13:54:45 RRSAgent has joined #wcag2ict 13:54:45 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-wcag2ict-irc 13:54:47 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:54:47 Zakim has joined #wcag2ict 13:54:49 Zakim, this will be 2428 13:54:49 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 13:54:50 Meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference 13:54:50 Date: 03 July 2012 13:55:02 chair: Mike_Pluke 13:55:05 scribe: Andi 13:56:16 Judy has joined #wcag2ict 13:57:17 BBailey has joined #wcag2ict 13:57:17 agenda+ Action item review http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG2ICT-TF/track/actions/open 13:58:23 WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM has now started 13:58:30 +Bruce_Bailey 13:58:34 agenda+ Return to June 22nd Meeting Prep Survey, to finish 3.1.2 Language of Parts https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN052012/results#xq8 13:58:35 + +1.571.296.aaaa 13:58:43 Mike has joined #wcag2ict 13:59:11 +Andi_Snow_Weaver 13:59:27 +??P10 13:59:46 agenda- Return to June 22nd Meeting Prep Survey, to finish 3.1.2 Language of Parts https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN052012/results#xq8 13:59:56 loicmn has joined #wcag2ict 14:00:06 s|agenda- Return to June 22nd Meeting Prep Survey, to finish 3.1.2 Language of Parts https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN052012/results#xq8|| 14:00:20 +Gregg_Vanderheiden 14:00:26 zakim, .aaaa is Allen_Hoffman 14:00:26 sorry, BBailey, I do not recognize a party named '.aaaa' 14:00:31 janina has joined #wcag2ict 14:00:32 MaryJo has joined #WCAG2ICT 14:00:33 greggvanderheiden has joined #wcag2ict 14:00:44 zakim, aaaa is Allen_Hoffman 14:00:44 +Allen_Hoffman; got it 14:00:54 +??P14 14:01:15 +Mary_Jo_Mueller 14:01:32 +Cooper 14:01:39 agenda+ Return to June 5th Meeting Prep Survey, starting with 3.1.1 Language of Page https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN052012/results#xq8 14:01:45 +Kiran_Keja 14:01:54 +??P20 14:02:13 agenda+ Return to June 22nd Meeting Prep Survey, to finish 3.1.2 Language of Parts https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN222012/results#xq1 14:02:18 zakim, ??P10 is Mike_Pluke 14:02:18 +Mike_Pluke; got it 14:02:26 zakim, mute me 14:02:26 sorry, janina, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 14:02:36 zakim, ??P20 is Janina_Sajka 14:02:36 +Janina_Sajka; got it 14:02:43 agenda+ Re-survey on 2.4.2 Page Titled https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUL032012/results 14:02:43 zakim, mute me 14:02:44 Janina_Sajka should now be muted 14:03:15 Kiran has joined #wcag2ict 14:03:17 +Judy 14:03:20 rrsagent, make minutes 14:03:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 14:03:22 zakim, ??P14 is Loïc_Martínez_Normand 14:03:22 +Loïc_Martínez_Normand; got it 14:04:46 zakim, next ite 14:04:46 I don't understand 'next ite', Andi 14:04:51 zakim, next item 14:04:51 agendum 1. "Action item review http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG2ICT-TF/track/actions/open" taken up [from Andi] 14:05:44 action-17? 14:05:45 ACTION-17 -- Gregg Vanderheiden to clarify when WCAG 2.0 Understanding document is likely to be published with these updates -- due 2012-07-03 -- OPEN 14:05:45 http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG2ICT-TF/track/actions/17 14:06:24 q+ 14:06:48 q- 14:07:52 AS: WCAG will update Understanding document as an "Editor's Draft" 14:08:15 AS: can't publish upated "Public Working Draft" of a W3C Note 14:08:58 JB: want to make it clear that for the WCAG2ICT document, even though it will be a W3C Note, we can still publish a "Public Working Draft" 14:09:06 JB: ... for review 14:10:03 GV: will get comments on the WCAG2ICT public working draft - will have to address comments in addition to continuing our work 14:10:14 close action 17 14:10:26 s/close action 17// 14:10:38 zakim, next item 14:10:38 agendum 2. "Return to June 22nd Meeting Prep Survey, to finish 3.1.2 Language of Parts https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN052012/results#xq8" taken up [from Andi] 14:10:45 zakim, close item 14:10:45 I don't understand 'close item', Andi 14:11:32 zakim, close this item 14:11:32 agendum 2 closed 14:11:33 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:11:33 3. Return to June 5th Meeting Prep Survey, starting with 3.1.1 Language of Page https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN052012/results#xq8 [from Andi] 14:11:37 zakim, next item 14:11:37 agendum 3. "Return to June 5th Meeting Prep Survey, starting with 3.1.1 Language of Page https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN052012/results#xq8" taken up [from Andi] 14:13:14 q+ 14:13:29 q+ 14:13:33 q+ 14:13:35 q+ Al_Hoffman 14:13:43 q- 14:14:10 q- Al_Hoffman 14:14:15 ack Andi 14:14:22 q+ to ask about difference between "software" and "software product" 14:14:46 +Pierce_Crowell 14:14:57 AS: Does screen reader use the locale information the same way it does the lang attribute on HTML 14:15:10 AH: Doesn't think it does 14:15:22 GV: under GPII, it will 14:15:41 GV: normally set OS and screen reader to same language 14:16:28 s/it does the lang attribute on HTML/it does the lang attribute on HTML?/ 14:17:02 Pierce has joined #wcag2ict 14:17:07 GV: issue of support in document formats for input and output formats 14:17:18 -Janina_Sajka 14:17:45 KK: concerned about using "document or software product" - should just be "document" 14:18:07 q+ 14:18:12 ack Kiran 14:18:21 zakim, call janina 14:18:21 ok, janina; the call is being made 14:18:22 +Janina 14:18:29 q+ 14:19:04 -Janina 14:19:16 OK, sorry 14:19:34 I'll retry sip 14:19:58 +??P20 14:20:10 zakim, ??P20 is Janina_Sajka 14:20:10 +Janina_Sajka; got it 14:20:17 zakim, mute me 14:20:17 Janina_Sajka should now be muted 14:20:21 q+ 14:20:38 GV: back to the question of locale - if something is programmatically exposed but there is no AT that accesses it, it's not "accessibility supported" 14:21:16 GV: if software exposes and there is no AT that uses it, then the SC can't be met 14:21:54 GV: AT doesn't move from machine to machine, people don't generally change their locale on a given machine 14:22:18 GV: not sure AT would ever need to determine the language, may need to defer this one 14:22:28 q+ Al_Hoffman 14:22:37 ack bbailey 14:22:37 BBailey, you wanted to ask about difference between "software" and "software product" 14:23:05 BB: some places we say "document or software" - here now we're saying "document or software PRODUCT" 14:24:09 ack mike 14:24:46 MP: M376 came up with two interpretations 14:25:14 MP: only applicable for formats that support a way to specify the human language of the document 14:25:51 +q 14:26:18 ack loic 14:27:15 LM: regarding separate languages for input and output purposes, example of Spanish form that you have to complete in English 14:28:17 Loic's issue should be handled by inline lang ml 14:28:40 LM: regarding the locale issue, many software applications don't care about languages - they are written for a particular language, don't provide several languages 14:29:06 LM: if your application is the same as the platform you are running on, you don't have to do anything else 14:29:44 LM: suggests separating "document or software product" 14:30:00 GV: if you separate it, we have to define what line we are separating on 14:30:09 q? 14:30:42 ack Judy 14:31:40 JB: want to make sure the language doesn't lock in defaults - not sure, based on current language, what the result would be 14:31:57 JB: don't want to make it harder for people to get around the system 14:32:11 ack al 14:32:21 ack Al_Hoffman 14:32:25 q+ 14:32:37 AH: think we do need to separate documents from software and this is a perfect example of why 14:32:54 AH: straight line requirement to HTML and Web - everybody knows exactly what to do 14:33:19 q+ 14:33:41 AH: when we take this outside the Web environment, things are much less known 14:34:34 AH: can set input language in MS Office, will accept it but doesn't tag it in the document 14:35:02 ack Pierce 14:35:10 +[Oracle] 14:35:23 -Janina_Sajka 14:35:30 PC: we are already defining electronic documents that are not interactive beyond simple hyperlinks 14:35:44 korn has joined #wcag2ict 14:35:45 Guess being muted fools SIP into thinking the call is inactive! 14:35:48 zakim, [Oracle] is Peter_Korn 14:35:48 +Peter_Korn; got it 14:36:06 +??P20 14:36:13 PC: +1 that we need to define documents and software 14:36:24 zakim, ??P20 is Janina_Sajka 14:36:24 +Janina_Sajka; got it 14:36:30 zakim, mute me 14:36:30 Janina_Sajka should now be muted 14:37:15 PC: localization is not the same thing - app developer decides what locales their software supports 14:37:28 q? 14:37:34 ack gregg 14:37:42 q+ 14:38:19 GV: tried in the beginning to separate documents from software - not accepted because separation doesn't exist anywhere else 14:41:44 q- 14:41:55 MP: shouldn't be trying to delineate documents and software across all the SC's but on this particular one, we may need to 14:42:00 ack mike 14:42:47 q+ 14:43:26 GV: regarding the issue of locale not being supported by AT, addressable in the future through personalization 14:44:15 GV: this problem doesn't arise in the same way for software that it does for Web pages 14:45:14 PK: there are at least two platforms and one AT that are able to deal with language information that is encoded in documents and software 14:46:07 -Allen_Hoffman 14:46:48 PK: locale need only be encoded where it is different from the platform - that's the only time it is needed 14:47:25 ack korn 14:48:44 GV: accessibility support has to be true for your users 14:49:10 zakim, who's here? 14:49:10 On the phone I see Bruce_Bailey, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Mike_Pluke, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Loïc_Martínez_Normand, Mary_Jo_Mueller, Cooper, Kiran_Keja, Judy, Pierce_Crowell, Peter_Korn, 14:49:13 ... Janina_Sajka (muted) 14:49:13 On IRC I see korn, Pierce, Kiran, greggvanderheiden, MaryJo, janina, loicmn, Mike, BBailey, Judy, Zakim, RRSAgent, Andi, MichaelC, trackbot 14:50:06 q+ 14:50:59 GV: one possible solution - regulatory process can help us solve this - key phrase "it is supported in some places but not in others" 14:51:19 I'll volunteer... 14:51:30 -Janina_Sajka 14:51:43 +??P7 14:52:01 zakim, ??P7 is Janina_Sajka 14:52:01 +Janina_Sajka; got it 14:52:08 zakim, mute me 14:52:08 Janina_Sajka should now be muted 14:52:16 ack korn 14:53:51 action: Gregg to work with Andi, Peter, Kiran to draft new proposal for 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 14:53:51 Created ACTION-25 - Work with Andi, Peter, Kiran to draft new proposal for 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 [on Gregg Vanderheiden - due 2012-07-10]. 14:54:21 q+ 14:55:35 zakim, next item 14:55:35 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Andi 14:55:56 ack korn 14:56:53 PK: in software context, this is almost a AAA requirement - suggests seeking permission from WCAG to say that something doesn't apply 14:57:14 q+ 14:57:40 GV: applicability is at the regulatory level, not our level 14:58:22 +q 14:58:33 GV: W3C is not chartered to say anything does or doesn't apply outside of Web 14:58:52 q? 14:59:25 ack mike 14:59:54 MP: M376 will almost certainly come to the conclusion that it's not applicable 15:00:11 q+ 15:00:31 GV: could say "only way to interpret this would be that it would mean the following", next layer up (regulatory) would say that's not reasonable 15:00:36 Should we unmute Al, so he can raise his hand if he wants to join in? 15:00:56 PC: think it's perfectly fine to say "we cannot find a reliable way to reply this to software" 15:01:10 zakim, who's on the phone? 15:01:11 On the phone I see Bruce_Bailey, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Mike_Pluke, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Loïc_Martínez_Normand, Mary_Jo_Mueller, Cooper, Kiran_Keja, Judy, Pierce_Crowell, Peter_Korn, 15:01:11 ... Janina_Sajka (muted) 15:01:21 s/Should we unmute Al, so he can raise his hand if he wants to join in?// 15:01:27 s/reply this to software/apply this to software/ 15:01:40 q+ 15:01:57 ack PC 15:02:01 ack Pierce 15:02:38 q+ 15:02:46 BB: think the TF should say something if they think it's unreasonable to apply something 15:02:50 ack bb 15:02:56 ack judy 15:04:04 JB: go with a statement that "it's hard to figure out what to do with this" in our initial review, will get comments that may help 15:04:43 ack gregg 15:05:04 GV: reminder that this document is an informative note, regs can't reference it because it's not normative 15:05:46 zakim, next item 15:05:46 agendum 4. "Return to June 22nd Meeting Prep Survey, to finish 3.1.2 Language of Parts https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN222012/results#xq1" taken up [from Andi] 15:05:53 zakim, close this item 15:05:53 agendum 4 closed 15:05:54 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:05:54 5. Re-survey on 2.4.2 Page Titled https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUL032012/results [from Andi] 15:05:57 zakim, next item 15:05:57 agendum 5. "Re-survey on 2.4.2 Page Titled https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUL032012/results" taken up [from Andi] 15:07:13 q+ 15:07:23 +Peter_Korn.a 15:07:33 zakim, Peter_Korn.a is Peter_Korn 15:07:33 +Peter_Korn; got it 15:08:19 -Peter_Korn 15:08:59 q+ 15:09:05 ack gregg 15:09:27 q+ 15:09:56 q+ 15:10:49 +q 15:11:29 GV: don't think we can use one phrase everywhere - have to look at the intent and see how the intent plays out in different context 15:12:38 GV: maybe "documents and software" is what we try to use - more specific version in those SC where it's too general 15:13:20 q? 15:13:27 ack korn 15:15:32 ack mike 15:16:21 MP: gets complicated if we don't have a term to map it to - introduces a lot of other terms that people might not know 15:17:06 q+ 15:18:15 MP: M376 team had trouble trying to use "software" 15:19:08 ack loic 15:19:47 LM: can live with "software" replacing "web pages" in some SC but think we need a replacement in 2.4.2 15:20:11 Proposal: For software aspects of products, the precise analog to "web page" is difficult to define precisely and absolutely.  However, the programmatically determined name (required by Success Criterion 4.1.2 for every user interface component) would also be considered a title for any window, frame, or other explicit grouping of user interface components. Thus for software, conforming to 4.1.2 would also mean conformance to this success criterion 15:20:15 q+ 15:20:15 LM: don't want just one title for software, want individual titles for components in software 15:21:09 ack gregg 15:21:27 q+ 15:21:44 GV: agree that there are some SC that we can't use such a general term as "document or software" 15:23:08 GV: perhaps regulatory layer can decide that they want to define static documents as those that don't have any interactivity other than links 15:23:39 GV: "software package" is set of products from an organization that are promoted as a "set" 15:24:11 GV: intended to work together in some fashion 15:24:28 q? 15:25:20 ack korn 15:28:13 ack mike 15:28:14 q+ 15:28:34 What about "User interface elements containing all user interface elements have titles that describe topic or purpose"? 15:30:14 ack loic 15:30:49 q+ 15:31:26 -Kiran_Keja 15:32:01 action: Peter to draft new proposal for 2.4.2 to try to address Loic's suggestion 15:32:01 Created ACTION-26 - Draft new proposal for 2.4.2 to try to address Loic's suggestion [on Peter Korn - due 2012-07-10]. 15:32:39 -Pierce_Crowell 15:32:58 -Judy 15:33:00 -Andi_Snow_Weaver 15:33:01 -Loïc_Martínez_Normand 15:33:01 -Cooper 15:33:03 -Janina_Sajka 15:33:03 -Peter_Korn.aa 15:33:04 -Gregg_Vanderheiden 15:33:08 -Bruce_Bailey 15:33:10 zakim, bye 15:33:10 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Bruce_Bailey, +1.571.296.aaaa, Andi_Snow_Weaver, Gregg_Vanderheiden, Allen_Hoffman, Mary_Jo_Mueller, Cooper, Kiran_Keja, Mike_Pluke, 15:33:10 Zakim has left #wcag2ict 15:33:13 ... Janina_Sajka, Judy, Loïc_Martínez_Normand, Pierce_Crowell, Janina, Peter_Korn 15:33:16 rrsagent, make minutes 15:33:16 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 15:33:22 janina has left #wcag2ict 15:35:05 korn has left #wcag2ict 15:52:28 regrets: David_MacDonald 15:52:37 rrsagent, make minutes 15:52:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 16:19:06 greggvanderheiden has left #wcag2ict 18:54:57 Andi has joined #wcag2ict 20:23:35 present+ Loïc_Martínez_Normand 20:23:39 rrsagent, make minutes 20:23:39 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 20:24:26 present+ Janina_Sajka, Peter_Korn 20:24:30 rrsagent, make minutes 20:24:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 20:24:53 present+ Pierce Crowell 20:28:27 s/OK, sorry// 20:28:47 s/Pierce Crowell/Pierce_Crowell/ 20:28:57 s/I'll retry sip// 20:29:54 s/Loic's issue/Loïc's issue/ 20:30:50 s/Guess being muted fools SIP into thinking the call is inactive!// 20:31:37 s/I'll volunteer...// 20:33:46 rrsagent, make minutes 20:33:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 20:34:26 s|Return to June 22nd Meeting Prep Survey, to finish 3.1.2 Language of Parts https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/JUN052012/results#xq8|| 20:34:52 rrsagent, make minutes 20:34:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-wcag2ict-minutes.html Andi 20:55:24 shadi has joined #wcag2ict 22:49:42 AndiSnow has joined #wcag2ict