_Pluke
- 14:02:50 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Pluke; got it
- 14:02:59 [Zakim]
- -Judy
- 14:03:21 [Zakim]
- +Al_Hoffman
- 14:03:34 [Zakim]
- +Judy
- 14:04:19 [Zakim]
- +[Oracle]
- 14:04:20 [korn]
- Zakim, Oracle has Peter_Korn
- 14:04:20 [Zakim]
- +Peter_Korn; got it
- 14:04:24 [janina]
- janina has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:04:27 [Andi]
- scribe: Andi
- 14:04:38 [Andi]
- zakim, next item
- 14:04:38 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Action items https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG2ICT-TF/track/actions/open" taken up [from Andi]
- 14:04:38 [Kiran]
- Kiran has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:04:52 [Zakim]
- +??P12
- 14:05:02 [janina]
- zakim, ??P12 is Janina_Sajka
- 14:05:02 [Zakim]
- +Janina_Sajka; got it
- 14:05:23 [Andi]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG2ICT-TF/track/actions/18
- 14:06:36 [greggvanderheiden]
- greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:06:52 [Andi]
- leave action 18 open but will probably be resolved as part of the UI Context work
- 14:06:54 [Zakim]
- +??P13
- 14:07:09 [Andi]
- zakim, ??P13 is Gregg_Vanderheiden
- 14:07:09 [Zakim]
- +Gregg_Vanderheiden; got it
- 14:09:08 [Zakim]
- +Pierce_Crowell
- 14:09:37 [Andi]
- action: Judy to draft Introduction section
- 14:09:37 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-31 - Draft Introduction section [on Judy Brewer - due 2012-07-20].
- 14:09:43 [Pierce]
- Pierce has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:10:32 [Andi]
- action: Judy to finish drafting Frontmatter
- 14:10:32 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-32 - Finish drafting Frontmatter [on Judy Brewer - due 2012-07-20].
- 14:10:33 [Pierce]
- Pierce has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:10:45 [Zakim]
- -Judy
- 14:11:12 [Andi]
- leave actions 22 and 25 open to be resolved with action 24
- 14:11:22 [Zakim]
- +Judy
- 14:11:22 [Andi]
- zakim, next item
- 14:11:24 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Summary of WCAG 2.0 decision on SC we sent for their review, starting with 1.2.2 and 1.2.4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag2ict-tf/2012Jul/0031.html"
- 14:11:24 [Zakim]
- ... taken up [from Andi]
- 14:11:35 [Kiran]
- q+
- 14:12:25 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft]
- 14:12:25 [David]
- scribe: David
- 14:12:27 [Kiran]
- q-
- 14:12:47 [Andi]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/1-perceivable/12-provide-alternatives-for-time-based-media/122-captions-prerecorded
- 14:13:00 [David]
- Topic: 1.2.2 and 1.2.2
- 14:13:23 [David]
- s/1.2.2/1.2.4
- 14:13:40 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:13:45 [Judy]
- scribe: Judy
- 14:14:26 [korn]
- q+
- 14:14:46 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 14:15:14 [korn]
- Zakim, Microsoft has Alex_Li
- 14:15:14 [Zakim]
- +Alex_Li; got it
- 14:16:59 [Judy]
- RESOLUTION: Accept WCAG 2.0 proposal on 1.2.2 and 1.2.4 to remove the note about players [& fix closing quote]
- 14:17:41 [Andi]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/1-perceivable/14-make-it-easier-for-users-to-see-and-hear-content---including-separating-foreground-from-background/144-resize-text
- 14:18:04 [korn]
- This success criterion applies directly as written and as described in intent from Understanding WCAG 2.0.
- 14:18:04 [korn]
- Electronic content and electronic documents that have software players, viewers or editors with a 200 percent zoom feature would automatically meet this SC unless the content or document will not work with zoom.
- 14:18:04 [korn]
- The INTENT refers to the ability to allow users to enlarge the text on screen at least up to 200 % without needing to use assistive technologies. This means that either the application itself, or one of the platforms under it, provides some means for enlarging the text 200% (zoom or otherwise) without loss of content or functionality. If a platform capability is relied upon, the application supports the platform capability.
- 14:18:32 [Andi]
- WCAG asked us to remove this sentence: If a platform capability is relied upon, the application supports the platform capability.
- 14:18:41 [korn]
- q+
- 14:19:12 [BBailey]
- q+
- 14:19:26 [Judy]
- Discussion about what was the WG concern regarding platform capability
- 14:19:43 [alex]
- q+
- 14:19:43 [Pierce]
- Pierce has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:19:51 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:20:20 [Andi]
- q+ Gregg_Vanderheiden
- 14:20:20 [Pierce]
- +q
- 14:20:26 [Andi]
- ack bbbailey
- 14:20:29 [Mike]
- q+
- 14:20:41 [Andi]
- ack bbailey
- 14:20:59 [Judy]
- Was is circuitous, or non-essential? Possibly reword as a note? Seems that it just needed clarification of the wording.
- 14:21:15 [Andi]
- ack alex
- 14:21:55 [Andi]
- http://www.w3.org/2012/07/05-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item03
- 14:22:11 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:22:34 [korn]
- q+
- 14:22:37 [BBailey]
- q+ to say that "the application supports the platform capability" is a statement, not a *requirement"
- 14:22:53 [Andi]
- If a platform capability is provided, the application supports the platform capability.
- 14:22:56 [Andi]
- ack pierce
- 14:23:03 [Andi]
- ack mike
- 14:23:06 [Kiran]
- q+
- 14:23:18 [Loic]
- q+
- 14:23:22 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:23:47 [Judy]
- Checking WG survey responses. Seems that it's an essential concept that is not addressed in the paragraph clearly or sufficiently.
- 14:23:54 [Andi]
- ack bbail
- 14:23:54 [Zakim]
- BBailey, you wanted to say that "the application supports the platform capability" is a statement, not a *requirement"
- 14:24:11 [Andi]
- ack kiran
- 14:24:44 [korn]
- q+
- 14:25:03 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:25:12 [korn]
- q-
- 14:25:50 [Andi]
- This means that the application provides some means for enlarging the text 200% (zoom or otherwise) without loss of content or functionality or that the application supports the platform features that meets this requirement.
- 14:25:55 [Andi]
- ack loic
- 14:26:08 [Judy]
- If one solely relies on the platform, it foregoes the possibility that a developer would go beyond the platform support.
- 14:26:09 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:26:11 [Andi]
- q+
- 14:27:39 [korn]
- q+
- 14:27:56 [Judy]
- Discussion of other interpretations. WG captured the following, though: this seems insufficiently clear, and the TF is invited to re-word and re-submit. That was the conclusion from WG discussion.
- 14:28:51 [Judy]
- We talked about relying on zoom -- when you rely on that, you need not to defeat that. You need to _work with_ the zoom feature.
- 14:28:58 [Andi]
- This means that the application provides some means for enlarging the text 200% (zoom or otherwise) without loss of content or functionality or that the application works with the platform features that meets this requirement.
- 14:29:26 [Judy]
- But it needs not to be worded with "support" since that might confuse people wrt to accessibility support.
- 14:30:34 [Judy]
- Perhaps re-word the sentence before? General comments of, 'that works'...
- 14:32:35 [Judy]
- RESOLUTION: Accept 1.4.4 as amended (New Proposal from TF meeting 13July12)
- 14:33:12 [Andi]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/3-understandable/33-help-users-avoid-and-correct-mistakes/331-error-identification
- 14:33:49 [korn]
- q+
- 14:33:56 [Loic]
- q+
- 14:34:02 [Andi]
- ack andi
- 14:34:27 [Pierce_]
- Pierce_ has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:34:32 [korn]
- q-
- 14:34:32 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:35:00 [Judy]
- Discussion on error identification.
- 14:35:47 [Andi]
- ack loic
- 14:35:49 [Judy]
- Perhaps just position as an explanatory note. Some people may not think about how input errors are processed, but not really part of the intent.
- 14:36:51 [korn]
- +1
- 14:37:04 [Judy]
- Shall we send the WG a note to modify the intent? They approved this, with the exception of those paragraphs.
- 14:37:36 [Judy]
- Andi takes action to draft the modification proposal.
- 14:37:42 [Andi]
- action: Andi to draft proposal to modify WCAG intent for 3.3.1 to replace note about definition of input error
- 14:37:42 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-33 - Draft proposal to modify WCAG intent for 3.3.1 to replace note about definition of input error [on Andi Snow-Weaver - due 2012-07-20].
- 14:38:34 [Judy]
- RESOLUTION: Accept WCAG proposal to remove last two paragraphs of 3.3.1
- 14:39:10 [Judy]
- Discussion of Parsing; the WG didn't accept our wording, and asked us to try again.
- 14:39:12 [korn]
- Andi - I volunteer for both... Can I have those AIs in this tracker?
- 14:39:28 [Judy]
- Reminder of pending actions assigned at the WG meeting. Re-record those here.
- 14:39:46 [Andi]
- action: Peter to draft new proposal for 2.4.6 taking into consideration the WCAG survey comments
- 14:39:46 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-34 - Draft new proposal for 2.4.6 taking into consideration the WCAG survey comments [on Peter Korn - due 2012-07-20].
- 14:40:16 [Andi]
- action: Peter to work with Loretta, James, Michael, and Bruce to draft new proposal on 4.1.1
- 14:40:17 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-35 - Work with Loretta, James, Michael, and Bruce to draft new proposal on 4.1.1 [on Peter Korn - due 2012-07-20].
- 14:41:50 [Judy]
- Checking on which items to add to the WCAG WG survey... yes, we're sending them item 1.3.1.
- 14:42:01 [Andi]
- zakim, next item
- 14:42:01 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Work items to be completed for publication of first public working draft" taken up [from Andi]
- 14:42:10 [Judy]
- Maybe also our 3.1.1 note.
- 14:43:02 [greggvanderheiden]
- q+
- 14:43:44 [Andi]
- ack gregg
- 14:44:09 [Andi]
- 1.3.2 Meaningful sequence https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/3-understandable/33-help-users-avoid-and-correct-mistakes/331-error-identification
- 14:44:09 [Pierce_]
- l
- 14:44:27 [korn]
- +1
- 14:44:30 [Loic]
- +1
- 14:44:47 [Andi]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/project-plan
- 14:44:50 [Judy]
- Discussion of what we need to get done before publishing our first public WD. Probably won't yet have consensus on user interface @@. Other pieces, perhaps to be sent up with simpler language.
- 14:44:50 [Pierce_]
- +1
- 14:46:11 [korn]
- q+
- 14:46:32 [Judy]
- Considering 1.3.2, 1.4.2, 1.4.3... these were consensed without that term defined, but since consensus on the term was pending, proposing sending these anyway.
- 14:47:23 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:47:23 [korn]
- q-
- 14:48:13 [Andi]
- also 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 3.3.2, 3.3.3
- 14:50:31 [korn]
- q+
- 14:50:38 [alex]
- q+
- 14:50:54 [Judy]
- One sentence was a concern, regarding non-web context that doesn't have activity behind it. Specific concern regarding relation to a particular success criteria... re-examine before sending up? Wording around "interactive context" may need attention.
- 14:52:06 [Judy]
- 2.4.2 & 2.4.3 may be OK on this; 2.3.2 has the issue, 1.3.2 doesn't have it... nor 1.4.2, nor 1.4.3
- 14:52:29 [Zakim]
- -David_MacDonald
- 14:52:50 [korn]
- E.g. for 3.3.3, remove the 2nd paragraph from:
- 14:52:50 [korn]
- Additional guidance when applying to Electronic Documents and Software Aspects of ProductsThis applies directly as written, and as described in INTENT from Understanding WCAG 2.0 (above).For non-web electronic documents without interactivity beyond hyperlinks - (no scripting or programming) - this SC would be automatically met. Note: The WCAG 2.0 definition of "input error" says that it is "information provided by the user that is not accepted" by
- 14:52:59 [Judy]
- only 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 have the issue --
- 14:53:02 [Zakim]
- +David_MacDonald
- 14:53:02 [korn]
- [sorry, paragraphs don't come through in IRC]
- 14:53:15 [Judy]
- s/2.3.2 has the issue,//
- 14:53:23 [korn]
- To make it easier: https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/2-operable/24-provide-ways-to-help-users-navigate-find-content-and-determine-where-they-are/242-page-titled">https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/2-operable/24-provide-ways-to-help-users-navigate-find-content-and-determine-where-they-are/242-page-titled && https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/2-operable/24-provide-ways-to-help-users-navigate-find-content-and-determine-where-they-are/242-page-titled
- 14:54:22 [Judy]
- RESOLUTION: Remove paragraph about non-web documents automatically complying from 3.3.2 and 3.3.3
- 14:54:49 [Judy]
- RESOLUTION: send 1.3.2, 1.4.2, 1.4.3, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 3.3.2, and 3.3.3 to WCAG for approval
- 14:57:12 [Judy]
- Draft page now updated as well. Discussion of capturing resolution. Historical proposals still available.
- 14:57:22 [Loic]
- q+
- 14:57:29 [korn]
- q-
- 14:57:29 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 14:57:32 [alex]
- q-
- 14:57:45 [greggvanderheiden]
- ack l
- 14:58:08 [korn]
- q+
- 14:58:30 [Mike_]
- Mike_ has joined #wcag2ict
- 14:59:47 [Judy]
- Discussion of clean-up of 3.3.1 and 3.3.3
- 15:00:21 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 15:00:42 [Andi]
- zakim, ??P1 is Mike_Pluke
- 15:00:42 [Zakim]
- +Mike_Pluke; got it
- 15:01:44 [Judy]
- RESOLUTION: Remove note about the definition of input error from 3.3.3 and add 3.3.3 to the action item about proposing an edit to 3.3.1 intent
- 15:03:47 [Judy]
- Discussion of other things we need to do before publishing
- 15:05:28 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Pluke
- 15:05:45 [Judy]
- General intent or introductory section will be to reflect the context from the TF work statement, and to provide a succinct overview of the doc, and to reinforce the context of this document as differentiated from context of WCAG 2.0 and other supporting WCAG 2.0 docs.
- 15:06:02 [Andi]
- zakim, who is on the queue?
- 15:06:02 [Zakim]
- I see korn on the speaker queue
- 15:06:08 [korn]
- q-
- 15:06:24 [Judy]
- Discussion of needing a "content" paragraph to refer back to in intro from items where we'd said we'd be referring back up to that paragraph.
- 15:07:49 [Judy]
- Michael and Shadi will be pulling together the other parts of the draft to prepare for publication.
- 15:08:16 [Andi]
- https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/quick-view
- 15:10:01 [Judy]
- Discussion of existing language for the items that are pointing to the intended statement of content in the intro.
- 15:10:03 [Judy]
- q+
- 15:10:22 [Andi]
- ack judy
- 15:11:44 [korn]
- q+
- 15:11:59 [Judy]
- No objections to leaving those statements in the items that point to an intended definition of content that will be in the intro once consensed, even if that isn't stable yet.
- 15:12:02 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 15:12:16 [Judy]
- Discussion of order change wrt discussion of software.
- 15:12:35 [Loic]
- q+
- 15:13:09 [Loic]
- I can hear you
- 15:13:17 [Andi]
- ack loic
- 15:13:18 [Loic]
- Ok.
- 15:13:39 [Loic]
- First. I think that there is no general agreement on "software user interface".
- 15:13:58 [korn]
- +1 for Andi
- 15:14:01 [Loic]
- At least Gregg thinks that "software aspects of products" is better (I don't).
- 15:14:38 [Loic]
- So we should first agree on what terms to use before agreeing on replacing
- 15:14:54 [Loic]
- Ok, What's the deadline?
- 15:15:25 [alex]
- monday
- 15:16:13 [korn]
- q+
- 15:17:11 [Loic]
- To Gregg: We could also use "software that provides a user interface". This is what we did in M 376.
- 15:18:27 [Loic]
- (I'm trying to reconnect to see I you can hear me)
- 15:18:33 [Zakim]
- -Loic_Martinez_Normand
- 15:18:51 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 15:18:53 [Judy]
- Software user interface language should be consistent... But guidelines apply to web content; most people think of SW user interface controls, they don't think of the content. Software aspects of products may give a clearer scope. But some SW doesn't have a UI at all, or instance middleware. So, SW UI. Further discussion....
- 15:19:04 [Andi]
- zakimm, ??P2 is Loic_Martinez_Normand
- 15:19:21 [Judy]
- zakim, ??P2 is Loic_Martinez_Normand
- 15:19:21 [Zakim]
- +Loic_Martinez_Normand; got it
- 15:19:43 [Loic]
- q+
- 15:19:58 [Andi]
- ack korn
- 15:21:34 [Judy]
- Would be helpful to pull together a page showing current inconsistencies in how we're using the terms, even where we may not be sure of final wording for all contexts.
- 15:21:50 [Andi]
- ack Loic
- 15:22:01 [Loic]
- Can you hear me?
- 15:22:07 [Loic]
- Ok. I take the action.
- 15:22:55 [Andi]
- action: Loic to create a page that collects all of the guidance that uses some variation of the "software" term
- 15:22:55 [trackbot]
- Sorry, couldn't find user - Loic
- 15:24:21 [Judy]
- Discussing examples of software-related terminology that we're using differently in different places.
- 15:24:28 [Zakim]
- -Mike_Pluke.a
- 15:24:44 [korn]
- +1
- 15:25:04 [Judy]
- General happiness at Andi picking consistent terminology. Then we'll review it.
- 15:25:25 [korn]
- +1
- 15:25:48 [Judy]
- And "document" should be "electronic document"? Multiple "yes" from around the room.
- 15:27:30 [Andi]
- the editor's draft doesn't have the date as part of the URL: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/
- 15:28:16 [BBailey]
- q+
- 15:28:43 [Judy]
- And our TF proposed draft, needs to link to the current WCAG WG Editor's Draft. Discussion of evergreen linking. Needs confirmation w/ Michael C. Gregg will ask linkage and production questions, cc'd.
- 15:29:02 [Zakim]
- -Al_Hoffman
- 15:29:24 [Andi]
- ack bb
- 15:29:27 [Andi]
- zakim, next item
- 15:29:28 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Discuss strategies for blocking issues - "user interaction context", 2.4.1 and 3.2.3 survey comments, remaining SC
- 15:29:30 [Zakim]
- ... https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUL062012/results" taken up [from Andi]
- 15:29:56 [Loic]
- BYe
- 15:29:58 [Judy]
- Lots to get through on Tuesday to prepare for publishing.
- 15:30:00 [Zakim]
- -David_MacDonald
- 15:30:01 [Zakim]
- -Bruce_Bailey
- 15:30:02 [Zakim]
- -Andi_Snow_Weaver
- 15:30:03 [Zakim]
- -Janina_Sajka
- 15:30:04 [Zakim]
- -Pierce_Crowell
- 15:30:06 [Zakim]
- -[Oracle]
- 15:30:07 [Zakim]
- -Kiran_Keja
- 15:30:08 [Andi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:30:08 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/13-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi
- 15:30:09 [Zakim]
- -Loic_Martinez_Normand
- 15:30:09 [janina]
- janina has left #wcag2ict
- 15:30:09 [korn]
- korn has left #wcag2ict
- 15:30:10 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft]
- 15:31:00 [Zakim]
- -Judy
- 15:36:00 [Zakim]
- disconnecting the lone participant, Gregg_Vanderheiden, in WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM
- 15:36:03 [Zakim]
- WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has ended
- 15:36:03 [Zakim]
- Attendees were David_MacDonald, Judy, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Alex_Li, Kiran_Keja, Bruce_Bailey, Loic_Martinez_Normand, Mike_Pluke, Al_Hoffman, Peter_Korn, Janina_Sajka,
- 15:36:03 [Zakim]
- ... Gregg_Vanderheiden, Pierce_Crowell
- 17:54:05 [greggvanderheiden]
- greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict
- 18:12:20 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #wcag2ict
- 20:22:41 [Andi]
- Andi has joined #wcag2ict
- 20:26:37 [Andi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 20:26:37 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/13-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi
- 20:26:52 [Andi]
- zakim, bye
- 20:26:52 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wcag2ict
- 20:29:24 [Andi]
- s/Loïc_Martinez_Normand/Loic_Martinez_Normand/
- 20:30:03 [Andi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 20:30:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/13-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi
- 20:32:44 [Andi]
- s/Andi - I volunteer for both... Can I have those AIs in this tracker?//
- 20:33:31 [Andi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 20:33:31 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/13-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi