15:54:17 RRSAgent has joined #rdb2rdf 15:54:17 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-rdb2rdf-irc 15:54:32 zakim, this will be rdb2rdf 15:54:32 ok, Ashok; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 15:54:45 chair: Ashok 15:55:04 meeting: RDB2RDF Weekly Telcon 15:55:29 regrets Nuno, Eric, Ivan, Michael 15:57:49 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started 15:57:56 +Ashok_Malhotra 16:01:11 dmcneil has joined #RDB2RDF 16:01:47 +dmcneil 16:01:51 boris has joined #rdb2rdf 16:02:04 +mhausenblas 16:02:15 zakim, code? 16:02:15 the conference code is 7322733 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), boris 16:02:34 +??P0 16:02:57 zakim, ??P0 is me 16:02:57 +boris; got it 16:03:21 juansequeda has joined #rdb2rdf 16:03:30 present: David, Richard. Ashok, Boris, Juan 16:03:46 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 16:04:12 + +575737aaaa 16:04:27 scribenick: cygri 16:04:32 zakim, aaaa is me 16:04:33 +juansequeda; got it 16:04:35 zakim, who is here? 16:04:36 scribe: Richard 16:04:36 On the phone I see Ashok_Malhotra, dmcneil, mhausenblas, boris, juansequeda 16:04:36 On IRC I see cygri, juansequeda, boris, dmcneil, RRSAgent, Zakim, Ashok, MacTed, betehess, trackbot, ericP 16:04:45 zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me 16:04:48 +OpenLink_Software 16:04:49 +cygri; got it 16:04:54 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 16:04:57 Zakim, mute me 16:04:59 +MacTed; got it 16:05:00 present+ Ted 16:05:03 MacTed should now be muted 16:05:16 regrets: nuno 16:05:20 regrets: ericP 16:05:27 PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2012/06/19-rdb2rdf-minutes.html 16:05:49 RESOLUTION: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2012/06/19-rdb2rdf-minutes.html 16:05:51 +1 16:06:04 Topic: Status of the WDs? When can we publish? Eric, Juan, Richard 16:06:20 ashok: do we have final versions that we can publish? 16:06:33 juan: i reported some weeks ago that there are some very minor issues in DM 16:06:59 ... i will do this in the next couple days 16:08:05 Ashok: What about R2RMl? 16:08:57 Richard: Some changes are needed 16:09:44 cygri: will do it this week 16:09:52 Richard: Should be ready this week 16:10:27 ashok: why don't you create the draft ASAP, send an email pointing out the changes, asking for review 16:10:33 cygri: yes 16:11:09 ashok: we can try to publish quickly by the end of the week or possibly early next 16:11:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/ 16:11:20 topic: Status of the Implementation Report. Boris 16:11:25 boris: almost ready 16:11:27 Ashok: Status of implementation report 16:11:39 ... need to fix some minor things still 16:11:40 q+ 16:11:52 ... still need to check toby inkster's report 16:12:06 ... latest report includes all the implementations we have so far 16:12:18 ashok: can you get final version this week? 16:12:23 boris: yes, ok 16:12:26 +q to ask till when do we have to keep submitting earl reports. 16:13:10 ashok: looks like we have seven implementations 16:13:15 ... but some do one spec only 16:13:28 boris: yes. five for DM and five for R2RML 16:14:55 cygri: boris, what's the latest time by which you still accept reports? 16:15:08 Richard: Until when can I send a report ... what's the deadline? 16:15:15 boris: i generate the implementation report automatically, so making the new report is quick 16:15:19 ... so just send whenever 16:15:33 Boris: Anytime, even Friday or Saturday 16:15:46 juan: i'd like to submit reports for all major RDBMS vendors 16:15:51 ... is next week still ok? 16:15:59 ashok: do it this week if you can 16:16:07 ... we just need "enough" reports 16:16:08 q+ 16:16:26 ... so no great need for further reports 16:17:44 ack me 16:18:01 cygri: does the implementation report still need review from the WG? 16:18:31 ashok: we can leave this to boris and michael. michael has done this for RDFa so knows how to do them 16:18:51 ... but of course can briefly look it over once we have the version on friday 16:18:56 ack juansequeda 16:18:56 juansequeda, you wanted to ask till when do we have to keep submitting earl reports. 16:19:10 boris: are partial reports that don't pass everything ok? 16:19:19 ashok: my understanding is: yes, per ivan 16:19:44 ... each test individually must have at least two successful implementations 16:21:44 +1 to all reports including those showing failures 16:21:46 cygri: to me it's also interesting to see that some implementations don't pass all the tests, we can learn which features are most interoperable, work best etc 16:22:26 ashok: to summarize, we should have both spec drafts this week 16:22:35 ... the R2RML changes needs a bit of review 16:22:44 ... boris will produce implementation report too this week 16:22:55 topic: Shall we publish the Test cases as a WG Note? 16:23:01 Topic: Shall we publish the Test cases as a WG Note? 16:23:38 ashok: this is optional, people can find the test cases anyway 16:23:45 ... but if we want, we can publish them as a note 16:23:54 ... it's a bit of formatting, bit of work and so on 16:23:55 q+ 16:23:57 q+ 16:24:14 ... boris, you'd be the one who would have to do the formatting 16:27:10 cygri: i'm in favour if the editors of the test suite would like to 16:27:20 ... perhaps not so much work compared to what already went into it 16:27:32 ... but have to think about change management 16:27:44 -juansequeda 16:27:47 ashok: we might still do that a bit later, e.g., next month 16:27:59 boris: i'd be happy to do it. it's a bit of work but should be ok 16:28:14 ashok: how about you prepare a draft with the proper formatting, boilerplate etc 16:28:31 ... process for publishing notes is not *so* much work 16:28:39 +juansequeda 16:29:10 RESOLUTION: WG will publish the test cases as a WG Note 16:29:18 q+ 16:29:31 ack boris 16:32:18 cygri: we have a suite of validator test cases. one small test case for every way in which you can break an R2RML file 16:32:25 ... should we bring this into the WG? 16:32:31 ... (we = D2RQ team) 16:32:48 ashok: i'd be happy to take this on board because it helps implementers outside of the WG 16:32:54 ... makes things easier to find 16:33:11 ... let's talk about this further 16:33:21 ... can you send us an outline? 16:33:25 cygri: ok, will do 16:33:30 topic: Status of Enrico/Juan note on blank nodes. 16:34:03 ashok: when we talked about blank node semantics in the DM, there was an action on Enrico and Juan to publish a note on that 16:34:08 ... that hasn't happened yet 16:34:27 ... it's not a charter requirement, but speaking personally i think it would be terrific to publish this note 16:34:44 juansequeda: i've been in discussion with Enrico on and off for several months 16:35:04 ... i've sent a draft outline but we don't really have agreement 16:35:15 ... i think it would be beneficial to write that 16:35:35 ... i think this wouldn't be holding back anything else, right? 16:36:12 ashok: would be good if you guys can publish something here 16:36:33 juansequeda: will continue and get back to the group as soon as there's anything to report 16:36:42 Topic: Close open actions: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/open 16:36:44 topic: Close open actions 16:37:18 ACTION-192? 16:37:18 ACTION-192 -- Richard Cyganiak to write wiki text on relationship between our SQL value mapping and the one in ISO/IEC 9075-14 -- due 2012-02-14 -- OPEN 16:37:18 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/192 16:37:32 -juansequeda 16:41:39 close ACTION-192 16:41:39 ACTION-192 Write wiki text on relationship between our SQL value mapping and the one in ISO/IEC 9075-14 closed 16:41:48 Zakim, unmute me 16:41:48 MacTed should no longer be muted 16:42:16 Zakim, mute me 16:42:16 MacTed should now be muted 16:42:20 MacTed: if you just write a few sentences on the wiki now, that would be good and sufficient 16:42:36 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Implementations 16:42:58 close ACTION-194 16:42:58 ACTION-194 Update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Implementations with reports from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2012Jan/0067.html closed 16:43:11 cygri: 194 is obsolete, that's from way back in january 16:43:21 ACTION-196? 16:43:22 ACTION-196 -- Michael Hausenblas to contact Antonio Garrote and Toby Inkster re TC -- due 2012-02-14 -- OPEN 16:43:22 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/196 16:44:03 ACTION-197? 16:44:03 ACTION-197 -- Juan Sequeda to contact Mariano Rodriguez re TC -- due 2012-02-14 -- OPEN 16:44:03 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/197 16:44:06 ACTION-198? 16:44:06 ACTION-198 -- Richard Cyganiak to suggest data errors TC -- due 2012-02-14 -- OPEN 16:44:06 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/198 16:44:15 close ACTION-198 16:44:15 ACTION-198 Suggest data errors TC closed 16:44:29 boris: nuno did 199 and provided the info on the wiki 16:44:34 close ACTION-199 16:44:34 ACTION-199 Report on comparing graphs experience and provide bash script used in XSPARQL testing on the Wiki closed 16:44:47 close ACTION-196 16:44:47 ACTION-196 Contact Antonio Garrote and Toby Inkster re TC closed 16:44:51 close ACTION-197 16:44:51 ACTION-197 Contact Mariano Rodriguez re TC closed 16:45:05 topic: AOB 16:45:29 ashok: so after this week we should think about the tc note and the blank node note 16:45:45 ... when we get to REC then WG will basically become inactive 16:46:00 ... doing notes will become a bit more difficult once we have reached REC 16:46:10 ... but nothing to worry about really 16:46:16 ... adjourned! 16:46:18 -dmcneil 16:46:21 -MacTed 16:46:22 -Ashok_Malhotra 16:46:23 -cygri 16:46:27 -boris 16:46:28 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended 16:46:28 Attendees were Ashok_Malhotra, dmcneil, boris, +575737aaaa, juansequeda, cygri, MacTed 16:46:36 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:46:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-rdb2rdf-minutes.html cygri 16:46:39 rrsagent, make logs public 16:46:48 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:46:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-rdb2rdf-minutes.html Ashok 16:47:35 regrets: nuno lopes 16:47:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:47:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-rdb2rdf-minutes.html cygri 16:48:54 regrets: Eric, Nuno 16:49:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:49:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-rdb2rdf-minutes.html cygri 16:54:55 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 16:55:13 regrets: Eric, Nuno, Souri 16:55:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:55:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-rdb2rdf-minutes.html cygri 16:56:17 regrets: Nuno, Eric, Ivan, Michael, Souri 16:56:22 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:56:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/03-rdb2rdf-minutes.html cygri 18:32:07 betehess_ has joined #RDB2RDF 18:55:23 Zakim has left #rdb2rdf 20:29:14 trackbot, end meeting 20:30:08 RRSAgent, bye 20:30:08 I see no action items 20:30:08 trackbot, bye 20:30:08 trackbot has left #RDB2RDF