13:56:20 RRSAgent has joined #sparql 13:56:20 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-sparql-irc 13:56:22 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:56:22 Zakim has joined #sparql 13:56:24 Zakim, this will be 77277 13:56:24 ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 13:56:25 Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference 13:56:25 Date: 03 July 2012 13:56:25 agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-07-03 13:58:57 SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started 13:59:04 +AxelPolleres 13:59:34 +??P11 13:59:47 zakim, ?P11 is me 13:59:47 sorry, cbuilara, I do not recognize a party named '?P11' 13:59:51 +kasei 14:00:22 zakim, ??P11 is me 14:00:22 +cbuilara; got it 14:00:26 MattPerry has joined #sparql 14:00:46 +??P15 14:00:51 zakim, ??P15 is me 14:00:51 +AndyS; got it 14:01:11 bglimm has joined #sparql 14:01:36 +MattPerry 14:02:03 Zakim, who is on the phone? 14:02:03 On the phone I see AxelPolleres, cbuilara, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry 14:02:16 +??P21 14:02:24 Zakim, ??P21 is me 14:02:24 +bglimm; got it 14:03:13 +Sandro 14:03:17 +pgearon 14:03:39 scribe: Andy 14:03:44 chimezie has joined #sparql 14:03:47 scribenick: AndyS 14:03:57 Topic: Admin 14:04:13 PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-06-26 14:04:14 Zakim, passcode? 14:04:14 the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), chimezie 14:04:36 RESOLVED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-06-26 14:04:48 Next regular meeting: 2012-07-10 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST 14:04:59 yep 14:05:04 I can do it 14:05:06 -Sandro 14:05:15 scribe next week, carlos. 14:05:33 +Chimezie 14:05:37 +Sandro 14:05:40 Zakim, mute me 14:05:41 Chimezie should now be muted 14:05:41 AndyS: no news from RDF-WG 14:05:43 topic: Comments 14:05:52 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments 14:06:51 Axel: assign unowned comments. 14:11:45 pgearon has left #sparql 14:11:59 pgearon has joined #sparql 14:12:05 Zakim, unmute me 14:12:05 Chimezie should no longer be muted 14:12:41 chimezie: we no longer say "REST" - maybe this will help. 14:12:59 This is the latest response (May 8): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012May/0009.html 14:13:12 axel: sandro - please advance this comment 14:13:14 Zakim, mute me 14:13:14 Chimezie should now be muted 14:14:51 andy: waiting on syntax / prefix to fix in Turtle; then 3 on BINDING/VALUES 14:15:10 ... WG needs to accept VALUS changes 14:15:15 ... WG needs to accept VALUES changes 14:15:32 carlos' draft http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PW1 14:17:03 greg: want changes to docs to reflect the possibility of using query string in service URL. 14:18:21 carlos: can point to SPARQL protocol for this. 14:18:26 q+ 14:18:45 ... or add a bit to federated query doc. 14:19:00 axel: informal -> no a LC 14:19:48 ack me 14:20:43 Andy: focus of Federated query is to send query to the data, and not to specify a remote dataset. 14:22:28 Greg: don't totally agree but will not hold things up. 14:23:06 Greg: DB-28 response ready 14:23:07 DB-28 response, anybody had a chance to look at that one? 14:25:57 Greg: can reword the bit around FETCH if wanted. 14:26:19 +q 14:27:32 Paul: update can bring data in. 14:28:28 ... FETCH in query could be LOAD in update. 14:29:06 Greg: DB implies now no system should dereference on FROM. 14:29:22 I agree with greg, I was using this as a counter argument to the keyword "fetch" 14:29:49 ... issue is still that update implies more power then query 14:30:18 (scribe thinks this sounds like temporary datasets) 14:31:04 I probably tend to think of UPDATE being more available than it is, since I always have access to it. Perhaps my point is ill considered 14:31:10 send it with ""could be viewed as" 14:31:43 topic: Progress on Documents 14:32:04 query status: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JulSep/0005.html 14:32:44 Andy? 14:33:01 Steve? 14:33:14 +Sandro.a 14:33:21 -Sandro 14:34:13 q+ 14:34:37 andy: missing parts: min max, what is min on empty set, no nested aggregates, with that it'd be ready to go? 14:34:58 Greg: would be good to have a test case in the test suite on that. 14:35:54 q- 14:36:29 See http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/17410/semantics-of-sparql-aggregates 14:37:27 ACTION: greg to check back whether there's a test case for MIN empty set, in case add the query from http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/17410/semantics-of-sparql-aggregates 14:37:27 Created ACTION-654 - Check back whether there's a test case for MIN empty set, in case add the query from http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/17410/semantics-of-sparql-aggregates [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-07-10]. 14:37:34 ack kasei 14:38:12 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:38:12 On the phone I see AxelPolleres, cbuilara, kasei, AndyS, MattPerry, bglimm, pgearon, Chimezie (muted), Sandro.a 14:38:19 axel: I'll ping steve 14:38:27 ACTION: axel to pinfg steve on critical path items for Query 14:38:27 Created ACTION-655 - Pinfg steve on critical path items for Query [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-07-10]. 14:38:53 topic: update 14:39:08 Reviews due -- carlos, olivier 14:39:13 Carlos: this week. 14:39:26 Olivier has already submitted a review 14:40:35 axel: bNodes across graphs 14:40:48 greg: we added a test 14:42:53 ACTION: axel to look into www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/insert-05a.ru and react to greg's suggestion on email 14:42:53 Created ACTION-656 - Look into www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/insert-05a.ru and react to greg's suggestion on email [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-07-10]. 14:43:17 axel: Paul - anything on your side? 14:43:37 I haven't had a chance to merge in Olivier's comments, but can do this today 14:43:43 protocol - no reviews needed 14:43:50 service description - no reviews needed 14:44:01 GSP - no reviews needed 14:44:23 entailment - nothing needed 14:44:37 json results - nothing needed 14:44:49 csv/tsv results - nothing needed 14:45:37 overview -- change made to s/REST//g 14:45:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0222.html 14:46:03 any approval? 14:46:25 ... Full review not needed 14:47:21 ACTION: sandro to approve rewording as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0222.html 14:47:21 Created ACTION-657 - Approve rewording as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0222.html [on Sandro Hawke - due 2012-07-10]. 14:48:01 close ACTION-657 14:48:01 ACTION-657 Approve rewording as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0222.html closed 14:48:07 -pgearon 14:48:09 Sandro: approved 14:49:33 ACTION: clean up to_pr page to mark finished docs 14:49:33 Sorry, couldn't find user - clean 14:49:55 ACTION axel to clean up to_pr page to mark finished docs 14:49:55 Created ACTION-658 - Clean up to_pr page to mark finished docs [on Axel Polleres - due 2012-07-10]. 14:50:07 topic: Action review 14:51:14 ACTIONS 638 and 653 can be closed for me 14:51:23 apologies… I was kicked off, and now the system won't let me connect in again (tells me the passcode is not valid) 14:51:23 friendly reminder on ACTION-389 14:51:25 ACTION-389 - namespace page - sandro acks. 14:51:52 close ACTION-638 14:51:52 ACTION-638 Informally reply on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jun/0002.html pointing to SD and asking whether formal response is needed. closed 14:52:16 close ACTION-653 14:52:16 ACTION-653 Draft a reply on DBooth comment on dataset construction closed 14:56:13 bad dtmf pgearon ? 14:57:28 sandro: we should skip CR where we can. 14:59:38 Zakim, pick a victim? 14:59:38 I don't understand your question, AxelPolleres. 14:59:45 Zakim, pick a victim 14:59:45 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose bglimm 15:00:45 ACTION: bglim to review query with particular focus on BIND / VALUES 15:00:45 Sorry, couldn't find user - bglim 15:00:50 It's one (short) section -- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#assignment (and formal if you want - http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#sparqlTranslateBindAssignments) 15:01:14 -Chimezie 15:01:15 bye 15:01:16 bye 15:01:16 ACTION: bglimm to review query with particular focus on BIND / VALUES 15:01:16 Sorry, couldn't find user - bglimm 15:01:18 -Sandro.a 15:01:20 -cbuilara 15:01:24 -bglimm 15:01:32 -MattPerry 15:01:32 adjourned 15:01:34 -kasei 15:01:40 -AndyS 15:01:42 next week we should agree how we can finalize our schedule to publish. 15:02:00 adjourned. thanks andy for scribing 15:02:20 rrsagent, make records public 15:02:33 -AxelPolleres 15:02:34 SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended 15:02:34 Attendees were AxelPolleres, kasei, cbuilara, AndyS, MattPerry, bglimm, Sandro, pgearon, Chimezie 15:03:15 ACTION: birte to review query with particular focus on BIND / VALUES 15:03:15 Created ACTION-659 - Review query with particular focus on BIND / VALUES [on Birte Glimm - due 2012-07-10]. 17:06:42 Zakim has left #sparql