07:55:39 RRSAgent has joined #egov 07:55:39 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/09-egov-irc 07:55:44 Zakim has joined #egov 07:55:57 good morning everybody - good morning Phil! 07:58:21 zakim, this is egov 07:58:21 ok, PhilA; that matches T&S_EGOV(Eurasian)4:00AM 07:58:21 deirdrelee has joined #egov 07:58:28 zakim, code? 07:58:28 the conference code is 3468 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), PhilA 07:58:56 +??P3 07:59:02 zakim, ??P3 is me 07:59:02 +PhilA; got it 07:59:24 +deirdrelee 07:59:27 zakim, mute me 07:59:27 PhilA should now be muted 07:59:32 zakim, unmute me 07:59:32 PhilA should no longer be muted 08:00:41 trackbot-ng, start telcon 08:00:43 RRSAgent, make logs public 08:00:45 Zakim, this will be EGOV 08:00:45 ok, trackbot, I see T&S_EGOV(Eurasian)4:00AM already started 08:00:46 Meeting: eGovernment Interest Group Teleconference 08:00:46 Date: 09 July 2012 08:00:55 scribe: deridrelee 08:00:57 LaurenceNZ has joined #egov 08:02:10 zakim, who is here? 08:02:10 On the phone I see +8532871aaaa, PhilA, deirdrelee 08:02:11 On IRC I see LaurenceNZ, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, elsa, PhilA, agipap, tomasz, ed_, CaptSolo, sandro, trackbot 08:02:23 chair: tomasz 08:02:53 zakim, aaaa 08:02:53 I don't understand 'aaaa', tomasz 08:02:53 agenda: http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/images/6/6d/Roadmap_slides_4.pdf 08:03:01 zakim, aaaa is tomasz 08:03:01 +tomasz; got it 08:03:15 zakim, tomasz has elsa 08:03:15 +elsa; got it 08:03:30 zakim, who is where? 08:03:30 I don't understand your question, PhilA. 08:03:35 zakim, who is here? 08:03:35 On the phone I see tomasz, PhilA, deirdrelee 08:03:36 tomasz has elsa 08:03:36 On IRC I see LaurenceNZ, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, elsa, PhilA, agipap, tomasz, ed_, CaptSolo, sandro, trackbot 08:03:53 agipap: will you dial in? 08:04:03 CaptSolo: ytou too? 08:04:46 can't at the moment, problem with telco lines 08:05:45 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-egov-ig/2012Jul/0008.html 08:06:56 LaurenceNZ: will you be dialling in? 08:07:53 3468 does not seem to get me in 08:08:02 +??P12 08:08:33 zakim, ??P12 is LaurenceNZ 08:08:33 +LaurenceNZ; got it 08:09:09 zakim, who is here? 08:09:09 On the phone I see tomasz, PhilA, deirdrelee, LaurenceNZ 08:09:10 tomasz has elsa 08:09:10 On IRC I see LaurenceNZ, deirdrelee, Zakim, RRSAgent, elsa, PhilA, agipap, tomasz, ed_, CaptSolo, sandro, trackbot 08:10:13 presentation is at http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/images/6/6d/Roadmap_slides_4.pdf 08:11:10 tomasz: aim of telco is to discuss #egov roadmap 08:11:48 PhilA: it would be good to introduce ourselves at some stage, to get to know each other 08:12:27 tomasz: introducing himself, works in Macau 08:12:35 ... with tomasz is Elsa 08:13:06 LaurencNZ: in Wellington, working in eGov 2004-2009, now an advisor in eGovernment 08:13:55 ... has been following eGov group for long time, but time of telcos were barrier to participate, delighted about new structure 08:14:12 PhilA: would be great to get more participants from Eurasian area 08:14:29 ... works in W3C and on European Commission projects 08:14:48 ... role to facilitate eGov group and support Jeanne and Tomasz 08:15:12 deirdrelee: I'm at DERI, Galway 08:15:22 ... focused on sem web, linked data etc. 08:15:37 ... in eGov we want to apply those techs to public data 08:15:44 ... eParticipation etc. 08:15:53 ... lots of European projects and national level 08:16:32 topic: draft #egov roadmap 08:17:15 tomasz: need to organise discussions, roadmap can help 08:17:45 ... present context of domain in general and this group 08:18:14 ... Public Sector ICT is a well established area 08:18:47 ... describes evolving goals 08:19:23 LaurenceNZ: elaborate on policy and development goals 08:19:33 tomasz: will further on in presentation 08:20:05 ... question mark over where this area will go next 08:20:59 ... there are corresponding goals, challenges and limitations to technology in governmnet 08:21:17 s/governmnet/government 08:22:13 ... stage 1 of Public Sector ICT is technology in government 08:22:16 ... stage 2 of Public Sector ICT is electronic government 08:22:35 ... stage 2 of Public Sector ICT is electronic governance 08:22:52 s/stage 2/stage3 08:25:39 ... policy-driven electronic governance 08:26:22 ... why and how will be guided by the policy framework 08:27:43 LaurenceNZ; not sure if policy-cycle is only available in stage 4 08:28:00 ... in many countries it is available in earlier stages as well 08:28:41 tomasz: agrees with comment, but particularly at the local-level we have to look at specific policy objectives 08:30:37 ... describes related W3C standards an themes around eGov 08:31:17 ... poses question, how to organise existing themes, discussions and outcomes of the W3C EGOV IG with respect to each other and with respect to the larger thematic context? 08:31:40 ... roadmap addresses this question 08:32:38 ... defines localisation of framework 08:33:16 ... concrete example of policy goal is sustainable development 08:34:46 ... discusses questions related to how eGov can be achieved 08:35:07 ... discusses questions related to why eGov is important, i.e. what is the value proposition 08:35:24 ... hope group members can help add some questions to those already defined 08:35:45 ... discusses questions related to the localisation of eGov 08:36:31 ... describes an example of UNU of transfer of knowledge to other countries 08:37:04 .... discuses questions related to the foundations of eGov 08:37:41 ... there has been discussion on the mailing list if we should pursue the definition of eGov at a conceptual level 08:37:46 ... with mixed responses 08:38:20 ... looks at social media as an example of an eGov theme 08:38:39 ... and how it relates to policy framework 08:39:55 ... presents matrix of eGov dimensions and themes 08:40:34 ... describes how members can contribute to the implementation of this roadmap 08:40:54 ... through creating new questions, addressing existing questions, etc. 08:41:35 ... members can also contribute through the bimonthly conference calls 08:42:24 ... hopes to create technical notes based on group discussions 08:42:48 ... any questions/input? 08:43:19 PhilA: role is to support work in group 08:43:33 ... picking up on some outcomes of recent events 08:43:44 ... should there be a greater emphasis on digital divide? 08:44:20 ... how much effort for public administrations to make services available to those not online? 08:44:39 ... how could group help with this question? 08:45:14 Tomasz: matching supply and demand of services, not much use providing services if they are not used 08:45:36 ... gives example of ?? where training was provided to support online services 08:45:47 s/??/Estonia/ 08:45:53 it was estonia 08:46:15 ... integration of online and offline services, as well as services that are provided across different channels 08:46:32 Elsa: also provision of services across multiple digital channels 08:46:43 ... this could be added as a theme of discussion 08:47:20 PhilA: does not agree that the Web is not distinct from mobile and TV, as the Web is a multi-channel platform, 08:47:59 ... if the service is made available in adaptable format, then Web can be seen as multi-channel 08:48:26 Tomasz: this is not just a technical challenge, but also an organisational challenge 08:48:55 LaurenceNZ: delivery to mobile devices is fragmented, compared to Web delivery, 08:49:14 ... suggests this is due to widespread Web standards 08:49:16 A big +1 to LaurenceNZ 08:50:02 ... disagrees with Tomasz that providing on a mobile device will require change to back-office, as this will be handled by middleware 08:50:52 ... regarding digital divide, when you reach a critical mass, you can turn off other channels 08:51:12 q+ 08:51:16 ... gives example of letting and company registration 08:52:00 ... at a certain point, public services can be offered online only, there are ways of handling this 08:52:36 ... for example in Denmark, citizens can go through an agent or Internet cafe, where the online service is utilised 08:53:17 Tomasz: to clarify on back-office, he meant more general, not just different electronic channels 08:53:43 ... the nature of digital divide is changing over time. 08:54:14 ... it was originally about access to Internet, but now is more about education about Internet usage 08:54:57 q? 08:55:08 q+ 08:55:16 ack LaurenceNZ 08:55:30 ack me 08:56:00 q? 08:56:29 PhilA: interested in LaurenceNZ's comment on public services completely online 08:56:37 ... examples given are B2B, 08:56:57 ... how does services for individuals fit in? 08:57:26 LaurenceNZ: similar, census is coming up next here and they are hoping to get ??% online 08:57:59 ... same principle for indivuals' services, you provide incentives 08:58:23 ... gradual introduction 08:59:08 q+ 08:59:30 PhilA: Neelie Kroes commented that 1/3 of European households do not have internet connection at home and 1/2 of European adults have not been online 08:59:50 ... shocking when Denmark claims it has no digital divide 09:00:03 ack me 09:00:04 Tomasz: they have mobiles 09:00:57 Elsa: topic to discuss is the take-up of public services 09:01:28 Tomasz: any comments concerning the roadmap itself? 09:01:44 q+ 09:01:59 ack ? 09:02:00 ... any suggestions on how to improve the roadmap? 09:02:13 q- elsa 09:02:34 LaurenceNZ: in relation to value proposition, it is not clear what is meant by sustainable development 09:02:55 Tomasz: SD is an example of a policy objective 09:04:38 LaurenceNZ: doesn't see how framework/matrix can help for all policy objectives 09:04:54 ... policy objectives should be rows on matrix 09:05:01 tomasz: agrees 09:06:22 deirdrelee: In relation to the outcomes. The roadmap covers the different topic areas, but with regards to outcomes, it seems a little vague still 09:06:43 ... what kind of recommendations do we want to make? 09:07:05 tomasz: So you're making a distinction between the topics and the outcomes? 09:07:27 deirdrelee: Yes. The danger is that we have endless interesting discussions that don't achieve anything 09:07:34 tomasz: I agree 09:07:54 ack deirdrelee 09:08:10 tomasz: We need to think about how the roadmap can lead to specific outputs 09:08:26 elsa: One possibility would be to apply the roadmap to specific themes of interest 09:09:14 PhilA: was in the room when roadmap was being discussed 09:09:24 ... theme of social media comes up a lot 09:09:42 ... many governments have published guidelines on how to use social media 09:10:22 ... look at how social media is used by citizens to feed back into governments 09:10:44 ... so to focus on a theme, such as social media, could be useful to focus group 09:10:53 ... to apply roadmap 09:11:14 Elsa: start thinking about questions related to social media 09:11:46 tomasz: the social media theme was given as an example on slide 23 of presentation 09:11:56 ... with questions associated with it 09:12:39 LaurenceNZ: agrees to roadtest roadmap with a theme like social media and ?? 09:13:15 ... struggling to understand what is meant by 'localisation' in the roadmap 09:13:56 ... surprised that localisation refers to a particular country 09:14:22 ... as most eGov refers to a particular country anyway 09:14:42 ... apart from some global organisations, like OECD 09:14:57 ... we need to think of a better word than localisation 09:15:21 ... transnational is not as relevant as sub-national and regional transfer of eGov practices 09:15:55 Tomasz: agrees 09:16:46 ... there are many standards/models/etc. from international organisations that don't take into account the localisation of eGov practices 09:16:56 ... at a national level 09:17:39 q+ 09:17:54 ... there is a need for eGov to go sectoral 09:18:01 ack me 09:18:08 ... not just horizontal 09:18:23 ack PhilA 09:18:51 PhilA: thinks in terms of standards 09:19:25 ... if ewhen writing a standard is applicable to NZ system, but not Danish, it is not published, and they go back to something that is applicable to all 09:19:38 ... otherwise it is application-specific 09:20:12 ... any implmentation will be in a specific context, but a guideline should be applicable in any context, otherwise guideline is wrong 09:21:49 LaurenceNZ: understands context is important, but, to go back at stages outlined in roadmap, eGov practices depends on the stage the particular country is at 09:22:37 tomasz: agrees that localisation dimension requires more work 09:23:15 Elsa: is there a common repository where we can share resources? 09:23:22 There is a wiki http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Main_Page 09:23:52 PhilA: members of the group will have login to be able to edit wiki 09:24:28 tomasz: to summarise, we covered multi-channel delivery of services 09:24:49 ... some governments decision to provide services only online 09:25:08 ... to test roadmap with example of a topic, e.g. social media 09:25:30 ... the roadmap will be revised and a new version created 09:25:39 .... will discuss suggestions with Jeanne 09:26:23 LaurenceNZ: how to use SIP with skype? 09:26:46 PhilA: SIP is different protocol than Skype 09:26:57 rrsagent, draft minutes 09:26:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/09-egov-minutes.html PhilA 09:27:17 -deirdrelee 09:27:19 -PhilA 09:27:28 -tomasz 09:27:35 zakim, bye 09:27:35 leaving. As of this point the attendees were +8532871aaaa, PhilA, deirdrelee, elsa, LaurenceNZ 09:27:36 Zakim has left #egov 09:47:08 PhilA has left #egov 09:48:44 agipap has left #egov 10:14:57 PDM has joined #egov 12:19:47 josema has joined #egov 12:53:12 MacTed has joined #egov 13:05:00 jose_ma has joined #egov 13:05:26 josema has joined #egov 13:06:09 jose_ma has joined #egov 13:16:06 bhyland has joined #egov 13:26:24 bhyland has joined #egov 13:34:15 ed_ has left #egov