IRC log of rdf-wg on 2012-06-27
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rdf-wg-irc
- 15:02:00 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 15:02:00 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:02:02 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 73394
- 15:02:02 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start 2 minutes ago
- 15:02:03 [trackbot]
- Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
- 15:02:03 [trackbot]
- Date: 27 June 2012
- 15:02:09 [MacTed]
- Zakim, this is 73394
- 15:02:09 [Zakim]
- ok, MacTed; that matches SW_RDFWG()11:00AM
- 15:02:14 [MacTed]
- Zakim, who's here?
- 15:02:16 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see +31.20.598.aaaa, [IBM], OpenLink_Software, AlexHall, ??P18
- 15:02:23 [MacTed]
- Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
- 15:02:24 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, AlexHall, AZ, pfps, swh, gavinc, Guus, MacTed, davidwood, LeeF, cygri, danbri, yvesr, manu1, manu, NickH, gkellogg, sandro, trackbot, ericP
- 15:02:26 [MacTed]
- Zakim, mute me
- 15:02:27 [AZ]
- zakim, ??P18 is me
- 15:02:27 [Zakim]
- +??P17
- 15:02:27 [yvesr]
- Zakim, ??P18 is me
- 15:02:28 [Guus]
- zakim, 31.20 is me
- 15:02:30 [yvesr]
- ah!
- 15:02:31 [Zakim]
- +MacTed; got it
- 15:02:35 [Zakim]
- MacTed should now be muted
- 15:02:37 [Zakim]
- +AZ; got it
- 15:02:42 [Zakim]
- I already had ??P18 as AZ, yvesr
- 15:02:42 [yvesr]
- Zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:02:43 [Zakim]
- sorry, Guus, I do not recognize a party named '31.20'
- 15:02:52 [MacTed]
- Zakim, aaaa is Guus
- 15:02:53 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see +31.20.598.aaaa, [IBM], MacTed (muted), AlexHall, AZ, ??P17
- 15:02:56 [Guus]
- zakim, +31.20 is me
- 15:02:57 [Zakim]
- +sandro
- 15:02:58 [yvesr]
- Zakim, ??P17 is me
- 15:02:59 [Zakim]
- +??P12
- 15:03:04 [Zakim]
- +Guus; got it
- 15:03:07 [Zakim]
- sorry, Guus, I do not recognize a party named '+31.20'
- 15:03:09 [Zakim]
- +yvesr; got it
- 15:03:12 [gkellogg]
- zakim, ??P12 is me
- 15:03:17 [Zakim]
- +gkellogg; got it
- 15:03:21 [Zakim]
- +mhausenblas
- 15:03:22 [cygri]
- zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me
- 15:03:25 [Zakim]
- +cygri; got it
- 15:03:27 [Zakim]
- +bhyland
- 15:03:32 [MacTed]
- Zakim, who's here?
- 15:03:32 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Guus, [IBM], MacTed (muted), AlexHall, AZ, yvesr, sandro, gkellogg, cygri, bhyland
- 15:03:34 [davidwood]
- Zakim, bhyland is me
- 15:03:35 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, AlexHall, AZ, pfps, swh, gavinc, Guus, MacTed, davidwood, LeeF, cygri, danbri, yvesr, manu1, manu, NickH, gkellogg, sandro, trackbot, ericP
- 15:03:38 [Zakim]
- +davidwood; got it
- 15:03:58 [Zakim]
- +??P28
- 15:04:01 [manu1]
- zakim, I am ??P28
- 15:04:01 [Zakim]
- +manu1; got it
- 15:05:54 [zwu2]
- zwu2 has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:05:59 [zwu2]
- zakim, code?
- 15:05:59 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 73394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), zwu2
- 15:06:11 [Zakim]
- +gavinc
- 15:06:47 [Zakim]
- +zwu2
- 15:06:56 [zwu2]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:06:56 [Zakim]
- zwu2 should now be muted
- 15:07:42 [MacTed]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 15:07:42 [Zakim]
- MacTed should no longer be muted
- 15:07:53 [manu1]
- scribenick: manu1
- 15:07:57 [Zakim]
- +??P33
- 15:08:09 [ericP]
- Zakim, ??P33 is me
- 15:08:09 [Zakim]
- +ericP; got it
- 15:08:25 [manu1]
- Topic: Minutes from Last week
- 15:08:35 [manu1]
- Guus: Propose to accept minutes from last week.
- 15:08:40 [manu1]
- No objections.
- 15:08:49 [pfps]
- Minutes look fine.
- 15:09:42 [manu1]
- RESOLVED: Accept minutes from June 20th 2012 telecon.
- 15:09:52 [manu1]
- Topic: Action Items
- 15:10:02 [manu1]
- Guus: One pending review from Andy - predicate-object list
- 15:10:07 [Zakim]
- +Souri
- 15:10:17 [Souri]
- Souri has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:10:33 [manu1]
- Ericp: I thought we were going to allow an arbitrary number of semicolons... Andy's contribution only allows up to one semicolon.
- 15:10:37 [manu1]
- Guus: The action has been done.
- 15:11:02 [manu1]
- Guus: Any other actions that should be closed that are currently open? 10 actions open.
- 15:11:12 [manu1]
- Guus: Let's continue.
- 15:11:16 [manu1]
- Topic: Next Meeting
- 15:11:31 [manu1]
- Guus: Next telecon is July 11th 2012... the rest of the telecons are in the Agenda
- 15:11:43 [manu1]
- Guus: From 5 september on, we continue w/ weekly schedule.
- 15:12:11 [manu1]
- Guus: The next face-to-face - proposal is to do it at TPAC - October 29th - November 3rd 2012 in Lyon, France. The link to TPAC is in the Agenda.
- 15:12:18 [manu1]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.06.27
- 15:12:54 [manu1]
- Guus: The face-to-face will be used to coordinate on the documents and other groups, like the Linked Data Group...
- 15:12:56 [Zakim]
- +LeeF
- 15:13:26 [pchampin]
- pchampin has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:13:49 [manu1]
- Guus: There are only rooms available on the Thursday or Friday - limited options for us. Proposal is to meet on the Thursday/Friday. ISWC is 11th-15th of November, that may be a possibility?
- 15:14:13 [manu1]
- Sandro: That's in Boston, Cambridge - ISWC is, that is.
- 15:14:18 [AZ]
- +1 to TPAC
- 15:14:20 [manu1]
- Guus: Sounds like folks are okay w/ meeting at TPAC.
- 15:14:24 [Zakim]
- +??P2
- 15:14:34 [pchampin]
- zakim, ??P2 is me
- 15:14:34 [Zakim]
- +pchampin; got it
- 15:14:36 [sandro]
- +1 TPAC
- 15:14:39 [cygri]
- +0.5 TPAC
- 15:14:43 [gavinc]
- -0 TPAC
- 15:14:44 [sandro]
- s/Sandro/DavidWood/
- 15:14:49 [pchampin]
- +1 TPAC
- 15:14:50 [ericP]
- +1
- 15:14:51 [manu1]
- s/Sounds like folks are okay w/ meeting at TPAC/Let's see if people are okay with TPAC/
- 15:14:53 [gkellogg]
- +0 TPAC
- 15:14:54 [davidwood]
- +1
- 15:14:55 [zwu2]
- -0 TPAC
- 15:14:58 [LeeF]
- 0
- 15:15:05 [MacTed]
- +0 (won't be there, won't block)
- 15:15:06 [LeeF]
- (I won't make it to TPAC)
- 15:15:10 [Souri]
- Are we planning to have a video conference for folks near Boston?
- 15:15:15 [pfps]
- I won't be there - conflict with Dagstuhl ontology seminar.
- 15:15:20 [yvesr]
- +1
- 15:15:29 [Souri]
- +0
- 15:15:45 [manu1]
- Guus: Preliminary decision could be made - see who says they will be there based on that.
- 15:15:47 [sandro]
- we can probably webcam but no fancy vid conf, and probably no room at MIT.
- 15:16:12 [manu1]
- Sandro: Don't know if TPAC has the bandwidth to do video
- 15:16:15 [gavinc]
- -1 if TPAC does not have video
- 15:16:18 [manu1]
- Guus: It may be voice-only
- 15:16:26 [LeeF]
- In the past, TPAC has not been able to do video conf
- 15:16:45 [manu1]
- Gavin: Everyone is welcome to meet in my living room.
- 15:17:02 [manu1]
- s/Everyone is welcome to meet in my living room/Would prefer video/
- 15:17:12 [zwu2]
- Gavin, I am happy to join you in your home office
- 15:17:15 [zwu2]
- :)
- 15:17:29 [manu1]
- Guus: We need to do a preliminary reservation at TPAC...
- 15:17:36 [manu1]
- Sandro: Want other options on the table?
- 15:17:44 [Zakim]
- -AZ
- 15:17:51 [manu1]
- Guus: Boston ISWC might work, but don't know how many folks from here would attend.
- 15:17:52 [pchampin]
- I will try to see what is possible in Lyon in terms if video conference
- 15:18:05 [manu1]
- Sandro: We could do a split meeting - Boston, ISWC and somewhere else with good video conferencing.
- 15:18:32 [manu1]
- EricP: HP could do it - but they don't play that game anymore.
- 15:18:34 [LeeF]
- Oxford, yes
- 15:18:50 [yvesr]
- we do have proper video conferencing facilities at the BBC, but the rooms are way too small
- 15:19:21 [manu1]
- cygri: We used to have a polycom system... but it broke and we decided not to replace it because it was used very rarely (ed: like all Polycom systems!)
- 15:20:56 [manu1]
- sandro: Weird to have no semantic web representation at TPAC - this has been dead-quiet since ISWC conflicted with it... a general issue - not taking advantage of a good opportunity. Linked Data group is planning to meet at ISWC?
- 15:21:01 [manu1]
- EricP: Yes, they are.
- 15:21:14 [manu1]
- Guus: Provenance at ISWC too?
- 15:21:21 [manu1]
- Sandro: Yes, entirely an academic group.
- 15:21:26 [Zakim]
- -zwu2
- 15:21:36 [sandro]
- s/entirely/almost entirely/
- 15:21:43 [manu1]
- Guus: Let's setup a poll for the two options.
- 15:22:16 [manu1]
- EricP: Odds are pretty good that we'll end up meeting at TPAC.
- 15:22:37 [Zakim]
- +zwu2
- 15:24:11 [manu1]
- Guus: I'll setup a poll - we'll decide on July 11th based on the information we have.
- 15:24:30 [pfps]
- Go for it!
- 15:24:31 [manu1]
- Guus: Two options - TPAC vs. ISWC Cage Match.
- 15:24:49 [manu1]
- ACTION: Guus to setup a poll for the next RDF WG F2F.
- 15:24:49 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-176 - Setup a poll for the next RDF WG F2F. [on Guus Schreiber - due 2012-07-04].
- 15:25:11 [manu1]
- Topic: TURTLE Last Call
- 15:25:28 [manu1]
- Guus: There was a message from Gavin - there is a new ED
- 15:25:31 [MacTed]
- q+
- 15:25:34 [Zakim]
- +LeeF.a
- 15:25:44 [manu1]
- http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html
- 15:25:48 [manu1]
- Guus: Is this ready to go?
- 15:25:56 [Zakim]
- -LeeF
- 15:26:02 [manu1]
- Gavin: Yes, ready to go - minor editorial issues including parenthesis.
- 15:26:18 [manu1]
- EricP: If we want a moment to publish i- s- k- f- ha-
- 15:26:38 [manu1]
- EricP: We should list the changes that we intend to make before publishing.
- 15:26:47 [manu1]
- Guus: In the Agenda, there is a proposal to publish.
- 15:26:51 [cygri]
- q+ to say would like to have the "Spïdermann"@de example changed
- 15:26:57 [gavinc]
- 1. Fix remaining undetected broken links 2. Fix one missing set of ()s
- 15:27:34 [manu1]
- ack MacTed
- 15:27:48 [manu1]
- MacTed: Small thing - based on Ivan's feedback - a plea for Oxford commas.
- 15:27:58 [pfps]
- +1, for, Oxford, commas!
- 15:28:03 [sandro]
- +1 oxford commas. (eats, shoots, and leaves)
- 15:28:56 [manu1]
- gavinc: Totally agreed, I'll make the change.
- 15:29:10 [Guus]
- ack cygri
- 15:29:10 [Zakim]
- cygri, you wanted to say would like to have the "Spïdermann"@de example changed
- 15:29:43 [cygri]
- "Человек-паук"@ru
- 15:29:47 [manu1]
- cygri: To show multi-lingual features, the German rendition of the word is wrong - the letters don't exist in German...
- 15:30:19 [manu1]
- cygri: Maybe we should use something different like Spiderman in Cyrillic?
- 15:30:34 [manu1]
- Guus: Any more commas?
- 15:30:38 [manu1]
- s/commas/comments/
- 15:31:12 [manu1]
- PROPOSAL: Publish the current version of the TURTLE Editors Draft as a Last Call Editor's Draft: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html
- 15:31:26 [manu1]
- PROPOSAL: Publish the current version of the TURTLE Editors Draft as a Last Call Working Draft: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html
- 15:31:31 [davidwood]
- +1
- 15:31:33 [MacTed]
- +1
- 15:31:33 [yvesr]
- +1
- 15:31:33 [manu1]
- +1
- 15:31:34 [LeeF]
- +1
- 15:31:35 [cygri]
- +1
- 15:31:36 [gkellogg]
- +1
- 15:31:37 [pfps]
- +1
- 15:31:39 [AlexHall]
- +1
- 15:31:40 [davidwood]
- AndyS voted +1 via email
- 15:31:41 [gavinc]
- +1
- 15:31:46 [zwu2]
- +1
- 15:31:49 [ericP]
- +1
- 15:31:49 [Souri]
- +1
- 15:32:17 [manu1]
- RESOLVED: Publish the current version of the TURTLE Editors Draft as a Last Call Working Draft: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html
- 15:32:35 [gavinc]
- Now with Russian! http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-intro
- 15:32:43 [manu1]
- Round of applause and woos! for the editors.
- 15:32:54 [Zakim]
- -cygri
- 15:33:13 [Zakim]
- +??P32
- 15:33:18 [cygri]
- zakim, ??P32 is me
- 15:33:18 [Zakim]
- +cygri; got it
- 15:33:18 [manu1]
- Guus: The editor's should prepare a version which we can request publication for - last editorial issues, etc.
- 15:33:39 [manu1]
- Gavin: I'll make those changes now.
- 15:34:22 [manu1]
- Gavin: Language but no change to the grammar on @prefix. Admissing parenthesis with one of the string productions.
- 15:34:37 [ericP]
- "A"@base and "A"@prefix are UDF
- 15:34:39 [manu1]
- EricP: Yes, one of the string productions has an issue with an OR...
- 15:34:46 [manu1]
- Gavin: We need some more explanatory text.
- 15:34:58 [manu1]
- EricP: IRI ref term constructor is wonky, will need to fix...
- 15:35:02 [manu1]
- Gavin: I think I fixed that.
- 15:35:05 [ericP]
- http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#turtle-literals
- 15:35:15 [manu1]
- EricP: TURTLE literals ...
- 15:35:30 [manu1]
- Gavin: Slightly larger change - not happy with the language you wrote?
- 15:35:39 [manu1]
- EricP: It mis-leads a little bit, it may be fine.
- 15:36:04 [manu1]
- Gavin: It goes through how Literals work w/ quotation marks... and then states that you can replace it with single quotes, double quotes, triple quotes.
- 15:36:14 [manu1]
- EricP: Well, I have some other text that may be more clear.
- 15:36:19 [manu1]
- Gavin: That sounds fine...
- 15:37:02 [ericP]
- s/are UDF/undefined behavior/
- 15:37:03 [manu1]
- Guus: David will write a blog item on this... we need to notify relevant mailing lists on this publication.
- 15:37:22 [Zakim]
- -zwu2
- 15:37:38 [gavinc]
- +q to ask about LC comment window
- 15:37:40 [Zakim]
- -cygri
- 15:37:46 [Zakim]
- +mhausenblas
- 15:37:51 [manu1]
- David: MInutes need to be published and final version needs to be published.
- 15:37:56 [cygri]
- zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me
- 15:37:57 [Zakim]
- +cygri; got it
- 15:38:04 [gavinc]
- I made up The Last Call period ends 15 September 2012
- 15:38:09 [Zakim]
- +zwu2
- 15:38:11 [manu1]
- Guus: I propose we have the regular period of 6 weeks for the Last Call period.
- 15:38:25 [manu1]
- Guus: That's 2.5 months...
- 15:38:43 [manu1]
- EricP: Are we in a rush?
- 15:39:34 [manu1]
- Discussion about "maximizing the quality of incoming comments".
- 15:40:01 [manu1]
- Guus: 15th of september, any objections from the WG?
- 15:40:05 [MacTed]
- +1 Sept 15
- 15:40:16 [manu1]
- +1 for September 15th, 2012.
- 15:40:23 [gavinc]
- +1 to 2012
- 15:41:50 [manu1]
- Guus: Every comment during LC should raise an issue in the issue tracker - editorial issues can be responded to quickly, anything that is non-editorial should be discussed by the group before the response.
- 15:43:18 [manu1]
- manu: May be easier to create a new TURTLE LC product in the issue tracker.
- 15:43:24 [manu1]
- Guus: Let's keep it simple for now.
- 15:43:57 [manu1]
- Guus: One feature at-risk in the document - David would it be appropriate to point out a particular feature at risk?
- 15:44:12 [manu1]
- David: Who should we send this to? What other communities would be interested in this document.
- 15:44:32 [manu1]
- Sandro: We need to mention any other WG in our charter - chairs should negotiate w/ external groups
- 15:44:48 [sandro]
- http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter#coordination
- 15:45:26 [manu1]
- Sandro: SPARQL, I18N, RDFa WG, Web Apps WG, XML Query WG
- 15:45:42 [manu1]
- Guus: Linked Data and Provenance WGs should also do a review.
- 15:46:21 [manu1]
- Guus: IETF IRI WG may also be interested.
- 15:46:56 [manu1]
- Guus: I think that's it - we'll have to come back if one of these groups can't do their review.
- 15:46:59 [pfps]
- pfps has joined #rdf-wg
- 15:47:30 [manu1]
- Sandro: I think EricP can handle publication steps...
- 15:47:51 [manu1]
- Guus: That's it for TURTLE LC
- 15:48:10 [ericP]
- scribenick: ericP
- 15:48:11 [manu1]
- Topic: JSON-LD First Public Working Draft
- 15:48:31 [ericP]
- Guus: there have been WG comments on the proposed draft
- 15:48:34 [manu1]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Jun/0117.html
- 15:49:00 [ericP]
- manu: since the last meeting, we've had comments from pierre antoine, ericP, andyS
- 15:49:16 [ericP]
- ... we've applied as many as possible without risking large discussion
- 15:49:34 [ericP]
- ... the commentors have recieved replies for their comments
- 15:49:43 [gavinc]
- "JSON-LD has no equivalent for the Turtle @base declaration. Instead, authors may use a prefix definition to resolve relative IRIs:" That is NOT true. ... note to self, review JSON-LD
- 15:49:49 [ericP]
- ... we got more this week, but put them off for post-FPWD
- 15:50:01 [ericP]
- ... CG is a last stage
- 15:50:24 [ericP]
- ... the W3C tool for gathering IPR commitments was broken untill 8am
- 15:50:36 [ericP]
- ... we probably won't have the commitments for another week
- 15:51:16 [ericP]
- ... the CG work is frozen, as is the (proposed) FPWD
- 15:51:51 [Guus]
- q?
- 15:51:51 [ericP]
- ... we could publish both by 12 July if we get the anticipated IPR commitments
- 15:51:55 [gavinc]
- ack me
- 15:51:55 [Zakim]
- gavinc, you wanted to ask about LC comment window
- 15:51:58 [gkellogg]
- q+
- 15:51:59 [manu1]
- Publish the JSON-LD Syntax 1.0 (shortname: json-ld-syntax) and JSON-LD API 1.0 (shortname: json-ld-api) as First Public Working Drafts on July 12th, 2012 with the caveat that publication will not occur if the proper Community Group IPR commitments are not made before that date.
- 15:52:31 [ericP]
- gkellogg: all core contributors have signed commitments
- 15:52:35 [gkellogg]
- http://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/spec/23/commitments
- 15:52:53 [Zakim]
- -zwu2
- 15:53:08 [ericP]
- manu: there's a diff between announcing a commitment in the mailing list and the w3c commitment machine
- 15:53:34 [Zakim]
- +zwu2
- 15:53:48 [zwu2]
- sorry my phone keeps cutting me off once every 15 minutes
- 15:55:22 [Zakim]
- -[IBM]
- 15:56:10 [Souri]
- (if I may suggest) minor editorial change => replace "manu" with "john" AND "sporny" with "dow" and replace any other reference to a real person name with a hypothetical one
- 15:56:24 [manu1]
- PROPOSAL: Publish the JSON-LD Syntax 1.0 (shortname: json-ld-syntax) and JSON-LD API 1.0 (shortname: json-ld-api) as First Public Working Drafts on July 12th, 2012 with the caveat that publication will not occur if the proper Community Group IPR commitments are not made before that date.
- 15:56:28 [gkellogg]
- +1
- 15:56:32 [ericP]
- +1
- 15:56:38 [yvesr]
- +1
- 15:57:01 [pchampin]
- +1
- 15:57:10 [manu1]
- PROPOSAL: Publish the JSON-LD Syntax 1.0 (shortname: json-ld-syntax) and JSON-LD API 1.0 (shortname: json-ld-api) as First Public Working Drafts on July 12th, 2012 with the caveat that publication will not occur if the proper Community Group IPR commitments are not made before that date. c.f.: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Jun/0117.html
- 15:57:13 [ericP]
- +1
- 15:57:14 [gkellogg]
- +1
- 15:57:18 [manu1]
- +1
- 15:57:21 [davidwood]
- +1
- 15:57:23 [yvesr]
- +1
- 15:57:29 [MacTed]
- +1
- 15:57:35 [gavinc]
- +0.9
- 15:57:50 [AlexHall]
- +1
- 15:57:52 [zwu2]
- +1
- 15:57:54 [Souri]
- +1
- 15:57:58 [sandro]
- +0 (just haven't reviewed it)
- 15:58:13 [manu1]
- RESOLVED: Publish the JSON-LD Syntax 1.0 (shortname: json-ld-syntax) and JSON-LD API 1.0 (shortname: json-ld-api) as First Public Working Drafts on July 12th, 2012 with the caveat that publication will not occur if the proper Community Group IPR commitments are not made before that date. c.f.: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Jun/0117.html
- 15:58:50 [ericP]
- Guus: thanks to the community group for bringing this to the RDF-WG and making it available as a FPWD
- 15:58:55 [Souri]
- q+
- 15:59:00 [gkellogg]
- q-
- 15:59:25 [ericP]
- manu: after i get IPR commitments, i'll send them to RDF-WG and document any issues i see
- 15:59:59 [ericP]
- ... then i'll sheperd them through pubrules
- 16:00:33 [ericP]
- Souri: as with RDB2RDF, should you avoid names of real people in specs?
- 16:00:47 [gavinc]
- -0 to changing the Turtle parsing example
- 16:01:14 [ericP]
- sandro: it's not written, but it tends not to translate across cultures
- 16:02:42 [Souri]
- "John Dow"
- 16:02:57 [sandro]
- only reference I can find is http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Examples which doesn't say anything about this.
- 16:03:00 [ericP]
- manu: almost any name will be somebody's name
- 16:03:18 [ericP]
- ... also is less personal
- 16:05:09 [ericP]
- ADJOURNED
- 16:05:12 [Zakim]
- -Souri
- 16:05:12 [Zakim]
- -MacTed
- 16:05:14 [Zakim]
- -sandro
- 16:05:16 [Zakim]
- -manu1
- 16:05:17 [Zakim]
- -cygri
- 16:05:21 [Zakim]
- -gkellogg
- 16:05:29 [Zakim]
- -AlexHall
- 16:05:32 [Zakim]
- -zwu2
- 16:05:39 [Zakim]
- -davidwood
- 16:05:45 [Zakim]
- -yvesr
- 16:05:47 [Zakim]
- -gavinc
- 16:05:58 [Zakim]
- -pchampin
- 16:06:02 [MacTed]
- remember, kids -- always ask for Spider-Man™ brand RDF by name!
- 16:06:04 [Guus]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 16:06:04 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 16:06:05 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been +31.20.598.aaaa, [IBM], AlexHall, MacTed, AZ, sandro, Guus, yvesr, gkellogg, cygri, davidwood, manu1, gavinc, zwu2, ericP, Souri, LeeF,
- 16:06:08 [Zakim]
- ... pchampin
- 16:06:10 [Zakim]
- -ericP
- 16:06:12 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 16:06:12 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot
- 16:06:13 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 16:06:13 [RRSAgent]
- I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rdf-wg-actions.rdf :
- 16:06:13 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Guus to setup a poll for the next RDF WG F2F. [1]
- 16:06:13 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rdf-wg-irc#T15-24-49
- 16:10:49 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdf-wg
- 16:10:49 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rdf-wg-irc
- 16:10:51 [manu1]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 16:10:58 [manu1]
- rrsagent, bye
- 16:10:58 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items
- 16:17:57 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdf-wg
- 16:17:57 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rdf-wg-irc
- 16:18:04 [manu1]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 16:18:04 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rdf-wg-minutes.html manu1
- 16:18:17 [manu1]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 16:19:43 [ericP]
- manu1, tx kindly!
- 16:19:56 [pfps]
- pfps has joined #rdf-wg
- 16:20:07 [manu1]
- well... CommonScribe isn't cooperating.
- 16:22:13 [manu1]
- sandro: I don't know what's wrong, but CommonScribe is refusing to write today's minutes when I publish them... not showing up here: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/
- 16:22:48 [manu1]
- Going from here: https://www.w3.org/2008/06/wiki_scribe/?source=http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Chatlog_2012-06-27 to here: https://www.w3.org/2008/06/wiki_scribe/wiki_scribe results in Insufficient Privileges...
- 16:22:59 [manu1]
- but it looks more like the issue is that the file isn't being written to the RDF WG meetings directory.
- 16:23:15 [manu1]
- (and could be a result of some kind of file system issue at W3C)... I've noticed w3.org being super slow today as well.
- 16:26:41 [sandro]
- :-(
- 16:26:42 [sandro]
- looking.
- 16:28:22 [sandro]
- manu, it's there now, right? And it seems to be the 5th version.
- 16:29:02 [sandro]
- Maybe you visited the destination too soon and then were caching a 404? (not that 404's are allowed to be cached, but I think the www.w3.org proxies do it any way.)
- 16:30:38 [sandro]
- Yeah, I see in the first version: > <p>This revision (#1) generated 2012-06-27 16:15:39 UTC by 'msporny', comments: 'Minor corrections to minutes before publication.'</p>
- 16:31:02 [sandro]
- I'm looking at the v1 file on http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/ to get that text
- 16:54:48 [manu1]
- sandro: I see it now ... thanks. I guess the lesson is: Be Patient.
- 16:55:03 [manu1]
- and I guess W3C does very aggressive caching on documents.
- 16:55:27 [manu1]
- I've seen that happen several times now... sometimes it seems like it's because I didn't do rrsagent, make logs public
- 16:55:49 [manu1]
- other times it must be the aggressive caching issue and me hitting a 404.
- 16:55:55 [manu1]
- Thanks for taking a look at it
- 17:46:03 [ericP]
- gavinc, want to geek about the RDF Literals section?
- 17:46:22 [ericP]
- or shall i just attack it and run it by you
- 17:46:23 [ericP]
- ?
- 17:50:57 [ericP]
- i guess that structre made sense in the integrated N-Triples/Turtle document http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/75d2a45d80db/rdf-turtle/index.html#literals
- 17:53:20 [ericP]
- the form previous to the N-Turtle doc was http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/24e6d59ad7aa/rdf-turtle/index.html#terms
- 17:53:47 [ericP]
- (a couple sections down; scan for "Literals are written")
- 18:58:44 [swh]
- swh has joined #rdf-wg
- 22:04:52 [cygri]
- cygri has joined #rdf-wg